Silicone breast implant rupture is more prevalent in the dominant limb side: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Breast implant rupture is associated with multiple risk factors such as implant age, manufacturer, and a history of trauma to the breast. However, the exact mechanism of breast implant rupture remains unclear. We hypothesize that repetitive minor mechanical forces on the implant collectively play a significant role in the cascade that eventually leads to its rupture. Therefore, we expect a more significant cumulative effect on the breast implant in the dominant upper limb side. Thus, we aim to ascertain whether laterality in silicone breast implant rupture is associated with the dominant upper limb. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients with silicone breast implants who underwent an elective breast implant removal or exchange. All patients had breast augmentations for cosmetic reasons. We collected data on implant rupture laterality and limb dominance together with known risk factors like patient age, implant age, implant pocket, and implant volume. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients with unilateral implant rupture were included in the study. Among patients with a dominant right limb (n = 133), an ipsilateral rupture was found in 77 patients (58%) (p = 0.036), while in patients with a left dominant limb (n = 21), an ipsilateral rupture was found in 14 patients (67%), (p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: The dominant limb was a significant risk factor for ipsilateral breast implant rupture. The prevailing theory that cyclic envelope movement carries an increased rupture risk is reinforced in this study. Extensive prospective studies are needed to clarify risk factors for implant rupture further.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Preconditioning Can Reduce Postabdominoplasty Complications: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) can improve wound healing and has been found to have positive preconditioning effects in animal models. Among esthetic surgical procedures, abdominoplasty poses the highest rate of postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of preoperative HBOT as a preconditioning treatment for expected postsurgical complications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among patients who underwent abdominoplasty at our institute and private practice between January 2012 and November 2017. Patients who received preoperative HBOT were compared with patients who did not receive HBOT. Surgical complication data and demographic, preoperative and postoperative data from patient records were collected. RESULTS: The study included 356 patients. Of them, 83 underwent HBOT preoperatively. Using preoperative HBOT, postoperative complications were significantly reduced from 32.6% (89 patients) to 8.4% (7 patients), P <0.001. Moreover, 17 (6.2%) patients in the comparison group and none in the HBOT group experienced necrosis (P = 0.016). In the multivariate analysis, preoperative HBOT was an independent protective factor against postoperative complications (odds ratio, 0.188; 95% CI, 0.082-0.432; P < 0.001). After propensity score matching, the study results remained the same. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative HBOT can reduce postoperative complication rate in abdominoplasty patients. Further prospective studies are necessary to validate the findings and characterize patients who benefit the most from this treatment.

Sub-muscular plane for augmentation mammoplasty patients increases silicone gel implant rupture rate.

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is one of the most common aesthetic procedures performed worldwide. One of the worst associated complications is implant rupture, a topic that will be addressed in the present study. The risk of developing silicone gel breast implant rupture following breast augmentation is associated with multiple factors, including: older generation implant, increased implant age, implant type, specific manufacturer, severe capsular contracture (Baker grade III or IV), and the presence of local symptoms. We hypothesize that the plane of the implant placement may also play a role in the development of implant rupture due to differences in opposing forces upon the implant between submuscular and subglandular planes. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of potential risk factors on breast prosthesis rupture rate, focusing on implant pocket selection, capsular contracture and implant volume. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients with silicone breast implants in either subglandular or submuscular plane, who underwent an elective breast implant exchange, with or without mastopexy, between January 2012 and June 2017. Data collected included patient's age, implant age, implant pocket, implant volume, capsular contracture grade, and implant status (ruptured or intact). RESULTS: Data was collected on 362 women (700 breasts). A total of 284 women (542 breasts) met the inclusion criteria. The average age of the subjects was 43.4 ±â€¯10.4 years. Average implant age during exchange was 10 ±â€¯6.1. There was no difference between the characteristics of the submuscular group and the subglandular group, except from patient age. In a univariant analysis, patient's age (46.4 vs. 41.8, p < 0.001) and implant age (12.2 vs. 8.92 years, p < 0.001) were associated with significantly higher rupture rate. Among ruptured implants, the relative proportion of submuscular to subglandular implants was 64%, compared to 48% among non-ruptured implants (p < 0.0001). When controlling for potential confounders, submuscular pocket (OR = 0.1835, CI95% 1.25-2.69, p = 0.002) as well as implant size (OR = 1.004, CI95% 1.001-1.007, p = 0.005) were found to be a risk factor for implant rupture. CONCLUSION: A sub-muscular implant pocket was identified as a significant risk factor for implant rupture. The prevailing theory that larger size implant carries an increased risk of complications, is also reinforced in this study. Large prospective studies are needed to further clarify risk factors for implant rupture.

Preoperative Implant Size Is Strongly Associated With Alternations of Implant Size During Secondary Breast Augmentation.

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is one of the most popular cosmetic surgeries performed worldwide. In turn, there has been an increasing number of secondary breast augmentation procedures in recent years. Implant selection at secondary breast augmentation can be a challenge and is affected by a number of factors. The aim of this study was to assess the main factors affecting the decision-making process with regard to implant volume determination prior to implant exchange. METHODS: Women who underwent elective breast implant exchange between 2012 and 2016 were included in this study. Medical records were used to acquire implant and patient data. The patient's desires, as well as medical considerations, were taken into account during the implant selection process. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-five women with an average age of 43 years (range, 21-69 years) were included in the study. The mean time between primary augmentation and implant exchange was 10 ± 5.7 years. Overall, 192 implants (38.9%) were exchanged with larger implants, 84 implants (17%) were exchanged with smaller implants, and 218 implants (44.1%) were exchanged with implants similar to the preoperative size (±25 mL). In patients who received smaller implants, the mean reduction in implant volume was found to be 78.88 mL. Women were more likely to receive a smaller implant during implant exchange if the preoperative implant volume was larger than 367 mL (P = 0.00006). Among patients who received larger implants, no correlation was found between preoperative and postoperative implant size. A positive correlation was found between the implant age and a reduction in implant size (P = 0.036). However, no correlation was found between the patient's age and the decision to reduce or enlarge implant size upon revision. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of patients receive similarly sized implants during elective implant exchange. Among those who did decide to change their implant size, more than twice as many patients opted for a larger implant as opposed to a smaller one. Relatively large preoperative implant size and longer time since primary augmentation were associated with the selection of smaller implants during exchange. Further studies should be conducted to reinforce these results.

Association of the Haptoglobin Gene Polymorphism With Cognitive Function and Decline in Elderly African American Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Findings From the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes-Memory in Diabetes (ACCORD-MIND) Study.

Importance: African American individuals have higher dementia risk than individuals of white race/ethnicity. They also have higher rates of type 2 diabetes, which may contribute to this elevated risk. This study examined the association of the following 2 classes of alleles at the haptoglobin (Hp) locus that are associated with poor cognition, cardiovascular disease, and mortality: Hp 1-1 (associated with poor cognition and cerebrovascular disease) and Hp 2-1 and Hp 2-2 (associated with greater risk of myocardial infarction and mortality). An additional polymorphism in the promoter region of the Hp 2 allele, restricted to individuals of African descent, yields a fourth genotype, Hp 2-1m. African American adults have a higher prevalence of Hp 1-1 (approximately 30%) compared with individuals of white race/ethnicity (approximately 14%), but the potential role of the Hp genotype in cognition among elderly African American individuals with type 2 diabetes is unknown. Objective: To assess the association of the Hp genotypes with cognitive function and decline in elderly African American adults with type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used publicly available data and specimens from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes-Memory in Diabetes (ACCORD-MIND) study to investigate the association of the Hp genotypes with cognitive function and decline in 466 elderly African American participants with type 2 diabetes. The hypothesis was that the Hp 1-1 genotype compared with the other genotypes would be associated with more cognitive impairment and faster cognitive decline in elderly African American adults with type 2 diabetes. The initial ACCORD trial was performed from October 28, 1999, to September 15, 2014. This was a multicenter clinical study performed in an academic setting. Exposures: The Hp genotypes were determined from serum samples by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Main Outcomes and Measures: The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to measure cognitive function and change after 40 months. The MMSE score ranges from 0 to 30 points; higher scores represent better cognition. Associations were examined with analysis of covariance and linear regression, adjusting for age, sex, education, baseline glycated hemoglobin level, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol level, creatinine level, and treatment arm (intensive vs standard). The cognitive change model adjusted also for the baseline MMSE score. Results: Among 466 African American study participants (mean [SD] age, 62.3 [5.7] years), 64.8% were women, and the genotype prevalences were 29.4% (n = 137) for Hp 1-1, 36.1% (n = 168) for Hp 2-1, 10.9% (n = 51) for Hp 2-1m, and 23.6% (n = 110) for Hp 2-2. The groups differed in their baseline MMSE scores (P = .006): Hp 1-1 had the lowest MMSE score (mean [SE], 25.68 [0.23]), and Hp 2-1m had the highest MMSE score (mean [SE], 27.15 [0.36]). Using the least squares method, the 40-month decline was significant for Hp 1-1 (mean [SE], -0.41 [0.19]; P = .04) and for Hp 2-2 (mean [SE], -0.68 [0.21]; P = .001). However, the overall comparison across the 4 groups did not reach statistical significance for the fully adjusted model. The interaction of age with the Hp 1-1 genotype on MMSE score decline estimate per year change was significant (mean [SE], -0.87 [0.37]; P = .005), whereas it was not significant for Hp 2-1 (mean [SE], 0.06 [0.37]; P = .85), Hp 2-1m (mean [SE], -0.06 [0.51]; P = .89), and Hp 2-2 (mean [SE], -0.44 [0.41]; P = .29), indicating that cognitive decline in Hp 1-1 carriers was accentuated in older ages, whereas it was not significant for the other Hp genotypes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the Hp 1-1 genotype, which is 2-fold (approximately 30%) more prevalent among African American individuals than among individuals of white race/ethnicity, was associated with poorer cognitive function and greater cognitive decline than the other Hp genotypes. The Hp gene polymorphism may explain the elevated dementia risk in African American adults. The neuropathological substrates and mechanisms for these associations merit further investigation.