Progression of Non-Significant Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation after Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Regurgitation.

Little is known about the natural history of non-significant mitral and tricuspid regurgitation (MR and TR) following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for aortic regurgitation (AR). We retrospectively analyzed 184 patients (median age 64 (IQR, 55-74) years, 76.6% males) who underwent SAVR for AR. Subjects with significant non-aortic valvulopathies, prior/concomitant valvular interventions, or congenital heart disease were excluded. The cohort was evaluated for MR/TR progression and, based on the latter's occurrence, for echocardiographic and clinical indices of heart failure and mortality. By 5.8 (IQR, 2.8-11.0) years post-intervention, moderate or severe MR occurred in 20 (10.9%) patients, moderate or severe TR in 25 (13.5%), and either of the two in 36 (19.6%). Patients who developed moderate or severe MR/TR displayed greater biventricular disfunction and functional limitation and were less likely to be alive at 7.0 (IQR, 3.4-12.1) years compared to those who did not (47.2 vs. 79.7%, p < 0.001). The emergence of significant MR/TR was associated with preoperative atrial fibrillation/flutter, symptomatic heart failure, and above-mild MR/TR as well as concomitant composite graft use, but not with baseline echocardiographic measures of biventricular function and dimensions, aortic valve morphology, or procedural aspects. In conclusion, among patients undergoing SAVR for AR, significant MR/TR developed in one fifth by six years, correlated with more adverse course, and was anticipated by baseline clinical and echocardiographic variables.

Acute Reduction in Left Ventricular Function Following Transcatheter Mitral Edge-to-Edge Repair.

Background Little is known about the impact of transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair on changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the effect of an acute reduction in LVEF on prognosis. We aimed to assess changes in LVEF after transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair for both primary and secondary mitral regurgitation (PMR and SMR, respectively), identify rates and predictors of LVEF reduction, and estimate its impact on prognosis. Methods and Results In this international multicenter registry, patients with both PMR and SMR undergoing transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair were included. We assessed rates of acute LVEF reduction (LVEFR), defined as an acute relative decrease of >15% in LVEF, its impact on all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac event (composite end point of all-cause death, mitral valve surgery, and residual mitral regurgitation grade ≥2), and LVEF at 12 months, as well as predictors for LVEFR. Of 2534 patients included (727 with PMR, and 1807 with SMR), 469 (18.5%) developed LVEFR. Patients with PMR were older (79.0±9.2 versus 71.8±8.9 years; P<0.001) and had higher mean LVEF (54.8±14.0% versus 32.7±10.4%; P<0.001) at baseline. After 6 to 12 months (median, 9.9 months; interquartile range, 7.8-11.9 months), LVEF was significantly lower in patients with PMR (53.0% versus 56.0%; P<0.001) but not in patients with SMR. The 1-year mortality was higher in patients with PMR with LVEFR (16.9% versus 9.7%; P<0.001) but not in those with SMR (P=0.236). LVEF at baseline (odds ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.05]; P=0.002) was predictive of LVEFR for patients with PMR, but not those with SMR (P=0.092). Conclusions Reduction in LVEF is not uncommon after transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair and is correlated with worsened prognosis in patients with PMR but not patients with SMR. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05311163.

Improved Screening Reduces Transesophageal Study Cancellations at a Large Tertiary Israeli Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: Cancellation of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) tests leads to inefficient use of echocardiography laboratory (echo lab) time and wastes resources. OBJECTIVES: To identify the causes of same-day TEE cancellations in hospitalized patients, to formulate a TEE order screening protocol, and to evaluate its efficacy at implementation. METHODS: We performed a prospective analysis of inpatients referred to a single tertiary hospital echo lab for TEE study by inpatient wards. A comprehensive screening protocol emphasizing active participation of all links directly involved in the chain of inpatient TEE referral was developed and implemented. Comparison of pre- and post-implementation of the new screening protocol on two consecutive periods of 6 months on TEE cancellation rates out of total ordered TEEs stratified by cause categories was performed. RESULTS: : In total, 304 inpatient TEE procedures were ordered during the initial observation period; 54(17.8%) were canceled on the same day. The most common cancellation reasons were equally respiratory distress and patient not in fasted state (20.4% of total cancellations and 3.6% of all scheduled TEEs for each cause). Following implementation of the new screening process, total TEEs ordered (192) and cancelled (16) dropped significantly. A decrease in the rate of each cancellation category was observed, with statistical significance achieved for the overall cancellation rate (8.3% vs. 17.8%, P = 0.003), but not for the individual cancellation categories in split analysis. CONCLUSIONS: A concerted effort to implement a comprehensive screening questionnaire significantly reduced same-day cancellations of scheduled TEEs.

Primary cardiac mesothelioma presenting with fulminant recurrent pericarditis: a case report.

Background: Primary pericardial mesothelioma is an extremely rare disease. Prognosis is poor, with little effects of chemo- or radio-therapy. The majority of cases is diagnosed at autopsy. Case summary: A 22-year-old man, who presented with recurrent pericarditis and large pericardial effusion 2 months after a second BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine, underwent pericardiocentesis and pericardial window. Pathology specimen of pericardium revealed benign mesothelial inflammation, consistent with acute pericarditis. Four months later, he presented with a large pericardial mass manifesting in heart failure and underwent urgent pericardiectomy. A new pathology specimen immunostaining and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed pericardial mesothelioma. Despite intensive care, the patient died 3 weeks later. Discussion: Primary pericardial mesothelial should be considered in the differential diagnosis of refractory recurrent pericarditis, even with prior biopsy-proven pericarditis or when a putative trigger (COVID-19 mRNA prior vaccination) is suspected, as was the case in this patient. Tumour diagnosis and identification consist of multimodal imaging and laboratory tests. A multidisciplinary, individualized care approach should be performed.

Comparison of Simultaneous Transthoracic Versus Transesophageal Echocardiography for Assessment of Aortic Stenosis.

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the gold standard for aortic stenosis (AS) assessment. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) provides better resolution, but its effect on AS assessment is unclear. To answer this question, we studied 56 patients with ≥moderate AS. Initial TTE (TTE1) was followed by conscious sedation with simultaneous TEE and TTE2. Based on conservative versus actionable implication, AS types were dichotomized into group A, comprising moderate and normal-flow low-gradient, and group B, comprising high gradient, low ejection fraction low-flow low-gradient, and paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS. Paired analysis of echocardiographic variables and AS types measured by TEE versus TTE2 and by TEE versus TTE1 was performed. TEE versus simultaneous TTE2 comparison demonstrated higher mean gradients (31.7 ± 10.5 vs 27.4 ± 10.5 mm Hg) and velocities (359 ± 60.6 vs 332 ± 63.1 cm/s) with TEE, but lower left ventricular outflow velocity-time-integral (VTI1) (18.6 ± 5.1 vs 20.2 ± 6.1 cm), all p <0.001. This resulted in a lower aortic valve area (0.8 ± 0.21 vs 0.87 ± 0.28 cm2), p <0.001, and a net relative risk of 1.86 of group A to B upgrade. TEE versus (awake state) TTE1 comparison revealed a larger decrease in VTI1 because of a higher initial awake state VTI1 (22 ± 5.6 cm), resulting in similar Doppler-velocity-index and aortic valve area decrease with TEE, despite a slight increase in mean gradients of 0.8 mm Hg (confidence interval -1.44 to 3.04) and velocities of 10 cm/s (confidence interval -1.5 to 23.4). This translated into a net relative risk of 1.92 of group A to B upgrade versus TTE1. In conclusion, TEE under conscious sedation overestimates AS severity compared with both awake state TTE and simultaneous sedation state TTE, accounted for by different Doppler insonation angles obtained in transapical versus transgastric position.

Severe aortic stenosis echocardiographic thresholds revisited.

BACKGROUND: In view of inconsistencies in threshold values of severe aortic stenosis (AS) hemodynamic indices, it is unclear what is the relative contribution of each variable in a binary classification of AS based on aortic valve replacement (AVR) indication. We aimed to assess relative discriminative value and optimal threshold of each constituent hemodynamic parameter for this classification and confirm additional prognostic value. METHODS: Echocardiography studies of 168 patients with ≥ moderate AS were included. AS types were dichotomized into Group-A, comprising moderate and Normal-Flow Low-Gradient (NFLG), and Group-B, comprising High-Gradient(HG), Low Ejection Fraction Low-Flow Low-Gradient(Low EF-LFLG), and Paradoxical Low-Flow Low-Gradient(PLFLG) AS. Aortic valve area (AVA), Doppler velocity index (DVI), peak aortic velocity, mean gradient, stroke volume index and transaortic flow rate(TFR) were assessed for A/B Group discrimination value and optimal thresholds were determined. Dichotomized values were assessed for predictive value for AVR or death. RESULTS: C-statistic values for binary AS classification was .74-.9 for the tested variables. AVA and DVI featured the highest score, and SVI the lowest one. AVA≤.81 cm2 and DVI≤.249 had 87.6% and 86% respective sensitivity for Group B patients, and a similar specificity of 80.9%. During a mean follow-up of 9.1±10.1 months, each of the tested dichotomized variables except for SVI predicted AVR or death on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: An AVA value ≤.81 cm2 or a DVI ≤ .249 threshold carry the highest discriminative value for severe AS in patients with aortic stenosis, translating into an independent prognostic value, and can be helpful in making clinical decisions.

Increased risk of non-hematological cancer in young patients with aortic stenosis: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported an increased risk for non-hematological malignancies in young patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis (AS). These findings were the result of a post-hoc analysis from a large echocardiography database and needed verification. Our aim was to determine, using a different study population, whether young patients with AS are at increased risk for cancer. METHODS: A large echocardiographic database was used to identify patients (age ≥ 20 years) with moderate or severe AS (study group) and patients without aortic stenosis (comparative group). The new occurrence of non-hematological malignancies was determined after the index date (first echo with moderate or severe AS or first recorded echo in the control group). RESULTS: The final study group included 7013 patients with AS and 98,884 without AS. During a median follow-up of 6.9 years (3.0-11.1) there were 10,705 new cases of non-hematological cancer. The crude incidence rate of cancer was higher in AS compared to non-AS patients (22.3 vs. 13.7 per 1000 patient-year, crude HR 1.58 (95%CI 1.46-1.71). After adjustment for relevant covariates, there was no difference between groups (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86-1.01). Only patients in the lowest age quartile (20-49.7 years), had an increased adjusted risk of cancer (HR 1.91, 95%CI 1.08-3.39). The HR for the risk of cancer associated with AS was inversely proportional to age (P < 0.001 for the interaction between AS and age). CONCLUSIONS: Young patients with moderate or severe AS may have an increased risk for cancer. Cancer surveillance should be considered for young patients with AS.

Effect of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Concomitant Mitral Regurgitation and Its Impact on Mortality.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of residual mitral regurgitation (MR) on mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: MR is common in patients undergoing TAVR. Data on optimal management of patients with significant MR after TAVR are limited. METHODS: The registry consisted of 16 TAVR centers (n = 7,303). Outcomes of patients with ≥ moderate versus lesser grade MR after TAVR were compared. RESULTS: In 1,983 (27.2%) patients, baseline MR grade was ≥ moderate. MR regressed in 874 (44.1%) patients and persisted in 1,109 (55.9%) after TAVR. Four-year mortality was higher for those with MR persistence, but not for those with MR regression after TAVR, compared with nonsignificant baseline MR (43.8% vs. 35.1% vs. 32.4%; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.38; p = 0.008; HR: 1.02; p = 0.383, respectively). New York Heart Association functional class III to IV after TAVR was more common in those with MR persistence vs. regression (14.4% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.001). In a propensity score-matched cohort (91 patients' pairs), with significant residual MR after TAVR who did or did not undergo staged mitral intervention, staged intervention was associated with a better functional class through 1 year of follow-up (82.4% vs. 33.3% New York Heart Association functional class I or II; p < 0.001), and a numerically lower 4-year mortality, which was not statistically significant (64.6% vs. 37.5%; HR: 1.66; p = 0.097). CONCLUSIONS: Risk stratification based on improvement in MR and symptoms after TAVR can identify patients at increased mortality risk after TAVR. These patients may benefit from a staged transcatheter mitral intervention, but this requires further proof from future studies. (Transcatheter Treatment for Combined Aortic and Mitral Valve Disease. The Aortic+Mitral TRAnsCatheter [AMTRAC] Valve Registry [AMTRAC]; NCT04031274).

Temporary Trends in Fever following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

OBJECTIVES: Fever following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a common phenomenon, attributed mostly to inflammatory response which may impact outcome. Systemic inflammatory response may be triggered by multiple factors, most associated with the TAVI procedure itself. However, there are no data regarding the incidence of fever following TAVI in contemporary era with newer generation devices. Our primary objective was to measure temporal trends in fever incidence and features following TAVI. METHODS: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of 802 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI at our institution between November 2008 and February 2018. We identified and characterized all patients who developed fever (>38.0°C from any cause) within the first 72 h following the procedure and analyzed incidence and characteristics stratified into 3 time frames: 2008-2014, 2014-2016, and 2016-2018. RESULTS: Following TAVI, 190 (23.7%) patients developed fever (mean age 82.3 ± 5.2 years, 64.2% female). An infectious etiology was evident in only 32.1% of cases. The frequency decreased gradually and significantly across timeframes (32.8, 23.6, and 14.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). In a multivariate regression analysis, 1st generation CoreValve (HR 1.91; CI 95% 1.2-3.04, p = 0.006) was found to be associated with higher incidence of fever in addition to female gender, vascular complications, transfemoral access, and reduced GFR. CONCLUSIONS: Fever incidence post TAVI decreased significantly throughout the last decade. The higher rate of fever in the early years of TAVI was likely associated with first-generation devices, vascular complications, and reduced GFR.

Natural History and Disease Progression of Early Cardiac Amyloidosis Evaluated by Echocardiography.

Since the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is often delayed, echocardiographic findings are frequently indicative of advanced cardiomyopathy. We aimed to describe early echocardiographic features in patients subsequently diagnosed with CA. Preamyloid diagnosis echocardiographic studies were screened for structural and functional parameters and stratified according to the pathogenetic subtype (immunoglobulin light-chain [AL] or amyloid transthyretin [ATTR]). Abnormalities were defined based on published guidelines. Our cohort included 75 CA patients of whom 42 (56%) were diagnosed with AL and 33 (44%) with ATTR. Forty-two patients had an earlier echocardiography exam available for review. Patients presented with increased wall thickness (1.3 [interquartile range {IQR} 1.0, 1.5] cm) ≥3 years before the diagnosis of CA and relative wall thickness was increased (0.47 [IQR 0.41, 0.50]) ≥7 years prediagnosis. One to 3 years before CA diagnosis restrictive left ventricular (LV) filling pattern was present in 19% of patients and LV ejection fraction ≤50% was present in 21% of patients. Right ventricular dysfunction was detected concomitantly with disease diagnosis. The echocardiographic phenotype of ATTR versus AL-CA showed increased relative wall thickness (0.74 [IQR 0.62, 0.92] versus 0.62 [IQR 0.54, 0.76], p = 0.004) and LV mass index (144 [IQR 129, 191] versus 115 [IQR 105, 146] g/m2, p = 0.020) and reduced LV ejection fraction (50 [IQR 44, 58] versus (60 [IQR 53, 60]%, p = 0.009) throughout the time course of CA progression, albeit survival time was similar. In conclusion, increased wall thickness and diastolic dysfunction in CA develop over a time course of several years and can be diagnosed in their earlier stages by standard echocardiography.

Echocardiographic Assessment of Aortic Stenosis under Sedation Underestimates Stenosis Severity.

BACKGROUND: Sedation can impact aortic stenosis (AS) classification, which depends on left ventricular ejection fraction (<≥ [less than or greater than and/or equal to] 50%), aortic valve area (AVA<≥ 1 cm2), mean pressure gradient (<≥ 40 mm Hg), peak velocity <≥ 400 cm/sec, and stroke volume index (SVI <≥35 mL/m2). We compared AS classification by transthoracic echo (TTE) during wakefulness versus sedation. METHODS: Immediately following a baseline TTE performed during wakefulness, another TTE was done during sedation delivered for a concomitant transesophageal study in 69 consecutive patients with AS (mean age 78 ± 7 years, 32 males). AVA was calculated through the continuity equation using the relevant hemodynamic parameters measured by each TTE study and same left ventricular outflow tract. AS class was defined as moderate, severe high gradient (HG), low ejection fraction low flow low gradient (LF-LG), paradoxical LF-LG (PLFLG), and normal flow low gradient (NF-LG). Based on conservative versus invasive treatment implication, AS classes were aggregated into group A (moderate AS and NFLG) and group B (HG, low-EF LF-LG, and PLFLG). RESULTS: During sedation, systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased by 14.3 ± 29 and 8 ± 22 mm Hg, respectively, mean pressure gradient from 30.4 ± 10.9 to 27.2 ± 10.8 mm Hg, peak velocity from 345.3 ± 57.7 to 329.3 ± 64.8 cm/m2, and SVI from 41.5 ± 11.3 to 38.3 ± 11.8 mL/m2 (all P < .05). Calculated AVA was similar (delta = -0.009 ± 0.15 cm2). Individual discrepancies in hemodynamic parameters between the paired TTE studies resulted in an overall 17.4% rate of AS intergroup misclassification with sedation, with a relative risk of 1.09 of downgrade misclassification from group B to A versus upgrade misclassification (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Sedation TTE assessment downgrades AS severity in a significant proportion of patients, with a conversely smaller proportion of patients being upgraded, and therefore cannot be a substitute for wakefulness assessment.

Long-term Israeli Single-Center Experience with the Percutaneous MitraClip Procedure.

BACKGROUND: The MitraClip procedure is becoming an acceptable alternative for high-risk patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) due to functional (FMR) or degenerative (DMR) disease and suitable mitral anatomy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results of MitraClip at our institute in carefully selected patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records and echocardiography data from January 2012 to December 2017. RESULTS: A total of 39 MitraClip procedures in 37 patients (aged 75 ± 12 years, 9 women) was performed. Twenty-four patients presented with FMR, 12 with DMR, and 1 with combined pathology. One-day post-procedure MR was moderate to low in 86.1% of patients, with immediate device success in 88.8%. MR at 1 year was moderate to low in 79% at 1 year. Survival at 1 year was 86% and at 2 years 69.4%. Peri-procedural (< 1 week) death and MitraClip failure occurred in one and three patients, respectively. New York Heart Association score improved to class 1 or 2 in 37% of patients at 1 year vs. one patient at baseline. Post-procedural systolic pulmonary pressure was reduced from 53 (range 48-65) to 43 (range 36-52) mmHg at 1 month with a subsequent plateau at follow-up, to 41 (34-57) mmHg at 6 months, and to 47 (38-50) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: MitraClip in severe MR resulted in modest improvement in functional status and pulmonary pressure with a small risk of immediate procedural complications. Outcomes are encouraging considering the natural course of MR and the risks of surgical intervention.

Long-Term Outcomes After Mitral Valve Replacement and Tricuspid Annuloplasty in Rheumatic Patients.

BACKGROUND: Late tricuspid regurgitation is a common finding in patients with rheumatic valvular disease after mitral valve replacement surgery. However, the long-term benefit of concomitant tricuspid valve annuloplasty has not been established in this population. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study in a tertiary hospital. The final cohort included 285 rheumatic patients who underwent either isolated mitral valve replacement (147 patients) or mitral valve replacement with concomitant tricuspid valve annuloplasty (138 patients). Tricuspid regurgitation severity grade was assessed according to current echocardiography guidelines and graded using a 0 to 3 scale (none or trivial, mild, moderate, severe). RESULTS: Patients were followed for a total median duration of 10.8 (interquartile range, 6.8 to 14.5) years. The majority of patients undergoing mitral valve replacement were women, with a median age at operation of 59 (interquartile range, 48 to 68) years. Patients undergoing concomitant tricuspid valve annuloplasty had a 3.4-fold odds of improving their tricuspid regurgitation grade at long-term follow-up by multivariate logistic regression. Furthermore, concomitant tricuspid valve annuloplasty was independently associated with a long-term survival benefit in patients with preoperative moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.87; p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates good long-term results in patients with rheumatic heart disease undergoing mitral valve replacement with concomitant tricuspid valve annuloplasty.

[AORTIC DISSECTION DIAGNOSED BY THE SUPRASTERNAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC VIEW].

INTRODUCTION: Patients with suspected dissection of the thoracic aorta require immediate diagnostic evaluation so that urgent therapeutic interventions can begin. We present a case of aortic dissection with an atypical initial presentation mimicking acute pericarditis, in which the correct diagnosis was made on the basis of the suprasternal view of transthoracic echocardiography.

Long-Term Outcomes of 560 Consecutive Patients Treated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Early- Versus New-Generation Valves.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment for severe aortic stenosis in patients at high or prohibitive surgical risk. Nevertheless, long-term clinical and echocardiographic data are still lacking. We carried out an analysis of 560 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI at our institution from 2008 to 2016 to evaluate temporal changes in TAVI characteristics, predictors of 1-year and long-term outcomes, and to compare the performance of the early- and new-generation valve systems. With time, we have adopted lower risk threshold for patient selection and have been using conscious sedation and transfemoral access preferentially (p <0.001 for all). The incidence of greater than mild PVL decreased from 16% to 7.6%, p = 0.029. Within 5 years, 47% of the patients died, the majority (78%) due to noncardiac causes. Independent predictors of 1-year death included periprocedural aspects (i.e., vascular complications, stroke, and PVL), whereas death occurring later than 1 year was solely related to baseline co-morbidities. Transvalvular gradients and residual regurgitation remained nonclinically significant for up to 5 years of follow-up. New-generation valves were associated with less PVL compared with propensity score-matched early-generation valves (p <0.001). In conclusion, TAVI utilization at our institution has progressed to include lower risk patients with transfemoral access becoming applicable in the great majority. Poor long-term survival is attributable to population factors rather than to procedural factors. Intermediate- and long-term hemodynamics are excellent. PVL has diminished significantly with the new-generation valves. Efforts to improve long- and short-term outcomes remain a therapeutic challenge.

Incremental Value of Transesophageal Echocardiography Integrated with Transthoracic Echocardiography in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis Severity.

BACKGROUND: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the standard method for evaluating the severity of aortic stenosis (AS), while transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is useful for morphologic characterization. The study aim was to assess the impact of complementary TEE to TTE in refining hemodynamic assessment of AS severity. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of sequential TTE and TEE studies performed in 100 patients with moderate or severe AS confirmed on prior TTE. The left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocity-time-integral (VTI1) and the aortic valve velocity-time integral (VTI2) were measured for both modalities. The highest values of VTI1 and VTI2 and mean gradients and peak velocities were selected from the sequential TTE/TEE study for indexed aortic valve area (AVAi) calculation and AS severity determination through an integrated assessment. RESULTS: AVAi determined by TTE was not significantly different from that determined by TEE (mean difference -0.008 cm2; p = 0.38). The dimensionless velocity index (DVI) was higher when assessed by TTE than by TEE (mean difference 0.0126 ± 0.04; p = 0.003). Using the integrated AS assessment, six of 13 patients with a TTE-based diagnosis of moderate AS were re-classified as severe AS. A slight lowering of the recommended TTE-derived DVI threshold for severe AS, from 0.25 to 0.24, improved the ability to discriminate moderate versus severe AS, as determined by the integrated assessment. CONCLUSIONS: TEE integrated with TTE may improve the detection of severe AS, particularly in patients with moderate AS criteria assessed by TTE, but with a DVI ratio ≤0.24.

Aortic Valve Gradient and Clinical Outcome in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Severe Aortic Stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the relation between the baseline aortic valve gradient (AVG) as a continuous variable and clinical outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in general and specifically in patients with high-gradient aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS: We reviewed 317 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI at our institution. We investigated the relation between AVG as a continuous/categorical variable and outcome among all patients and in patients without low-flow low-gradient AS, using the Cox proportional hazard model adjusting for multiple prognostic variables. RESULTS: Patients had a peak AVG of 79.9 ± 22.8 mm Hg (mean 50.5 ±15.7). During a mean follow-up of 2.7 years, AVG was inversely associated with mortality and mortality or cardiac hospitalization. Every 10-mm-Hg increase in peak AVG was associated with 18% reduction in mortality (p = 0.003) and 19% reduction in mortality/cardiac hospitalization (p < 0.001). Every 10-mm-Hg increase in mean AVG was associated with a 24% reduction in both outcomes (p = 0.005 and p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of patients with left-ventricular ejection fraction >40% or peak AVG >64 mm Hg yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Mean and peak baseline AVGs are directly associated with improved outcomes after TAVI; AVG can be used to select the patients most likely to benefit from TAVI.

The Quandary of Oral Anticoagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease.

Compared to patients with normal renal function, the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increased, as is consequently the stroke prevalence in these patients. This increased risk of stroke in patients with CKD is caused not only by the increased prevalence of AF, but also by associated co-morbidities, and inherent platelet and vascular dysfunction. Paradoxically, imbalance in the same factors also increases the bleeding risk, imposing a dilemma as to whether anticoagulation should be prescribed or deferred, particularly in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), in whom the bleeding diathesis and thromboembolic predisposition are most recalcitrant. Unfortunately, it is in this vulnerable population, in whom therapeutic options are most limited, that evidence-based studies relating to stroke prophylaxis are scarce, discordant and based only on registry observations. Pending randomized controlled studies on this issue, we will review important epidemiologic data and major recent registry-based studies that the clinician has to weigh when making the best decision on the issue of the prophylactic use of warfarin in patients with CKD with AF, focusing on patients with end-stage renal disease.

Long-Term Outcomes for Patients With Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis Treated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established technique for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Data on long-term TAVI outcomes, both hemodynamic and clinical, in real-world practice settings are limited. We aim to explore the long-term clinical results in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis using multiple catheter-based options: 360 TAVI-treated patients were followed up for ≤5 years. The Medtronic CoreValve was used in 71% and the Edwards SAPIEN in 26%. The primary end point was all-cause mortality during follow-up. Outcomes were assessed based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 criteria. The mean ± SD patient age was 82.1 ± 6.9 years (56.4% women). The Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 7.5 ± 4.7. The clinical efficacy end point and time-related valve safety at 3 years was 50% and 81.7%, respectively. The calculated 3- and 5-year survival rates were 71.6% and 56.4%, respectively. Five-year follow-up data were obtained for 54 patients alive; 96.2% of alive patients were in the New York Heart Association class I and II, 4 years after TAVI. No gender differences in all-cause mortality rates were observed (p = 0.58). In multivariate analysis, hospitalization 6 months previous to TAVI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17 to 3.15, p = 0.01), frailty (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.2, p = 0.02), acute kidney injury (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.61, p = 0.04), and moderate or more paravalvular aortic regurgitation after TAVI (HR 4.26, 95% CI 2.54 to 7.15, p <0.001) were independent predictors for all-cause mortality. In conclusion, long-term outcomes of TAVI are encouraging. Prevention and early identification of paravalvular leak and acute renal failure after the procedure would improve short- and long-term outcomes.