Altered Movement Biomechanics in Chronic Ankle Instability, Coper, and Control Groups: Energy Absorption and Distribution Implications.

CONTEXT: Patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) exhibit deficits in neuromuscular control, resulting in altered movement strategies. However, no researchers have examined neuromuscular adaptations to dynamic movement strategies during multiplanar landing and cutting among patients with CAI, individuals who are ankle-sprain copers, and control participants. OBJECTIVE: To investigate lower extremity joint power, stiffness, and ground reaction force (GRF) during a jump-landing and cutting task among CAI, coper, and control groups. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 22 patients with CAI (age = 22.7 ± 2.0 years, height = 174.6 ± 10.4 cm, mass = 73.4 ± 12.1 kg), 22 ankle-sprain copers (age = 22.1 ± 2.1 years, height = 173.8 ± 8.2 cm, mass = 72.6 ± 12.3 kg), and 22 healthy control participants (age = 22.5 ± 3.3 years, height = 172.4 ± 13.3 cm, mass = 72.6 ± 18.7 kg). INTERVENTION(S): Participants performed 5 successful trials of a jump-landing and cutting task. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Using motion-capture cameras and a force plate, we collected lower extremity ankle-, knee-, and hip-joint power and stiffness and GRFs during the jump-landing and cutting task. Functional analyses of variance were used to evaluate between-groups differences in these dependent variables throughout the contact phase of the task. RESULTS: Compared with the coper and control groups, the CAI group displayed (1) up to 7% of body weight more posterior and 52% of body weight more vertical GRF during initial landing followed by decreased GRF during the remaining stance and 22% of body weight less medial GRF across most of stance; (2) 8.8 W/kg less eccentric and 3.2 W/kg less concentric ankle power, 6.4 W/kg more eccentric knee and 4.8 W/kg more eccentric hip power during initial landing, and 5.0 W/kg less eccentric knee and 3.9 W/kg less eccentric hip power; and (3) less ankle- and knee-joint stiffness during the landing phase. Concentric power patterns were similar to eccentric power patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The CAI group demonstrated altered neuromechanics, redistributing energy absorption from the distal (ankle) to the proximal (knee and hip) joints, which coincided with decreased ankle and knee stiffness during landing. Our data suggested that although the coper and control groups showed similar landing and cutting strategies, the CAI group used altered strategies to modulate impact forces during the task.

Kinetic Compensations due to Chronic Ankle Instability during Landing and Jumping.

INTRODUCTION: Skeletal muscles absorb and transfer kinetic energy during landing and jumping, which are common requirements of various forms of physical activity. Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is associated with impaired neuromuscular control and dynamic stability of the lower extremity. Little is known regarding an intralimb, lower-extremity joint coordination of kinetics during landing and jumping for CAI patients. We investigated the effect of CAI on lower-extremity joint stiffness and kinetic and energetic patterns across the ground contact phase of landing and jumping. METHODS: One hundred CAI patients and 100 matched able-bodied controls performed five trials of a landing and jumping task (a maximal vertical forward jump, landing on a force plate with the test leg only, and immediate lateral jump toward the contralateral side). Functional analyses of variance and independent t-tests were used to evaluate between-group differences for lower-extremity net internal joint moment, power, and stiffness throughout the entire ground contact phase of landing and jumping. RESULTS: Relative to the control group, the CAI group revealed (i) reduced plantarflexion and knee extension and increased hip extension moments; (ii) reduced ankle and knee eccentric and concentric power, and increased hip eccentric and concentric power, and (iii) reduced ankle and knee joint stiffness and increased hip joint stiffness during the task. CONCLUSIONS: CAI patients seemed to use a hip-dominant strategy by increasing the hip extension moment, stiffness, and eccentric and concentric power during landing and jumping. This apparent compensation may be due to decreased capabilities to produce sufficient joint moment, stiffness, and power at the ankle and knee. These differences might have injury risk and performance implications.

Movement Strategies among Groups of Chronic Ankle Instability, Coper, and Control.

INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive evaluation of movement strategies during functional movement is a difficult undertaking. Because of this challenge, studied movements have been oversimplified. Furthermore, evaluating movement strategies at only a discrete time point(s) provide limited insight into how movement strategies may change or adapt in chronic ankle instability (CAI) patients. This study aimed to identify abnormal movement strategies in individuals with a history of ankle sprain injury during a sports maneuver compared with healthy controls. METHODS: Sixty-six participants, consisting of 22 CAI patients, 22 ankle sprain copers, and 22 healthy controls, participated in this study. Functional profiles of lower extremity kinematics, kinetics, and EMG activation from initial contact (0% of stance) to toe-off (100% of stance) were collected and analyzed during a jump landing/cutting task using a functional data analysis approach. RESULTS: Compared with copers, CAI patients displayed landing positions of less plantarflexion, less inversion, more knee flexion, more hip flexion, and less hip abduction during the first 25% of stance. However, restricted dorsiflexion angle was observed in both CAI patients and copers relative to controls during the midlanding to mid-side-cutting phase when the ankle and knee reached its peak range of motion (e.g., dorsiflexion and knee flexion). Reduced EMG activation of tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, medial gastrocnemius, and gluteus medius may be due to altered kinematics that reduce muscular demands on the involved muscles. CONCLUSIONS: CAI patients displayed altered movement strategies, perhaps in an attempt to avoid perceived positions of risk. Although sagittal joint positions seemed to increase the external torque on the knee and hip extensors, frontal joint positions appeared to reduce the muscular demands on evertor and hip abductor muscles.