Can a mock medication-taking learning activity enable pharmacy students to experience the range of barriers and facilitators to medication adherence? An analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model.

Background: Pharmacy professionals are well-placed to provide medication adherence support to patients. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) are two complementary models previously applied to medication-taking behaviour. Understanding the patient-specific barriers and facilitators to adherence using psychological frameworks from the early stages of pharmacy education enables the design and delivery of effective interventions. Objectives: To examine whether a novel 'mock medicine' learning activity enabled students to experience the range of barriers and facilitators to medication adherence using the COM-B and TDF. Methods: A mock medicine activity was conducted with students at pharmacy schools in three universities in the UK, Norway, and Australia over one week. Percentage adherence was calculated for five dosing regimens; theoretical framework analysis was applied to map reflective statements from student logs to COM-B and TDF. Results: A total of 349 students (52.6%) returned completed logs, with high overall mean adherence (83.5%, range 0-100%). Analysis of the 277 (79.4%) students who provided reflective statements included barriers and facilitators that mapped onto one (9%), two (29%) or all three (62%) of the COM-B components and all fourteen TDF domains (overall mean = 4.04; Uni 1 = 3.72; Uni 2 = 4.50; Uni 3 = 4.38; range 1-8). Most frequently mapped domains were 'Environmental context and resources' (n = 199; 72%), 'Skills' (n = 186; 67%), 'Memory, attention and decision-making' (184; 66%) and 'Beliefs about capabilities' (n = 175; 63%). Conclusions: This is the first study to utilise both COM-B and TDF to analyse a proxy measure of medication adherence in pharmacy education. Data mapping demonstrated that students experienced similar issues to patients when prescribed a short course of medication. Importantly, all the factors influencing medication-taking reported by students were captured by these two psychological frameworks. Future educational strategies will involve students in the mapping exercise to gain hands-on experience of using these psychological constructs in practice.

Using the theoretical domains framework to determine the barriers and facilitators to medication adherence in Parkinson's disease.

Background: Patient medication adherence in Parkinson's Disease (PD) is often suboptimal. This may lead to poor symptom management, greater disease burden, decreased quality of life and increased healthcare costs. Use of psychological theory such as the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) has effectively captured barriers and facilitators to medication adherence in other long-term conditions. Applying this framework to medication adherence in PD could provide a better understanding of the challenges to inform the development of effective interventions. Objectives: The aim of the study was to apply the TDF to determine the barriers and facilitators to medication adherence in people with PD. Methodology: This qualitative study employed online interviews to explore medication adherence in a small group of people with PD recruited via Parkinson's UK and social media. A semi-structured interview schedule was designed informed by the 14 TDF domains. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and mapped to the TDF using Framework Analysis. Results: Twelve participants diagnosed with PD were interviewed, 11 of whom were currently taking prescribed medication plus another self-medicating with Vitamin B1. All TDF domains were evident in the data. Predominant facilitators were Domains 1 - Knowledge, 6 - Social Influence, and 12 - Beliefs about Consequences and barriers were 7 - Reinforcement, 10 - Memory, Attention and Decision Processes, and 11 - Environmental Context and Resources. Other themes were not related to medication adherence. Conclusion: In this small group, all data relating to the barriers and facilitators for medication adherence in PD were successfully mapped onto the TDF. This indicates the utility of the framework for determining and structuring the factors to consider when providing medication support for this patient population in an accessible and coherent way. Further quantitative studies are needed to determine the extent to which these factors can be generalised to other PD patients.

Do disinhibited eaters pay increased attention to food cues?

The Three Factors Eating Questionnaire's measure of disinhibited eating is a robust predictor of long-term weight gain. This experiment explored if disinhibited eaters display attentional bias to food cues. Participants (N = 45) completed a visual dot probe task which measured responses to food (energy dense and low energy foods) and neutral cues. Picture pairs were displayed either for a 100 ms or 2000 ms duration. All participants displayed attentional bias for energy dense food items. Indices of attentional bias were largest in disinhibited eaters. Attentional bias in disinhibited eaters appeared to be underpinned by facilitated attention.