An immunohistochemical panel to distinguish ovarian from uterine serous papillary carcinomas.

Serous papillary carcinomas (SPCs) share a similar morphology regardless of whether they originate from the ovary or the uterus. Identification of the site of origin of the tumor can be a challenging and a diagnostic dilemma, particularly, in the setting of a pelvic mass or peritoneal carcinomatosis. Recognition of the site of origin influences the staging, management, and prognosis of these malignancies. The purpose of this study is to identify a panel of markers to distinguish the ovarian serous papillary carcinomas (OSPC) from the uterine serous papillary carcinomas (USPC). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival tissue from 46 cases of SPCs (33 uterine and 13 ovarian) were stained using antibodies for estrogen receptor (ER), WT1, insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3), p53, and p16. The OSPC expressed ER (92%), WT1 (100%), IMP3 (92%), p53 (92%), and p16 (92%). The USPCs expressed ER (30%), WT1 (64%), IMP3 (85%), p53 (64%), and p16 (76%). Only ER expression was significantly higher in OSPC compared with USPCs (P<0.001). The combined ER(+)WT1(+) phenotype was present in 92% of the OSPC, whereas only 18% of the USPCs had the same phenotype (P<0.001). Furthermore, 71% of the OSPCs expressed ER(+), p53(+), WT1(+), IMP3(+), and p16(+) immunophenotype, whereas in USPCs, the tumor cells showed immunophenotypic diversity, with only 6% of the USPCs expressing reactivity to all the 5 markers (P<0.001). This study suggests that ER alone or in combination with a limited panel of markers may be used to identify the site of origin of SPCs.

Laparoendoscopic single-site extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy: first experience.

OBJECTIVES: To report the first clinical experience with laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 33-year-old woman with biopsy proven locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix was taken to the operating room for surgical staging. Preoperative imaging did not detect any aortic lymph node metastases. Informed consent for LESS extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy was obtained. A 2 cm transverse incision was made on the left side midway between the iliac crest and inferior costal margin along the middle axillary line. The preperitoneal space was created and the Triport(TM) inserted. Using the Deflectable-Tip EndoEye(TM) laparoscope and two straight instruments, the aortic lymphadenectomy was performed as defined by the disease-specific oncologic principles. RESULTS: The procedure was completed in 125 minutes. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications, and the blood loss was minimal (10 mL). The patient was discharged home on postoperative day number 1. LESS extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy yielded 10 lymph nodes. Microscopic metastatic squamous cell carcinoma was detected in 1 out of the 10 lymph nodes. Her treatment plan was modified to extend the field of radiation to include the paraaortic lymphatic basins. CONCLUSIONS: LESS extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy is feasible and safe, and provides a comprehensive assessment of aortic lymph nodes as defined by the disease-specific oncologic principles.

A Phase I Study using low-dose fractionated whole abdominal radiotherapy as a chemopotentiator to full-dose cisplatin for optimally debulked stage III/IV carcinoma of the endometrium.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of combining low-dose fractionated whole abdominal radiation (LDF-WAR) with weekly full-dose cisplatin (FD-CDDP) for patients with stage III/IV endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with optimally debulked stage III/IV carcinoma of the endometrium (without extra-abdominal disease) were eligible for the study. Postoperatively, patients received the institutional standard systemic chemotherapy and vaginal brachytherapy. Patients then underwent experimental six weekly cycles of FD-CDDP (40 mg/m², maximum 70 mg IV) followed by LDF-WAR 6-8 hours after initiation of chemotherapy. In a conservative design, 6 patients were accrued to two sequential cohorts of LDF-WAR, at 0.5 Gy/fraction [Fx] (total 3 Gy) and 0.75 Gy/Fx (total 4.5 Gy). Toxicities and laboratory studies were evaluated at each visit. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled from January 2005 to June 2009 with median follow-up of 13.5 months (range: 5-27 months). Seventy-five percent of enrolled patients had uterine papillary serous histology. Eleven patients at least partially completed therapy (range: 2-6 cycles of FD-CDDP/LDF-WAR) with one additional patient opting out at the higher dose level. Combination therapy overall was well tolerated. Three patients in each cohort experienced grade 3 acute hematologic events with one recorded grade 4 toxicity in the second cohort. Of patients receiving any of the experimental treatment, five have experienced recurrences. Three of these patients were in cohort one and received 0.5 Gy/Fx LDF-WAR. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with LDF-WAR as a novel chemopotentiator to FD-CDDP is a feasible adjuvant regimen in optimally debulked patients with stage III/IV endometrial carcinoma. Further investigation is warranted to determine treatment efficacy.

Processing sentinel nodes in breast cancer: when and how many?

OBJECTIVES: To analyze a series of sentinel nodes (SNs) from patients with node-positive breast cancer to determine their diagnostic value, to delineate a working algorithm, and to assess the clinical value of our common practice DESIGN: A prospectively collected database. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred five patients with node-positive breast cancer who underwent SN biopsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The diagnostic value of SNs by analyzing the sensitivity of processing the hottest, 2 hottest, hot and blue, or hot, blue, and suspicious SNs. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-three axillary SNs were recorded in the database. An analysis of the 282 radioactive axillary nodes for which the 10-second count was recorded reveals that the most radioactive node was positive in 73 of 94 analyzable patients (77.7%). Consideration of the 2 most intense axillary nodes was sufficient to diagnose nodal disease in an additional 12 patients, representing a significant increase in sensitivity to 90.4% (P < .001). Examination of all other radioactive nodes did not diagnose any additional cases. On the basis of all 105 patients, consideration of nonradioactive blue axillary nodes did not add significant diagnostic value relative to testing only radioactive nodes: sensitivity of 86.7% vs 88.6% (P = .50), whereas consideration of all hot, blue, and suspicious nodes improved sensitivity to 96.2% (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Processing of the 2 hottest nodes, along with suspicious but nonhot and nonblue nodes, is sufficient for initial axillary staging. Additional radioactive SNs should be processed only in the presence of nodal disease.

Malnutrition as a predictor of poor postoperative outcomes in gynecologic cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Poor nutritional status has been associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality in surgical patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if decreased nutritional parameters correlate with increased postoperative complications regardless of other risk factors in the gynecologic cancer patient. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed among women who underwent surgical management for gynecologic malignancies from October 2006 to June 2008. Variables included age, race, medical comorbidities, cancer type/stage, preoperative albumin, absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), and body mass index (BMI), estimated blood loss (EBL), intraoperative blood transfusion (BT), intraoperative or postoperative complications, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, hospital readmissions, reoperations, and cancer recurrence. RESULTS: Three hundred gynecologic oncology patients with preoperative nutritional parameters were included in the study. Decreased albumin was significantly associated with more postoperative complications (p < 0.001), hospital readmissions (p = 0.01), reoperations (p = 0.03), ICU admissions (p < 0.001), and cancer recurrence (p < 0.001). Decreased ALC and BMI preoperatively was also significantly associated with higher incidence of cancer recurrence (p = 0.01, p = 0.01). Surgical cases involving increased EBL (p = 0.01, p < 0.001) and more BT (p < 0.001, p < 0.001) had significantly more postoperative complications and more ICU admissions. Multivariable logistic regression found preoperative albumin to be an independent predictor of increased postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased albumin is significantly associated with more postoperative complications, hospital readmissions, reoperations, ICU admissions, and cancer recurrence. This nutritional parameter is an important predictor of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Thus, it is important to assess nutritional status preoperatively and offer nutritional support or alternate treatment options if necessary.

Metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia complicated by tumor lysis syndrome, heart failure, and thyrotoxicosis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is an extremely rare complication of solid tumors and is more frequently observed in patients with hematologic malignancies. This report describes a novel approach to the management of a rare case of TLS in metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). CASE: A 17-year-old female presented 8 weeks postpartum with severe anemia, thyrotoxicosis, and elevated serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG). Imaging studies confirmed metastatic GTN to the lungs. The patient developed grade 4 TLS after the first cycle of etoposide, methotrexate, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine (EMA-CO). She did not respond to standard treatment of aggressive hydration and allupurinol and continued to be in renal failure with elevated uric acid. A single dose of recombinant urate oxidase, rasburicase, rendered the uric acid level undetectable in 3 days and completely reversed the renal failure, avoiding hemodialysis. Three more cycles of EMA-CO were then administered. Subsequently, the patient developed congestive heart failure and was switched to single-agent actinomycin-D. Beta-hCG became negative after 5 cycles, and her ejection fraction returned to baseline. CONCLUSION: This is a rare case of TLS in the setting of metastatic GTN. To our knowledge this is the first reported case of utilizing rasburicase for the management of TLS in GTN.

Pegfilgrastim dosing on same day as myelosuppressive chemotherapy for ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer.

According to the prescribing information, pegfilgrastim should not be administered within 14 days prior to, or within 24 hours after, the administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, few data exist to support this recommendation. A single-institution retrospective review was conducted of all patients with ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer who received prophylactic pegfilgrastim on the same day as myelosuppressive chemotherapy from May 2003 to June 2006. Forty-six patients were treated for the following malignancies: 35 (76%) epithelial ovarian, 6 (13%) primary peritoneal, and 5 (11.0%) ovarian germ cell or stromal cell carcinoma. All patients met the current guidelines of using colony-stimulating factors for prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia. A total of 269 cycles of chemotherapy were administered. All patients received pegfilgrastim within 1 hour of the completion of chemotherapy administration. Grade 1 or 2 neutropenia developed in 10 cycles (3.7%), and the mean absolute neutrophil count was 4926/uL (range, 1,293-24,300). No patients had febrile neutropenic episodes, hospitalizations, or antibiotic use secondary to neutropenia, nor did they have dose reductions or chemotherapy delays due to neutropenia. Administration of pegfilgrastim on the same day as myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients with ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer may be determined to be a convenient, safe, and effective approach.

Laparoscopic findings during adnexal surgery in women with a history of nongynecologic malignancy.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the results of laparoscopic management of adnexal masses in women with a history of nongynecologic malignancy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 262 patients with history of prior nongynecologic malignancy who underwent laparoscopy for management of an adnexal mass between 1/1992 and 6/2004. RESULTS: Median patient age at laparoscopy was 55 years (range, 20-91 years), and median BMI was 25 kg/m2 (range, 14-41 kg/m2). Of the 262 patients, 145 (55.3%) had prior abdominal/pelvic surgery. Prior cancer history included breast (202, 77.1%), lymphoma/leukemia (16, 6.1%), colorectal (8, 3.0%), lung (7, 2.7%), multiple myeloma (5, 1.9%), head/neck (5, 1.9%), genitourinary (5, 1.9%), upper gastrointestinal (4, 1.5%), and other (10, 3.8%). Median ovarian mass diameter measured on radiologic imaging was 3.8 cm (range, 0.2-13.5 cm); median CA-125 was 17.0 U/mL (range, 1-7000 U/mL). In all, 49 (18.7%) patients had malignancy identified at laparoscopy, with 30/49 (61.2%) diagnosed with metastatic malignancy to the ovary and 19/49 (38.8%) having a new primary ovarian malignancy. Median tumor diameter and CA-125 were significantly higher in women found to have a malignancy (4.7 vs. 3.7 cm, and 35 vs. 14 U/mL, respectively). Overall, conversion to laparotomy occurred in 34 (12.9%) cases. Twenty-one of 49 (42.9%) patients with malignancy were converted to laparotomy compared with 13/213 (6.1%) when benign disease was noted (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 5 patients with a history of nongynecologic malignancy who were selected for laparoscopic management of an adnexal mass was found to have malignancy, with 60% being metastatic from other primaries. The majority of cases were managed laparoscopically even if malignancy was identified.