Knotless Tendon Repair with a Resorbable Barbed Suture: An In-vivo Comparison in the Turkey Foot.

Background: Un-knotted barbed suture constructs are postulated to decrease repair bulk and improve tension loading along the entire repair site resulting in beneficial biomechanical repair properties. Applying this repair technique to tendons has shown good results in ex-vivo experiments previously but thus far no in-vivo study could confirm these. Therefore, this current study was conducted to assess the value of un-knotted barbed suture repairs in the primary repair of flexor tendons in an in-vivo setting. Methods: Two groups of 10 turkeys (Meleagris gallapovos) were used. All turkeys underwent surgical zone II flexor tendon laceration repairs. In group one, tendons were repaired using a traditional four-strand cross-locked cruciate (Adelaide) repair, while in group two, a four-strand knotless barbed suture 3D repair was used. Postoperatively repaired digits were casted in functional position, and animals were left free to mobilise and full weight bear, resembling a high-tension post-op rehabilitation protocol. Surgeries and rehabilitations went uneventful and no major complications were noted. The turkeys were monitored for 6 weeks before the repairs were re-examined and assessed against several outcomes, such as failure rate, repair bulk, range of motion, adhesion formation and biomechanical stability. Results: In this high-tension in-vivo tendon repair experiment, traditionally repaired tendons performed significantly better when comparing absolute failure rates and repair stability after 6 weeks. Nevertheless, the knotless barbed suture repairs that remained intact demonstrated benefits in all other outcome measures, including repair bulk, range of motion, adhesion formation and operating time. Conclusions: Previously demonstrated ex-vivo benefits of flexor tendon repairs with resorbable barbed sutures may not be applicable in an in-vivo setting due to significant difference in repair stability and failure rates. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Cyclic Testing of a Modified Pull-Out Suture Repair Technique for Flexor Digitorum Profundus Avulsion in a Turkey Foot Model.

Background: Numerous repair techniques have been described for closed flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) avulsion. One option is a pull-out suture tied over the nail plate (Bunnell repair). We modified the Bunnell repair by incorporating a portion of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint volar plate into the repair to improve strength and reduce gapping. The aim of this study is to compare gap formation and load to failure between the Bunnell repair and our modification in a turkey foot model. Methods: Twenty-four fresh-frozen cadaveric turkey feet were divided into two repair groups namely the conventional Bunnell pull-out suture technique and the modified Bunnell pull-out suture technique, incorporating the middle-third of the DIP joint volar plate into the repair. Both repairs were carried out with 3-0 prolene suture and underwent ex-vivo cyclic loading at 2-12 n in a sinusoidal wave for 100 cycles to simulate a passive range of motion (ROM) protocol. Subsequently, specimens were loaded to failure at 12 mm/minute. Gap formation and load to failure were measured. Results: No repair ruptures occurred during cyclical testing. Mean gap formation was 9.2 mm (±1.49) in the Bunnell repair, and 3.5 mm (±1.19) in the modified Bunnell repair (p < 0.0001). The mean load to failure for the Bunnell repair was 35.4 n compared to 45 n for the modified repair (p = 0.0017). Conclusions: Gap formation was reduced and load to failure increased by augmenting the Bunnell pull-out suture repair with the central portion of the DIP joint volar plate.

Midcarpal Arthrodesis Biomechanics: Memory Staples versus Cannulated Screws.

BACKGROUND: Midcarpal arthrodesis is a treatment of choice in patients with midcarpal arthritis. Traditionally a four corner fusion has been favoured, however recent research has shown improved results when the triquetrum and scaphoid are excised. There is no clear evidence as to which remaining bones should be fused or which implants should be used. The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanics of midcarpal arthrodesis after scaphoid and triquetrum excision, using memory staples or cannulated screws, in recognised construct patterns. METHODS: 36 identical sets of carpal bones were 3D printed from acetyl butyl styrene. Midcarpal arthrodeses were performed in three configurations with shape memory alloy staples or headless compression screws. This gave 6 treatment groups; lunocapitate single staple or screw, lunocapitate with 2 staples or screws, three corner fusion with 2 staples or screws. Peak torque to distraction was measured and analysed. RESULTS: The peak torque to distraction was significantly greater in almost all constructs utilizing screws compared to staples, with two lunocapitate screws having the highest peak torque at both 1 and 3 mm distraction with 244 Nmm and 749 Nmm respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Constructs utilizing screws have a peak torque to distraction significantly higher when compared to staples. Our recommendation when performing a midcarpal arthrodesis after scaphoid and trapezium excision is to fuse the midcarpal joint with 2 headless compression screws.

Animal Models for Tendon Repair Experiments: A Comparison of Pig, Sheep and Human Deep Flexor Tendons in Zone II.

BACKGROUND: This laboratory study compared pig, sheep and human deep flexor tendons in regards to their biomechanical comparability. METHODS: To investigate the relevant biomechanical properties for tendon repair experiments, the tendons resistance to cheese-wiring (suture drag/splitting) was assessed. Cheese-wiring of a suture through a tendon is an essential factor for repair gapping and failure in a tendon repair. RESULTS: Biomechanical testing showed that forces required to pulling a uniform suture loop through sheep or pig tendons in Zone II were higher than in human tendons. At time point zero of testing these differences did not reach statistical significance, but differences became more pronounced when forces were measured beyond initial cheese-wiring (2 mm, 5 mm and 10 mm). The stronger resistance to cheese-wiring was more pronounced in the pig tendons. Also regarding size and histology, sheep tendons were more comparable to human tendons than pig tendons. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in tendon bio-properties should be kept in mind when comparing and interpreting the results of laboratory tendon experiments.

Structural Failure Mechanisms of Common Flexor Tendon Repairs.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the exact failure mechanisms of the most commonly used conventional tendon repair techniques. A new method, radiographing repair constructs in antero-posterior and lateral projections before and after tensioning was used. This allowed to precisely analyse failure mechanisms in regards to geometrical changes in all three dimensions. Additionally the biomechanical stability focusing on gapping was tested. METHODS: Sheep fore limb deep flexor tendons were harvested and divided in eight groups of ten tendons. Three common variants of the Kessler repair method and four common 4-strand repair techniques were tested. Additionally a new modification of the Adelaide repair was tested. RESULTS: Biomechanical testing showed no significant differences in gapping for the three tested 2-strand Kessler repair groups. Once a double Kessler or 4-strand Kessler repair was performed the stability of the repair improved significantly. Further significant improvements in biomechanical stability could be achieved by using cross locks in the repair like in the Adelaide repair method. Qualitative analysis using radiographs showed that all Kessler repair variants unfolded via rotations around the transverse suturing component, no matter which variant was used. CONCLUSIONS: Additional to the commonly described constriction of the repair construct, the rotating deformation is the main reason for repair site gapping in Kessler tendon repair methods. The term "locking" in a Kessler repair is misleading. The cruciate repairs tended to loose grip and drag (cheese-wire) through the tendon and therefore lead to gapping. The most stable repair constructs in all three dimensions were the Adelaide repair and its interlocking modification. This is due to the superior anchoring qualities of its cross locks and three dimensional stability.

The Interlocking Modification of the Cross Locked Cruciate Tendon Repair (Modified Adelaide Repair): A Static and Dynamic Biomechanical Assessment.

The 4-strand cross-locked cruciate flexor tendon repair technique (Adelaide technique) has been shown to have comparably high resistance to gap formation and ultimate tensile strength. This study aimed to determine whether an interlocking modification to the Adelaide repair would impart improved biomechanical characteristics. Twenty four sheep flexor tendons were harvested, transected and repaired using either standard or modified Adelaide techniques. Repaired tendons were cyclically loaded. Gap formation and ultimate tensile strength were measured. Additionally, suture exposure on the tendon surface was determined. There was a statistically significant increase in resistance to gap formation in the early phase of cyclic loading within the modified Adelaide group. In the later stages of testing no significant difference could be noted. The average final load to failure in the modified group was higher than the standard group but this did not achieve statistical significance. Interlocking suture techniques in four strand tendon repair constructs can improve gapping behavior in the early phase of cyclic loading.

Prognosis and prognostic factors for patients with persistent wrist pain who proceed to wrist arthroscopy.

UNLABELLED: Wrist pain is common. People with persistent pain commonly undergo arthroscopic investigation. Little is known about the prognosis or prognostic factors for these patients. The purpose of the study was to evaluate prognosis and prognostic factors for pain and functional disability in patients with persistent wrist pain who proceed to arthroscopic investigation. The study design used was a prospective cohort study. One hundred and five consecutive participants who underwent arthroscopic investigation for undiagnosed wrist pain for at least four-week duration were recruited. Patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation (PRWHE) scores were determined at baseline (before arthroscopy) and one year after arthroscopy. One-year follow-up data were obtained for 97 (92%) of 105 participants. Mean PRWHE total score declined from 49 of 100 (standard deviation [SD] 18.5) at baseline to 26 of 100 (SD 20.4) at one year. Two prognostic factors were identified: baseline PRWHE and duration of symptoms. These factors explained 19% and 5% of the variability in the final PRWHE score, respectively. Results of provocative wrist tests and arthroscopic findings did not significantly contribute to prognosis in this cohort. This study provides the first robust evidence of the prognosis of persistent wrist pain. Participants who underwent arthroscopic investigation for persistent wrist pain improved on average by approximately 50% at one year; however, most continued to have some pain and disability. Duration of pain and PRWHE at baseline explained 24% of the one-year PRWHE score. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.

Provocative wrist tests and MRI are of limited diagnostic value for suspected wrist ligament injuries: a cross-sectional study.

QUESTION: What is the diagnostic value of provocative wrist tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for suspected wrist ligament injuries? DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: 105 people presenting to hand clinics with wrist pain and suspected wrist ligament injuries were evaluated prospectively. OUTCOME MEASURES: The integrity of wrist ligaments was tested with seven provocative tests. The results were compared to the reference standard of arthroscopy. In a subgroup of 55 participants, MRI findings were also compared to arthroscopy. The provocative tests were the scaphoid shift test (SS test), lunotriquetral test (LT test), midcarpal test (MC test), distal radioulnar joint test (DRUJ test), triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) stress test (TFCC test), TFCC stress test with compression (TFCC comp test), and the gripping rotatory impaction test (GRIT). RESULTS: Most provocative tests and MRI findings were of little or no value for diagnosing wrist ligament injuries. Exceptions were the SS test (+ve LR 2.88 and -ve LR 0.28), MC test (+ve LR 2.67) and DRUJ test (-ve LR 0.30), all of which were of mild diagnostic usefulness. MRI was moderately useful for diagnosing TFCC injuries (+ve LR 5.56, -ve LR 0.15), and was mildly useful for diagnosing scapholunate (SL) ligament injuries (+ve LR 4.17, -ve LR 0.32) and lunate cartilage damage (+ve LR 3.67, -ve LR 0.33). Adding MRI to provocative tests improved the accuracy of diagnosis of TFCC injuries slightly (by 13%) and lunate cartilage damage (by 8%). CONCLUSION: Provocative wrist tests of SL ligament injuries and midcarpal ligament injuries are mildly useful for diagnosing wrist injuries. MRI diagnostic findings of SL ligament injuries, lunate cartilage damage, and TFCC are mildly to moderately useful. MRI slightly improves the diagnosis of TFCC injury and lunate cartilage damage compared to provocative tests alone.

Etonogestrel implants - case studies of median nerve injury following removal.

The etonogestrel implant has been available in Australia since 2001. General practitioners routinely insert and remove these implants in their rooms under local anaesthetic. We report two cases of significant median nerve injury following inappropriate dissection of the arm to remove this device when impalpable. These cases illustrate the need to follow the product guidelines and to refer impalpable or deeply placed implants for imaging and subsequent removal under ultrasound guidance or by a qualified surgeon.

Influence of locking stitch size in a four-strand cross-locked cruciate flexor tendon repair.

PURPOSE: The 4-strand cross-locked cruciate technique (Adelaide technique) for repairing flexor tendons in zone II is a favorable method in terms of strength and simplicity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of varying the cross-lock stitch size in this repair technique. Outcomes measured were load to failure and gap formation. METHODS: We harvested 22 deep flexor tendons from adult pig forelimbs and randomly allocated them into 2 groups. After cutting the tendons at a standard point, we performed a 4-strand cross-locked cruciate repair using 3-0 braided polyester with either 2-mm cross-locks (n = 11) or 4-mm cross-locks (n = 11). All repairs were completed with a simple running peripheral suture using 6-0 polypropylene. Repaired tendons were loaded to failure and the mechanism of failure, load to failure, stiffness, and load to 2-mm gap formation were determined. RESULTS: All repairs failed by suture breakage; we noted no suture pullout. There was no difference in load to failure (71.7-71.1 N; p = .89) or stiffness (4.1-4.6 N/mm; p = .23) between the 2-mm cross-lock and the 4-mm cross-lock groups. There was a trend toward higher resistance to 2-mm gap formation with the 4-mm cross-locks (55-62.2 N; p = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Four-strand cross-locked cruciate repairs with cross-lock sizes of 2 and 4 mm provide high tensile strength and are resistant to pullout. Repairs with 4-mm cross-locks tend to provide a more central load distribution and better gapping resistance than repairs with 2-mm cross-locks.

Cross-sectional area and strength differences of fiberwire, prolene, and ticron sutures.

PURPOSE: Flexor tendons should be repaired with suture material strong enough to permit early motion and small enough for the resulting knot to allow unimpeded tendon glide and healing. This study sought to define differences in cross-sectional area and knotted tensile strength among Fiberwire, Prolene, and Ticron sutures. METHODS: Five strands, each of 3-0 and 4-0 Prolene, Ticron, and Fiberwire sutures, were embedded in polymethylmethacrylate and sectioned in a linear precision saw to obtain 10 cross-sections of each material and size. These were examined by scanning electron microscopy and digitally analyzed for cross-sectional areas. Ten strands of each suture material and size had a single throw knot placed, and they were loaded to failure in a micromechanical tester. RESULTS: Prolene and Ticron cross-sections were circular. Fiberwire was noncircular. The 3-0 Fiberwire sutures had greater cross-sectional area than the 3-0 Ticron sutures (p < .001), which in turn were larger than 3-0 Prolene (p < .05). The 4-0 Fiberwire cross-sectional area was also greater than that of 3-0 Ticron and Prolene (p < .05). After relating knotted tensile strength to cross-sectional area, Fiberwire was 10% stronger than Prolene, and 25% stronger than Ticron. CONCLUSIONS: Fiberwire is not only stronger, but also larger than other sutures in the same or even higher suture size category. Failure to meet the United States Pharmacopeia standards for suture diameter is declared in the product information sheet, although surgeons may not be aware of these size variations. Suture size definitions are currently based on diameter, a consistent measure for circular monofilament sutures, but not for braided or noncircular sutures.