The Clamping of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Does Not Influence Cognitive Function Performance During Moderate Hyperthermia With or Without Skin Temperature Manipulation.

Increases in body temperature from heat stress (i.e., hyperthermia) generally impairs cognitive function across a range of domains and complexities, but the relative contribution from skin versus core temperature changes remains unclear. Hyperthermia also elicits a hyperventilatory response that decreases the partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) and subsequently cerebral blood flow that may influence cognitive function. We studied the role of skin and core temperature along with PetCO2 on cognitive function across a range of domains. Eleven males completed a randomized, single-blinded protocol consisting of poikilocapnia (POIKI, no PetCO2 control) or isocapnia (ISO, PetCO2 maintained at baseline levels) during passive heating using a water-perfused suit (water temperature ~ 49°C) while middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv) was measured continuously as an index of cerebral blood flow. Cognitive testing was completed at baseline, neutral core-hot skin (37.0 ± 0.2°C-37.4 ± 0.3°C), hot core-hot skin (38.6 ± 0.3°C-38.7 ± 0.2°C), and hot core-cooled skin (38.5 ± 0.3°C-34.7 ± 0.6°C). The cognitive test battery consisted of a detection task (psychomotor processing), 2-back task (working memory), set-shifting and Groton Maze Learning Task (executive function). At hot core-hot skin, poikilocapnia led to significant (both p < 0.05) decreases in PetCO2 (∆-21%) and MCAv (∆-26%) from baseline, while isocapnia clamped PetCO2 (∆ + 4% from baseline) leading to a significantly (p = 0.023) higher MCAv (∆-18% from baseline) compared to poikilocapnia. There were no significant differences in errors made on any task (all p > 0.05) irrespective of skin temperature or PetCO2 manipulation. We conclude that neither skin temperature nor PetCO2 maintenance significantly alter cognitive function during passive hyperthermia.

The effects of acute dopamine reuptake inhibition on cognitive function during passive hyperthermia.

Dopamine activity can modulate physical performance in the heat, but less is known about its effects on cognition during thermal stress. Twelves males completed a randomized, double-blinded protocol consisting of oral ingestion of 20 mg of methylphenidate (MPH) or placebo (lactose pill) during passive heating using a water-perfused suit (water temperature ∼49 °C). To identify the impact of peripheral versus central thermal strain, a cognitive test battery was completed at 4 different thermal states: baseline (BASE; 37.2 ± 0.6 °C core, 32.9 ± 0.7 °C skin), neutral core-hot skin (NC-HS; 37.2 ± 0.3 °C, 37.4 ± 0.3 °C), hyperthermic core-hot skin (HC-HS; 38.7 ± 0.4 °C, 38.7 ± 0.2 °C), and hyperthermic core-cooled skin (HC-CS; 38.5 ± 0.4 °C, 35.1 ± 0.8 °C). The cognitive test battery consisted of the 2-back task (i.e., working memory), set-shifting (i.e., executive function), Groton Maze Learning Task (i.e., executive function) and detection task (i.e., psychomotor processing). MPH led to significantly higher heart rates (∼5-15 b·min-1) at BASE, NC-HS, and HC-HS (all p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the number of errors made on each task (all p < 0.05). Participants were significantly faster (p < 0.05) on the set-shifting task in the HC-HS timepoint, irrespective of drug condition (p > 0.05). In summary, we demonstrated that 20 mg of MPH did not significantly alter cognitive function during either normothermia or moderate hyperthermia. Novelty: Twenty milligrams of MPH did not significantly alter cognitive function during passive heat stress. MPH led to significant higher heart rates (∼5-15 b·min-1) in thermoneutral and during passive heat stress. Future studies are needed to determine the mechanisms of why MPH improves physical but not cognitive performance during heat stress.