Patients' perceived health service needs for osteoarthritis (OA) care: a scoping systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and synthesise evidence regarding patients' perceived health service needs related to osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: A comprehensive systematic scoping review of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE and CINAHL (1990-2016) was performed to capture information regarding patient perceived health service needs related to OA. Risk of bias and quality of included articles were assessed. Relevant data were extracted and collated to provide a systematic review of the existing literature. RESULTS: Of the 1384 identified manuscripts, 21 were relevant to areas of patient perceived need, including needs related to medical care, pharmacologic therapy, physiotherapy and exercise therapy and alternative medicine. Key findings included (1) Symptom control drove the need for both conventional and complementary services. (2) An individualized relationship was sought with a practitioner knowledgeable in OA care and who adopted a holistic approach, whether providing conventional or alternative therapies. (3) Medications were required to obtain symptomatic relief, with use tempered by recognition of potential side effects and financial cost. (4) The need for allied health services was recognised, although patient and system issues were barriers to uptake. (5) Patient's attitudes towards joint replacement, orthoses and physical aids were influenced by patient preferences and previous healthcare experiences. CONCLUSION: Patient perceived needs are similar to those suggested by clinical guideline recommendations. Better aligning patient perceived needs with healthcare requirements may improve OA outcomes and optimise healthcare system utilisation.

Management options for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of symptom and structural outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal therapy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the evidence for surgical and non-surgical treatment of FAI on symptom and structural outcomes. DESIGN: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched electronically. Surgical and non-surgical management strategies were searched with "FAI". Studies which included comparison groups and reported symptom or structural outcomes were included (Levels I-III evidence). A risk of bias assessment was performed. RESULTS: Eighteen studies comparing management strategies for FAI were identified. Most studies had high risk of bias. No study compared surgical and non-surgical treatment. When surgical approaches were compared there was evidence of superior symptom outcomes with arthroscopy compared to open surgery and with labral preservation. There was some evidence that surgical interventions are effective in reducing alpha angle (improved hip shape), but no data on whether this affects long-term outcomes. There was some weak evidence that surgery is associated with structural progression of hip osteoarthritis (OA). CONCLUSIONS: Although evidence supports improvement in symptoms after surgery in FAI, no studies have compared surgical and non-surgical treatment. Therefore no conclusion regarding the relative efficacy of one approach over the other can be made. Surgery improves alpha angle but whether this alters the risk of development or progression of hip OA is unknown. This review highlights the lack of evidence for use of surgery in FAI. Given that hip geometry may be modified by non-surgical factors, clarifying the role of non-surgical approaches vs surgery for the management of FAI is warranted.