Comparative efficacy and safety of non-neuraxial analgesic techniques for midline laparotomy: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Fascial plane blocks provide effective analgesia after midline laparotomy; however, the most efficacious technique has not been determined. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to synthesise the evidence with respect to pain, opioid consumption, and adverse events. METHODS: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Scopus databases for studies comparing commonly used non-neuraxial analgesic techniques for midline laparotomy in adult patients. The co-primary outcomes of the study were 24-h cumulative opioid consumption and 24-h resting pain score, reported as i.v. morphine equivalents and 11-point numerical rating scale, respectively. We performed a frequentist meta-analysis using a random-effects model and a cluster-rank analysis of the co-primary outcomes. RESULTS: Of 6115 studies screened, 67 eligible studies were included (n=4410). Interventions with the greatest reduction in 24-h cumulative opioid consumption compared with placebo/no intervention were single-injection quadratus lumborum block (sQLB; mean difference [MD] -16.1 mg, 95% confidence interval [CI] -29.9 to -2.3, very low certainty), continuous transversus abdominis plane block (cTAP; MD -14.0 mg, 95% CI -21.6 to -6.4, low certainty), single-injection transversus abdominis plane block (sTAP; MD -13.7 mg, 95% CI -17.4 to -10.0, low certainty), and continuous rectus sheath block (cRSB; MD -13.2 mg, 95% CI -20.3 to -6.1, low certainty). Interventions with the greatest reduction in 24-h resting pain score were cRSB (MD -1.2, 95% CI -1.8 to -0.6, low certainty), cTAP (MD -1.0, 95% CI -1.7 to -0.2, low certainty), and continuous wound infusion (cWI; MD -0.7, 95% CI -1.1 to -0.4, low certainty). Clustered-rank analysis including the co-primary outcomes showed cRSB and cTAP blocks to be the most efficacious interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Based on current evidence, continuous rectus sheath block and continuous transversus abdominis plane block were the most efficacious non-neuraxial techniques at reducing 24-h cumulative opioid consumption and 24-h resting pain scores after midline laparotomy (low certainty). Future studies should compare techniques for upper vs lower midline laparotomy and other non-midline abdominal incisions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021269044.

Consensus Practice Guidelines on Postdural Puncture Headache From a Multisociety, International Working Group: A Summary Report.

Importance: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) can follow unintentional dural puncture during epidural techniques or intentional dural puncture during neuraxial procedures, such as a lumbar puncture or spinal anesthesia. Evidence-based guidance on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of this condition is, however, currently lacking. Objective: To fill the practice guidelines void and provide comprehensive information and patient-centric recommendations for preventing, diagnosing, and managing PDPH. Evidence Review: With input from committee members and stakeholders of 6 participating professional societies, 10 review questions that were deemed important for the prevention, diagnosis, and management of PDPH were developed. A literature search for each question was performed in MEDLINE on March 2, 2022. Additional relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews, and research studies published through March 2022 were also considered for practice guideline development and shared with collaborator groups. Each group submitted a structured narrative review along with recommendations that were rated according to the US Preventive Services Task Force grading of evidence. Collaborators were asked to vote anonymously on each recommendation using 2 rounds of a modified Delphi approach. Findings: After 2 rounds of electronic voting by a 21-member multidisciplinary collaborator team, 47 recommendations were generated to provide guidance on the risk factors for and the prevention, diagnosis, and management of PDPH, along with ratings for the strength and certainty of evidence. A 90% to 100% consensus was obtained for almost all recommendations. Several recommendations were rated as having moderate to low certainty. Opportunities for future research were identified. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this consensus statement suggest that current approaches to the treatment and management of PDPH are not uniform due to the paucity of evidence. The practice guidelines, however, provide a framework for individual clinicians to assess PDPH risk, confirm the diagnosis, and adopt a systematic approach to its management.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on postdural puncture headache: a consensus report from a multisociety international working group.

INTRODUCTION: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) can follow unintentional dural puncture during epidural techniques or intentional dural puncture during neuraxial procedures such as a lumbar puncture or spinal anesthesia. Evidence-based guidance on the prevention, diagnosis or management of this condition is, however, currently lacking. This multisociety guidance aims to fill this void and provide practitioners with comprehensive information and patient-centric recommendations to prevent, diagnose and manage patients with PDPH. METHODS: Based on input from committee members and stakeholders, the committee cochairs developed 10 review questions deemed important for the prevention, diagnosis and management of PDPH. A literature search for each question was performed in MEDLINE (Ovid) on 2 March 2022. The results from each search were imported into separate Covidence projects for deduplication and screening, followed by data extraction. Additional relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews and research studies published through March 2022 were also considered for the development of guidelines and shared with contributors. Each group submitted a structured narrative review along with recommendations graded according to the US Preventative Services Task Force grading of evidence. The interim draft was shared electronically, with each collaborator requested to vote anonymously on each recommendation using two rounds of a modified Delphi approach. RESULTS: Based on contemporary evidence and consensus, the multidisciplinary panel generated 50 recommendations to provide guidance regarding risk factors, prevention, diagnosis and management of PDPH, along with their strength and certainty of evidence. After two rounds of voting, we achieved a high level of consensus for all statements and recommendations. Several recommendations had moderate-to-low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: These clinical practice guidelines for PDPH provide a framework to improve identification, evaluation and delivery of evidence-based care by physicians performing neuraxial procedures to improve the quality of care and align with patients' interests. Uncertainty remains regarding best practice for the majority of management approaches for PDPH due to the paucity of evidence. Additionally, opportunities for future research are identified.

Methodological and reporting quality assessment of network meta-analyses in anesthesiology: a systematic review and meta-epidemiological study.

PURPOSE: The scientific rigour of the conduct and reporting of anesthesiology network meta-analyses (NMAs) is unknown. This systematic review and meta-epidemiological study assessed the methodological and reporting quality of NMAs in anesthesiology. METHODS: We searched four databases, including MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Systematic Reviews Database, for anesthesiology NMAs published from inception to October 2020. We assessed the compliance of NMAs against A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2), Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement for Network Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-NMA), and PRISMA checklists. We measured the compliance across various items in AMSTAR-2 and PRISMA checklists and provided recommendations to improve quality. RESULTS: Using the AMSTAR-2 rating method, 84% (52/62) of NMAs were rated "critically low." Quantitatively, the median [interquartile range] AMSTAR-2 score was 55 [44-69]%, while the PRISMA score was 70 [61-81]%. Methodological and reporting scores showed a strong correlation (R = 0.78). Anesthesiology NMAs had a higher AMSTAR-2 score and PRISMA score if they were published in higher impact factor journals (P = 0.006 and P = 0.01, respectively) or followed PRISMA-NMA reporting guidelines (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). Network meta-analyses from China had lower scores (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). Neither score improved over time (P = 0.69 and P = 0.67, respectively). CONCLUSION: The current study highlights numerous methodological and reporting deficiencies in anesthesiology NMAs. Although the AMSTAR tool has been used to assess the methodological quality of NMAs, dedicated tools for conducting and assessing the methodological quality of NMAs are urgently required. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42021227997); first submitted 23 January 2021.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La rigueur scientifique de la conduite et de la communication des méta-analyses en réseau (MAR) en anesthésiologie est inconnue. Cette revue systématique et étude méta-épidémiologique a évalué la qualité méthodologique et de communication des MAR en anesthésiologie. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené des recherches dans quatre bases de données, soit MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase et la base de données des revues systématiques Cochrane, pour trouver des MAR en anesthésiologie publiées depuis la création de ces bases de données jusqu'en octobre 2020. Nous avons évalué la conformité des MAR par rapport à trois outils, soit : AMSTAR-2 (outil de mesure pour évaluer les revues systématiques), PRISMA-NMA et les listes de contrôle PRISMA. Nous avons mesuré la conformité de divers éléments des listes de contrôle AMSTAR-2 et PRISMA et formulé des recommandations pour améliorer la qualité. RéSULTATS: En utilisant la méthode de notation AMSTAR-2, 84 % (52/62) des MAR ont reçu la cote « extrêmement faible ¼. Quantitativement, le score médian [écart interquartile] sur l'AMSTAR-2 était de 55 [44-69] %, tandis que le score PRISMA était de 70 [61-81] %. Les scores méthodologiques et de communication ont montré une forte corrélation (R = 0,78). Les MAR en anesthésiologie avaient un score AMSTAR-2 et un score PRISMA plus élevés si elles étaient publiées dans des revues à facteur d'impact plus élevé (P = 0,006 et P = 0,01, respectivement) ou avaient suivi les lignes directrices de PRISMA-NMA en matière de communication des résultats (P = 0,001 et P = 0,002, respectivement). Les méta-analyses en réseau provenant de Chine avaient des scores plus faibles (P < 0,001 et P < 0,001, respectivement). Aucun des deux scores ne s'est amélioré au fil du temps (P = 0,69 et P = 0,67, respectivement). CONCLUSION: La présente étude met en évidence de nombreuses lacunes méthodologiques et de communication dans les MAR en anesthésiologie. Bien que l'outil AMSTAR ait été utilisé pour évaluer la qualité méthodologique des MAR, il est urgent de disposer d'outils spécialisés pour mener des MAR et en évaluer la qualité méthodologique. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: PROSPERO (CRD42021227997); soumis pour la première fois le 23 janvier 2021.

Multimodal analgesia did not improve post-operative pain scores, reduce opioid consumption or reduce length of stay following hip arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: To determine whether different regimens of multimodal analgesia will reduce postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, costs and hospital length-of-stay following hip arthroscopy. METHODS: From 2018 to 2021, 132 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) were included in this prospective, single-center randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized into four treatment groups: (1) Group 1-Control: opioid medication (oxycodone-acetaminophen 5 mg/325 mg, 1-2 tabs q6H as needed), Heterotopic ossification prophylaxis-Naprosyn 500 mg twice daily × 3 weeks); (2) Group 2-Control + postoperative sleeping aid (Zopiclone 7.5 mg nightly × 7 days); (3) Group 3-Control + preoperative and postoperative Gabapentin (600 mg orally, 1 h preoperatively; 600 mg postoperatively, 8 h following pre-op dose); (4) Group 4-Control + pre-medicate with Celecoxib (400 mg orally, 1 h preoperatively) The primary outcome was pain measured with a visual analog scale, monitored daily for the first week and every other day for 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, healthcare resource use, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar between groups. There were no statistically significant differences in pain scores between groups at any timepoint after adjusting for intra-operative traction time, intra-operative opioid administration and preoperative pain scores (p > 0.05). There were also no significant differences in the number of days that opioids were taken (n.s.) and the average daily morphine milligram equivalents consumed (n.s.). Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in length of stay in the experimental groups, compared with the control group (n.s.). Finally, there were no differences in cost between groups (n.s.). CONCLUSION: The routine use of Zopiclone, Celecoxib and Gabapentin did not improve postoperative pain control or reduce length-of-stay following hip arthroscopy. Therefore, these medications are not recommended for routine postoperative pain control following hip arthroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: l.

Epidemiological, methodological, and statistical characteristics of network meta-analysis in anaesthesia: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Network meta-analyses (NMAs) combine direct and indirect estimates to provide mixed (or network) estimates of effect sizes. The scientific rigour of the conduct and reporting of anaesthesia NMAs is unknown. This review assessed the epidemiological, methodological, and statistical characteristics of anaesthesia NMAs. METHODS: We searched four databases for anaesthesia NMAs and developed a 64-item checklist to evaluate NMAs. For 29 binary items, we defined compliance as 'the ratio of NMAs that was awarded a 'yes' for that item, divided by the total number of NMAs. The compliance of such binary items was reclassified as very low (≤25%), low (26-50%), fair (51-75%), and high (>75%). We amalgamated findings from 29 key items to provide specific recommendations (post hoc). We compared the compliance of NMAs in anaesthesia across 26 items, with that of cancer NMAs and Cochrane NMAs, and analysed improvement over time (post hoc). RESULTS: Among 62 included NMAs, compliance was low (26-50%) for protocol registration, use of PRISMA-NMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for NMA), publication bias assessment, evidence appraisal, reporting of Bayesian methodology and consistency evaluation. Compliance was very low (≤25%) for bias assessment, biostatistician involvement, search specialist, and use of predefined important differences. CONCLUSIONS: Anaesthesia NMAs need improvement in their conduct and reporting. Anaesthesia journals should mandate the registration of protocols and reporting of NMAs using PRISMA-NMA. Authors should carefully assess publication bias, and use updated bias assessment tools, and evidence appraisal methods designed for NMAs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO CRD42021227608.

Analgesic Efficacy of Adjuvant Medications in the Pediatric Caudal Block for Infraumbilical Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Various adjuvants are added to local anesthetics in caudal block to improve analgesia. The comparative analgesic effectiveness and relative rankings of these adjuvants are unknown. This network meta-analysis (NMA) sought to evaluate the comparative analgesic efficacy and relative ranking of caudal adjuvants added to local anesthetics (versus local anesthetics alone) in pediatric infra-umbilical surgery. We searched the United States National Library of Medicine database (MEDLINE), PubMed, and Excerpta Medica database (Embase) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing caudal adjuvants (clonidine, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, magnesium, morphine, fentanyl, tramadol, dexamethasone, and neostigmine) among themselves, or to no adjuvant (control). We performed a frequentist NMA and employed Cochrane's 'Risk of Bias' tool to evaluate study quality. We chose the duration of analgesia (defined as 'the time from caudal injection to the time of rescue analgesia') as our primary outcome. We also assessed the number of analgesic dose administrations and total dose of acetaminophen within 24 h. The duration of analgesia [87 randomized control trials (RCTs), 5285 patients] was most prolonged by neostigmine [mean difference: 513 min, (95% confidence interval, CI: 402, 625)]. Dexmedetomidine reduced the frequency of analgesic dose administrations within 24 h [29 RCTs, 1765 patients; -1.2 dose (95% CI: -1.6, -0.9)] and the total dose of acetaminophen within 24 h [18 RCTs, 1156 patients; -350 mg (95% CI: -467, -232)] the most.  Among caudal adjuvants, neostigmine (moderate certainty), tramadol (low certainty), and dexmedetomidine (low certainty) prolonged the duration of analgesia the most. Dexmedetomidine also reduced the analgesic frequency and consumption more than other caudal adjuvants (moderate certainty).

Efficacy and safety of caudal dexmedetomidine in pediatric infra-umbilical surgery: a meta-analysis and trial-sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine is used as a local-anesthetics adjuvant in caudal block to prolong analgesia in pediatric infra-umbilical surgery. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of the addition of caudal dexmedetomidine to local anesthetics (vs local anesthetics alone) in pediatric infra-umbilical surgery. EVIDENCE REVIEW: We searched 10 databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pediatric patients undergoing infra-umbilical surgery, comparing caudal block with and without dexmedetomidine as local anesthetic adjuvant. We performed a frequentist random-effects meta-analysis (R statistical package). We analyzed continuous outcomes as a ratio of means (ROM) and dichotomous data as relative risk (RR), along with 95% CI. We included 19 RCTs (n=1190 pediatric patients) in the meta-analysis. The primary outcome was duration of analgesia (defined as 'the time from caudal injection to the time at which the study-specific pain score was greater than a cut-off threshold'). FINDINGS: Data from 19 included RCTs (n=1190) suggested that compared with control (mean duration 346 min), the addition of caudal dexmedetomidine significantly prolonged the duration of analgesia (ratio of means 2.14, 95% CI 1.83 to 2.49, p<0.001; 'moderate' evidence). Trial-sequential analysis showed adequate 'information size' for the primary outcome. Caudal dexmedetomidine also reduced the number of analgesic administrations ('low' evidence), total acetaminophen dose ('moderate' evidence) and the risk of emergence delirium ('moderate' evidence). There were no significant differences in adverse effects such as hypotension, bradycardia, post-operative nausea and vomiting, urinary retention and respiratory depression. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the addition of dexmedetomidine to local anesthetic in caudal block significantly improves the duration of analgesia and reduces the analgesic requirements, while maintaining a similar risk-profile compared with local anesthetic alone. Further data on neurological safety are needed.

Phrenic Nerve Block at the Azygos Vein Level Versus Sham Block for Ipsilateral Shoulder Pain After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Ipsilateral shoulder pain (ISP) is a common problem after pulmonary surgery. We hypothesized that phrenic nerve block (PNB) at the azygos vein level, near the location of the surgical operation, would be effective for reducing ISP. Our primary aim was to assess the effect of PNB on postoperative ISP, following video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). METHODS: This prospective, randomized, patient-blinded, single-institution trial was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000030464). Enrolled patients had been scheduled for VATS under general anesthesia with epidural analgesia. Patients were randomly allocated to receive infiltration of the ipsilateral phrenic nerve at the azygos vein level with either 10 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine (PNB group) or 0.9% saline (control group) before chest closure. Postoperative ISP was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10) at rest at 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours. The incidence of ISP was defined as the proportion of patients who reported an NRS score of ≥1 at least once within 24 hours after surgery. In the primary analysis, the proportion of patients with ISP was compared between PNB and control groups using the χ2 test. NRS values of ISP and postoperative incision pain within 24 hours were investigated, as was the frequency of postoperative analgesic use. Incision pain was assessed using an NRS at the time of ISP assessment. Finally, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and shoulder movement disorders were also evaluated. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were included, and their data were analyzed. These patients were randomly assigned to either PNB group (n = 42) or control group (n = 43). There were no clinically relevant differences in demographic and surgical profiles between the groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of ISP (the control group 20/43 [46.5%] versus the PNB group 14/42 [33.3%]; P = .215). The severity of ISP was lower in the PNB group than in the control group (linear mixed-effects model, the main effect of treatment [groups]: P < .001). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of postoperative incision pain. The frequency of postoperative analgesic use was significantly higher in the control group (Wilcoxon rank sum test, P < .001). Postoperative nausea and vomiting did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. There were no changes in the range of shoulder joint movement. CONCLUSIONS: Azygos vein level PNB did not significantly affect the incidence of ISP after VATS.

Ultrasound-guided subomohyoid suprascapular nerve block and phrenic nerve involvement: a cadaveric dye study.

BACKGROUNDS AND OBJECTIVES: The anterior approach to the subomohyoid suprascapular (SOS) nerve is a new, technically easy and reliable regional anesthesia technique for postoperative shoulder analgesia. However, due to its proximity, the injectate may spread to the brachial plexus and phrenic nerve. The goal of this anatomic study with dye injection in the subomohyoid space and subsequent cadaver dissection was to establish the likely spread of local anesthesia and the extent of brachial plexus and phrenic nerve involvement resulting from ultrasound-guided SOS nerve block. METHODS: The suprascapular nerve (SSN) under the inferior belly of omohyoid muscle in the posterior triangle of the neck was identified. Using a contrast dye, 10 ultrasound-guided SOS nerve injections of 5 mL were done bilaterally, in five fresh cadavers. The area was then dissected to evaluate the spread of the contrast dye in the immediate proximity of the brachial plexus, phrenic and SSN. RESULTS: The SSN and omohyoid muscle were easily identified on each cadaver. SOS nerve staining with contrast dye was seen in 90% of dissections. The superior trunk was stained in 90% and the middle trunk was stained in 80% of dissections. The inferior trunk was stained in 20% of dissections. A spread of dye around the SSN was observed in 90% and the phrenic nerve was mildly stained in 20% of the dissections. CONCLUSION: In-plane ultrasound-guided needle injection with a 5 mL volume for SOS block was sufficient to stain the SSN. This conservative volume involved other parts of the brachial plexus and may potentially spread to the phrenic nerve. Further clinical studies are required for confirmation.

Evidence Basis for Regional Anesthesia in Ambulatory Arthroscopic Knee Surgery and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Part II: Adductor Canal Nerve Block-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adductor canal block (ACB) has emerged as an effective analgesic regional technique for major knee surgeries in the last decade. Its motor-sparing properties make it particularly attractive for ambulatory knee surgery, but evidence supporting its use in ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery is conflicting. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the analgesic effects of ACB for ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgeries. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases for randomized controlled trials examining the analgesic effects of ACB compared to control or any other analgesic modality. Both minor arthroscopic and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgeries were considered. Rest and dynamic pain scores, opioid consumption, opioid-related adverse effects, time to first analgesic request, patient satisfaction, quadriceps strength, and block-related complications were evaluated. Data were pooled using random-effects modeling. RESULTS: Our search yielded 10 randomized controlled trials comparing ACB with placebo or femoral nerve block (FNB); these were subgrouped according to the type of knee surgery. For minor knee arthroscopic surgery, ACB provided reduced postoperative resting pain scores by a mean difference (95% confidence interval) of -1.46 cm (-2.03 to -0.90) (P < .00001), -0.51 cm (-0.92 to -0.10) (P = .02), and -0.48 cm (-0.93 to -0.04) (P = .03) at 0, 6, and 8 hours, respectively, compared to control. Dynamic pain scores were reduced by a mean difference (95% confidence interval) of -1.50 cm (-2.10 to -0.90) (P < .00001), -0.50 cm (-0.95 to -0.04) (P = .03), and -0.59 cm (-1.12 to -0.05) (P = .03) at 0, 6, and 8 hours, respectively, compared to control. ACB also reduced the cumulative 24-hour oral morphine equivalent consumption by -7.41 mg (-14.75 to -0.08) (P = .05) compared to control. For ACLR surgery, ACB did not provide any analgesic benefits and did not improve any of the examined outcomes, compared to control. ACB was also not different from FNB for these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: After minor ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery, ACB provides modest analgesic benefits, including improved relief for rest pain, and reduced opioid consumption for up to 8 and 24 hours, respectively. The analgesic benefits of ACB are not different from placebo or FNB after ambulatory ACLR, suggesting a limited role of both blocks in this procedure. Paucity of trials dictates cautious interpretation of these findings. Future studies are needed to determine the role of ACB in the setting of local anesthetic instillation and/or graft donor-site analgesia.

Low Back Pain in Pregnancy: Investigations, Management, and Role of Neuraxial Analgesia and Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is commonly experienced during pregnancy and is often poorly managed. There is much ambiguity in diagnostic work-up, appropriate management and decision-making regarding the use of neuraxial analgesia and anaesthesia during labour and delivery in these patients. This systematic review summarises the evidence regarding investigations, management strategies and considerations around performing neuraxial blocks for pregnant women with LBP. METHODS: We searched 3 databases and reviewed literature concerning LBP in pregnancy with regards to diagnostic modalities, management strategies and use of neuraxial techniques for facilitating labour and delivery. RESULTS: In all, we included 78 studies in this review, with 32 studies concerning diagnostic investigations, 56 studies involving management strategies, and 4 studies regarding the use of neuraxial techniques for labour and delivery. SUMMARY: MRI is the safest investigative modality for LBP in pregnancy. Antenatal educational programmes, exercise and steroid injections into the epidural space or sacroiliac joints may help with pain management. Worsening neurological deficits, vertebral fractures and tumours may need surgical management. There is limited evidence on challenges of performing neuraxial blocks in the peripartum period for analgesia and anaesthesia, but there is a potential for increased risk of neurological complications in parturients with pre-existing neurological deficits.

Perineural Dexmedetomidine Is More Effective Than Clonidine When Added to Local Anesthetic for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Clonidine, an α-2 agonist, has long been used as a local anesthetic adjunct with proven efficacy to prolong peripheral nerve block duration. Dexmedetomidine, a newer α-2 agonist, has a more favorable pharmacodynamic and safety profile; however, data comparing its efficacy as an adjunct to that of clonidine are inconsistent. We sought to compare the clinical efficacy of these 2 α-2 agonists by examining their effects on peripheral nerve block characteristics for upper extremity surgery. METHODS: A preliminary search found that the overwhelming majority of randomized controlled trials comparing perineural dexmedetomidine to clonidine for upper extremity surgery were in the setting of supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCB). Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing dexmedetomidine with clonidine as perineural adjuncts to single-injection SCB. Sensory and motor block duration and onset, analgesic duration, α-2 agonist side effects, and block complications were analyzed. Sensory block duration was designated as a primary outcome. Data were combined using random-effects modeling, and ratio-of-means was used to analyze the results. RESULTS: A total of 868 patients from 14 clinical studies were included in the analysis. Compared with clonidine, dexmedetomidine prolonged the duration (ratio of means [95% confidence interval {CI}]) of sensory block by an estimate of 1.2 (1.2-1.3; P< .00001). It also prolonged the duration (ratio of means [99% CI]) of motor block by an estimate of 1.2 (1.1-1.3; P < .00001), and analgesia by an estimate of 1.2 (1.1-1.3; P < .00001). It also hastened the onset of sensory block by an estimate of 0.9 (0.8-1.0; P < .00001) and motor block by an estimate of 0.9 (0.9-1.0; P = .002). Dexmedetomidine was associated with an increased odds ratio (99% CI) of transient bradycardia by an estimate of 7.4 (1.3-40.8; P = .003) and postoperative sedation by an estimate of 11.8 (1.9-73.6; P = .0005). There were no differences in other α-2 agonist-related side effects or block-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with clonidine as a local anesthetic adjunct for single-injection SCB, perineural dexmedetomidine enhances sensory, motor, and analgesic block characteristics. These benefits should be weighed against the increased risk of transient bradycardia.

Ultrasound guided distal peripheral nerve block of the upper limb: A technical review.

Upper extremity surgery is commonly performed under regional anesthesia. The advent of ultrasonography has made performing upper extremity nerve blocks relatively easy with a high degree of reliability. The proximal approaches to brachial plexus block such as supraclavicular plexus block, infraclavicular plexus block, or the axillary block are favored for the most surgical procedures of distal upper extremity. Ultrasound guidance has however made distal nerve blocks of the upper limb a technically feasible, safe and efficacious option. In recent years, there has thus been a resurgence of distal peripheral nerve blocks to facilitate hand and wrist surgery. In this article, we review the technical aspects of performing the distal blocks of the upper extremity and highlight some of the clinical aspects of their usage.

Anaesthetic management of a patient with sturge-weber syndrome undergoing oophorectomy.

SUMMARY: The Sturge-Weber Syndrome (SWS) is a neurocutaneous disorder characterized by leptomeningeal and facial angiomas, neurologic and ocular manifestations. We report a case of oophorectomy for ovarian dermoid in a 14 year-old girl who was a diagnosed case of Sturge-Weber Syndrome. General anaesthesia was given for the procedure. The perioperative anaesthestic management is discussed in the present report.