["Traffic lights" in pediatrics: what do residents beginning their family residency know about them?]. / Les « feux tricolores ¼ en pédiatrie : état des lieux des connaissances en début de 3e cycle de médecine générale.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric practice is a difficult task requiring physicians to discriminate potentially serious situations among a variety of benign situations. The goal of this study was to assess the knowledge of students beginning their residency in family medicine on these situations. METHODS: One hundred and three students were evaluated on pediatric "traffic lights" using 103 true/false questions. Pediatric and family medicine teachers of the Nantes University Hospital defined "traffic lights" as the fundamentals of pediatrics, misleading situations, and diagnosis and treatment that should not to be missed. Emergency levels were defined by colors, with "red light" corresponding to life-threatening emergencies. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent of the questions (n=103) had a correct response rate below 75%. Thirty-two percent of the questions on emergency situations ("red lights") (n=37) had a response rate below 75%. Fifteen percent of the questions (n=103) had a correct response rate below 50%, half of which were "red light" (e.g., on meningitis, diabetic acidocytosis, or shock). Questions concerning infants (n=24) had significantly fewer correct answers (correct response rate below 50%: 29% versus 10%; P=0.047). All the students answered seven questions correctly. The students' mean score (percentage of good answers) was 76% (±6%). No student had 100% or less than 50% good answers. CONCLUSIONS: Some life-threatening situations or situations concerning infants had not been mastered by most of the students. It is therefore essential to optimize the teaching of pediatrics during the second cycle of medical studies.

[Management of bronchiolitis in general practice and determinants of treatment being discordant with guidelines of the HAS]. / État des lieux des pratiques médicales en médecine générale en matière de bronchiolite et déterminants de prises en charge thérapeutiques discordantes par rapport aux recommandations de l'HAS.

INTRODUCTION: The Haute autorité de santé released clinical practice guidelines in 2000 to assist in the management of bronchiolitis. These guidelines emphasized supportive care with nasal suctioning and encouraged chest physiotherapy. The aim of this study was to examine the adherence to the french guidelines for the management of bronchiolitis by general practitioners. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included infants less than 24 months of age with bronchiolitis, consulting a general practitioner in Vendée or in Loire-Atlantique, from November 2011 to April 2012 and whose parents accepted to participate to the study. The primary endpoint was the concordance of therapeutic practice with the french guidelines (administrated treatments, refer to pediatric emergencies). Data were collected through questionaires completed by general practitioners. RESULTS: Of the 1236 questionnaires distributed, 134 were completed and 118 therapeutic practice were analyzed. A total of 52.5% of therapeutic practice were concordant with guidelines and 57.5% in case of first bronchiolitis. 50% of infants with a hospitalization criteria according to the guidelines, have not been, which probably shows the interest of new guidelines, with highlighting of hospitalization criteria.