Healthcare professionals' experiences of interprofessional collaboration in patient education: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: This study explores interprofessional collaboration amongst healthcare professionals in patient education. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. A search in seven databases was conducted from 2011 to 2022 and screened against the inclusion criteria. Quality appraisal was done independently by two reviewers. Studies were extracted and synthesised using the data-based convergent synthesis design. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were included. Five themes on factors affecting interprofessional collaboration in patient education emerged: 1) role clarification, 2) communication infrastructure, 3) shared space for collaboration, 4) interprofessional trust, and 5) organisational support. CONCLUSION: Findings highlighted the importance of developing trustful relationships within the multidisciplinary team in delivering patient education. Channels for additional infrastructural support, guidelines and training in patient education delivery is required. Future research could explore patients' perspectives on how their learning needs in patient education may be optimised through a multidisciplinary approach. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare leaders could promote shared goals within the team by facilitating a common space and time for interprofessional team rounding, and by developing shared patient education resources and documentation processes. Interprofessional education focusing on the delivery of team-based patient education could be implemented to foster understanding of the interdependent role of multidisciplinary healthcare professionals.

Factors Influencing the Uptake of Seasonal Influenza Vaccination among Community-Dwelling Older Adults during COVID-19: A Mixed Methods Study.

Background: Despite making the influenza vaccine accessible and affordable, vaccination rates remained low among community-dwelling older adults. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the factors influencing vaccine uptake and the impact of COVID-19 on vaccine uptake among community-dwelling older adults in Singapore. Methods: A mixed methods study involving a survey and semi-structured interviews were conducted between September 2020 and July 2021. Community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 65 years were recruited from 27 Community Nurse Posts. Data on participants' demographics, health condition(s), vaccination status, attitudes towards influenza infections and vaccinations, willingness to pay, intention for future vaccination and source of information were collected via the survey. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand vaccination experiences, key enablers and barriers, and the impact of COVID-19 on vaccine uptake. All interviews were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests and multinomial logistic regressions. Results: A total of 235 participants completed the survey. Living arrangement was a statistically significant contributing factor for influenza vaccine uptake (ꭓ2= -0.139; p = 0.03). Participants who lived alone were 2.5 times more likely to be vaccinated than those living with others (OR = 2.504, 95% CI: 1.294-4.842, p = 0.006). Avoidance of getting infected (82.5%), avoidance of transmission to others (84.7%), and advice from healthcare professionals to receive vaccination (83.4%) were key enablers, while concerns about possible side effects (41.2%), the effectiveness of the vaccine (42.6%), and not having enough information (48.1%) were barriers. Twenty participants were interviewed. The findings were congruent with the survey results. Five themes were identified as follows: (1) Perceived importance of influenza vaccination, (2) Sphere of influence, (3) Healthcare schemes and medical subsidies, (4) Psychological impediments, and (5) Inconsistent emphases at various touch points. Conclusions: Greater public health efforts are needed to reach out to the larger population of older adults of different living arrangements and those concerned about the possible side effects and effectiveness of the influenza vaccine. Healthcare professionals need to provide more information to address these concerns, especially during COVID-19, to encourage vaccine uptake.

Employing serious game for assessing knowledge of blood transfusion procedure among nurses: A qualitative evaluation and feedback improvement study.

BACKGROUND: Employing serious game for assessing nurses' blood transfusion knowledge and skill competency has gained interest among nurse educators worldwide. However, its acceptance by nurses has not been fully explored. AIM: To explore the registered nurses' experiences using serious game for nursing skills competency and gather feedback to improve the quality of learning using serious game. SETTING: Acute tertiary hospital in Singapore. PARTICIPANTS: Registered nurses in inpatient settings. METHODS: This qualitative evaluation and feedback improvement study was conducted in an acute tertiary hospital in Singapore between September 2019 and November 2019. Registered nurses who had completed the blood transfusion knowledge and skills competency via the serious game platform were invited to participate in this study. Individual face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured questionnaire were conducted. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was performed inductively using the Braun and Clarke's six-step of thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 11 registered nurses were interviewed from a variety of clinical areas including medical and surgical wards, and intensive care units. The mean age of the participants was 28 years old. The majority of participants were females (81.8%), with their years of experience ranging from 1 to 13 years. Each interview took between 20 and 30 min. Three themes were identified: (1) novel learning experience; (2) varying levels of appreciation towards the serious game; and (3) navigating the interface and technical issues. CONCLUSION: Employing serious game for nursing skills competency is considered acceptable by the nurses in this sample population. Compared to the traditional modes of competency assessment, the serious game is innovative and stimulates learning. Nevertheless, more rigorous efforts are needed to improve the interface and technical issues to enhance the user learning experience. Future versions of the serious game will need to be more accessible and intuitive for all levels of nursing staffs.

Risk factors for unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge among medical oncology patients: A retrospective medical record review.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the risk factors for unplanned hospital readmissions (UHR) within 30 days of discharge among medical oncology patients at a tertiary hospital in Singapore. METHODS: This study is a retrospective, case-control medical record review of patients admitted to a medical oncology unit at a tertiary hospital between 1 June and October 31, 2017. During the study period, there were 1559 adult patients discharged alive from the medical oncology unit. Of this, 359 patients had experienced at least a 30-day UHR (cases). The cases were matched to those without a 30-day UHR (controls) by their primary reason for index admission and discharge date. After matching, 312 medical records (cases: 156; controls: 156) were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 156 cases with a 30-day UHR, 46.2% (n = 72) were readmitted within the first 10 days of discharge. The top reasons contributing to the UHR were non-neutropenic infection (n = 41) and pain (n = 23). Multivariate analyses identified three independent risk factors that were associated with the 30-day UHR: (1) single marital status, (2) emergency department visit(s) in the past six months, and (3) recent decline in activities of daily living. CONCLUSION: The study results can guide risk stratification to identify medical oncology patients at high risk for 30-day UHR. In addition, the results warrant the need to refine the inpatient assessments and discharge planning, as well as ensure the accurate referral to and allocation of community and outpatient resources so as to reduce the risk of UHR.

Missed nursing care in patient education: A qualitative study of different levels of nurses' perspectives.

AIM: To explore the different levels of nurses' perspectives in the delivery of patient education in postoperative care. BACKGROUND: Patient education is a frequently reported missed nursing care and can lead to postoperative complications and hospital readmissions. METHODS: Descriptive exploratory qualitative study involving eight focus groups with 35 nurses was conducted in an acute hospital. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were thematically analysed. RESULTS: The analysis yielded three themes: 'Role ambiguity' between the levels of nurses concerning their roles in patient education; 'Not a priority nursing care' for patient education due to competing work demands and the missing workplace culture to teach; and 'Informal teaching' carried out conversationally during nursing care activities. CONCLUSION: This study augments the need to develop strategies, including informal teaching, to strengthen the delivery of patient education to avert missed nursing care. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse managers and educators are instrumental in establishing role clarity between ward nurses and specialty care nurses for patient education, recognizing patient education as the next nurse-sensitive indicator in reflecting quality of care, fostering positive workplace cultures to teach and providing ward nurses with trainings on communication strategies to provide effective informal teaching at bedside.

Role transition: A descriptive exploratory study of assistant nurse clinicians in Singapore.

AIM: To explore the role-transition experiences of assistant nurse clinicians after their first year of appointment. BACKGROUND: The National Nursing Taskforce was set up in Singapore to examine the professional development and recognition of nurses. It created the assistant nurse clinician role as an avenue for the nurses' career development. The role was intended to assist nurse managers to guide the nursing team in the assessment, planning, and delivery of patient care. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study design was adopted. A purposive sample of 22 registered nurses from six acute care institutions and two polyclinics in Singapore participated in the face-to-face interviews. An inductive content analysis approach was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: (a) promotion to assistant nurse clinician is a form of recognition and vindication; (b) there was uncertainty about the expected role of the assistant nurse clinician; (c) experience eases transition; and (d) there was a need for peer support, mentorship, and training. CONCLUSIONS: The job description of the assistant nurse clinician needs to be better defined to provide greater clarity about their clinical and administrative duties and what is expected of their performance. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: It is essential for nurse managers to provide successful role-transition strategies to help the newly appointed assistant nurse clinicians to become efficient and effective leaders.

A Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of 2 Treatment Methods in Reducing Incidence of Short Peripheral Catheter-Related Phlebitis.

Short peripheral catheter (SPC)-related phlebitis can lead to bloodstream infections and affect patients' quality of life. A randomized trial was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 treatment methods in reducing the incidence of SPC-related phlebitis. The 2 treatment methods differed in terms of the cleansing solution used before insertion and dressing material used after removal. The results demonstrated that the type of cleansing solution and postremoval dressing material did not make a difference in the incidence of phlebitis. Strict adherence to aseptic techniques and prompt removal of the SPC remained the cornerstone in the prevention of phlebitis.

Expectations and experiences of patients with osteoarthritis undergoing total joint arthroplasty: An integrative review.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of educational interventions for osteoarthritic patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty remains inconclusive. It is essential to understand the educational needs of these patients from their perspectives. AIM: The aim of this study was to systematically summarize and synthesize osteoarthritic patients' expectations and experiences in undergoing total joint arthroplasty to identify their educational needs. DESIGN: An integrative review was conducted. METHODS: Twenty studies (13 qualitative and 7 quantitative), published between 2006 and 2016, were independently appraised by 2 reviewers using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools for quantitative studies. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, and the findings were synthesized in a narrative summary. RESULTS: Six themes describing patients' preoperative and post-operative educational needs were identified: (1) preoperative anxiety, (2) unrealistic expectations of recovery, (3) post-operative pain, (4) regaining functional abilities, (5) physical and psychological sense of loss, and (6) lack of continuity of care. CONCLUSION: This review is the first to capture the osteoarthritic patients' educational needs from their perspectives. The biopsychosocial model can address the multidimensionality (biological, psychological, and social) of patients' educational needs. A robust infrastructure supporting interprofessional collaborative practice and continuity of care should be adopted to enhance current educational efforts.

Factors influencing the activation of the rapid response system for clinically deteriorating patients by frontline ward clinicians: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To synthesize factors influencing the activation of the rapid response system (RRS) and reasons for suboptimal RRS activation by ward nurses and junior physicians. DATA SOURCES: Nine electronic databases were searched for articles published between January 1995 and January 2016 in addition to a hand-search of reference lists and relevant journals. STUDY SELECTION: Published primary studies conducted in adult general ward settings and involved the experiences and views of ward nurses and/or junior physicians in RRS activation were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on design, methods and key findings were extracted and collated. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirty studies were included for the review. The process to RRS activation was influenced by the perceptions and clinical experiences of ward nurses and physicians, and facilitated by tools and technologies, including the sensitivity and specificity of the activation criteria, and monitoring technology. However, the task of enacting the RRS activations was challenged by seeking further justification, deliberating over reactions from the rapid response team and the impact of workload and staffing. Finally, adherence to the traditional model of escalation of care, support from colleagues and hospital leaders, and staff training were organizational factors that influence RRS activation. CONCLUSION: This review suggests that the factors influencing RRS activation originated from a combination of socio-cultural, organizational and technical aspects. Institutions that strive for improvements in the existing RRS or are considering to adopt the RRS should consider the complex interactions between people and the elements of technologies, tasks, environment and organization in healthcare settings.

Effectiveness of a patient education intervention in enhancing the self-efficacy of hospitalized patients to recognize and report acute deteriorating conditions.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and pilot test the effectiveness of a patient education intervention in enhancing the self-efficacy of hospitalized patients to recognize and report symptoms of acute deteriorating conditions. METHOD: Using cluster randomization, acute care general wards were randomized to the experimental and control groups. 34 patients in the experimental group received a 30-minute patient education intervention on Alert Worsening conditions And Report Early (AWARE) while 33 patients in the control group received the routine care only. Levels of self-efficacy to recognize and report symptoms were measured before and after the intervention. RESULTS: The level of self-efficacy reported by the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The AWARE intervention was effective in enhancing the self-efficacy of hospitalized patients to recognize and report acute deteriorating conditions. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patient engagement through patient education could be included in the rapid response system which aims to reduce hospital mortality and cardiac arrest rates in the general wards.