Potential Diaphragm Muscle Weakness-related Dyspnea Persists Two Years after COVID-19 and Could Be Improved by Inspiratory Muscle Training: Results of an Observational and an Interventional Trial.

RATIONALE: Diaphragm muscle weakness might underly persistent exertional dyspnea despite normal lung/cardiac function in individuals previously hospitalized for acute COVID-19 illness. OBJECTIVES: Firstly, to determine the persistence and pathophysiological nature of diaphragm muscle weakness and its association with exertional dyspnea two years after hospitalization for COVID-19, and secondly to investigate the impact of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on diaphragm and inspiratory muscle weakness and exertional dyspnea in individuals with long COVID. METHODS: ~2 years after hospitalization for COVID-19, 30 individuals (11 female, median age 58 [interquartile range (IQR) 51-63] years) underwent comprehensive (invasive) respiratory muscle assessment and evaluation of dyspnea. Eighteen with persistent diaphragm muscle weakness and exertional dyspnea were randomized to 6 weeks of IMT or sham training; assessments were repeated immediately after and 6 weeks after IMT completion. The primary endpoint was change in inspiratory muscle fatiguability immediately after IMT. RESULTS: At median 31 [IQR 23-32] months after hospitalization, 21/30 individuals reported relevant persistent exertional dyspnea. Diaphragm muscle weakness on exertion and reduced diaphragm cortical activation were potentially related to exertional dyspnea. Compared with sham control, IMT improved diaphragm and inspiratory muscle function (sniff transdiaphragmatic pressure 83 [IQR 75-91] vs. 100 [IQR 81-113] cmH2O; p=0.02), inspiratory muscle fatiguability (time to task failure 365 [IQR 284-701] vs. 983 [IQR 551-1494] sec; p=0.05), diaphragm voluntary activation index (79 [IQR 63-92] vs 89 [IQR 75-94]%; p=0.03), and dyspnea (Borg score 7 [IQR 5.5-8] vs. 6 [IQR 4-7]; p=0.03); improvements persisted for 6 weeks after IMT completion. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to identify a potential treatment for persisting exertional dyspnea in long COVID, and provide a possible pathophysiological explanation for the treatment benefit. This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Diaphragm Muscle Weakness Might Explain Exertional Dyspnea 15 Months after Hospitalization for COVID-19.

Rationale: Dyspnea is often a persistent symptom after acute coronavirus disease (COVID-19), even if cardiac and pulmonary function are normal. Objectives: This study investigated diaphragm muscle strength in patients after COVID-19 and its relationship to unexplained dyspnea on exertion. Methods: Fifty patients previously hospitalized with COVID-19 (14 female, age 58 ± 12 yr, half of whom were treated with mechanical ventilation, and half of whom were treated outside the ICU) were evaluated using pulmonary function testing, 6-minute-walk test, echocardiography, twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure after cervical magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve roots, and diaphragm ultrasound. Diaphragm function data were compared with values from a healthy control group. Measurements and Main Results: Moderate or severe dyspnea on exertion was present at 15 months after hospital discharge in approximately two-thirds of patients. No significant pulmonary function or echocardiography abnormalities were detected. Twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure was significantly impaired in patients previously hospitalized with COVID-19 compared with control subjects, independent of initial disease severity (14 ± 8 vs. 21 ± 3 cm H2O in mechanically ventilated patients vs. control subjects [P = 0.02], and 15 ± 8 vs. 21 ± 3 cm H2O in nonventilated patients vs. control subjects [P = 0.04]). There was a significant association between twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure and the severity of dyspnea on exertion (P = 0.03). Conclusions: Diaphragm muscle weakness was present 15 months after hospitalization for COVID-19 even in patients who did not require mechanical ventilation, and this weakness was associated with dyspnea on exertion. The current study, therefore, identifies diaphragm muscle weakness as a correlate for persistent dyspnea in patients after COVID-19 in whom lung and cardiac function are normal. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04854863).

State-of-the-Art Opinion Article on Ventilator-Induced Diaphragm Dysfunction: Update on Diagnosis, Clinical Course, and Future Treatment Options.

Evidence from both animal and human studies now supports the development of ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD) starting as early as 24 h after initiation of mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, although the concept of VIDD is now widely accepted, there remain several unanswered questions regarding its pathophysiology, rate of development, and (potentially) recovery after mechanical ventilation.This state-of-the-art opinion article briefly explains VIDD and provides an update on its clinical and prognostic relevance. It then focusses on state-of-the-art diagnostic approaches to determine diaphragm function, strength, and control (neural and peripheral), highlights knowledge gaps relevant to VIDD, and discusses the use of diaphragm pacing for VIDD prevention. It is suggested that future research projects in mechanically ventilated patients would ideally use both cortical and cervical phrenic nerve stimulation studies over time (including also diaphragm electromyography) as the gold standard techniques. This approach has not yet been utilized in a longitudinally designed study in the ICU. Application of these gold standard techniques would allow better understanding of the true pathophysiology and rate of development of VIDD. Notably, these techniques would be superior to diaphragm ultrasound, which yields surrogate markers of diaphragm function only without any direct measure of diaphragm strength or control. It is also suggested that such translational research would further advance understanding of diaphragm pacing as a very promising treatment option for VIDD.