Benchmarking palliative care practices in neurooncology: a german perspective.

PURPOSE: To benchmark palliative care practices in neurooncology centers across Germany, evaluating the variability in palliative care integration, timing, and involvement in tumor board discussions. This study aims to identify gaps in care and contribute to the discourse on optimal palliative care strategies. METHODS: A survey targeting both German Cancer Society-certified and non-certified university neurooncology centers was conducted to explore palliative care frameworks and practices for neurooncological patients. The survey included questions on palliative care department availability, involvement in tumor boards, timing of palliative care integration, and use of standardized screening tools for assessing palliative burden and psycho-oncological distress. RESULTS: Of 57 centers contacted, 46 responded (81% response rate). Results indicate a dedicated palliative care department in 76.1% of centers, with palliative specialists participating in tumor board discussions at 34.8% of centers. Variability was noted in the initiation of palliative care, with early integration at the diagnosis stage in only 30.4% of centers. The survey highlighted a significant lack of standardized spiritual care assessments and minimal use of advanced care planning. Discrepancies were observed in the documentation and treatment of palliative care symptoms and social complaints, underscoring the need for comprehensive care approaches. CONCLUSION: The study highlights a diverse landscape of palliative care provision within German neurooncology centers, underscoring the need for more standardized practices and early integration of palliative care. It suggests the necessity for standardized protocols and guidelines to enhance palliative care's quality and uniformity, ultimately improving patient-centered care in neurooncology.

Assessing the efficacy of large language models in spinal health information dissemination.

•Examines AI's role in spinal health education.•Stresses multidisciplinary AI evaluations.•Advocates for stringent AI healthcare regulations.

Palliative care for in-patient malignant glioma patients in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: Malignant gliomas impose a significant symptomatic burden on patients and their families. Current guidelines recommend palliative care for patients with advanced tumors within eight weeks of diagnosis, emphasizing early integration for malignant glioma cases. However, the utilization rate of palliative care for these patients in Germany remains unquantified. This study investigates the proportion of malignant glioma patients who either died in a hospital or were transferred to hospice care from 2019 to 2022, and the prevalence of in-patient specialized palliative care interventions. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, retrospective study, we analyzed data from the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK GmbH, Siegburg, Germany), covering 2019 to 2022. We included patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis of C71 (malignant glioma) in our analysis. To refine our dataset, we identified cases with dual-coded primary and secondary diagnoses and excluded these to avoid duplication in our final tally. The data extraction process involved detailed scrutiny of hospital records to ascertain the frequency of hospital deaths, hospice transfers, and the provision of complex or specialized palliative care for patients with C71-coded diagnoses. Descriptive statistics and inferential analyses were employed to evaluate the trends and significance of the findings. RESULTS: From 2019 to 2022, of the 101,192 hospital cases involving malignant glioma patients, 6,129 (6% of all cases) resulted in in-hospital mortality, while 2,798 (2.8%) led to hospice transfers. Among these, 10,592 cases (10.5% of total) involved the administration of complex or specialized palliative medical care. This provision rate remained unchanged throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Notably, significantly lower frequencies of complex or specialized palliative care implementation were observed in patients below 65 years (p < 0.0001) and in male patients (padjusted = 0.016). In cases of in-hospital mortality due to malignant gliomas, 2,479 out of 6,129 cases (40.4%) received specialized palliative care. CONCLUSION: Despite the poor prognosis and complex symptomatology associated with malignant gliomas, only a small proportion of affected patients received advanced palliative care. Specifically, only about 10% of hospitalized patients with malignant gliomas, and approximately 40% of those who succumb to the disease in hospital settings, were afforded complex or specialized palliative care. This discrepancy underscores an urgent need to expand palliative care access for this patient demographic. Additionally, it highlights the importance of further research to identify and address the barriers preventing wider implementation of palliative care in this context.

Bone density of the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine measured using Hounsfield units of computed tomography - results of 4350 vertebras.

INTRODUCTION: The assessment of bone density has gained significance in recent years due to the aging population. Accurate assessment of bone density is crucial when deciding on the appropriate treatment plan for spinal stabilization surgery. The objective of this work was to determine the trabecular bone density values of the subaxial cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine using Hounsfield units. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from 200 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced polytrauma computed tomography at a maximum care hospital over a two-year period were retrospectively analyzed. HUs were measured with an elliptical measurement field in three different locations within the vertebral body: below the upper plate, in the middle of the vertebral body, and above the base plate. The measured Hounsfield units were converted into bone density values using a validated formula. RESULTS: The mean age of the patient collective was 47.05 years. Mean spinal bone density values decreased from cranial to caudal (C3: 231.79 mg/cm3; L5: 155.13 mg/cm3; p < 0.001), with the highest values in the upper cervical spine. Bone density values generally decreased with age in all spinal segments. There was a clear decrease in values after age 50 years (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, bone density decreased from cranial to caudal with higher values in the cervical spine. These data from the individual spinal segments may be helpful to comprehensively evaluate the status of the spine and to design a better preoperative plan before instrumentation.

Early detection of aseptic bone necrosis post-cranioplasty: A retrospective CT analysis using Hounsfield units.

This study examined the efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-based Hounsfield units (HU) as early predictors of aseptic bone necrosis, a serious post-cranioplasty complication after autologous cranioplasty. In total, 100 patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy and subsequent autologous cranioplasty were included. The radiodensity of the bone flap was evaluated in HU from CT scans at five follow-up timepoints. HU thresholds were established to predict the development of aseptic bone necrosis. HU demonstrated a declining trend throughout the follow-up period in all patients. Necrosis type I patients showed significant differences at all timepoints from 3 months post-procedure onwards, while necrosis type II patients displayed a significant decline in HU at every follow-up. Optimal thresholds with cut-off A (91.23% of initial HU) and cut-off B (78.73% of initial HU) were established to predict the occurrence of bone necrosis and the need for artificial bone replacement, respectively. Our findings demonstrated the utility of CT-based HU measurements as a simple, non-invasive tool for the early prediction of aseptic bone necrosis following autologous cranioplasty. By delineating specific HU thresholds, our study offers a valuable guide for orchestrating timely follow-ups and advising patients on the necessity of proactive interventions.

Red blood cell transfusion in patients undergoing elective primary glioblastoma resection.

BACKGROUND: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in patients undergoing major elective cranial surgery is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study aims to identify the clinical outcome of transfused glioblastoma patients undergoing primary surgical tumor resection and identify risk factors for RBC transfusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2009 and 2019, 406 patients underwent elective primary glioblastoma resection. For multivariate analysis to assess risk factors for RBC transfusion, logistic regression was conducted. The impact of RBC transfusion on overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: In total, 36 (8.9%) patients received RBC transfusion. Preoperative anemia rate was significantly higher in transfused patients compared to patients without RBC transfusion (33.3 vs 6.5%; p<0.0001). Postoperative complications as well as hospital length of stay (LOS) (p<0.0001) were significantly increased in transfused patients compared to non-transfused patients. After multivariate analysis, risk factors for RBC transfusion were preoperative anemia (p<0.0001), intraoperative blood loss (p<0.0001), female gender (p=0.0056) and radiation (p=0.0064). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that RBC transfusion and being elderly (age ≥75 years) were relevant for overall survival. DISCUSSION: RBC transfusion is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing elective primary glioblastoma resection. Preoperative anemia and intraoperative blood loss are major risk factors for RBC transfusion. Preoperative anemia management and blood conservation strategies are crucial in patients undergoing elective primary glioblastoma resection.

Functional Outcomes in Conservatively vs Surgically Treated Cerebellar Infarcts.

Importance: According to the current American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines, decompressive surgery is indicated in patients with cerebellar infarcts that demonstrate severe cerebellar swelling. However, there is no universal definition of swelling and/or infarct volume(s) available to support a decision for surgery. Objective: To evaluate functional outcomes in surgically compared with conservatively managed patients with cerebellar infarcts. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, patients with cerebellar infarcts treated at 5 tertiary referral hospitals or stroke centers within Germany between 2008 and 2021 were included. Data were analyzed from November 2020 to November 2023. Exposures: Surgical treatment (ie, posterior fossa decompression plus standard of care) vs conservative management (ie, medical standard of care). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome examined was functional status evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the predicted probabilities for favorable outcome (mRS score of 0 to 3) stratified by infarct volumes or Glasgow Coma Scale score at admission and treatment modality. Analyses included propensity score matching, with adjustments for age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale score at admission, brainstem involvement, and infarct volume. Results: Of 531 included patients with cerebellar infarcts, 301 (57%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 68 (14.4) years. After propensity score matching, a total of 71 patients received surgical treatment and 71 patients conservative treatment. There was no significant difference in favorable outcomes (ie, mRS score of 0 to 3) at discharge for those treated surgically vs conservatively (47 [66%] vs 45 [65%]; odds ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.5-2.2; P > .99) or at follow-up (35 [73%] vs 33 [61%]; odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.7-4.2; P > .99). In patients with cerebellar infarct volumes of 35 mL or greater, surgical treatment was associated with a significant improvement in favorable outcomes at 1-year follow-up (38 [61%] vs 3 [25%]; odds ratio, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.2-19.3; P = .03), while conservative treatment was associated with favorable outcomes at 1-year follow-up in patients with infarct volumes of less than 25 mL (2 [34%] vs 218 [74%]; odds ratio, 0.2; 95% CI, 0-1.0; P = .047). Conclusions and Relevance: Overall, surgery was not associated with improved outcomes compared with conservative management in patients with cerebellar infarcts. However, when stratifying based on infarct volume, surgical treatment appeared to be beneficial in patients with larger infarct volumes, while conservative management appeared favorable in patients with smaller infarct volumes.

Necrosectomy Versus Stand-Alone Suboccipital Decompressive Craniectomy for the Management of Space-Occupying Cerebellar Infarctions-A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Space-occupying cerebellar stroke (SOCS) when coupled with neurological deterioration represents a neurosurgical emergency. Although current evidence supports surgical intervention in such patients with SOCS and rapid neurological deterioration, the optimal surgical methods/techniques to be applied remain a matter of debate. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study of patients undergoing surgery for SOCS. Patients were stratified according to the type of surgery as (1) suboccipital decompressive craniectomy (SDC) or (2) suboccipital craniotomy with concurrent necrosectomy. The primary end point examined was functional outcome using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and at 3 months (mRS 0-3 defined as favorable and mRS 4-6 as unfavorable outcome). Secondary end points included the analysis of in-house postoperative complications, mortality, and length of hospitalization. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were included in the final analysis: 49 underwent necrosectomy and 43 underwent SDC. Those with necrosectomy displayed significantly higher rate of favorable outcome at discharge as compared with those who underwent SDC alone: 65.3% vs 27.9%, respectively ( P < .001, odds ratios 4.9, 95% CI 2.0-11.8). This difference was also observed at 3 months: 65.3% vs 41.7% ( P = .030, odds ratios 2.7, 95% CI 1.1-6.7). No significant differences were observed in mortality and/or postoperative complications, such as hemorrhagic transformation, infection, and/or the development of cerebrospinal fluid leaks/fistulas. CONCLUSION: In the setting of SOCS, patients treated with necrosectomy displayed better functional outcomes than those patients who underwent SDC alone. Ultimately, prospective, randomized studies will be needed to confirm this finding.

Treatment of very elderly glioblastoma patients ≥ 75 years of age: whom to treat.

PURPOSE: The prognosis of patients ≥ 75 years suffering from glioblastoma is poor. Novel therapies are usually reserved for patients ≤ 70 years. In an aging population, treatment of very elderly patients remains a challenge. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2018, a total of 977 glioblastoma patients were treated at our institution. Of these, 143 patients were ≥ 75 years at diagnosis. Primary procedure was surgical resection or biopsy followed by adjuvant treatment, whenever possible. We retrospectively investigated overall survival (OS) and potential prognostic factors influencing survival, including Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), surgical therapy, adjuvant therapy as well as MGMT promotor status. RESULTS: In very elderly patients, median age was 79 years (range: 75-110). Biopsy only was performed in 104 patients; resection was performed in 39 patients. Median OS for the entire cohort was 5.9 months. Univariate analysis showed that KPS at presentation (≥ 70 vs. ≤60), surgery vs. biopsy, adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy were significantly associated with OS (6 vs. 3, p < 0.0111; 12 vs. 4, p = 0.0011; 11 vs. 4, p = 0.0003 and 10 vs. 1.5 months, p < 0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed adjuvant radiotherapy (p < 0.0001) and chemotherapy (p = 0.0002) as independent factors influencing OS. CONCLUSION: For very elderly patients, the natural course of disease without treatment is devastating. These patients benefit from multimodal treatment including adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. A beneficial effect of resection has not been demonstrated. Treatment options and outcomes should be thoughtfully discussed before treatment decisions are made.

The role of neuromuscular ultrasound in diagnostics of peripheral neuropathies induced by cytostatic agents or immunotherapies.

A relevant number of cancer patients who receive potentially neurotoxic cytostatic agents develop a chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy over time. Moreover, the increasing use of immunotherapies and targeted agents leads to a raising awareness of treatment-associated peripheral neurotoxicity, e.g., axonal and demyelinating neuropathies such as Guillain-Barré-like syndromes. To date, the differentiation of these phenomena from concurrent neurological co-morbidities or (para-)neoplastic nerve affection as well as their longitudinal monitoring remain challenging. Neuromuscular ultrasound (NMUS) is an established diagnostic tool for peripheral neuropathies. Performed by specialized neurologists, it completes clinical and neurophysiological diagnostics especially in differentiation of axonal and demyelinating neuropathies. No generally approved biomarkers of treatment-induced peripheral neurotoxicity have been established so far. NMUS might significantly extend the repertoire of diagnostic and neuromonitoring methods in this growing patient group in short term. In this article, we present enlargements of the dorsal roots both in cytostatic and in immunotherapy-induced neurotoxicity for the first time. We discuss related literature regarding new integrative applications of NMUS for cancer patients by reference to two representative case studies. Moreover, we demonstrate the integration of NMUS in a diagnostic algorithm for suspected peripheral neurotoxicity independently of a certain cancer treatment regimen emphasizing the emerging potential of NMUS for clinical routine in this interdisciplinary field and prospective clinical trials.

Radionuclide Cisternography with [64Cu]Cu-DOTA.

Radionuclide cisternography (RNC) is a method for conducting imaging of the cerebrospinal system and can be used to identify cerebrospinal fluid leaks. So far, RNC has commonly employed radiopharmaceutical agents suitable only for single-photon emission tomography techniques, which are thus lacking in terms of image resolution and can potentially lead to false-negative results. Therefore, [64Cu]Cu-DOTA was investigated as an alternative radiopharmaceutical for RNC, employing positron emission tomography (PET) instead of single-photon emission tomography. A formulation of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA was produced according to the guidelines for good manufacturing practice. The product met the requirements of agents suitable for intrathecal application. [64Cu]Cu-DOTA was administered to a patient and compared to the approved scintigraphic RNC agent, [111In]In-DTPA. While no cerebrospinal fluid leak was detected with [111In]In-DTPA, [64Cu]Cu-DOTA RNC exhibited a posterolateral leak between the vertebral bodies C1 and C2. Thus, in this patient, PET RNC with [64Cu]Cu-DOTA was superior to RNC with [111In]In-DTPA. Since radiopharmaceuticals have a very good safety profile regarding the occurrence of adverse events, PET RNC with [64Cu]Cu-DOTA may become an attractive alternative to scintigraphic methods, and also to computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, which often require contrast agents, causing adverse events to occur much more frequently.

Tumor size, treatment patterns, and survival in neuro-oncology patients before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted healthcare delivery worldwide, leading to significant delays in cancer diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment of malignant brain tumors, specifically glioblastoma (GBM) and cerebral metastasis (CM), in a specialized neuro-oncology center. We analyzed data from 236 patients diagnosed with previously unknown malignant brain tumors between January 2018 and December 2021. Patients were classified into two groups: pre-COVID (January 2018 to December 2019) and COVID (January 2020 to December 2021). Tumor volumes were compared between the two groups and factors affecting tumor volumes were studied. Of 236 patients diagnosed with previously unknown malignant brain tumors, 114 were in the pre-COVID group and 122 were in the COVID group. Median tumor volumes at first diagnosis were significantly larger in the COVID group compared to the pre-COVID group (21.7 vs 15.7 cm3; p < 0.05). The survival times for the overall cohort and the GBM and CM subgroups did not differ significantly between the pre-COVID and COVID periods. Delays in diagnosis and treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic led to larger tumor volumes at diagnosis for patients with malignant brain tumors. However, these larger tumors did not result in worse survival outcomes. This counterintuitive finding highlights the crucial role of specialized neuro-oncological centers in mitigating the potential negative impact of delayed treatment and emphasizes the need for continued access to specialized care during times of crisis.

Development and implementation of a student tumor board as a teaching format for medical students.

PURPOSE: Tumor boards serve as established platforms for interdisciplinary expert discussions and therapeutic recommendations tailored to individual patient characteristics. Despite their significance, medical students often lack exposure to such interdisciplinary discussions as tumor boards are currently not integrated into medical curricula. To address this, we aimed to enhance future physicians' interdisciplinary communication skills and subject-specific knowledge by introducing an interactive series of five linked tumor board seminars within the domain of neuro-oncology. METHODS: We developed a neuro-oncological student tumor board using a flipped-classroom format. The primary objectives of this case-centered approach included fostering an understanding of the tumor board process, active participation in multidisciplinary case discussions, honing appropriate communication strategies, and creating personalized therapy plans that consider inputs from all relevant disciplines, individual patient factors, and ethical considerations. To gauge the effectiveness of the seminar series, we administered structured pre- and post-course questionnaires. RESULTS: Fourteen medical students in third to fifth year participated in the pilot series. Despite its organizational complexity, the interdisciplinary seminars were feasible. Students demonstrated significant growth in competence, aligned with predefined learning objectives. Notably, they appreciated the supportive learning environment and interactive teaching format, which kindled their interest in interdisciplinary oncology. CONCLUSION: Active participation in a student tumor board can empower students to tackle the diverse challenges of caring for cancer patients within an interdisciplinary team during the early stages of their careers. The student tumor board represents an innovative, learner-centered approach to teach interdisciplinary cancer treatment, communication strategies, and ethical aspects of medical practice.

Frequency of social burden and underage children in neuro-oncological patients.

OBJECTIVE: Brain tumours can cause significant burden for patients and their families, including physical, psychological, and social challenges. This burden can be particularly difficult for patients with malignant brain tumours and those with underage children. However, the frequency of social burden among neuro-oncological patients and the proportion of patients with underaged children is currently unknown. The aim of this retrospective study is to determine the frequency of social and family dysfunction among neuro-oncological patients, the percentage of such patients who have underage children, and to assess their associated burden. METHODS: During a 22-month period, all brain tumour patients were asked to complete a short questionnaire that included epidemiological data, the EORTC-qlq-C30 and -BN20 questionnaire, and the distress thermometer. Data were collected and analysed using Prism 9 for macOS (version 9, GraphPad Prism). RESULTS: Our analysis included 881 brain tumour patients, of which 540 were female. Median age was 61 years (ranging from 16 to 88 years). Of all patients, 228 suffered from malignant intracranial tumours. More than half of all patients and more than 65% of patients with malignant tumours reported that their illness or medical treatment interfered with their social activities and family life. Almost 30% of patients reported moderate or severe complaints. About 27% of all patients (and 31% of patients with malignancies) expressed moderate or major concerns that their family life could be disrupted. Among the patients with malignancies, 83.5% of patients had a total of 318 children at the time of tumour diagnosis, with a mean age of 33 ± 0.9. Of these patients with malignancies, 38 (17.9%) had a total of 56 underage children at the time of tumour diagnosis, and currently have 53 underage children. Patients with minor children had more financial worries but less interference of their disease with social activities, less psycho-oncological distress, and a more positive outlook into the future (each, p < 0.0001). They evaluated their general health status and quality of life in the week prior to their current appointment significantly better (each p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our study found that 17.9% of patients with malignant brain tumours have underage children. However, having underage children may actually be a positive resource for these patients, as they show lower distress values and better quality of life.

Retrospective comparison of long-term functionality and revision rate of two different shunt valves in pediatric and adult patients.

PURPOSE: The most frequent therapy of hydrocephalus is implantation of ventriculoperitoneal shunts for diverting cerebrospinal into the peritoneal cavity. We compared two adjustable valves, proGAV and proGAV 2.0, for complications resulting in revision surgery. METHODS: Four hundred patients undergoing primary shunt implantation between 2014 and 2020 were analyzed for overall revision rate, 1-year revision rate, and revision-free survival observing patient age, sex, etiology of hydrocephalus, implantation site, prior diversion of cerebrospinal fluid, and cause of revision. RESULTS: All data were available of all 400 patients (female/male 208/192). Overall, 99 patients underwent revision surgery after primary implantation. proGAV valve was implanted in 283 patients, and proGAV 2.0 valves were implanted in 117 patients. There was no significant difference between the two shunt valves concerning revision rate (p = 0.8069), 1-year revision rate (p = 0.9077), revision-free survival (p = 0.6921), and overall survival (p = 0.3232). Regarding 1-year revision rate, we observed no significant difference between the two shunt valves in pediatric patients (40.7% vs 27.6%; p = 0.2247). Revision operation had to be performed more frequently in pediatric patients (46.6% vs 24.8%; p = 0.0093) with a significant higher number of total revisions with proGAV than proGAV 2.0 (33 of 59 implanted shunts [55.9%] vs. 8 of 29 implanted shunts [27.6%]; p = 0.0110) most likely due to longer follow-up in the proGAV-group. For this reason, we clearly put emphasis on analyzing results regarding 1-year revision rate. CONCLUSION: According to the target variables we analyzed, aside from lifetime revision rate in pediatric patients, there is no significant difference between the two shunt valves.

Cerebellar Stroke Score and Grading Scale for the Prediction of Mortality and Outcomes in Ischemic Cerebellar Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Several individual predictors for outcomes in patients with cerebellar stroke (CS) have been previously identified. There is, however, no established clinical score for CS. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop simple and accurate grading scales for patients with CS in an effort to better estimate mortality and outcomes. METHODS: This multicentric retrospective study included 531 patients with ischemic CS presenting to 5 different academic neurosurgical and neurological departments throughout Germany between 2008 and 2021. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors related to 30-day mortality and unfavorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 4-6). By weighing each parameter via calculation of regression coefficients, an ischemic CS-score and CS-grading scale (CS-GS) were developed and internally validated. RESULTS: Independent predictors for 30-day mortality were aged ≥70 years (odds ratio, 5.2), Glasgow Coma Scale score 3 to 4 at admission (odds ratio, 2.6), stroke volume ≥25 cm3 (odds ratio, 2.7), and involvement of the brain stem (odds ratio, 3.9). When integrating each parameter into the CS-score, age≥70 years and brain stem stroke were assigned 2 points, Glasgow Coma Scale score 3 to 4, and stroke volume≥25 cm3 1 point resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 6. CS-score of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 points resulted in 30-day mortality of 1%, 6%, 6%, 17%, 21%, 55%, and 67%, respectively. Independent predictors for 30-day unfavorable outcomes consisted of all components of the CS-score with an additional variable focused on comorbidities (CS-GS). Except for Glasgow Coma Scale score 3 to 4 at admission, which was assigned 3 points, all other parameters were assigned 1 point resulting in an overall score ranging from 0 to 7. CS-GS of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 points resulted in 30-day unfavorable outcome of 1%, 17%, 33%, 40%, 50%, 80%, 77%, and 100%, respectively. Both 30-day mortality and unfavorable outcomes increased with increasing CS-score and CS-GS (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The CS-score and CS-GS are simple and accurate grading scales for the prediction of 30-day mortality and unfavorable outcome in patients with CS. While the score systems proposed here may not directly impact treatment decisions, it may help discuss mortality and outcome with patients and caregivers.

Does response to vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy differ in patients with and without Lennox-Gastaut syndrome?

INTRODUCTION: Literature on outcomes of patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) receiving adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) lacks information on seizure types and the time course of therapeutic effects. We have therefore performed what is to our knowledge the largest and most in-depth analysis of the effectiveness of VNS in LGS patients paying special attention to the impact of VNS Therapy on individual seizure types. METHODS: The VNS Therapy Outcomes Registry includes over 7000 patients. A propensity score matching method was employed to match patients with LGS to non-LGS patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Overall seizure frequencies were assessed prior to implantation and at 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month follow-ups to derive the main study outcomes: response rates and time to first response. RESULTS: A total of 564 LGS patients with sufficient data were identified in the registry and matched 2:1 to 1128 non-LGS patients. Responder rates at 24 months were 57.5% in the LGS group and 61.5% in the non-LGS group. Median seizure frequency reduction at 24 months was 64.3% versus 66.7% in the LGS versus non-LGS group, respectively. In both groups, VNS was most effective at reducing focal aware seizures, "other" seizures, generalized-onset non-motor seizures, and drop attacks with relative reduction rates for these seizure types at 24 months exceeding 90% in both groups. Time-to-first response did not differ between the groups; however, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients who regressed from bilateral tonic-clonic (BTC) seizure response in the LGS group versus the non-LGS group at 24 months: 22.4% versus 6.7%; p = .015. CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by its retrospective design, the study shows that the effectiveness of VNS is comparable in DRE patients with and without LGS; however, LGS patients may be more prone to fluctuating control of BTCs.