A randomized, double-blind pilot study of analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of naproxen sodium and acetaminophen following dental implant placement surgery.

Introduction: Post-surgical pain following dental implant placement surgery is typically managed with non-opioid analgesics, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen. However, the comparative analgesic efficacy of over-the-counter doses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen in implant patients is unknown. Therefore, we compared the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of naproxen sodium and acetaminophen after surgical placement of one or two dental implants. Methods: Adult patients were treated with naproxen sodium (440 mg loading dose +220 mg q8h, n = 15) or acetaminophen (1,000 mg q6h-max daily dose 3,000 mg, n = 15) for 3 days after implant placement in a randomized, double-blind design. Pain was assessed on a 0-10 scale every 20 min for 6 h after study medication treatment. Tramadol (50 mg) was available as a rescue medication. Plasma and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) were collected prior to the surgery and 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, and 72 h after surgery for quantification of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and IL-1ß levels. Results: Pain scores were significantly lower in patients treated with naproxen sodium compared to those treated with acetaminophen. Inflammatory mediator levels in plasma and gingival crevicular fluid increased after surgery and returned to near baseline levels by 72 h. Plasma IL-6 levels were significantly lower 6 h after surgery in patients treated with naproxen sodium compared to acetaminophen. No differences in inflammatory mediator concentrations in gingival crevicular fluid were observed between the treatment groups. The number of implants placed and body mass index (BMI) influenced inflammatory mediator concentrations in plasma and gingival crevicular fluid, respectively. Discussion: Naproxen sodium was more effective than acetaminophen in reducing post-operative pain and systemic inflammation following surgical placement of one or two dental implants. Further studies are needed to determine whether these findings are applicable to more complex implant cases and how they affect clinical outcomes following implant placement. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04694300.

Preoperative and Postoperative Hyperalgesia in Dental Patients on Chronic Opioid Therapy: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: Opioid-induced hyperalgesia, a paradoxical increase in pain sensitivity associated with ongoing opioid use, may worsen the postoperative pain experience. This pilot study examined the effect of chronic opioid use on pain responses in patients undergoing a standardized dental surgery. METHODS: Experimental and subjective pain responses were compared prior to and immediately following planned multiple tooth extractions between patients with chronic pain on opioid therapy (≥30 mg morphine equivalents/d) and opioid-naïve patients without chronic pain matched on sex, race, age, and degree of surgical trauma. RESULTS: Preoperatively, chronic opioid users rated experimental pain as more severe and appreciated less central modulation of that pain than did opioid-naïve participants. Postoperatively, chronic opioid-using patients rated their pain as more severe during the first 48 hours and used almost twice as many postoperative analgesic doses during the first 72 hours as the opioid-naïve controls. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that patients with chronic pain taking opioids approach surgical interventions with heightened pain sensitivity and have a more severe postoperative pain experience, providing evidence that their complaints of postoperative pain should be taken seriously and managed appropriately.

Variability in the Analgesic Response to Ibuprofen Is Associated With Cyclooxygenase Activation in Inflammatory Pain.

The mechanisms underlying interindividual variability in analgesic efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are not well understood. Therefore, we performed pain phenotyping, functional neuroimaging, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic assessments, inflammation biomarkers, and gene expression profiling in healthy subjects who underwent surgical extraction of bony impacted third molars and were treated with ibuprofen (400 mg; N = 19) or placebo (N = 10). Analgesic efficacy was not associated with demographic or clinical characteristics, ibuprofen pharmacokinetics, or the degree of cyclooxygenase inhibition by ibuprofen. Compared with partial responders to ibuprofen (N = 9, required rescue medication within the dosing interval), complete responders (N = 10, no rescue medication) exhibited greater induction of urinary prostaglandin metabolites and serum tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin 8. Differentially expressed genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were enriched for inflammation-related pathways. These findings suggest that a less pronounced activation of the inflammatory prostanoid system is associated with insufficient pain relief on ibuprofen alone and the need for additional therapeutic intervention.

A Proof-of-concept Study Using Quantitative Sensory Threshold Analysis to Compare Two Intraoral Topical Anesthetics.

PURPOSE: CTY-5339A is an investigational topical anesthetic spray containing 14% benzocaine/2% tetracaine in a metered canister. Each spray delivers ∼0.2 mL of solution. This double-blind, randomized, crossover study compared the local anesthetic effect of CTY-5339A versus 14% benzocaine alone by using 2 quantitative sensory threshold experimental pain paradigms on the maxillary gingiva: pin prick test pain intensity (PPT PI) and heat pain threshold (HPT). METHODS: American Society of Anesthesiology Class 1 and 2 subjects (N = 50) were enrolled in this study. To qualify for the study, subjects were tested on the anterior maxillary gingiva with both PPT and HPT. Subjects had to report a PPT PI of ≥3 on a 0 to 10 numeric pain intensity scale on 1 of 2 consecutive pin pricks separated by 10 s, with at least one score ≥4. After PPT, mean HPT following 2 ramps in the same location had to be ≤ 46.5 °C, with each ramp beginning at 35 °C and an automatic cutoff of 50.6 °C. For treatment visits, subjects were randomly administered either 1 spray of CTY-5339A or 14% benzocaine to the anterior maxillary gingiva within 3 weeks of screening and then the alternative treatment 5 days to 2 weeks later. PPT PI and HPT were recorded immediately before drug application. After drug administration, PPT PI was recorded every minute through 5 min. Commencing at 5 min, PPT PI and HPT were recorded every 5 min through 60 min. For assessment of methemoglobin concentrations, venous blood (5 mL) was drawn from the antecubital fossa both before and 60 min after drug application. Oxygen saturation was recorded via pulse oximetry at baseline and every 10 min. FINDINGS: The AUCs for pain intensity difference from 0-30 and 0-60 min after PPT and HPT differences were significantly greater (P < 0.0001) for CTY-5339A compared with 14% benzocaine. Multiple time points on the time-action curves for PPT PI difference and HPT difference statistically (P < 0.05) favored CTY-5399A. Methemoglobin and oxygen saturation levels did not change compared with baseline after dosing with either treatment. IMPLICATIONS: Recommended doses of CTY-5339A provided significantly more profound and sustained local anesthesia than 14% benzocaine when applied to the maxillary gingiva. Significant changes in methemoglobin or oxygen saturation concentrations did not occur for either drug. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03233737.

Lack of Methemoglobin Elevations After Topical Applications of Benzocaine Alone or Benzocaine Plus Tetracaine to the Oral Mucosa.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated changes in methemoglobin and oxygen saturation concentrations after the administration of recommended doses of 14% benzocaine alone or 14% benzocaine combined with 2% tetracaine. METHODS: American Society of Anesthesiology class 1 and 2 subjects (n = 40) were enrolled in this modified crossover study. Subjects were administered 0.2 mL of 14% benzocaine alone, 0.2 mL of 14% benzocaine plus 2% tetracaine, or 0.4 mL of 14% benzocaine plus 0.2% benzocaine to their cheek mucosa. Venous blood (5 mL) was drawn from the antecubital fossa before and 60 minutes after drug application for methemoglobin analyses. Oxygen saturation was also recorded via pulse oximetry at baseline and every 10 minutes through 60 minutes after drug application. FINDINGS: Methemoglobin and oxygen saturation levels did not change from baseline after the administration of benzocaine alone or when combined with tetracaine. IMPLICATIONS: Recommended doses of benzocaine or benzocaine combined with tetracaine when applied to the cheek mucosa do not induce even clinically insignificant elevations in methemoglobin levels. Metered dosing, such as that used in this study, can help avoid this overdose phenomena with these drugs. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02908620.

Characterization and treatment of postsurgical dental implant pain employing intranasal ketorolac.

The intensity and duration of pain following surgical placement of dental implants has not been well studied. Thus, the aim of this open-label study was to characterize the nature of postsurgical pain following the placement of one to three implants. The secondary goal was to explore the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of intranasal ketorolac in this patient population. Following implant surgery, postoperative pain was rated moderate or severe in 25/28 patients (89 percent), requiring prn analgesic dosing for up to 3 days in 14/25 individuals (56 percent). Intranasal ketorolac displayed an analgesic onset within 20 minutes, a duration of at least 6 hours, and was well tolerated by the cohort with brief stinging of the nasal mucosa reported by 9/25 individuals (36 percent).

The cardiovascular effects and pharmacokinetics of intranasal tetracaine plus oxymetazoline: preliminary findings.

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the cardiovascular effects and pharmacokinetics of an intranasal 3 percent tetracaine/0.05 percent oxymetazoline spray developed to provide needle-free anesthesia of maxillary teeth. METHODS: The authors administered to 12 participants a proposed maximum recommended dose (MRD) (18 milligrams tetracaine/0.3 mg oxymetazoline) as three bilateral pairs of 0.1-milliliter nasal sprays. They administered two times this dose (36 mg tetracaine/0.6 mg oxymetazoline) as six bilateral pairs one to three weeks later. The authors recorded the patients' heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation. They drew blood samples at baseline and 15 times during the two hours after drug administration. RESULTS: Physiological measures remained fairly stable throughout the two-hour period, with small but significant decreases (P < .05) in heart rate at 40 and 50 minutes for the two-times MRD (6.1 beats/minute) and MRD (7.5 beats/minute) administrations, respectively, and a significant increase in diastolic blood pressure (5.9 millimeters of mercury) for the two-times-MRD administration at 90 minutes. Mean oxygen saturation remained above 99 percent. Tetracaine plasma levels were undetectable in most participants, whereas concentrations of its major metabolite parabutylaminobenzoic acid from the two-times-MRD administration were approximately twice that from the MRD administration. Oxymetazoline concentrations from the two-times-MRD administration were approximately 50 percent greater than those from the MRD administration, with a half-life of 1.72 to 2.32 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal tetracaine/oxymetazoline mist generally was well tolerated in study participants. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The safety profile and pharmacokinetics of this intranasal formulation indicate that it appears to be generally well tolerated in patients for achieving anesthesia of the maxilla. Additional safety and efficacy data are required, particularly in patients with cardiovascular disease and other comorbidities.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot study of cerebral blood flow patterns employing SPECT imaging in dental postsurgical pain patients with and without pain relief.

BACKGROUND: Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has been employed in the study of altered regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) in experimental and chronic pain. CBF patterns have not been evaluated in patients with acute postoperative pain. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this pilot study was to employ SPECT to measure CBF distribution associated with postoperative dental pain and to compare these CBF patterns to subsequent images in the same patients who were experiencing pain relief versus continued or worsening pain who had received active or placebo analgesic interventions. The primary outcome measure was the percentage change in blood flow in various regions of interest. METHODS: Twenty-two healthy individuals (10 males and 12 females, age range 20-29 years) who underwent the removal of ≥1 partial or full bony impacted mandibular third molars were evaluated for pain intensity as the local anesthesia dissipated, employing a 0 to10 numeric rating scale (0 = no pain; 10 = worst imaginable). When the subjects' pain level reached ≥4/10, they were injected intravenously with 260 MBq of technetium Tc 99m bicisate (ethyl cysteinate dimer). Under double-blind conditions and 10 minutes before being placed in the SPECT scanner, the first 10 subjects were randomized to receive intravenous ketorolac 15 mg or saline while the remaining 12 subjects were randomized to receive by mouth either ibuprofen 400 mg, ibuprofen 200 mg, acetaminophen 1000 mg, or placebo. One hour after drug administration, subjects were reevaluated for pain, injected with 925 MBq of technetium Tc 99m bicisate, given rescue medication if required, and then rescanned. CBF ratios were obtained for regions of interest and by normalizing to average whole brain activity. RESULTS: Subjects generally had a moderate degree (mean [SD], 7.3% [4.0%]) of thalamic asymmetry on initial scans with pain; after treatment, subjects reporting worsening pain regardless of the intervention had higher thalamic asymmetry (8.1% vs 2.8%) than those reporting relief of pain. Subjects who reported reduced pain after the intervention had significantly different (P < 0.05) mean CBF changes compared with those reporting worsening pain in the left prefrontal cortex, left sensorimotor area, right anterior cingulate, and right caudate. CONCLUSIONS: Acute postoperative dental pain was associated with moderate thalamic asymmetry that improved following successful pain management. Sustained or worsening pain was associated with increased CBF in brain regions associated with pain pathways, whereas pain relief was associated with decreased activity in the same areas.

The pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular effects of high-dose articaine with 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 epinephrine.

OBJECTIVES: The authors conducted a randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover clinical trial to compare the pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular effects of 11.9 milliliters of 4 percent articaine hydrochloride (HCl) plus 1:100,000 epinephrine (A100) with those of 11.9 mL of 4 percent articaine HCl plus 1:200,000 epinephrine (A200). METHODS: During two testing sessions, the authors administered injections of A100 and A200 over a seven-minute period (in one-cartridge doses unless otherwise noted): maxillary right first molar infiltration, maxillary left first molar infiltration, maxillary right first premolar infiltration, maxillary left first premolar infiltration, right inferior alveolar injection, left inferior alveolar injection, right long buccal infiltration (one-half cartridge) and left long buccal infiltration (one-half cartridge). They analyzed venous blood samples for articaine levels. They used noninvasive acoustic tonometry to measure a variety of cardiovascular parameters over a two-hour period. RESULTS: Plasma concentration curves of articaine over time were similar for both solutions, with peak concentrations and times to maximum concentration being 2,037 nanograms per milliliter and 22 minutes for A100 and 2,145 ng/mL and 22 minutes for A200. At the 10-minute point, the mean systolic blood pressure and heart rate were significantly elevated (P < .05) with A100 versus A200. CONCLUSIONS: Maximum dose recommendations for the A100 solution also can be applied to the A200 solution. A200 produces less cardiovascular stimulation than does A100. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: A200 is as safe as A100, and may be preferable to A100 in patients with cardiovascular disease and in those taking drugs that reportedly enhance the systemic effects of epinephrine.

A study of benzocaine gel dosing for toothache.

OBJECTIVE: This pilot study evaluated subject compliance with a proposed OTC label with improved dosing directions for self-application of a 20% benzocaine gel for toothache pain, and assessed the methodology for evaluating efficacy in a future pivotal study of benzocaine gel. It was hypothesized that > or = 75% of subjects would apply < or = 400 mg of product (80 mg benzocaine). Exploratory analyses of efficacy were also performed. METHODOLOGY: Thirty patients with spontaneous pain of moderate or severe intensity from a single tooth due to caries, a lost restoration, or a fracture entered this randomized, parallel group, double-blind study. Before self-applying 20% benzocaine gel or placebo, patients read a label containing new dosing directions, including a picture of how much product to apply to their tooth and the surrounding gingival tissues. The amount applied was determined by weighing the tube before and after dosing. Following dosing, pain intensity and relief were recorded every five minutes through 30 minutes, then every ten minutes through 120 minutes. Responders were defined as those subjects who experienced at least a one-unit reduction in pain intensity from baseline at two consecutive time points within the first 20 minutes. Onset of meaningful relief was recorded using a stopwatch. The percentage of responders was compared using the Mantel-Haenszel test. ANOVA was employed to test for differences in Pain Relief Combined with Pain Intensity Difference (PRID), and the areas under the curve at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes for this measure (SPRID). Median onset and duration times were compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. Adverse events were recorded if and when they occurred. RESULTS: It was found that 86.7% of the subjects (26/30) applied < or = 375 mg of product (mean +/- SD = 327.7 +/- 276.8 mg). The benzocaine group had a significantly higher (p = 0.022) responder rate (86.7%) than the placebo group (46.7%). Significant differences in favor of the benzocaine group were also recorded for PRID at 10, 15, and 30 minutes (p < 0.05) and SPRID-30 (p = 0.037). Median onset and duration times were 8.3 minutes and > 115 minutes for the benzocaine group, >120 minutes and 5 minutes for the placebo group. There were no adverse events recorded in the study. CONCLUSION: The improved dosing directions resulted in a high percentage of subjects self-applying an appropriate amount of benzocaine gel or matching placebo. The label and study methodology appear suitable for a pivotal dose-response study in subjects with toothache pain. While the current study was not statistically powered to make firm efficacy conclusions, 20% benzocaine gel appeared more efficacious than placebo, providing a rapid onset of pain relief and a relatively long duration of action.

Efficacy and tolerability of an intraoral benzocaine patch in the relief of spontaneous toothache pain.

OBJECTIVE: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, the effectiveness and tolerability of a novel intraoral benzocaine patch was evaluated in 60 patients who presented to the Dental School's emergency clinic with spontaneous toothache pain of at least a moderate intensity. METHODOLOGY: Mucoadhesive patches, containing either 12 mg of benzocaine or a matching placebo, were applied approximately two millimeters apical to the mucogingival junction of the symptomatic tooth and remained in place for 60 minutes. Pain intensity (0-4 scale) and pain relief (0-4 scale) were recorded every five minutes through 30 minutes, and then every ten minutes through the 90-minute time point. The onset times of first perceptible and meaningful relief were recorded using two stopwatches. The occurrence of adverse events was also monitored. RESULTS: While the benzocaine patches were numerically superior to the placebo patches at all time points with respect to pain relief, PID (pain intensity difference) and their summed measures (TOTPAR and SPID scores), an analysis of covariance revealed no significant differences between treatments. Survival analysis indicated that the percentage of patients reporting meaningful pain relief by 30 minutes was significantly (p < 0.05) greater in the benzocaine group than in the placebo group (77% for benzocaine and 47% for placebo). The median onset times to first perceptible and meaningful relief were 5.4 and 18.1 minutes in the benzocaine group, and 7.8 and 30.4 minutes in the placebo group. Only two side effects (headache) were reported in the entire study. CONCLUSION: Although the results of the present study were promising, further research on this novel delivery system of benzocaine is warranted to firmly establish efficacy in patients with spontaneous toothache pain.