The role of orthopaedic trainees during the COVID-19 pandemic and impact on post-graduate orthopaedic education: a four-nation survey of over 100 orthopaedic trainees.

AIMS: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the provision of orthopaedic care across the UK. During the pandemic orthopaedic specialist registrars were redeployed to "frontline" specialties occupying non-surgical roles. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on orthopaedic training in the UK is unknown. This paper sought to examine the role of orthopaedic trainees during the COVID-19 and the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on postgraduate orthopaedic education. METHODS: A 42-point questionnaire was designed, validated, and disseminated via e-mail and an instant-messaging platform. RESULTS: A total of 101 orthopaedic trainees, representing the four nations (Wales, England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland), completed the questionnaire. Overall, 23.1% (23/101) of trainees were redeployed to non-surgical roles. Of these, 73% (17/23) were redeployed to intensive treatment units (ITUs), 13% (3/23) to A/E, and 13%(3/23%) to general medicine. Of the trainees redeployed to ITU 100%, (17/17) received formal induction. Non-deployed or returning trainees had a significant reduction in sessions. In total, 42.9% (42/101) % of trainees were not timetabled into fracture clinic, 53% (53/101) of trainees had one allocated theatre list per week, and 63.8%(64/101) of trainees did not feel they obtained enough experience in the attached subspecialty and preferred repeating this. Overall, 93% (93/101) of respondents attended at least one weekly online webinar, with 79% (79/101) of trainees rating these as useful or very useful, while 95% (95/101) trainees attended online deanery teaching which was rated as more useful than online webinars (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Orthopaedic specialist trainees occupied an important role during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 has had a significant impact on orthopaedic training. It is imperative this is properly understood to ensure orthopaedic specialist trainees achieve competencies set out in the training curriculum.Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-11:676-682.

Technical and surgical causes of outliers after computer navigated total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves implant and limb alignment but outliers continue to exist. This study aimed to determine the technical and surgical causes of outliers. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 208 patients who had undergone navigated TKA. Limb and implant alignment indices were measured on post-operative CT scans: mechanical femoro-tibial angle (MFTA); coronal femoral angle (CFA); coronal tibial angle (CTA); sagittal femoral angle (SFA); and sagittal tibial angle (STA). Values outside 0°±3° for MFTA and SFA, 90°±3° for CFA, CTA and STA were considered outliers. Intra-operative navigation data and CT scans were evaluated to categorize the causes of sagittal and coronal plane outliers into hip centre error; ankle centre error; heterogeneous tibial cement mantle; malalignment accepted by surgeon; suboptimal knee balance; and no obvious explanation. RESULTS: Of the 1040 measurements (five per TKA), the overall incidence of outliers was 10.4% (n = 108). Femoral component outliers (CFA + SFA, n = 51) were all attributable to hip centre error. Tibial component outliers (CTA + STA, n = 43) were attributable to ankle centre error (n = 6), heterogeneous cement mantle (n = 20), malalignment accepted by the surgeon (n = 6) and no obvious cause (n = 11). MFTA outliers were attributable to hip centre error (n = 4) or suboptimal knee balance (n = 10). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon related errors can be minimized by a meticulous operative technique. These results indicate scope for additional technical improvement, especially in hip centre acquisition, which may further reduce the incidence of outliers.

A randomized controlled trial to compare component placement in navigated total knee arthroplasty using original and streamlined registration processes.

BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled trial validated a redesigned version of navigated total knee arthroplasty software with a streamlined registration (Smart) against the previous version (Classic). The objectives were to determine if Smart software had the same accuracy of component positioning and whether registration and operative time were reduced. METHODS: A total of 220 patients were recruited and had a navigated total knee arthroplasty performed. With the exception of the software, all patients had the same perioperative care. At 6-week follow-up with an independent arthroplasty service, all patients had a computerized tomography scan. This was assessed by an independent radiologist to measure the mechanical alignment of the components. RESULTS: The mean postoperative mechanical femorotibial angles were equivalent between groups (mean difference -0.2°, 95% confidence interval -0.7° to 0.3°, P = .407). Component positions were similar in both groups. Mean registration time was significantly shorter for the Smart group (2 minutes 30 seconds ± 54 seconds) than the Classic group (3 minutes 23 seconds ± 39 seconds), P < .001. The mean operative time was 72 ± 12 minutes in both groups (P = .855). At 6-week follow-up, both groups had similar clinical outcomes with 96.5% of patients being satisfied or very satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: The study verified that a reduced registration time did not alter the accuracy of component placement. However, despite a shorter registration time, the overall surgical time was not reduced.

A rare presentation of TB: Osteomyelitis of distal ulna.

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major health issue in both developing and developed countries such as the UK. Healthy individuals who contract the infection have only 5-10% chance of converting to the active disease over their lifetime. We present the clinical history of a 76 year old female who attended the emergency department complaining of wrist pain, and was only diagnosed with TB after three years. This case report emphasises the importance of including TB in the differential diagnosis when treating patients with an infection resistant to conventional antibiotics, even though risk factors for TB may not be evident or special stains for TB are negative.