Effects of photodynamic therapy in periodontal treatment: A randomized, controlled clinical trial.

AIM: To evaluate the effects of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the nonsurgical treatment of chronic periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, single-blind, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial was performed. Sixty patients were enrolled: 20 healthy controls and 40 patients with periodontitis. The 40 patients were randomized for scaling and root planing (SRP) or SRP + PDT. Periodontal (plaque index, probing depth, clinical recession, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing and gingival crevicular fluid volume, corresponding to 381 versus 428 critical sites), microbiological (Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, Prevotella intermedia and Campylobacter rectus presence, 18 versus 19 samples) and biochemical (interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANK-L) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) levels, 18 versus 19 samples) parameters were recorded. RESULTS: Within each group, significant improvements were found for clinical parameters, though without significant differences between groups. RANK-L was significantly decreased at week 13 in the SRP + PDT group compared with the SRP group. SRP + PDT, but not SRP alone, significantly reduced the abundance of A. actinomycetemcomitans. CONCLUSIONS: Except for a significant decrease in the pathogenic burden of A. actinomycetemcomitans, coadjuvant PDT resulted in no additional improvement compared with SRP alone in patients diagnosed with moderate-to-advanced chronic periodontitis.

A controlled clinical study of periodontal health in anticoagulated patients: Assessment of bleeding on probing.

BACKGROUND: According to the Spanish Society of Cardiology, 700,000 patients receive oral anticoagulants, and in these cases bleeding on probing (BOP) could be altered. However, no studies have analyzed the periodontal status of these patients and the effects anticoagulants may have upon BOP. A study was made of the possible relationship between plaque index, probing depth, INR (International Normalized Ratio) and acenocoumarol dose versus the clinical signs of BOP in a sample of anticoagulated patients. Likewise, an analysis was made of oral hygiene habits and attitude towards bleeding in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A controlled observational clinical study was made in La Ribera Hospital (Valencia, Spain) involving 44 anticoagulated patients treated with Sintrom® (acenocoumarol) and a homogeneous control group of 44 non-anticoagulated patients. A survey on oral hygiene habits and attitude towards bleeding was carried out, and the main periodontal parameters were recorded. RESULTS: Probing depth was the parameter with the strongest correlation to BOP (p<0.001), followed by the plaque index (p<0.002). In contrast, no relationship was observed between acenocoumarol dose or INR and BOP. Mean BOP was greater in the control group than in the anticoagulated group (p<0.001). Oral hygiene habits and attitude towards bleeding differed significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We have found no explanation why BOP was greater in the control group. What seems clear is that in the presence of the same plaque index and probing depth, anticoagulated patients did not bleed more than non-anticoagulated patients. A lack of knowledge of health and oral hygiene habits was observed in these subjects. Key words:Anticoagulant therapy, bleeding on probing, periodontal health.

Comparison of the clinical effects of white brand toothbrushes versus Vitis Suave®.

BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in the use of white label manual toothbrushes and a greater increase in inquiries for discomfort of the gingiva and mucosa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, cross-over clinical trial was made of four white brand toothbrushes versus a control brush (Vitis Suave®), with the recording of plaque index, bleeding upon probing, and gingival abrasions following utilization of the different brushes. RESULTS: All the brushes except Deliplus® were equally effective in terms of plaque removal (p<0.05). Vitis Suave® and Veckia® were the brushes associated to the greatest increase in minor abrasions (p<0.01), while Veckia®, Carrefour® and Deluxe® significantly increased the number of medium intensity abrasions (p<0.05). These brushes also increased the number of large abrasions, though statistical significance was not reached in this case. CONCLUSIONS: The white brand brushes proved effective in controlling bacterial plaque, but were associated to more intense soft tissue abrasion. KEY WORDS: Gingival abrasions, manual tooth brushing, white brand, clinical effects.