18F-FDG-PET/CT as an imaging biomarker for regorafenib efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (JACCRO CC-12).

INTRODUCTION: Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Despite providing a statistically significant survival benefit, a substantial number of patients fail to respond to or continue with treatment, which has resulted in an unmet clinical need for a biomarker of regorafenib efficacy. METHODS: The JACCRO CC-12 study was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm phase II trial designed to evaluate the usefulness of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) as an imaging biomarker of regorafenib in patients with mCRC that progressed after standard chemotherapies. FDG-PET and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) were performed before and after treatment with regorafenib 160 mg once daily 3 weeks on/1 week off. The primary end point was the change in the maximum standardized uptake value in the lesion with the highest uptake at pre-treatment FDG-PET. The secondary end points included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), the objective response rate (ORR), safety, and the correlation between FDG-PET and CT. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled from November 2014 to March 2016, 17 of whom were evaluated for metabolic and morphological changes. Metabolic response with FDG-PET was partial response (PR) in one case (5.9%), stable disease (SD) in four (23.5%), and progressive disease (PD) in 12 (70.6%). The metabolic response rate was 5.9%. On CT imaging, no complete response or PR was observed, and the ORR was 0%. Median PFS and OS were 1.7 and 9.8 months, respectively. The median PFS of patients who achieved PR or SD by FDG-PET was 3.7 months, whereas that of those assessed as PD was 1 month (p = 0.13). The median OS of patients who achieved PR or SD by FDG-PET was 13.0 months, whereas that of patients assessed as PD was 10.6 months (p = 0.43). Frequent adverse events were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, hypertension, loss of appetite, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, FDG-PET failed to demonstrate usefulness as an early imaging biomarker of regorafenib in patients with mCRC.

Correction: A phase II trial of 1st-line modified-FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer harboring RAS mutation: JACCRO CC-11.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24702.].

A phase II trial of 1st-line modified-FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer harboring RAS mutation: JACCRO CC-11.

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is considered a standard initial therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, few prospective trials have evaluated triplet therapy plus bevacizumab in patients with RAS mutant mCRC. Patients with an age of 20 to 75 years, and unresectable, measurable tumors harboring RAS mutation were given first-line treatment with bevacizumab (5 mg/kg on day 1) plus modified-FOLFOXIRI (irinotecan 150 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, levofolinate 200 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 as a 46-h continuous infusion on day 1, repeated every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) as evaluated by an external review board. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, early tumor shrinkage (ETS), depth of response (DpR), and safety were secondary endpoints. Among 64 patients who were enrolled between October 2014 and August 2016, 62 were evaluable for efficacy (right-sided tumors in 27%). ORR and disease control rate were 75.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 65.1-86.5) and 96.8%, respectively. ETS was 73.8%, and median DpR was 49.2%. Median PFS was 11.5 (95% CI 9.5-14.0) months as of the cut-off date of September 2017. Adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were neutropenia (54%), hypertension (32%), diarrhea (13%), anorexia (11%), peripheral neuropathy (2%), and febrile neutropenia (5%). In conclusion, this prospective trial demonstrated for the first time that FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is an active first-line treatment for patients with RAS mutant mCRC. Modified-FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab might become an alternative regimen of triplet chemotherapy for mCRC in Japan.

Cost-minimization analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens given to patients with colorectal cancer in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Consideration of medical costs as well as effectiveness and adverse events is rapidly been becoming an important factor in the selection of chemotherapy regimens. However, practical data on the costs of chemotherapy are scarce. We clinically estimated the medical costs of 6 adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for colorectal cancer on the basis of clinical and cost-related data and compared their cost-effectiveness by cost-minimization analyses. METHODS: All patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer between April 2012 and May 2015 at four hospitals affiliated with Showa University were studied retrospectively. Clinical and cost data related to adjuvant chemotherapy were collected from medical records and medical fee receipt data, respectively. Six adjuvant chemotherapy regimens were studied: capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOX); 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), ℓ-leucovorin (LV), and oxaliplatin (modified FOLFOX6 [mFOLFOX6]); 5-FU and LV (5-FU/LV); tegafur and uracil (UFT), and LV (UFT/LV); capecitabine; and tegafur, gimeracil and oteracil (S-1). The regimens were divided into 2 groups according to whether or not they contained oxaliplatin because of the difference in effectiveness. Cost-minimization analyses, where relative costs of regimens showing equivalent effectiveness were simply compared, were performed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the regimens in each group. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients with colorectal cancer received adjuvant chemotherapy during the study period. Fifty-seven patients were treated with CapeOX, 10 with mFOLFOX6, 38 with UFT/LV, 20 with capecitabine, and 29 with S-1. No patient received 5-FU/LV. The total costs of oxaliplatin-containing regimens were significantly higher than those of oxaliplatin non-containing regimens. The high cost of oxaliplatin, but not the costs of drugs or various tests for the treatment of adverse events, was the primary reason for the higher costs of the oxaliplatin-containing regimens. The cost-effectiveness of the oxaliplatin-containing regimens CapeOX and mFOLFOX6 were comparable. Among the oxaliplatin non-containing regimens, the cost-effectiveness of S-1 and capecitabine was superior to that of UFT/LV. CONCLUSION: Thus, we provided the cost-effectiveness data of 5 adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for colorectal cancer based on practical clinical and cost data from Japanese patients. The results can be included as a factor in regimen selection because these results would represent the real world. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is a retrospective observational study and does not include any health care interventions. Therefore, we did not register the protocol of this study.

Early tumor shrinkage as a predictor of favorable outcomes in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX.

There are several reports on the correlation between early tumor shrinkage (ETS) or depth of response (DpR) and survival in chemotherapies for colorectal cancer; however, few studies have investigated it in pancreatic cancer. We therefore investigated whether the ETS will predict outcomes in 59 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX therapy. The association of ETS with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated but also we addressed to the correlation between outcomes and DpR. ETS was defined as a reduction ≥ 20% of target lesions' diameters measured at 6 to 8 weeks from treatment start. DpR was percentage of maximal tumor shrinkage observed at the nadir diameter compared with baseline. Among 47 evaluable patients for the ETS, 12 (25.5%) patients experienced ETS. The ETS was significantly associated with better PFS (9.0 vs. 4.2 months) as well as OS (24.0 vs. 9.1 months); moreover, the association had a statistically significance for PFS but a strong trend for OS in multivariate analysis. The DpR was statistically significantly but weakly associated with OS. In conclusion, this is the first report that the early response to chemotherapy may predict favorable outcomes in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX therapy.

S-1 plus leucovorin versus S-1 plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin versus S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Although leucovorin enhances the efficacy of fluorouracil, the anti-tumour activity of S-1 and leucovorin and their combination with oxaliplatin for patients with advanced gastric cancer is unknown. We compared the activity and safety of S-1 plus leucovorin, S-1 plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin, and S-1 plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial, we recruited chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer with measurable lesions aged 20 years or older from 25 general hospitals and specialist centres in Japan. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) centrally to receive S-1 plus leucovorin (S-1 40-60 mg orally plus oral leucovorin 25 mg twice a day for 1 week, every 2 weeks), S-1 plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin (S-1 plus leucovorin and intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 2 weeks), or S-1 plus cisplatin (S-1 40-60 mg orally twice a day for 3 weeks, plus intravenous cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 8, every 5 weeks). Randomisation was done with the minimisation method using performance status (0 vs 1) and tumour stage (stage IV vs recurrent) as stratification factors. The primary endpoint was independently reviewed overall response in the full analysis set. This trial is registered with Japic CTI, number 111635. FINDINGS: Between Oct 20, 2011, and Dec 17, 2012, we enrolled and randomly assigned 145 patients: 49 patients were assigned to S-1 plus leucovorin, 47 to S-1 plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin, and 49 to S-1 plus cisplatin. An objective response assessed by the independent review committee was achieved in 20 (43% [95% CI 28·3-57·8]) of the 47 patients in the S-1 plus leucovorin group, 31 (66% [50·7-79·1]) of the 47 patients in the S-1 plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin group, and 22 (46% [31·4-60·8]) of the 48 patients in the S-1 plus cisplatin group (Fisher's exact test, p=0·84 for S-1 plus leucovorin vs S-1 plus cisplatin, p=0·063 for S-1 plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin vs S-1 plus cisplatin, and p=0·038 for S-1 plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin vs S-1 plus leucovorin). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (three [6%] of 48 patients in the S-1 plus leucovorin group vs 12 [26%] of 47 patients in the S-1 plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin group vs 17 [35%] of 49 patients in the S-1 plus cisplatin group), decreased appetite (six [13%] vs 14 [30%] vs 12 [24%]), anaemia (five [10%] vs seven [15%] vs 13 [27%]), and hyponatraemia (two [4%] vs two [4%] vs nine [18%]). INTERPRETATION: S-1 plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin was more active than S-1 plus leucovorin or S-1 plus cisplatin with acceptable toxic effects for patients with advanced gastric cancer. A phase 3 trial comparing S-1 plus leucovorin and oxaliplatin with S-1 plus cisplatin is underway. FUNDING: Taiho Pharmaceutical.

The risk of adverse events of CPT- 11.

Irinotecan is a camptothecin analog used worldwide for a broad range of solid tumors, including colorectal cancer. It can cause severe adverse drug reactions, such as neutropenia or diarrhea. Recent pharmacogenetic studies on irinotecan have revealed the impact of UGT1A1 polymorphisms on severe adverse effects. The concurrence of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6, even when heterozygous, markedly alters the disposition of irinotecan, potentially increasing toxicity. For patients showing homozygosity for UGT1A1*28, *6 or compound heterozygosity for UGT1A1*6 and *28, dose reduction of irinotecan is strongly recommended. But dose reduction criteria or effect of dose reduction have not been clarified. If prediction accuracy of expression risk of adverse reaction improve, It is expected to be possible to appro- priate therapeutic indications and drug selection, dose setting.

A phase II study of bevacizumab with modified OPTIMOX1 as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: the TCOG-GI 0802 study.

BACKGROUND: Although bevacizumab plus FOLFOX is a standard treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer, oxaliplatin must be withdrawn in many patients because of cumulative neurotoxicity. We postulated that a reduced dose of oxaliplatin and modified treatment schedule would prolong the time to treatment failure and evaluated bevacizumab combined with a modified OPTIMOX1 regimen (mOPTIMOX1, oxaliplatin dose: 85 mg/m(2)). METHODS: Eligible patients had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer and a performance status of 0-1. Patients were excluded if they had grade 1 or higher peripheral sensory neuropathy or had previously received chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients received bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 every 2 weeks for 6 cycles, followed by 12 cycles of a simplified biweekly regimen of leucovorin and fluorouracil (sLV5FU2) plus bevacizumab. Oxaliplatin was then reintroduced, and bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 was continued until progressive disease. RESULTS: The median duration of disease control was 11.7 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 9.7-13.5 months). The median overall survival was 23.1 months (95 % CI, 18.8-27.9 months). The overall response rate according to both the RECIST and WHO criteria was 51.3 %. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropaenia (32.5 %), hypertension (17.5 %), leukocytopaenia, sensory neuropathy, and diarrhoea (10.0 %). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 was well tolerated, and patients could continue chemotherapy for longer than with conventional FOLFOX regimens. This regimen might be an effective treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Biweekly irinotecan plus cisplatin versus irinotecan alone as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III trial (TCOG GI-0801/BIRIP trial).

PURPOSE: We compared biweekly irinotecan plus cisplatin (BIRIP) with irinotecan alone as the second-line chemotherapy (SLC) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). METHODS: Patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer refractory to S-1-based first-line chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive BIRIP (irinotecan 60mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 30mg/m(2), every 2weeks) or irinotecan alone (irinotecan 150mg/m(2), every 2weeks). The primary end-point was to show the superiority of BIRIP to irinotecan in terms of progression free survival (PFS). RESULTS: 130 patients were enrolled. PFS was significantly longer in the BIRIP group (3.8months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.0-4.7]) than in the irinotecan group (2.8months [2.1-3.3]; hazard ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.98; P=0.0398). Median overall survival was 10.7months in the BIRIP group and 10.1months in the irinotecan group (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.69-1.44, P=0.9823). The objective response rate was 22% in the BIRIP group and 16% in the irinotecan group (P=0.4975). However, the disease control rate was significantly better in the BIRIP group (75%) than in the irinotecan group (54%, P=0.0162). The incidences of grade 3 or worse adverse events did not differ between the two groups. Any grade elevation of serum creatinine was more common in the BIRIP group (25% versus 8%, P=0.009), but any grade diarrhoea (17% versus 42%, P=0.002) was more common in the irinotecan group. CONCLUSION: BIRIP significantly prolonged PFS as compared with irinotecan alone and was tolerated as SLC, but did not demonstrate the survival benefit in this trial.

Second-line chemotherapy with biweekly paclitaxel after failure of fluoropyrimidine-based treatment in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer: a report from the gastrointestinal oncology group of the Tokyo cooperative oncology group, TCOG GC-0501 trial.

OBJECTIVE: A multicenter trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel every 2 weeks in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer who had previously received fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. METHODS: The subjects were patients with gastric cancer who had disease progression or recurrence while receiving fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. All patients had adequate major organ functions with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0-2. Paclitaxel 140 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint was the response rate. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival and safety. RESULTS: Response was assessable in 40 of 41 enrolled patients. Their median age was 63 (range: 48-77) years, and PS was 0 in 22 patients, 1 in 13 and 2 in 5. Previous treatment included S-1 (1 M tegafur-0.4 M gimestat-1 M otastat potassium) monotherapy in 32 patients and S-1-based combination therapy in 5. The median number of administered courses of paclitaxel was 3.5 (1-14). The response rate was 17.5% (95% confidence interval: 7.3-32.8%, partial response: 7, stable disease: 21, progressive disease: 10 and not evaluable: 2). The disease control rate was 70.0%, the median PFS was 111 days and the median overall survival was 254 days. Major adverse events of Grade 3 or 4 were neutropenia (27.5%), anemia (12.5%), diarrhea (2.5%) and sensory neuropathy (2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Biweekly paclitaxel seemed to be one of the useful chemotherapies after failure of fluoropyrimidine-based treatment in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

Analysis of inhaled corticosteroid selection in patients with bronchial asthma using a questionnaire survey--effects of age, gender, and disease severity.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) has played an important role in the management of asthma. Although several kinds of ICSs are currently available, there is no established strategy for ICS selection. METHODS: Using the data from the 2004 questionnaire surveys by the Niigata Asthma Treatment Study Group, we analyzed relationships between each patient and the ICS employed on the basis of patient background, asthma control and treatment, and indicated characteristics of ICS selection by the physician. RESULTS: Of 2852 cases, 2279 (79.9%) were ICS users, and 1513 (66.4% of ICS users) were classified as being in the fluticasone propionate (FP) group, 438 (19.2%) in the budesonide (BUD) group, and 240 (10.5%) in the hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone (HFA-BDP) group, indicating that FP was a standard ICS in this study. The mean age was significantly lower in the BUD group (52.3+/-18.2 years) and was significantly higher in the HFA-BDP group (59.9+/-17.0 years) than that in the FP group (55.8+/-16.6 years). The proportion of female patients was significantly higher not in the HFA-BDP (46.5%) but in the BUD group (59.0%) than in the FP group (51.1%). These results indicated that BUD was frequently prescribed to young female and HFA-BDP was employed in the elderly patients irrespective of gender compared with FP. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that ICS selection is reasonably adapted to each patient's background at least in the surveyed area. We need to elucidate the characteristics of ICS selection further in the future as new ICS and devices are developed.

Intoxication with over-the-counter antitussive medication containing dihydrocodeine and chlorpheniramine causes generalized convulsion and mixed acidosis.

We report a 35-year-old man who was referred to our hospital with generalized convulsion and mixed acidosis presumably caused by abuse of SS-BRON tablets, an over-the-counter (OTC) antitussive medication sold in Japan. These tablets contain dihydrocodeine phosphate, methylephedrine, chlorpheniramine, and caffeine. Although it is difficult to discern which component caused these symptoms, it seems that dihydrocodeine phosphate or methylephedrine was involved in the addiction to SS-BRON and chlorpheniramine may have caused the generalized convulsion. It should be recognized that an OTC antitussive, which is quite easy to obtain, can be abused and subsequently induce serious intoxication.

[Ultrasonographic study of the hip joint in infants].

We performed ultrasonography screening for the hip joint in 145 infants between January 2003 and January 2004 at Nakajo-machi in Niigata Prefecture. This ultrasonographic study was conducted by Graf's method. The method could discriminate normal hip joints and was able to visualize 11 abnormal hip joints as well. All abnormal hip joints were dysplastic. This method is more useful than x-ray examination for infants, since the cartilaginous femoral head and the soft tissues around the hip could be clearly visualized. As a result, ultrasonography appears to be a useful screening method for congenital dislocation of the hip joint, without the hazard of radiation caused by x-rays.

Cellular sensitivity determinants to docetaxel in human gastrointestinal cancers.

beta-tubulin (beta-TUB), Bcl-XL, and additionally glutathione S-transferase pi (GSTpi) were found to participate in sensitivity to docetaxel (TXT) in 7 human gastrointestinal cancer cell lines. The gene expression level of beta-TUB, Bcl-XL, and GSTpi was closely correlated with the IC50 for TXT. beta-TUB amount related to TXT resistance, and GST activity was correlated with IC50 for TXT in the 30-min treatment setting. Bcl-XL transfection increased TXT resistance of COLO201 cells, whereas GST inhibition by ethacrynic acid enhanced TXT cytotoxicity. Continuous TXT treatment increased beta-TUB and GSTpi expression, but the increased GSTpi mRNA was observed in TXT-resistant HCC-48 cells alone.

O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) as a determinant of resistance to camptothecin derivatives.

The precise mechanisms of resistance to camptothecin (CPT)-derived DNA topoisomerase (topo I) inhibitors and the determinants remain unclear. We found that a DNA repair protein, O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), participated in resistance to irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11), its active metabolite SN-38, and a novel CPT derivative, DX-8951f. In 17 human cancer cell lines, MGMT gene expression level closely correlated with sensitivity to the CPT derivatives, and inhibition of MGMT activity by nontoxic 5 microM O(6)-benzylguanine augmented the drug activity in relation to the MGMT expression levels in 8 cell lines examined. Transfection of pCR / MGMT-sense into U-251MG and pCR / MGMT-antisense into T98G and HEC-46 cells revealed that increased MGMT expression decreased the sensitivity to CPT-11, SN-38, and DX-8951f, whereas repressed MGMT expression sensitized cells to the drugs. Western analysis revealed that treatment of MGMT-expressing T98G cells with the drugs caused a decrease of both MGMT and topo I in a dose-dependent manner. Although, in the transfectants, MGMT expression did not so closely correlate with the sensitivity to drugs as to nimustine hydrochloride (ACNU), MGMT is probably an important resistance determinant to CPT derivatives, and may play some role in the topo I-mediated DNA damage and / or the repair process.