Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Children: Does Modified Platinum- and Doxorubicin-Based Chemotherapy Increase Tumor Resectability and Change Outcome? Lessons Learned From the SIOPEL 2 and 3 Studies.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this article is to present an experience of two prospective studies from the International Childhood Liver Tumor Strategy Group (SIOPEL 2 [S2] and SIOPEL [S3]) trials and to evaluate whether modified platinum- and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy is capable of increasing tumor resectability and changing patient outcomes. METHODS: Between 1995 and 2006, 20 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were included in the S2 trial and 70 were included in the S3 trial. Eighty-five patients remained evaluable. RESULTS: Response to preoperative chemotherapy was observed in 29 of 72 patients (40%) who did not have primary surgery, whereas 13 patients underwent upfront surgery. Thirty-three patients had a delayed resection. Thirty-nine tumors never became resectable. Complete tumor resection was achieved in 34 patients (40%), including seven of those treated with liver transplantation (LTX). After a median follow-up period of 75 months, 63 patients (74%) had an event (a progression during treatment, a relapse after treatment, or death from any cause). Sixty patients died. Twenty-three of 46 patients (50%) who underwent tumor resection died. Eighteen of 27 patients (63%) with complete tumor resection (without LTX) and 20 of 34 patients (59%) with LTX survived. Only one of seven patients (14%) with microscopically involved margins survived. Overall survival at 5 years was 22%. CONCLUSION: Survival in pediatric HCC is more likely when complete tumor resection can be achieved. Intensification of platinum agents in the S2 and S3 trials has not resulted in improved survival. New treatment approaches in pediatric HCC should be postulated.

No advantage of a rotational continuation phase in acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood treated with a BFM back-bone therapy.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to compare two different schedules of maintenance in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with a BFM-based therapy, in a randomized study: an Arm with 6-MP + MTX (with or without vincristine and dexamethasone pulses) versus a more intensive continuation phase. PROCEDURE: From January 1996 to November 2002, 429 eligible children with ALL were enrolled in a protocol with BFM-based back-bone, followed by a randomized continuation phase in standard (SRG) and intermediate (IRG) risk groups. Patients were randomized between Arms A and B for SRG and B or C for IRG. Arms A and C consisted of 6-MP and MTX and in Arm C, six pulses of VCR and dexamethasone were added. Arm B combined four pairs of drugs rotated weekly. All risk-groups received maintenance until completing 2 years of therapy from diagnosis. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 138 (range: 96-178) months, the overall pEFS (SE) was 72 (6)% for all patients and the different risk groups showed: SRG: 85 (3)%, IRG: 71 (1)%, and HRG: 42 (7)% (P-value ≤ 0.0001). The pDFS (SE) according to the assigned arm of maintenance was, for Arm A: 89 (3)% and for Arm B: 85 (4)% in SRG, and, for Arm B: 77 (4)% and for Arm C: 75 (4)% in IRG, at 10 years follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in outcome between arms of maintenance for both risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: In protocols with initial BFM-based strategy, a more intensive continuation phase did not benefit any risk group of patients.

Treatment results in patients with retinoblastoma and invasion to the cut end of the optic nerve.

BACKGROUND: There is little information on the outcome of patients with retinoblastoma and tumor at the resection margin of the optic nerve. PROCEDURE: Retrospective evaluation of three successive prospective protocols. Twenty-six consecutive patients were analyzed (International Staging System-IRSS-stage 2 = 21, stage 3 = 5) from three successive prospective protocols (1988-2006). Patients with stage 2 were enucleated upfront and those with stage 3 had neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by enucleation and adjuvant therapy. Both groups received adjuvant chemotherapy and orbital radiotherapy after enucleation. Patients in protocol 1 received 1 year of the lower-dose chemotherapy regimen including cyclophosphamide, vincristine and doxorubicin along with intrathecal chemotherapy. Patients of protocols 2 and 3 received a more intense and shorter intravenous regimen including carboplatin and etoposide alternating with cyclophosphamide, idarubicin and vincristine with no intrathecal treatment. The components of protocol 2 and 3 were similar except for the dose of carboplatin which was 10% lower in protocol 3. RESULTS: Thirteen were treated in protocol 1 and 13 in protocols 2 and 3. The probability of event-free survival was 0.70 at 5 years. Events included: CNS relapse = 3, second malignancies = 3, death in complete remission = 2. There were no significant differences in outcome between protocols or stages. Endocrinological disturbances related to the hypothalamus-hypophysis axis were evident in 6/8 patients evaluated. Severe orbital sequelae occurred in 12 cases. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of patients with tumor at the resection margin of the optic nerve can be cured with current therapy; however, therapy related sequelae are frequent.

Revisiting the role of doxorubicin in the treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma: an up-front window study in newly diagnosed children with high-risk metastatic disease.

PURPOSE: Many cooperative groups have reported on the chemo-sensitivity of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). Doxorubicin has been tested but remains a controversial treatment option. We report here the results of the up-front evaluation of the efficacy of doxorubicin in children and adolescents with high-risk metastatic RMS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients younger than 18 years of age (>6 months) with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed high-risk metastatic RMS were required to have measurable disease, to have undergone no prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy and to have normal liver, renal and cardiac function before treatment. Doxorubicin was administered intravenously over 48h to a total dose of 60mg/m2. Two courses were given separated by a 21day interval. Response to therapy was assessed by diagnostic imaging after the second course. The study was designed as a two-stage procedure according to the multistep plan described by Fleming. RESULTS: Twenty patients were eligible for analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 9.8 years (range from 2 to 16). Thirteen of the 20 patients treated in the first step responded to treatment, corresponding to an overall response to doxorubicin of 65% [95% confidence interval (CI), 44-85%]. The rates of CR and PR were 5% [95% CI, 0-14%] and 60% [95% CI, 39-81%], respectively. Four (20%) patients had progressive disease, corresponding to a progression rate of 20% [95% CI, 2-38%]. CONCLUSION: This window study provides the definitive demonstration of the efficacy of doxorubicin in untreated RMS. Given the inconclusive results obtained from previous studies using differing schedules chemotherapy incorporating doxorubicin, the next step should be a randomised study testing dose intensity in high-risk localised RMS. This issue is being addressed in a current European study (EpSSG RMS 2005).

Experience with chemoreduction and focal therapy for intraocular retinoblastoma in a developing country.

BACKGROUND: Chemoreduction is used for the treatment of retinoblastoma in industrialized nations; however, there are fewer data from developing countries. Before the implementation of this program, radiotherapy was used in almost all preserved eyes. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation from 1995 to 2001 at the Hospital Garrahan (Argentina). Carboplatin 18.7 mg/kg/day 1 and vincristine (0.05 mg/kg/day 1) were offered to patients with Reese-Ellsworth (RE) groups I-III and all unilateral cases. Etoposide (3.3 mg/kg/day 1 and 2) was added for groups IV and V. The number of cycles was tailored according to response. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (78 eyes) were evaluated (39 bilateral, 19 unilateral). With a median follow-up of 47 months, 40 patients had unilateral enucleation, 14 were not enucleated, and 4 had bilateral enucleation. Nineteen patients had unilateral initial enucleation. Eye preservation at 5 years was: RE groups I-III (n = 24 eyes), 0.9 (SE: 0.095) IV-V (n = 54), 0.45 (SE 0.07). Patients received a median of four cycles of chemotherapy. Acute toxicity was mild. External beam radiotherapy was avoided in 41% of eyes with groups I-III. Etoposide was avoided in 24 patients. Two patients died of metastasis. No secondary malignancy occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to our previous experience, eye preservation was better and even though less radiotherapy was used, it was prescribed more often than currently recommended in eyes with less advanced disease because of limited availability of sophisticated local therapy.

Paediatric oncology in Argentina: medical and ethical issues.

The process of globalisation is affecting health and health care in Argentina, as it is in many other countries. The full extent of this effect is still unclear, but winners and losers in the world economy are emerging--not only different countries, but also sectors or populations within those countries. There are serious inequalities in health-care provision in Argentina, so that not all children with cancer receive the best possible therapy. What happens to those children who don't? How do staff feel when they have to turn away new patients? Only by asking these questions and examining and understanding the answers can we begin the process of improving the status of paediatric oncology in Argentina.