A comparison of single-level fusions with and without hardware.

During a 47-month period, 68 patients were studied prospectively to compare single-level lumbar fusion with and without adjunctive pedicular fixation. Fusion indications were disabling back pain for a minimum of 6 months, inability to work, and failed conservative care. Twenty-nine patients fused without hardware and 39 fused with VSP fixation in identical procedures. All patients were evaluated according to fusion success, perceived pain, and return to work. Pseudarthrosis was demonstrated in 58.6% of the noninstrumented group. No pseudarthroses were noted in instrumented patients. Pain improvement in the nonhardware group was 41.4%, and in the hardware group, 76.9%. Return to work was 31% and 72% in each group, respectively. The fusion rate for patients exhibiting single-level disc disease improves with spinal fixation.

Ray resection in the dysvascular foot. A retrospective review.

Twenty-nine ray resection amputations of the lower extremity were performed in 25 dysvascular patients during a four-year period. The indications for amputation were localized gangrene, resistant localized osteomyelitis of a metatarsal, or both. Specific criteria included: (1) foot Doppler pressure of 70 mm Hg, (2) ankle-arm Doppler arterial pressure ratio of at least 0.5, (3) lateral ray resection only when healthy tissue margins could easily be produced, and (4) central ray resection only for persistent deep infection resistant to local treatment. Only 31% healed without further amputation or ulceration. Analyzed retrospectively, the results demonstrate that ray resection has a poor potential for success in the presence of "localized" gangrene and is only moderately successful in the treatment of chronic resistant localized infection.