Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Vaccine ; 40(5): 774-779, 2022 01 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34998605

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV) has been in use in US adults since 2013. This study evaluated the safety of quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4, Flublok® Quadrivalent, Sanofi Pasteur) compared with standard-dose quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV4) in self-identified Chinese adults at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). METHODS: This study evaluated adults aged 18-64 years within KPNC during the 2018-2019 influenza season who self-identified as Chinese (NCT03694392). We compared the rates of prespecified diagnoses of interest in the emergency department and inpatient settings as done in prior influenza studies, for three risk intervals: 0-2 days, 0-13 days, and 0-41 days following influenza vaccination, as well as number of deaths within 0-180 days after vaccination. We estimated the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals using logistic regression adjusted for sex, age group, presence of comorbidities, and same-day concomitant vaccination. RESULTS: Comparing 15,574 adults who received RIV4 with 27,110 who received SD-IIV4, there was no statistically significant difference in the prespecified diagnoses of interest and deaths between the 2 groups. There were 35 deaths total, none of which were considered to be related to influenza vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not identify any safety concerns regarding RIV4 use among 18-64-year-olds who self-identified as Chinese. This study supports the safety of RIV4 vaccine in this population.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , China , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/efeitos adversos
2.
Vaccine ; 38(46): 7323-7330, 2020 10 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32967791

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare rates of myopericarditis, severe and serious dermatological or neurological events, and other adverse events in deploying US military personnel who received or did not receive ACAM2000® (Smallpox [Vaccinia] Vaccine, Live) vaccine and to evaluate potential risk factors for development of myopericarditis. METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study enrolling up to 15,000 ACAM2000 recipients (Cohort 1) and up to 5000 persons otherwise eligible for ACAM2000 vaccination but not vaccinated due to recency of vaccination or characteristics of their contacts (Cohort 2). Data and specimens were collected initially and 10 (6-17) days later. Those with clinical or laboratory evidence of possible myopericarditis were referred for further evaluation and adjudication by a blinded independent review committee. The adjusted odds ratio for myopericarditis was determined by a logistic regression model controlling for age, race, gender, and exercise regimen. RESULTS: 14,667 subjects provided initial data and specimens (Cohort 1, 10,825; Cohort 2, 3842); 12,110 (Cohort 1, 8945; Cohort 2, 3165) completed Visit 2 per-protocol. A total of 125 (Cohort 1, 111; Cohort 2, 14) were referred for myopericarditis adjudication, yielding 54 (Cohort 1, 44, Cohort 2, 10) subclinical myopericarditis, 5 suspected myocarditis, 1 confirmed myocarditis, and 1 suspected pericarditis. Unadjusted myopericarditis rates were: Cohort 1, 5.7/1000 (95% CI, 4.3-7.5); Cohort 2, 3.2/1000 (95% CI, 1.7-5.8). Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for myopericarditis were 1.8 (95% CI: 0.9-3.6) and 1.3 (95% CI: 0.6-2.6), respectively. One hundred seventeen subjects (1.1%) in Cohort 1 and 13 (0.3%) in Cohort 2 experienced at least 1 serious adverse event. No instances of serious and severe neurological or dermatological adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In this carefully screened, generally young and healthy service-member population, ACAM2000 vaccination was associated with modest non-significant increases in the risk of myopericarditis (adjusted OR, 1.3; unadjusted OR, 1.8); all but seven cases were subclinical. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00928577.


Assuntos
Militares , Vacina Antivariólica , Varíola , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Vacina Antivariólica/efeitos adversos , Vacinação
3.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(2): ofz523, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32025524

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To understand the clinical burden of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), we analyzed health outcome data from Ontario, Canada for CDI associated with and manifested in acute care hospitals (ACH), long-term care facilities (LTCF), the community, or ACH-associated with community-onset. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis using individual-level data from Ontario databases (April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2015), identifying CDI cases ≥18 years requiring hospitalization, and stratifying into cohorts based on association and onset location. Cohort members were matched to controls on demographics and medical conditions at onset, for outcomes including 30- and 180-day all-cause mortality and rehospitalization. RESULTS: We stratified 22 617 individuals hospitalized with CDI during the study period: 13 152 (58.1%) ACH-associated/ACH-onset, 7116 (31.5%) community-associated/community-onset, 1847 (8.2%) ACH-associated/community-onset, and 502 (2.2%) LTCF-associated/LTCF-onset. Compared with controls, unadjusted 30-day rehospitalization rates were significantly higher (P < .0001) for ACH-associated/ACH-onset CDI (9.5% vs 0.4%), LTCF-associated/LTCF-onset (7.2% vs 1.1%), community-associated/community-onset (7.8% vs 0.8%), and ACH-associated/community-onset (10.9% vs 0.7%). One hundred eighty-day mortality rates were higher in the community-associated/community-onset and the LTCF-associated/LTCF-onset cohorts than controls: 66.3% vs 12.3% (P < .0001) and 30.9% vs 3.1% (P < .0001), respectively. All differences remained significant after adjusting for patient factors. CONCLUSIONS: Clostridioides difficile infection is associated with higher rates of 30-day rehospitalization compared with controls. In addition, mortality rates within 180-days of hospital discharge are significantly higher for community-associated/community-onset and LTCF-associated/LTCF-onset CDI cohorts than controls. Clostridioides difficile infection warrants increased prevention and monitoring efforts.

4.
CMAJ Open ; 8(1): E16-E25, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32001435

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Understanding the impact of prevention programs on Clostridioides difficile infection rates is important, and decisions on future program changes, including how to use vaccines currently in development, requires a detailed understanding of the epidemiologic features of C. difficile infection. We analyzed Ontario health administrative data to determine incidence rates and medical costs of C. difficile infection, based on whether acquisition and onset occurred in acute care hospitals (ACHs), long-term care facilities or the community. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis using individual-level data from Ontario health databases from Apr. 1, 2005, to Mar. 31, 2015, identifying rates of C. difficile infection requiring hospital admission per 100 000 person-years in adults aged 18 years or more for categories of acquisition and onset. We estimated health care system costs of infection 180 and 365 days after admission by matching patients with C. difficile infection with control patients with similar characteristics. RESULTS: Over the study period, 33 909 people in Ontario were admitted to hospital with C. difficile infection; 17 272 cases (50.9%) were associated with ACHs. The number of cases per 100 000 person-years ranged from 27.7 in 2009/10 to 37.0 in 2012/13. Annually, the highest incidence of infection was for ACH-associated/ACH-onset. Community-associated infection became more prevalent over time, rising from 19.4% of cases in 2005/06 to 29.2% in 2014/15. Infection costs were mostly due to hospital admission within 180 days after hospital discharge. Infection associated with ACHs had the highest total costs and the largest cost attributable to C. difficile infection (median $38 953 for infected patients v. $13 542 for control patients). Median costs attributable to C. difficile infection were $1051 for that associated with long-term care facilities, $13 249 for community-associated infection and $11 917 for ACH-associated/community-onset infection. INTERPRETATION: Community-associated C. difficile infection had similar health care cost implications as hospital-associated infection. With rates of community-associated C. difficile infection on the rise, family physicians should be supported to prevent this infection in their patients.


Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Adulto Jovem
5.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 231(22): 4383-91, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24781517

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Pilot study results suggested that a new form of nicotine oral soluble film relieved smoking cue-provoked acute craving faster than nicotine lozenge or gum. The new nicotine film may provide smokers another choice to relieve acute craving. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the efficacy of the 2.5 mg nicotine oral soluble film to 2 mg nicotine lozenge for acute relief of smoking cue-provoked craving. METHODS: A randomized, open label, active comparator controlled, parallel group study was conducted with 322 smokers enrolled. After 4 h of abstinence from smoking, eligible subjects were exposed to smoking cues as provocation. Immediately after the post-provocation baseline craving assessment using a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), subjects took a randomized single dose of either the 2.5 mg nicotine film or the 2 mg nicotine lozenge. Craving assessments were completed at 50 s, 3 min, 5 min, 7 min, 15 min, 20 min, 25 min and 30 min after drug administration. RESULTS: Both treatments reduced cue-induced craving and had similar maximum effects on craving relief. However, the 2.5 mg nicotine film relieved cue-induced craving to a greater degree than the 2 mg nicotine lozenge at 50 s (mean difference: -4.9, p = 0.014), 3 min (mean difference: -6.7, p = 0.011), and 5 min (mean difference: -5.6, p = 0.049) post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirmed the results from the pilot study. The 2.5 mg nicotine film relieved cue-provoked craving much quicker than the 2 mg nicotine lozenge while both having similar maximum effects. Nicotine film could be useful to provide quick craving relief for low dependence smokers.


Assuntos
Fissura/efeitos dos fármacos , Nicotina/administração & dosagem , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/normas , Adulto , Sinais (Psicologia) , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA