Comparison of the Distribution of Healthcare-Associated Infections and Causative Agents Between Intensive Care Units and Other Clinics.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the trends in the distribution of healthcare associated infectious (HAIs) and causative agents in intensive care units (ICUs) and other clinics. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Health Sciences University, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye, from 2015 to 2022. METHODOLOGY: The study included patients who were diagnosed with HAIs and admitted to both the ICUs and the clinics. The data of HAIs identified between 2015-2022 were accessed and analysed retrospectively from the surveillance records of the IPC committee between 28.05.2023-07.08.2023. RESULTS: There was a decreasing trend observed in both ICU and clinics regarding the ratio of patients developing HAIs and the overall HAI rate (all p-values <0.001). These two measures were found to be significantly lower in the years 2019-2022 compared to the years 2015-2018. Over the years, particularly after 2020, a significant increasing trend in carbapenem resistance was observed in E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa (p=0.009, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively). The ratio of patients developing HAIs in the ICUs was higher than in the clinics (p<0.001). There was an increasing trend in the ratio of pneumonia and bloodstream infection (BSI) in ICUs. CONCLUSION: The increasing ratio of BSI and pneumonia in ICUs highlighted the need to review infection control bundles. Carbapenem resistance has been increasing over the years, suggesting that antimicrobial description and consumption practices should be re-evaluated, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. KEY WORDS: Intensive Care Unit, Healthcare-Associated Infections, Surveillance, Infection prevention and control, Antibiotic resistance.

Rates of underreported needlestick and sharps injuries among healthcare workers in Turkey: in the light of Infection Control Committee data.

OBJECTIVE: Doctors and nurses are frequently exposed to needlestick and sharps injuries (NSIs) because of their work. It is estimated that NSIs are more common than the rates reported to Infection Control Committee. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and reporting rates of NSIs in our hospital. METHODS: After their consent forms were obtained for the questionnaire, 670 doctors and nurses were interviewed face-to-face by the Infection Control Committee nurse. The questionnaire consisted of 22 questions, and the answers were recorded. The questions were on demographic data and injuries. The data of NSIs, whose active surveillance was made in our hospital since 2005 and in the last 1 year, were also analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 119 (17%) people out of 670 people who participated in the study had at least one NSI; 43 (36%) people of the 119 people were doctors and 76 (63.9%) people were nurses. The most common injuries among doctors were found in assistant doctors (60%). No statistically significant differences were detected between the doctors and nurses in terms of injury status (P = 0.398). The most common injuries were found in surgical clinics, and a significant difference was detected here when compared to other clinics. The data that 20 (17%) people of the 118 people who were injured by the NSIs reported the injury were obtained from the Infection Control Committee database. CONCLUSION: It is seen that injuries are high in surgical clinics and assistant doctors who have high work stress and workload. There were more injuries with sharp objects than the expected rates in our hospital although the reports were made very rarely. First of all, we should determine strategies, especially education, to reduce injuries, and then remove the obstacles to unreported injuries. The methods of clinics with a high rates of reporting needlestick and sharps injuries to the infection control committee should be examined and tried to be applied in our own clinics.

Implementation of the EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test (RAST) directly from positive blood culture bottles without the advanced identification systems.

OBJECTIVES: EUCAST published its recommendations for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility tests (RASTs) directly from positive signal blood culture (BC) bottles. The objective of the present study was to investigate the accuracy and applicability of the predicted RAST (p-RAST) method without using automated identification systems, and the effects of the results obtained with this method on the treatment decision of the clinician. METHODS: The RAST procedure was applied to positive BC samples between November 2020 and June 2021. The categorical results of the method were obtained by comparing the p-RAST results obtained at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation according to predicted bacterial species with conventional methods and standard disc diffusion results. The effects of these results on the treatment decision of the clinician were evaluated retrospectively. The actual categorical results of the EUCAST RAST [standard RAST (s-RAST)] method were identified. RESULTS: The p-RAST and s-RAST results were analysed according to 145 and 111 isolates, respectively. The p-RAST total error rates were 3.0%, 3.1% and 2.8% at 4, 6 and 8 h of incubation, respectively, and the s-RAST total error rates were determined as 2.7%, 3.3% and 3.2%, respectively. With p-RAST's results, it was observed that effective escalation was performed in the antimicrobial treatment for 45 patients, and effective de-escalation could be performed in 32 patients, but it was recommended not to perform de-escalation. CONCLUSIONS: Even in a microbiology laboratory with limited facilities, reliable antimicrobial susceptibility test results can be obtained in a short time with the p-RAST method without using automated systems and antimicrobial choice can be guided in a shorter time.

Low immunity against vaccine preventable diseases in Turkish HIV cohort

Background/aim: HIV infection increase the risk of serious disease resulting from common vaccine-preventable infections. Vaccinations are particularly important for HIV infected adults. We aimed to investigate the immunity rates against measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis A, B, and tetanus in newly diagnosed HIV patients. Materials and methods: Patients who admitted to outpatient clinics of three centers with newly diagnosed HIV infection, between 1 January 2015 and 31 June 2017 were included. Measles, mumps, rubella, varicella zoster virus, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and tetanus antibody levels were measured by commercial diagnostic kits. Demographical and laboratory data of the patients were recorded. Results: Five hundred and twenty-three patients were enrolled in the study. Of the patients 87% were male (n = 455) and the mean age was 38 ± 13 years. Serology was available for measles 74.2% (388/523), mumps 73.8% (386/523), rubella 77.8% (407/523), hepatitis A 88.5% (463/523), hepatitis B 97.7% (511/523), tetanus 8.6% (45/523), and VZV 79.9% (418/523). Seropositivity was 82% for measles, 75.6% for mumps, 92.1% for rubella. Of the patients whom all three of the components of the MMR vaccine was tested, 37.7% (127/337) were susceptible at least one and needed the vaccine. Mean age was lower in patients who are nonimmune to measles and mumps (p = 0.008). Younger patients were also nonimmune for hepatitis A, while older patients were nonimmune for hepatitis B. Conclusion: In our study we found that rates of nonimmunity can increase up to one third of the patients even though there is a national vaccination program. Nonimmune individuals should be detected and vaccinated in line with recent guidelines and response should be monitored because of the possibility of impaired immunity and possible suboptimal response. National campaigns can be launched for adult immunization and physicians should be aware of the importance of adult immunization.

Predicting diabetic foot ulcer infection using the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may be used in the early stage risk assessment and follow-up in diabetic foot infection. METHODS: Over a five-year study, NLR values on admission and day 14 of treatment were matched with their laboratory and clinical data in a cohort study. Patients were followed-up or consulted in several clinics or polyclinics (infectious diseases). RESULTS: Admission time NLR was higher, in severe cases as indicated by both Wagner and PEDIS infection scores (severe versus mild Wagner score NLR 6.7 versus 4.2; p=0.04; for PEDIS score NLR 6.3 versus 3.6; p=0.03, respectively). In patients who underwent vascular intervention (12.6 versus 4.6; p=0.02); amputation indicated (9.2 versus 4.1; p=0.005) and healed afterwards (6.9 versus 4.3; p<0,001), when matched with others. NLR was also found to be correlated with duration of both IV antibiotic treatment (r=0.374; p=0.005) and hospitalisation (r=0.337; p=0.02). Day 14 NLR was higher in patients who underwent vascular intervention (5.1 versus 2.9; p=0.007) when matched to others. CONCLUSION: Patients with higher NLR values at admission had more severe diabetic foot infection, higher risk for amputation, need for long-term hospitalisation and aggressive treatment. However, they also have more chance of benefit from treatment.

Evaluation of Post-operative Meningitis: Comparison of Meningitis Caused by Acinetobacter spp. and Other Possible Causes.

AIM: To analyse postoperative meningitis (POM) after craniotomy, and to compare the clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes and mortality rates of POM that were caused by Acinetobacter spp. or other possible causes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, POM cases in our hospital between 2008 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Cases were divided into three groups; Acinetobacter spp. meningitis (case group), non-Acinetobacter bacterial meningitis (control group 1) and culture negative meningitis (control group 2). Demographic, clinical, laboratory features, treatment modalities and mortality rates were compared between case and control groups. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients with POM were included in the study. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture results were negative in 50 (44.6%) patients; bacteria were isolated from CSF of 62 (55.3%) patients. Acinetobacter spp. was isolated from 28 (45%) patients, while bacteria other than Acinetobacter spp. were detected in 34 (55%) patients. No significant differences were observed between case and control groups in terms of age, gender, comorbidity and operation type. For the case group, change of treatment according to culture result was significantly different from control groups (p < 0.001). Mortality was 55.6% in the case group, 24.2% in control group 1 (p=0.013), and 24% in control group 2 (p=0.006). In multivariate analysis, isolation of Acinetobacter spp. from CSF culture [OR < sub > adj < /sub > 5.2, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.2-22.0, p=0.026] and inappropriate treatment (OR < sub > adj < /sub > 15.7, 95%CI:3.6-68.9, p < 0.001) were determined to be independent risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSION: Postoperative meningitis, especially caused by Acinetobacter spp., and its inappropriate empirical treatment are associated with high mortality.

Reactivation rates in patients using biological agents, with resolved HBV infection or isolated anti-HBc IgG positivity.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors and ustekunimab are widely used in autoimmune diseases. It is known that these biological agents cause the reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV). There is no standardized strategy to prevent the reactivation in patients with evidence of a previous HBV infection. In our study, anti-HBc IgG-positive patients who received a biological agent were evaluated in terms of HBV reactivation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were followed up for the use of biological agents in our clinic were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with isolated anti-HBc IgG positivity were included in the study. The HBV reactivation data were recorded from the patients' files retrospectively. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-eight patients who received biological treatment were evaluated. Twenty-nine patients with isolated anti-HBc IgG positivity or resolved HBV infection were included in the study. The HBV reactivation was seen in 5 patients (17.2%). Of these patients, 3 were using adalimumab, 1 infliximab, and 1 ustekunimab. It was controlled by antiviral therapy that was started in the early period. CONCLUSION: Drugs that block TNF-α and ustekunimab cause an increase in viral replication. In literature, the HBV reactivation rate was approximately 1% in HBsAg-negative, anti-HBC IgG-positive cases, whereas it was found to be as high as 17.2% in our study. Patients receiving the immunomodulator therapy should be evaluated for HBV serology before treatment and carefully monitored for HBV reactivation during and after treatment.

Is West Nile Virus infection associated with myasthenia gravis?

BACKGROUND: Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease which is characterised by disruption of signal transmission at neuromuscular junction. We aimed to search about a newly reported association between MG and West Nile Virus (WNV) infection. METHODS: We searched WNV IgG by ELISA in serum samples of 50 available MG patients and 38 controls. RESULTS: None of the samples gave positive results for past WNV infection. CONCLUSION: No evidence of past WNV infection was found in our study population of MG patients. This may have been because MG has been showed to be related with neuroinvasive WNV, which none of our study subjects seem to have had based on their stories. New multicentre studies focusing on immunological mechanisms and held with larger groups or especially neuroinvasive disease patients can cast light onto the answer of this question.

Serum sTREM-1 level is quite higher in Crimean Congo Hemorrhagic Fever, a viral infection.

Members of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM) family are known as immunmodulators in several infectious or noninfectious inflammatory disorders. The information about their role in viral infections is very limited. To enlighten if there is a relation between soluble TREM-1(sTREM-1) and a viral infection, Crimean Congo Haemorrhagic Fever (CCHF), we investigated the levels of sTREM-1 in the sera of 39 CCHF patients both at admission and at recovery and compared with 40 healthy controls by using microELISA technique. Statistical analysis was made by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 20 programme. Value of P < 0.05 was accepted as significant for statistical analyses. Median sTREM-1 level was higher in CCHF group when compared to the control group (1,961 vs. 151.1 pg/ml, respectively; P < 0.001). In CCHF patients, sTREM-1 levels were significantly decreased at recovery compared to initial level measured at hospital admission (1,961 vs. 948 pg/ml, respectively; P = 0.019). ΔsTREM-1 is correlated with ΔCRP, ΔWBC, and ΔPlt. We found that serum levels of sTREM-1 higher than 405.9 pg/ml existed as a cut off point for differentiating CCHF patients and control group with a sensitivity of 94.9% and specifity of 87.5%. It is proved that sTREM-1 is increased and correlates with the clinical and laboratory findings in CCHF, a viral infection characterized by activation of inflammation. This finding may lead new studies to enlighten the pathogenesis of infections developing by activation of inflammatory cascades and high level cytokine releases, especially. J. Med. Virol. 88:1473-1478, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Case management and supportive treatment for patients with Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever.

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a tick-borne infection which has been increasing in Turkey and European countries since the year 2000. The disease is particularly endemic in the Middle East and in some African countries. It is also seen in European countries as a travel infection. Patients with confirmed diagnosis are usually hospitalized for monitoring, while patients with good overall condition may be monitored on an outpatient basis. Hospitals that manage CCHF should have easy access to a blood bank, and tertiary care hospitals must have a well-equipped intensive care unit. Strict blood and body fluid control precautions should be started on admission to limit CCHF exposure. The follow-up period for each patient is determined based on individual clinical status and laboratory values. Since there is no specific antiviral treatment for CCHF, supportive treatment is essential. This review highlights some of the major features of case monitoring and supportive treatment in CCHF.

Does treatment affect the levels of serum interleukin-6, interleukin-8 and procalcitonin in diabetic foot infection? A pilot study.

AIMS: To investigate about serum PCT, IL-6 and IL-8 levels and how they are affected by the treatment in diabetic foot patients. METHODS: Fifty patients' blood samples were taken to study ESR and CRP, IL-6, IL-8 and PCT before and at the 14th day of the treatment. RESULTS: The pretreatment results of the 50 patients showed positive correlations between PCT and either ESH (r=0.49, p<0.001), or CRP (r=0.56, p<0.001). Similarly, there was a positive correlation between IL-6 and ESH (r=0.46, p=0.001), just like as it was between IL-6 and CRP (r=0.54, p<0.001). At the 14th day, the levels of ESR (70 ± 30.2 and 58.4 ± 26.2, p=0.02), CRP (63.8 ± 73.1 and 18.1 ± 19.7, p<0.001) and PCT (0.6 ± 2.1 and 0.05 ± 0.02, p=0.007) were significantly decreased while IL-6 was decreased at a close range to statistical significancy at healing patients (97.5 ± 147.2 and 47.1 ± 77.6; p=0.05), but they did not at nonhealing patients. IL-8 levels were not changed anyhow. CONCLUSIONS: PCT was significantly decreased such as ESR and CRP were in the early phase of healing; IL-6 and IL-8 levels were also decreased by the treatment, but not statistically significantly. IL-6 and PCT were affected in correlation with the other inflammatory parameters in the beginning, but IL-8 was not. PCT and IL-6 may be useful like CRP and ESR in the diagnosis and follow up of diabetic foot infection, but IL-8 is not. Further investigation is needed.