The Arthroscopic Trillat Procedure Is a Valuable Treatment Option for Recurrent Anterior Instability in Young Athletes With Shoulder Hyperlaxity.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes of the all-arthroscopic Trillat procedure, combined with capsular plication, for the treatment of recurrent anterior instability in young athletes with shoulder hyperlaxity (external rotation >90°). METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of patients with recurrent anterior instability and shoulder hyperlaxity who underwent an arthroscopic Trillat between 2009 and 2019. Patients with concomitant rotator cuff lesions or voluntary or multidirectional instability were excluded. The osteotomized coracoid was fixed above the subscapularis with a cannulated screw or a suture button; a capsular plication was systematically associated. We followed patients with x-rays, computed tomography scans, and Subjective Shoulder Value, visual analog scale, Walch, Constant, and Rowe scores. Mean follow-up was 56 months (24-145). RESULTS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients (30 shoulders) with a mean age of 25 years were identified, and all met criteria. The main finding under arthroscopy was a "loose shoulder" with anteroinferior capsular redundancy and no or few (10%) labrum tears, glenoid erosion (13%), or Hill-Sachs lesions (10%). At last follow-up, 90% of the shoulders (27/30) were stable, and 79% (19/24) of the patients practicing sports returned to their preinjury activity level. The Walch-Duplay and Rowe scores improved from 54 (38-68) to 81 (4-100) and 55 (30-71) to 84 (45-100), respectively, P < .001. CONCLUSIONS: The arthroscopic Trillat is an effective procedure for the treatment of recurrent anterior instability in young athletes with shoulder hyperlaxity but no substantial humeral or glenoid bone loss, allowing return to overhead/contact sports. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective study.

The Arthroscopic Trillat Procedure Is a Valuable and Durable Treatment Option for Recurrent Anterior Instability Associated With Massive Irreparable Cuff Tears.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study is to report the mid- and long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of the arthroscopic Trillat for the treatment of recurrent anterior instability in patients with chronic massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) and maintained active shoulder motion where reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is not indicated. METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients (mean age 61 years) were identified and retrospectively reviewed. All patients had recurrent anterior dislocations and conserved active forward elevation and active external rotation. The MIRCTs included a retracted (stage 3) supraspinatus tear in 14%, a supra- and infraspinatus tear in 76.5%, and a 3-tendon tear in 14%. A closed-wedge osteotomy of the coracoid was performed, and the coracoid was fixed above the subscapularis with a cannulated screw (10 cases) or suture buttons (11 cases). We followed patients with x-rays and computed tomography scan at 6 months, along with Subjective Shoulder Value, visual analog scale, Walch, Constant, and Rowe scores. The mean clinical and radiographic follow-up was 58 months (24-145 months). RESULTS: Overall, 96% (20/21) of the patients had a stable and functional shoulder and were satisfied with the procedure; no patient lost active shoulder motion. The Subjective Shoulder Value increased from 44% (10%-75%) to 94% (80%-100%), P < .001. The Constant and Rowe scores improved from 60 (25-81) to 81 (66-96) and from 54 (35 to 65) to 92 (70-100), respectively (P < .001). Among the 13 patients practicing sports before surgery, 10 (77%) went back to sports. At last follow-up, only 1 patient was revised to RSA. CONCLUSIONS: The arthroscopic Trillat procedure is a valuable and durable option for the treatment of recurrent anterior dislocations in older patients with chronic MIRCTs and conserved active shoulder motion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

The arthroscopic Latarjet: a multisurgeon learning curve analysis.

BACKGROUND: The open Latarjet procedure is a standard surgical treatment option for anterior shoulder instability in patients with a high risk of failure following soft tissue stabilization. The arthroscopic technique has potential advantages of minimal invasiveness, reduced postoperative stiffness, and faster rehabilitation but is regarded as technically challenging with concern over surgical risk during the learning curve. The aim of this study was to undertake a multisurgeon, large-volume learning curve analysis of the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure using continuous learning curve analysis. METHODS: Individual patient data from 12 surgeons across 5 countries were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 573 patients undergoing the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure were included. Outcome measures of learning were collected, including operative time, computed tomography (CT) bone-block positioning, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A segmented linear regression modeling technique was used for learning curve analysis. RESULTS: High-volume surgeons converged to an operative time steady state after 30-50 cases. Surgeons completing fewer procedures demonstrated a constant reduction in operative time without reaching a plateau. Low-volume surgeons completing fewer than 14 operations did not demonstrate a reduction in operative time. Accuracy of bone-block positioning on postoperative CT demonstrated constant improvement without reaching a plateau after 53 cases. There was no change in PROMs or complications with increased operative volume. CONCLUSION: Specialist shoulder surgeons require 30-50 arthroscopic Latarjet procedures to attain steady-state operative efficiency, during which there is improvement in bone-block positioning. Only surgeons expecting to undertake the arthroscopic Latarjet in high volume should consider adopting this procedure.

The Doubled-Suture Nice Knot.

The authors describe a novel suture fixation technique that combines a doubled suture with a sliding knot. The knot can be tied in both open and arthroscopic surgery to fix torn tendons/ligaments and fractured/osteotomized bones. The advantages of the doubled-suture Nice knot include strength, adjustability, simplicity, and versatility. This technique, which has proven useful in the authors' practice for the past 10 years, has replaced metallic wires and cables for bone fixation. The doubled-suture Nice knot can also be tied over a double-button and has been used for ankle syndesmosis, acromioclavicular joint separation repair, and coracoid bone block fixation. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(2):e382-e386.].

All-Arthroscopic Revision Eden-Hybinette Procedure for Failed Instability Surgery: Technique and Preliminary Results.

PURPOSE: To describe the technique of an all-arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette procedure in the revision setting for treatment of a failed instability procedure, particularly after failed Latarjet, as well as to present preliminary results of this technique. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2011, 18 shoulders with persistent instability after failed instability surgery were treated with an arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette technique using an autologous bicortical iliac crest bone graft. Of 18 patients, 12 (9 men, 3 women) were available for follow-up. The average follow-up was 28.8 months (range, 15 to 60 months). A Latarjet procedure was performed as an index surgery in 10 patients (83%). Two patients (17%) had a prior arthroscopic Bankart repair. RESULTS: Eight patients (67%) obtained a good or excellent result, whereas 4 patients (33%) reported a fair or poor result. Seven patients (58%) returned to sport activities. A positive apprehension test persisted in 5 patients (42%), including 2 patients (17%) with recurrent subluxations. The Rowe score increased from 30.00 to 78.33 points (P < .0001). The Walch-Duplay score increased from 11.67 to 76.67 points (P < .0001). The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score showed a good result of 28.71% (603 points). The average anterior flexion was 176° (range, 150° to 180°), and the average external rotation was 66° (range, 0° to 90°). Two patients (16.67%) showed a progression of glenohumeral osteoarthritic changes, with each patient increasing by one stage in the Samilson-Prieto classification. All 4 patients (33%) with a fair or poor result had a nonunion identified on postoperative computed tomography scan. CONCLUSIONS: An all-arthroscopic Eden-Hybinette procedure in the revision setting for failed instability surgery, although technically demanding, is a safe, effective, and reproducible technique. Although the learning curve is considerable, this procedure offers all the advantages of arthroscopic surgery and allows reconstruction of glenoid defects and restoration of shoulder stability in this challenging patient population. In our hands, this procedure yields good or excellent results in 67% of patients. Successful outcome is correlated with bony healing of the iliac crest graft to the glenoid. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Kinematic impact of size on the existing glenohumeral joint in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Glenohumeral relationships in reverse shoulder arthroplasty patients have not been previously reported. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the shoulder spatial relationships and moment arms. Measurements were used to define general size categories and determine if sizes scale linearly for all metrics. METHODS: Ninety-two shoulders of patients undergoing primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for functionally-deficient massive rotator cuff tear without bony deformity or deficiency were evaluated using three-dimensional CT reconstructions and computer-aided design software. Multiple glenohumeral relationships (including moment arm) were measured and evaluated for size stratification and linearity. Generalized linear modeling was used to investigate how predictive glenoid height, coronal humeral head diameter, and gender were of greater tuberosity positions. FINDINGS: The 92 shoulders were grouped based on glenoid height: small (<33.4mm), medium (33.4-38.0mm), and large (>38.0mm). All relationships varied between groups. The humeral head size, glenoid width, lateral offset, and moment arm all independently increased linearly (r(2)≥0.92) but the rate of increase varied (slope range: 0.59-1.92). Glenoid height, coronal humeral head diameter and gender predicted the greater tuberosity position within mean 1.09mm (standard deviation (SD) 0.84mm) of actual position in 90% of the population. INTERPRETATION: Distinct groups exist based on the size of the glenoid in shoulder arthroplasty patients. Shoulder modeling should account for size groups, sex, and non-uniform linear scaling of morphometric parameters. Prediction of the greater tuberosity offset can be made using sex and size parameters. Clinical implications include appropriate prosthetic size selection and avoiding large deviations in non-anatomic reconstructions.

Can surgeons predict what makes a good hemiarthroplasty for fracture?

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were (1) to identify the risk factors for tuberosity complications and poor functional outcomes and (2) to compare a standard humeral stem with a fracture-specific humeral stem in hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 60 consecutively operated patients (61 shoulders) using radiographs and computed tomography scans. There were 56 displaced four-part and 5 three-part fractures. The technique was standardized for prosthesis positioning in height and retroversion and for tuberosity fixation. A conventional standard stem was implanted in the first 31 shoulders (group A), and a specific fracture stem was implanted in the next 30 shoulders (group B). The sample size needed for comparison was predetermined with an a priori power analysis. The mean follow-up period was 64 months (range, 24 to 150 months). RESULTS: At the last follow-up, the greater tuberosity was healed in an adequate (anatomic) position in 45% of the patients in group A (14 of 31) and 87% of those in group B (26 of 30) (P = .0001). Active forward elevation, active external rotation, and the Constant score were significantly better with fracture stems (136°, 34°, and 68 points, respectively) than with conventional stems (113°, 23°, and 58 points, respectively) (P < .0001). Regardless of the type of implant used, patients aged 75 years or older and women had significantly lower functional results and higher rates of tuberosity complications (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Good functional outcomes can be anticipated after hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures if the greater tuberosity is anatomically positioned (ie, lateral to the stem) and healed around the prosthesis. The use of a specific fracture stem allows to double the rate of tuberosity healing compared to a conventional stem (87% vs. 45%), decreases complications and improves shoulder function. Risk factors associated with poor functional results and anatomic failures are (1) patient age (≥75 years), (2) patient gender (women), and (3) use of a conventional (bulky) stem.

The anterior deltoid's importance in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: Frequently, patients who are candidates for reverse shoulder arthroplasty have had prior surgery that may compromise the anterior deltoid muscle. There have been conflicting reports on the necessity of the anterior deltoid thus it is unclear whether a dysfunctional anterior deltoid muscle is a contraindication to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine the 3-dimensional (3D) moment arms for all 6 deltoid segments, and determine the biomechanical significance of the anterior deltoid before and after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: Eight cadaveric shoulders were evaluated with a 6-axis force/torque sensor to assess the direction of rotation and 3D moment arms for all 6 segments of the deltoid both before and after placement of a reverse shoulder prosthesis. The 2 segments of anterior deltoid were unloaded sequentially to determine their functional role. RESULTS: The 3D moment arms of the deltoid were significantly altered by placement of the reverse shoulder prosthesis. The anterior and middle deltoid abduction moment arms significantly increased after placement of the reverse prosthesis (P < .05). Furthermore, the loss of the anterior deltoid resulted in a significant decrease in both abduction and flexion moments (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The anterior deltoid is important biomechanically for balanced function after a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Losing 1 segment of the anterior deltoid may still allow abduction; however, losing both segments of the anterior deltoid may disrupt balanced abduction. Surgeons should be cautious about performing reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients who do not have a functioning anterior deltoid muscle.

Arthroscopic posterior bone block procedure: a new technique using suture anchor fixation.

We present a novel all-arthroscopic technique of posterior shoulder stabilization that uses suture anchors for both bone block fixation and capsulolabral repair. The bone graft, introduced inside the glenohumeral joint through a cannula, is fixed with 2 suture anchors. The associated posteroinferior capsulolabral repair places the bone block in an extra-articular position. In this article we present the detailed arthroscopic technique performed in a consecutive series of 15 patients and report the early results. We also report the positioning, healing, and remodeling of the bone block using postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography. The benefits of this new technique are as follows: (1) it is all arthroscopic, preserving the posterior deltoid and posterior rotator cuff muscles; (2) it is accurate, resulting in appropriate bone block positioning; (3) it is efficient, allowing for consistent bone graft healing; (4) it is anatomic, both restoring the glenoid bone stock and repairing the injured posterior labrum; and (5) it is safe, limiting hardware-related complications and eliminating the risk of injury to vital structures associated with drilling or screw insertion from posterior to anterior. We believe that this technique is advantageous because it does not use screws for fixation and may be safer for the patient.

Male-female differences in Scoliosis Research Society-30 scores in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare functional outcomes between male and female patients before and after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is no clear consensus in the existing literature with respect to sex differences in functional outcomes in the surgical treatment of AIS. METHODS: A prospective, consecutive, multicenter database of patients who underwent surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was analyzed retrospectively. All patients completed Scoliosis Research Society-30 (SRS-30) questionnaires before and 2 years after surgery. Patients with previous spine surgery were excluded. Data were collected for sex, age, Risser grade, previous bracing history, maximum preoperative Cobb angle, curve correction at 2 years, and SRS-30 domain scores. Paired sample t tests were used to compare preoperative and postoperative scores within each sex. Independent sample t tests were used to compare scores between sexes. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-four patients (621 females and 123 males) were included. On average, males were 1 year older than females. There were no differences between sexes in Risser grade, bracing history, maximum curve magnitude, or correction after surgery. Both males and females had similar improvement in all SRS-30 domains after surgery. Self-image/appearance had the greatest relative improvement. Males had better self-image/appearance scores preoperatively, better pain scores at 2 years, and better mental health and total scores both preoperatively and at 2 years. Both males and females were similarly satisfied with surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Males treated with surgery for AIS report better preoperative self-image, less postoperative pain, and better mental health than females. These differences may be clinically significant. For both males and females, the most beneficial effect of surgery is improved self-image/appearance. Overall, the benefits of surgery for AIS are similar for both sexes.