RESUMO
Objetivo: avaliar as informações disponíveis no site de buscas Google® sobre a relação entre a odontologia e a infecção pelo novo Coronavírus, e sua concordância com a literatura atual. Material e Métodos: estudo descritivo e observacional, realizado em uma universidade privada em Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, através da utilização da plataforma de buscas Google® aonde analisou-se os sites através de um roteiro de perguntas previamente elaborado. Resultados: foram analisados 67 sites após buscas pelas expressões "Coronavírus e odontologia", "Saúde bucal e Coronavírus" e "Fratura de dente e Coronavírus". Apenas 24,2% das perguntas foram respondidas com conteúdo completo enquanto 62,5% não apresentavam os conteúdos e 13,3% simplesmente os citavam sem dar maiores esclarecimentos. Apesar disso, 99% dos conteúdos foram publicados por fontes confiáveis (órgãos renomados, sites privados de profissionais da saúde bucal ou matérias de jornal assessoradas por estes). Conclusão: Apesar de confiáveis, os resultados das buscas apresentaram pequena quantidade de informações que realmente auxiliariam o leigo no entendimento da relação entre Coronavírus e odontologia, o que demonstra a necessidade de criação de canais oficiais para disseminação destas para o público geral
Objective:to evaluate the information available on the Google® search site concerning the relationship between dentistry and infection with the new coronavirus, and its concurrence with the current literature. Material and Methods: a descriptive and observational study was conducted by a private university in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to analyze the Google® search platform and the sites found through a previously prepared questionnaire. Results: the expressions "Coronavirus and dentistry", "Oral health and Coronavirus" and "Tooth fracture and Coronavirus" searched produced 67 sites for analysis. However, only 24.2% of the questions of the questionnaire were answered fully, while 62.5% did not answer them at all and 13.3% simply cited them without giving details. Notwithstanding this, 99% of the contents were published by official entities, dental websites or articles assisted by oral health care professionals. Conclusion: although reliable, the search results presented little information that would really help a layperson understand the relationship between Coronavirus and dentistry, which demonstrates the need to create official channels to disseminate such information to the public in an appropriate manner
Assuntos
Coronavirus , Odontologia , Pandemias , BocaRESUMO
The objective of this study was to assess antagonism of nematophagous fungi and species producers metabolites and their effectiveness on Haemonchus contortus infective larvae (L3). Assay A assesses the synergistic, additive, or antagonistic effect on the production of spores of fungal isolates of the species Duddingtonia flagrans, Clonostachys rosea, Trichoderma esau, and Arthrobotrys musiformis; Assay B evaluates in vitro the effect of intercropping of these isolates grown in 2% water-agar (2% WA) on L3 of H. contortus. D. flagrans (Assay A) produced 5.3 × 10(6) spores and associated with T. esau, A. musiformis, or C. rosea reduced its production by 60.37, 45.28, and 49.05%, respectively. T. esau produced 7.9 × 10(7) conidia and associated with D. flagrans, A. musiformis, or C. rosea reduced its production by 39.24, 82.27, and 96.96%, respectively. A. musiformis produced 7.3 × 10(9) spores and associated with D. flagrans, T. esau, or C. rosea reduced its production by 99.98, 99.99, and 99.98%, respectively. C. rosea produced 7.3 × 10(8) conidia and associated with D. flagrans, T. esau, or A. musiformis reduced its production by 95.20, 96.84, and 93.56%, respectively. These results show evidence of antagonism in the production of spores between predators fungi.
