Exploring Combat Tourniquet Application Errors and Duration Among Skilled and Novice Medical Trainees.

INTRODUCTION: The use of tourniquets in combat medicine continues to be a key focus as they have consistently been shown to combat one of the leading causes of preventable death on the battlefield, massive hemorrhage to extremities. The present study analyzed tourniquet application among combat medics (68W) and combat lifesavers (CLSs) in a training environment to determine whether trainees' performance is consistent among one another and whether performance can be associated with participant demographics such as experience or role. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study participants treated male and female patient simulators within a tactical field care phase, both of which experienced an amputated leg and required the application of a Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT). To assess tourniquet application variability and performance, a series of application subtasks and potential errors were measured via video coding of the scenarios by a team of 5 coders. Time to tourniquet application and tourniquet application duration were also coded to assess correlations between application duration and variability or performance. RESULTS: Results from analyzing tourniquet application subtasks and errors through a series of one-way ANOVA tests showed that application of the CAT first, hasty CAT application, and high tourniquet application were not predictive of participant role, time within the role, and self-reported tourniquet skill, confidence, or experience. Such demographic variables were also not predictive of successful tourniquet application as defined by the number of windlass rod rotations. Results from binomial logistic regressions showed that participant role and self-reported tourniquet skill and experience were predictors of tourniquet application duration. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that high variability in CAT application methodology and performance exists among CLS and combat medics, which is largely not predictable by various demographics such as role, experience within the designated role, and self-reported confidence, skill, or experience. The observed disconnect between training or experience and CAT application performance suggests substantial variability in the consistency of training for both CLS and 68W soldiers. These inconsistencies may stem from variability in instructor knowledge, teaching styles, or training materials or may be developed through informal methods such as experiences in the field or recommendations from colleagues and experts. These findings highlight a potential need to reassess CAT application training, particularly in regard to consistency and validation. Finally, it should be noted that the study's findings may be limited or fail to capture some study effects because of the sample size and wide range of reported experience among participants.

Evaluation of driver navigational errors and acceptance of a simulated J-turn intersection.

The J-turn intersection is a novel roadway design which decreases the points of conflict at an intersection, by restricting straight crossing and left-turning movements from the minor road across the highway. The novelty of the intersection design may lead to driver errors and dissatisfaction. This study provides an examination of how naïve or first-time drivers may initially navigate J-turns during their first and early exposures to the novel intersection design. Thirty-six participants with limited previous experience and knowledge of J-turns participated in a simulation study to examine their acceptance of J-turns and left turning navigational performance at three simulated J-turn intersections in counterbalanced order, each featuring one of three signage levels. Results revealed participants committed slightly more frequent minor errors (e.g., inefficient lane selection) and significantly more major errors (e.g., missed U-turn) during the first J-turn exposure and these errors tended to decline during subsequent exposures, while moderate severity errors (e.g., risky lane change) slightly increased. Participants' J-turn acceptance significantly declined following simulated driving exposure. The decline in J-turn acceptance was found to be greater among participants who experienced major severity errors; however, more frequent minor errors were associated with increased acceptance. Signage level had little effect on errors, but participants preferred improved signage or on-road markings to guide crossing movements. This work suggests that advanced educational programs and community initiatives should be utilized to prepare drivers for how to navigate J-turns rather than only rely on J-turn exposure to improve driver performance and acceptance.

A Pilot Study on the Role of Experience and Patient Gender on MARCH Treatment Sequence.

INTRODUCTION: The brevity of training for soldiers and combat medics to learn how to provide treatment on the battlefield may restrict optimal performance for treating chest and airway injuries, particularly when treating female soldiers. The present study tested treatment performance on patient simulators by battlefield medic trainees to determine whether there is a need for more extensive training on chest and airway procedures on female soldiers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Battlefield medic trainees treated male and female patient simulators in counterbalanced order. The assessment considered the effects of patient gender and order on procedures performed, particularly critical chest and airway interventions such as needle chest decompression (NCD), and considered the appropriate order of treatment tasks. Four coders rated video footage of three simulated procedures, i.e., tourniquet, chest seal (front and back application), and NCD, using a binary coding system to determine completeness and order correctness according to the Massive hemorrhage, Airway, Respiration, Circulation, and Head injury/Hypothermia (MARCH) mnemonic. RESULTS: Results from analysis of variance showed that when presented with a female patient first, trainees performed significantly fewer total procedures on both the female and male simulators. More experienced trainees completed significantly more procedures compared to trainees with minimal experience. Results from the binary logistic regression showed that trainees with more experience and trainees presented with the male patient simulator first performed significantly more procedures in the correct order. Finally, an examination of the NCD procedure found that trainees presented with the female patient simulator first had more errors and that trainees with less experience were less likely to perform the procedure adequately. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that treating a female patient first may lead to undertreatment of both patients. Furthermore, the observed differences in treating sensitive areas of the body (e.g., near female breasts) suggest providing greater opportunities for trainees to practice often missed or incorrectly performed procedures. Treating a female patient remains a novel experience for many trainees, such that trainees are less likely to fully treat a female patient and are less likely to treat female soldiers for the most life-threatening injuries. In fact, the initial presentation of the female patient simulator appeared to affect experienced trainees, suggesting that removing the experience of novelty and stress requires more extensive exposure and alternative training. The study's small sample size with a wide range of trainee experience may limit the findings, which may fail to capture some study effects. Finally, the study did not request trainees' experience treating female soldiers, so future studies should examine the extent to which experience is predictive of performance. There is a need for more interactive approaches in patient simulations to provide opportunities for practice, especially those that require the treatment of sensitive areas.