Examination of multiple sources of selenium release from coal wastes and strategies for remediation.

Selenium (Se) has been mobilised by leaching from coal and associated waste rock exposed by mining activities in Western Canada, with deleterious impact on aquatic wildlife. Waste rock characterisation indicates that up to 7% of the Se, as Se(IV), may be associated with organic matter, with ≈9%, as Se(0), associated with euhedral pyrite. Small 1-2 µm mineral particles with average Se concentration of 1.0 ± 0.4 wt% account for the remaining Se with the largest components likely to be associated with Fe oxide/hydroxide/carbonate as Se(0) and framboidal pyrite as Se(IV) and Se(0). No evidence was found for the presence of Se(-I), Se(-II) or Se(VI). In the first 8 weeks of leaching Se release was not correlated to the addition of aqueous silicate, added to aid pyrite passivation, but was reduced by approximately one third when the waste was treated with manure. This suggests the primary initial source of leached Se was not pyrite. Added organic C results in increased microbial numbers, particularly aerobic microbes, and promotes the formation of extensive coating of extracellular polymeric substances resulting in depletion of O2 at particle surfaces, reducing oxidation of Se(IV) and therefore reducing the leach rate of Se. Subsequent to 8 weeks of leaching the rates of release of Se from the treated wastes were similar regardless of treatment strategy but were reduced as compared to the untreated waste rock, suggestive of partial framboidal pyrite geochemical and microbial passivation. Se leaching was not correlated to S leaching, but the source(s) of the leached S was not known as approximately half of the S within the waste rock was non-sulfidic. These results indicate that utilisation of local organic carbon-containing wastes for coverage of coal waste rock may be a cost-effective strategy to reduce Se leaching to acceptable rates of release regardless of whether the Se is associated with framboidal pyrite or organics.

Passivation of pyrite for reduced rates of acid and metalliferous drainage using readily available mineralogic and organic carbon resources: A laboratory mine waste study.

Acid and metalliferous drainage (AMD) is a major environmental issue resulting largely from exposure to weathering of mine wastes containing pyrite (FeS2). At-source strategies to reduce the rate of formation of AMD have potential to be more cost-effective and sustainable than post-generation downstream treatments. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy of geochemical and microbial treatments for at-source control through pyrite surface passivation. Six kinetic leach columns (KLCs), using a mine waste containing 3.8 wt% pyrite, were subjected to various treatments: 1) untreated, 2) blended calcite, and applications of 3) calcite-saturated water, 4) lime-saturated water followed by calcite-saturated water, 5) biosolids extract water (providing a source of organic carbon to promote microbial growth) and 6) biosolids extract in calcite-saturated water. The untreated KLC leachate pH was on average 5.7 for the first 12 weeks, followed by a gradual decrease to pH 4.5 at week 52. This slow pH decrease is attributed to neutralisation released upon Mg-siderite dissolution. The leachate pH from all treated KLCs was near-neutral at the end of the tests. Pyrite was surface-passivated and leaching supressed by all treatments except for calcite-saturated water. Leaching of Mn and Zn from the untreated waste identified the potential for adverse environmental impact. No evidence was found for surface passivation of Zn- or Mn-containing minerals in the treated KLCs. Blended calcite addition and lime-saturated water followed by calcite-saturated water were most effective at reducing release of Zn and Mn, likely due to precipitation as hydroxides/carbonates.

Oxidative Dissolution of Sulfide Minerals in Single and Mixed Sulfide Systems under Simulated Acid and Metalliferous Drainage Conditions.

Chalcopyrite, galena, and sphalerite commonly coexist with pyrite in sulfidic waste rocks. The aim of this work was to investigate their impact, potentially by galvanic interaction, on pyrite oxidation and acid generation rates under simulated acid and metalliferous drainage conditions. Kinetic leach column experiments using single-minerals and pyrite with one or two of the other sulfide minerals were carried out at realistic sulfide contents (total sulfide <5.2 wt % for mixed sulfide experiments), mimicking sulfidic waste rock conditions. Chalcopyrite was found to be most effective in limiting pyrite oxidation and acid generation with 77-95% reduction in pyrite oxidation over 72 weeks, delaying decrease in leachate pH. Sphalerite had the least impact with reduction of pyrite dissolution by 26% over 72 weeks, likely because of the large band gap and poor conductivity of sphalerite. Galena had a smaller impact than chalcopyrite on pyrite oxidation, despite their similar band gaps, possibly because of the greater extent of oxidation and the significantly reduced surface areas of galena (area reductions of >47% for galena vs <1.5% for chalcopyrite) over 72 weeks. The results are directly relevant to mine waste storage and confirm that the galvanic interaction plays a role in controlling acid generation in multisulfide waste even at low sulfide contents (several wt %) with small probabilities (≤0.23%) of direct contact between sulfide minerals in mixed sulfide experiments.

Role of microbial diversity for sustainable pyrite oxidation control in acid and metalliferous drainage prevention.

Acid and metalliferous drainage (AMD) remains a challenging issue for the mining sector. AMD management strategies have attempted to shift from treatment of acid leachates post-generation to more sustainable at-source prevention. Here, the efficacy of microbial-geochemical at-source control approach was investigated over a period of 84 weeks. Diverse microbial communities were stimulated using organic carbon amendment in a simulated silicate-containing sulfidic mine waste rock environment. Mineral waste in the unamended leach system generated AMD quickly and throughout the study, with known lithotrophic iron- and sulfur-oxidising microbes dominating column communities. The organic-amended mineral waste column showed suppressed metal dissolution and AMD generation. Molecular DNA-based next generation sequencing confirmed a less diverse lithotrophic community in the acid-producing control, with a more diverse microbial community under organic amendment comprising organotrophic iron/sulfur-reducers, autotrophs, hydrogenotrophs and heterotrophs. Time-series multivariate statistical analyses displayed distinct ecological patterns in microbial diversity between AMD- and non-AMD-environments. Focused ion beam-TEM micrographs and elemental mapping showed that silicate-stabilised passivation layers were successfully established across pyrite surfaces in organic-amended treatments, with these layers absent in unamended controls. Organic amendment and resulting increases in microbial abundance and diversity played an important role in sustaining these passivating layers in the long-term.

The Combined Effects of Galvanic Interaction and Silicate Addition on the Oxidative Dissolution of Pyrite: Implications for Acid and Metalliferous Drainage Control.

The aim of this study was to determine the combined effect of galvanic interaction and silicate addition on the dissolution of pyrite, the major contributor to acid and metalliferous drainage (AMD). Single (pyrite, sphalerite, and galena)- and bi-sulfide (pyrite-sphalerite and pyrite-galena) batch dissolution experiments were carried out with addition of 0.8 mM dissolved silicate for comparison to previously published data. The pyrite dissolution rate was reduced by 98% upon silicate addition at pH 7.4 with little effect at pH 3.0 and 5.0. The effect of galvanic interaction on reducing pyrite dissolution decreased with increasing pH and was greater in the presence of sphalerite than galena. In contrast, the effect of silicate addition increased with increasing pH and was greater in the presence of galena than sphalerite. The greatest combined effect was at pH 7.4, with <0.1% of pyrite leached in both bi-sulfide systems. Silicate addition also significantly reduced the dissolution of sphalerite or galena (by 10-44%, except at pH 3 for the pyrite-sphalerite system). These results suggest that silicate addition, for reducing both pyrite dissolution and metalliferous drainage, may be applicable at a broad pH in mixed sulfide systems.

Formation of Aluminum Hydroxide-Doped Surface Passivating Layers on Pyrite for Acid Rock Drainage Control.

The aim of this study was to test the performance of a novel method for acid rock drainage (ARD) control through the formation of Al(OH)3-doped passivating surface layers on pyrite. At pH 2.0 and 4.0, there was no obvious inhibition of the pyrite oxidation rate on addition of 20 mg L-1 Al3+ (added as AlCl3·6H2O). In comparison, the pyrite oxidation rate at circumneutral pH (7.4 ± 0.4) decreased with increasing added Al3+ with ≈98% reduction in long-term (282 days) dissolution rates in the presence of 20 mg L-1 Al3+. Al3+ was added to the solution and allowed to equilibrate prior to pyrite addition (2 g L-1). Consequently almost all Al3+ (>99.9%) was initially present as aluminum hydroxide precipitates at pH 7.4. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis showed a significant concentration of Al3+ (20.3 at. %) on the pyrite surface reacted at pH 7.4 with 20 mg L-1 added Al3+, but no Al3+ on pyrite surfaces reacted at pH 2.0 and 4.0 with added Al3+. Transmission electron microscopy and synchrotron X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy analyses indicated that compact surface layers containing both goethite and amorphous or nanocrystalline Al(OH)3 formed in the presence of 20 mg L-1 Al3+ at circumneutral pH, in contrast to the porous goethite surface layers formed on pyrite dissolved in the absence of Al3+ under otherwise identical conditions. This work demonstrates the potential for novel Al-based pyrite passivation of relevance to the mining industry where suitable Al-rich waste materials are available for ARD control interventions.

The Effects of Galvanic Interactions with Pyrite on the Generation of Acid and Metalliferous Drainage.

Although the acid generating properties of pyrite (FeS2) have been studied extensively, the impact of galvanic interaction on pyrite oxidation, and the implications for acid and metalliferous drainage, remain largely unexplored. The relative galvanic effects on pyrite dissolution were found to be consistent with relative sulfide mineral surface area ratios with sphalerite (ZnS) having greater negative impact in batch leach tests (sulfide minerals only, controlled pH) and galena (PbS) having greater negative impact in kinetic leach column tests (KLCs, uncontrolled pH, >85 wt% silicate minerals). In contrast the presence of pyrite resulted consistently in greater increase in galena than sphalerite leaching suggesting that increased anodic leaching is dependent on the difference in anodic and cathodic sulfide mineral rest potentials. Acidity increases occurred after 44, 20, and 12 weeks in the pyrite-galena, pyrite-sphalerite, and the pyrite containing KLCs. Thereafter acid generation rates were similar with the Eh consistently above the rest potential of pyrite (660 mV, SHE). This suggests that treatment of waste rocks or tailings, to establish and maintain low Eh conditions, may help to sustain protective galvanic interactions and that monitoring of Eh of leachates is potentially a useful indicator for predicting changes in acid generation behavior.

The Formation of Silicate-Stabilized Passivating Layers on Pyrite for Reduced Acid Rock Drainage.

Acid and metalliferous release occurring when sulfide (principally pyrite)-containing rock from mining activities and from natural environments is exposed to the elements is acknowledged as a major environmental problem. Acid rock drainage (ARD) management is both challenging and costly for operating and legacy mine sites. Current technological solutions are expensive and focused on treating ARD on release rather than preventing it at source. We describe here a viable, practical mechanism for reduced ARD through the formation of silicate-stabilized iron oxyhydroxide surface layers. Without silicate, oxidized pyrite particles form an overlayer of crystalline goethite or lepidocrocite with porous structure. With silicate addition, a smooth, continuous, coherent and apparently amorphous iron oxyhydroxide surface layer is observed, with consequent pyrite dissolution rates reduced by more than 90% at neutral pH. Silicate is structurally incorporated within this layer and inhibits the phase transformation from amorphous iron (oxy)hydroxide to goethite, resulting in pyrite surface passivation. This is confirmed by computational simulation, suggesting that silicate-doping of a pseudoamorphous iron oxyhydroxide (ferrihydrite structure) is thermodynamically more stable than the equivalent undoped structure. This mechanism and its controlling factors are described. As a consequence of the greatly reduced acid generation rate, neutralization from on-site available reactive silicate minerals may be used to maintain neutral pH, after initial limestone addition to achieve neutral pH, thus maintaining the integrity of these layers for effective ARD management.

Method for distinctive estimation of stored acidity forms in acid mine wastes.

Jarosites and schwertmannite can be formed in the unsaturated oxidation zone of sulfide-containing mine waste rock and tailings together with ferrihydrite and goethite. They are also widely found in process wastes from electrometallurgical smelting and metal bioleaching and within drained coastal lowland soils (acid-sulfate soils). These secondary minerals can temporarily store acidity and metals or remove and immobilize contaminants through adsorption, coprecipitation, or structural incorporation, but release both acidity and toxic metals at pH above about 4. Therefore, they have significant relevance to environmental mineralogy through their role in controlling pollutant concentrations and dynamics in contaminated aqueous environments. Most importantly, they have widely different acid release rates at different pHs and strongly affect drainage water acidity dynamics. A procedure for estimation of the amounts of these different forms of nonsulfide stored acidity in mining wastes is required in order to predict acid release rates at any pH. A four-step extraction procedure to quantify jarosite and schwertmannite separately with various soluble sulfate salts has been developed and validated. Corrections to acid potentials and estimation of acid release rates can be reliably based on this method.

A simplified method for estimation of jarosite and acid-forming sulfates in acid mine wastes.

In acid base accounting (ABA) estimates of acid mine wastes, the acid potential (AP) estimate can be improved by using the net carbonate value (NCV) reactive sulfide S method rather than total S assay methods but this does not give recovery of potentially acid producing ferrous and ferric sulfates present in many wastes. For more accurate estimation of AP, an effective, site-specific method to quantify acid sulfate salts, such as jarosite and melanterite, in waste rocks has been developed and tested on synthetic and real wastes. The SPOCAS (acid sulfate soils) methods have been modified to an effective, rapid method to speciate sulfate forms in different synthetic waste samples. A three-step sequential extraction procedure has been established. These steps are: (1) argon-purged water extraction (3 min) to extract soluble Fe(II) salts (particularly melanterite), epsomite and gypsum (<10 wt.%), (2) roasting at 550 degrees C (1 h) to remove sulfur from pyrite and other reactive sulfides, (3) HCl extraction (4 M, 30 min) for determination of jarosites. Products (solid and aqueous) have been characterized at each step including the jarosite decomposition process in Step 2 where temperature control is critical to avoid S loss. The sequential extraction procedure was used to quantitatively determine melanterite, epsomite, gypsum, pyrite and jarosite concentrations in a synthetic waste sample containing these mineral phases at 5 wt.% in quartz, and also tested using a tailings waste sample to quantitatively determine epsomite, gypsum and jarosite contents. The method is applicable to most waste samples including those with non-pyrite sulfides but for samples containing significant amounts of sulfur (>1 wt.% S) as copper sulfides, the second step of roasting needs to be excluded from the procedure with an increased time of 4 M HCl extraction to 16 h for jarosite determination.