Comparison of efficacy of erector spinae plane block, thoracic paravertebral block, and erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block combination for acute pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB), thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), and ESPB and TPVB combination on acute pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). METHODS: Seventy-five patients were evaluated (three groups: ESPB, TPVB, or combined ESPB-TPVB [comb-group], each 25 patients). All interventions were performed with the same volume of bupivacaine (20 mL). Primary outcome was VAS (Visual Analog Scale) during the first 24 hours. Secondary outcomes were postoperative morphine consumption and rescue analgesic requirements. RESULTS: VAS during rest and coughing of TPVB was significantly higher compared to other groups (in all measurements compared to comb-group; and in all but 24 hours measurement to ESPB) ESPB and comb-group had similar VAS in all measurements (e.g., median VAS in ESPB, TPVB and comb-group at 8th hour: 3-4-2 [P=0.014] during coughing and 2-3-1 in rest [P<0.001], respectively). Morphine consumption was statistically significantly higher in TPVB than comb-group (ESPB: 15.28 mg; TPVB: 19.30 mg; ESPB+TPVB: 10.00 mg) (P=0.003). Rescue analgesic requirement was statistically significantly higher in the TPVB group than comb-group (P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: ESPB alone and the combination of ESPB and TPVB provided superior primary outcomes compared to TPVB alone. Morphine and rescue analgesic consumptions were higher in TPVB than comb-group. ESPB and comb-group were statistically similar in terms of primary and secondary outcomes. This study is one of the first studies using the combination of ESBP and TPVB for pain after VATS, and shows the efficacy of this approach.

Patient-centred care in thoracic surgery: a holistic approach-A review of the subjects of enhanced recovery after surgery, rehabilitation, pain management and patient-reported outcome measures in thoracic surgery.

The symposium Patient-centered care in thoracic care: a holistic approach was held on June 22, 2021, as a virtual event in the context of the European conference on general thoracic surgery. Its aim was to explore how to improve patient outcomes in thoracic surgery by using enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) frameworks and collaboration within healthcare. During the four presentations, topics on patient mobilization and physical rehabilitation, pain management, and the role of chest drainage in facilitating perioperative care were discussed. Strategies to minimize opioid consumption and incorporate patients' experiences as quality indicators were described. There were two main ideas that were considered pivotal to achieve optimal care: (I) the use of simple, easily implementable perioperative protocols and practices to improve compliance from both patients and the healthcare team, and (II) promote a better recovery with early mobilization and reducing the patient's levels of pain. Among the key learnings that emerged from the presentations are the importance of taking the patient's experiences into account, including what they value the most after surgery, and how technology can enable better care. The use of digital chest drainage systems emerged as a way for improving patient outcomes and experiences across several key indicators.

Should fluid management in thoracic surgery be goal directed?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To find a reliable answer to the question in the title: Should fluid management in thoracic surgery be goal directed? RECENT FINDINGS: 'Moderate' fluid regimen is the current recommendation of fluid management in thoracic anesthesia, however, especially in more risky patients; 'Goal-Directed Therapy' (GDT) can be a more reliable approach than just 'moderate'. There are numerous studies examining its effects in general anesthesia; albeit mostly retrospective and very heterogenic. There are few studies of GDT in thoracic anesthesia with similar drawbacks. SUMMARY: Although the evidence level is low, GDT is generally associated with fewer postoperative complications. It can be helpful in decision-making for volume-optimization, timing of fluid administration, and indication of vasoactive agents.

Impact of regional analgesia techniques on the long-term clinical outcomes following thoracic surgery.

Continuous monitoring of clinical outcomes after thoracotomy is very important to improve medical services and to reduce complications. The use of regional analgesia techniques for thoracotomy offers several advantages in the perioperative period including effective pain control, reduced opioid consumption and associated side effects, enhanced recovery, and improved patient satisfaction. Postthoracotomy complications, such as chronic postthoracotomy pain syndrome, postthoracotomy ipsilateral shoulder pain, pulmonary complications, recurrence, and unplanned admission to the intensive care unit are frequent and may be associated with poor outcomes and mortality. The role of regional techniques to reduce the incidence of these complications is questionable. This narrative review aims to investigate the impact of regional analgesia on the long-term clinical outcomes after thoracotomy.

Enhanced recovery after thoracic anesthesia.

In recent years, the concept of "Perioperative Medicine" has been evolved to a more concrete and sophisticated approach called "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS). ERAS has been first introduced in colorectal surgery by a dedicated leading ERAS® society, ERAS-criteria has been subsequently extended into several types of surgery, including thoracic surgery. Anesthesiology has always been one of the most important components of the multidisciplinary perioperative approaches, which is also valid for ERAS. There are several guidelines published on the enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery (ERATS). This article focuses on the "official" ERATS protocols of a joint consensus of two different societies. Regarding thoracic anesthesia, there are some challenges to be dealt with. The first challenge, although there is a large number of studies published on thoracic anesthesia, only a very few of them have studied the overall outcome and quality of recovery; and only few of them were powered enough to provide sufficient evidence. This has led to the fact that some components of the protocol are debatable. The second challenge, the adherence to individual elements and the overall compliance are poorly reported and also hard to apply even in the best organized centers. This article explains and discusses the debatable viewpoints on the elements of the ERATS protocol published in 2019 aiming to achieve a list for the future steps required for a more effective and evidence-based ERATS protocol.

Effects of short-term hyperoxic ventilation on lung, kidney, heart, and liver in a rat model: A biochemical evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Despite studies on the adverse effects of hyperoxia, its use is still recommended by the World Health Organization. The aim of this study was to test the possible harmful effects of hyperoxia on the lung, kidney, heart, and liver in a rat mechanical ventilation model. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were randomly assigned into two groups (n=6/group): Normoxic (FiO2: 0.3) or hyperoxic (FiO2: 1.0) ventilation for 4 h. The injury was evaluated in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), blood, lung, liver, kidney, and heart was evaluated in terms of cell surface integrity, extracellular matrix (sialic acid, syndecan-1), osmotic stress (free hemoglobin), and redox homeostasis-lipid peroxidaation (malondialdehyde). BAL and wet/dry weight ratio were also evaluated for cellular permeability. RESULTS: Four hours of hyperoxic ventilation did not lead to significant changes in (1) sialic acid, syndecan-1, (2) malondialdehyde levels and wet/dry weight ratio in liver, kidney, heart, and lung compared to normoxic ventilation. CONCLUSION: Mechanical ventilation with hyperoxia seems to have almost similar effects compared to ventilation with normoxia. However, the long term effect of hyperoxia should be evaluated.

Thoracic Anesthesia during the COVID-19 Pandemic: 2021 Updated Recommendations by the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC) Thoracic Subspecialty Committee.

The novel coronavirus pandemic has radically changed the landscape of normal surgical practice. Lifesaving cancer surgery, however, remains a clinical priority, and there is an increasing need to fully define the optimal oncologic management of patients with varying stages of lung cancer, allowing prioritization of which thoracic procedures should be performed in the current era. Healthcare providers and managers should not ignore the risk of a bimodal peak of mortality in patients with lung cancer; an imminent spike due to mortality from acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, and a secondary peak reflecting an excess of cancer-related mortality among patients whose treatments were deemed less urgent, delayed, or cancelled. The European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Thoracic Anesthesia Subspecialty group has considered these challenges and developed an updated set of expert recommendations concerning the infectious period, timing of surgery, vaccination, preoperative screening and evaluation, airway management, and ventilation of thoracic surgical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Thoracic Paravertebral Block Achieves Better Pain Control Than Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intercostal Nerve Block in Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB), thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), and intercostal nerve block (ICNB) after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-blind study. SETTING: University hospital, single institution. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing VATS. INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasonography-guided ESPB, ultrasonography-guided TPVB, or ICNB. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were enrolled into the following three groups according to analgesia technique as ESPB, TPVB, or ICNB, respectively, group erector spinae plane block (GESP) (n = 35), group thoracic paravertebral block (GTPV) (n = 35), and group intercostal nerve block (GICN) (n = 36). Multimodal analgesia was achieved with paracetamol, tenoxicam, and intravenous morphine (via patient-controlled analgesia) for all study groups. Pain scores were assessed by visual analog scale, and morphine consumption, rescue analgesic requirement, and side effects were recorded postoperatively. Dynamic visual analog scale at the first hour as primary outcome was determined five (two-seven), four (one-six) and (two-six) in GESP, GTPV, and GICN, respectively. Dynamic pain scores were significantly lower in GTPV compared with GESP and GICN at 24 hours (p < 0.017). Dynamic pain scores in GICN were significantly lower at 12 hours compared with GESP (p < 0.017). Morphine consumption for the first 24 hours was similar in GICN and GTPV, and it was significantly lower in GICN and GTPV in comparison to GESP (p < 0.017). Rescue analgesic requirement and side effects were similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: All three blocks can obtain sufficient analgesia after VATS; however, TPVB appeared to be the preferable method compared with ESPB and ICNB, with a more successful analgesia and less morphine consumption.

Thoracic Anesthesia of Patients With Suspected or Confirmed 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infection: Preliminary Recommendations for Airway Management by the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology Thoracic Subspecialty Committee.

The novel coronavirus has caused a pandemic around the world. Management of patients with suspected or confirmed coronavirus infection who have to undergo thoracic surgery will be a challenge for the anesthesiologists. The thoracic subspecialty committee of European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology (EACTA) has conducted a survey of opinion in order to create recommendations for the anesthetic approach to these challenging patients. It should be emphasized that both the management of the infected patient with COVID-19 and the self-protection of the anesthesia team constitute a complicated challenge. The text focuses therefore on both important topics.

Comparison of epidural analgesia combined with general anesthesia and general anesthesia for postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive dysfunction in the early postoperative course is common for the elderly population. Anesthetic management may affect postoperative cognitive decline. Effective analgesia, early recovery and modulation of the stress response are advantages of neuraxial blocks. This study aims to compare the effects of general anesthesia and the combination of general anesthesia with epidural analgesia for postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). We hypothesized that neuraxial block combined with general anesthesia (GA) would have a favorable influence on POCD prevention. METHODS: Patients above 60 years undergoing non-cardiac surgery were included in this randomized, prospective study and randomized into two groups. Patients in the first group (GI) were treated under GA, whereas in the second group (GII), epidural analgesia was combined with GA. Patients' cognitive function was assessed before and one week after surgery using a neuropsychological test battery. POCD was defined as a drop of one standard deviation from baseline on two or more tests. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were allocated for the final analysis. Demographic and operative data were similar between groups, except maximum pain scores, which were significantly higher in GI than GII (4.9±2.8 vs. 1.7±1.7; p<0.001, respectively). The incidence of POCD was comparable between groups (26% in GI and 24% in GII). Memory performance, visuospatial functions, and language skills tests were significantly higher in GII compared to GI. CONCLUSION: General anesthesia and epidural analgesia combined with general anesthesia resulted in similar POCD in elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery. However, in combined anesthesia group memory, language skills and visuospatial functions appeared to be better preserved. Effective pain control might contribute to preventing cognitive decline in some domains.

[Effects of cerebral oxygen changes during coronary bypass surgery on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients: a pilot study]. / Efeitos das alterações no oxigênio cerebral durante cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio sobre a disfunção cognitiva no pós­operatório em pacientes idosos: estudo piloto.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction is common after cardiac surgery. Adequate cerebral perfusion is essential and near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) can measure cerebral oxygenation. Aim of this study is to compare incidence of early and late postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients treated with conventional or near infrared spectroscopy monitoring. METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary surgery above 60 years, were included and randomized to 2 groups; control and NIRS groups. Peroperative management was NIRS guided in GN; and with conventional approach in control group. Test battery was performed before surgery, at first week and 3 rd month postoperatively. The battery comprised clock drawing, memory, word list generation, digit spam and visuospatial skills subtests. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction was defined as drop of 1 SD (standard deviation) from baseline on two or more tests. Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of quantitative measurements; Chi-square exact test to compare quantitative data. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients in control group and 19 in NIRS group completed study. Demographic and operative data were similar. At first week postoperative cognitive dysfunction were present in 9 (45%) and 7 (41%) of patients in control group and NIRS group respectively. At third month 10 patients (50%) were assessed as postoperative cognitive dysfunction; incidence was 4 (24%) in NIRS group (p:0.055). Early and late postoperative cognitive dysfunction group had significantly longer ICU stay (1.74+0.56 vs. 2.94+0.95; p<0.001; 1.91+0.7 vs. 2.79+1.05; p<0.01) and longer hospital stay (9.19+2.8 vs. 11.88+1.7; p<0.01; 9.48+2.6 vs. 11.36+2.4; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study conventional monitoring and near infrared spectroscopy resulted in similar rates of early postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Late cognitive dysfunction tended to ameliorate with near infrared spectroscopy. Early and late cognitive declines were associated with prolonged ICU and hospital stays.

Postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A comparison between single-shot interscalene block and single-shot supraclavicular block.

OBJECTIVES: In arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery for postoperative analgesia opioids, nonsteroid analgesics, and local anesthetics can be used. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness, additional analgesic requirements, patients satisfaction, and complications of single-shot interscalene and supraclavicular blocks. METHODS: After obtaining the ethics committee's approval and informed consent, 50 ASA I-II patients were randomized to either the interscalene (GISB) or supraclavicular (GSCB) group. Preoperatively, patients received an ultrasonography-guided block using 30 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine. In the postoperative period, morphine patient-controlled analgesia was administered as a 0.3-mg/h basal dose and 1-mg bolus dose, with a 20-min lockout time. Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS; 0-10 cm) scores of the patients were evaluated at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively; additional analgesic requirements, adverse effects, and complications were recorded. Patient satisfaction (PS) scores were evaluated after 24 h. RESULTS: VAS scores at 4 h were lower in the GSCB group than in the GISB group, and the VAS scores at 8, 12, and 24 h were lower in the GISB group than in the GSCB group, with no statistical significance. Additional analgesic requirements was 28% in the GISB group and 68% in the GSCB group (p < 0.05). Total morphine consumption was lower in the GISB group than in the GSCB group (18.95±9.2 mg vs. 30.6 ± 9.6 mg; p < 0.001). PS scores were higher in the GISB group than in the GSCB group (7.0±1.0 vs. 6.1±0.9; p < 0.01). Adverse effects and complication rates were similar in both the groups. In GISB group, seven patients (28%) had nausea/vomiting, whereas in the GSCB group, 12 patients (48%) had nausea/vomiting. This difference was statistically insignificant. CONCLUSION: Supraclavicular block can be considered as an alternative to interscalene block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

WHO Needs High FIO2?

World Health Organization and the United States Center for Disease Control have recently recommended the use of 0.8 FIO2 in all adult surgical patients undergoing general anaesthesia, to prevent surgical site infections. This recommendation has arisen several discussions: As a matter of fact, there are numerous studies with different results about the effect of FIO2 on surgical site infection. Moreover, the clinical effects of FIO2 are not limited to infection control. We asked some prominent authors about their comments regarding the recent recommendations.

The effect of two different glycemic management protocols on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in coronary artery bypass surgery / Efeito de dois protocolos de controle glicêmico diferentes sobre a disfunção cognitiva após cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio

Abstract Introduction: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is an adverse outcome of surgery that is more common after open heart procedures. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of tightly controlled blood glucose levels during coronary artery surgery on early and late cognitive decline. Methods: 40 patients older than 50 years undergoing elective coronary surgery were randomized into two groups. In the "Tight Control" group (GI), the glycemia was maintained between 80 and 120 mg dL-1 while in the "Liberal" group (GII), it ranged between 80-180 mg dL-1. A neuropsychological test battery was performed three times: baseline before surgery and follow-up first and 12th weeks, postoperatively. POCD was defined as a drop of one standard deviation from baseline on two or more tests. Results: At the postoperative first week, neurocognitive tests showed that 10 patients in the GI and 11 patients in GII had POCD. The incidence of early POCD was similar between groups. However the late assessment revealed that cognitive dysfunction persisted in five patients in the GII whereas none was rated as cognitively impaired in GI (p = 0.047). Conclusion: We suggest that tight perioperative glycemic control in coronary surgery may play a role in preventing persistent cognitive impairment.

Resumo Introdução: A disfunção cognitiva pós-operatória (DCPO) é um resultado adverso cirúrgico que é mais comum após cirurgias cardíacas abertas. O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar o papel dos níveis de glicose no sangue rigorosamente controlados durante a cirurgia coronariana no declínio cognitivo precoce e tardio. Métodos: Foram randomizados em dois grupos 40 pacientes acima de 50 anos e submetidos à cirurgia coronariana eletiva. No grupo "controle rigoroso" (GI), a glicemia foi mantida entre 80-120 mg.dL-1; enquanto no grupo "liberal" (GII), variou entre 80-180 mg.dL-1. A bateria de testes neuropsicológicos foi feita três vezes: fase basal, antes da cirurgia e na primeira e 12ª semana de acompanhamento no pós-operatório. DCPO foi definida como uma queda de um desvio padrão da fase basal em dois ou mais testes. Resultados: Na primeira semana de pós-operatório, os testes neurocognitivos mostraram que 10 pacientes no GI e 11 pacientes no GII apresentaram DCPO. A incidência de DCPO precoce foi semelhante entre os grupos. No entanto, a avaliação tardia revelou que a disfunção cognitiva persistiu em cinco pacientes no GII, enquanto nenhum paciente foi classificado como cognitivamente prejudicado no GI (p = 0,047). Conclusão: Sugerimos que o controle glicêmico rigoroso no perioperatório de cirurgia coronariana pode desempenhar um papel na prevenção da deterioração cognitiva persistente.

[The effect of two different glycemic management protocols on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in coronary artery bypass surgery]. / Efeito de dois protocolos de controle glicêmico diferentes sobre a disfunção cognitiva após cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is an adverse outcome of surgery that is more common after open heart procedures. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of tightly controlled blood glucose levels during coronary artery surgery on early and late cognitive decline. METHODS: 40 patients older than 50 years undergoing elective coronary surgery were randomized into two groups. In the "Tight Control" group (GI), the glycemia was maintained between 80 and 120mg·dL-1 while in the "Liberal" group (GII), it ranged between 80-180mg·dL-1. A neuropsychological test battery was performed three times: baseline before surgery and follow-up first and 12th weeks, postoperatively. POCD was defined as a drop of one standard deviation from baseline on two or more tests. RESULTS: At the postoperative first week, neurocognitive tests showed that 10 patients in the GI and 11 patients in GII had POCD. The incidence of early POCD was similar between groups. However the late assessment revealed that cognitive dysfunction persisted in five patients in the GII whereas none was rated as cognitively impaired in GI (p=0.047). CONCLUSION: We suggest that tight perioperative glycemic control in coronary surgery may play a role in preventing persistent cognitive impairment.

Fluid management in thoracic anesthesia.

Fluid management during thoracic anesthesia remains as a challenge for the anesthesiologists. The "safe zone" between volume overload (risk of pulmonary edema) and hypovolemia (potential risk of renal failure) is hard to determine and narrow. Relationship between perioperative fluid administration and postoperative lung injury has been clearly demonstrated but lung injury can even occur after the most restrictive management. Multiple hit hypothesis and endothelial glycocalyx in addition to revised Starling equation can help us understand this dilemma. Although a "liberal" fluid strategy is out of question for thoracic surgery, evidence on "restrictive" and "goal-directed" fluid strategies are missing. New monitors with dynamic parameters can help to evaluate if the patient will respond to a fluid challenge. However, "volume responsiveness" should not be equated with volume deficiency, especially in a patient with thoracic epidural catheter. Fluid type (crystalloids or colloids) is also another unclear point, although balanced solutions should be preferred for crystalloids. Minimal discontinuation of oral hydration, early feeding and mobilization should be encouraged. This review summarizes current evidence on the topic and highlights unanswered questions.

Patient state index and cerebral blood flow changes during shoulder arthroscopy in beach chair position / Patient State Index e alterações do fluxo sanguíneo cerebral durante artroscopia do ombro em posição de cadeira de praia

Abstract Background and objectives: The aim of the study were to demonstrate the possible hemodynamic changes and cerebral blood flow alterations in patients who were positioned from supine to beach chair position; and to detect if the position change causes any cortical activity alteration as measured by the 4-channeled electroencephalography monitor. Methods: 35 patients were included. Before the induction, mean arterial pressure and patient state index values were recorded (T0). After the intubation, doppler-ultrasonography of the patients’ internal carotid and vertebral arteries were evaluated to acquire cerebral blood flow values from the formula. In supine position, mean arterial pressure, patient state index and cerebral blood flow values were recorded (T1) and the patient was positioned to beach chair position. After 5 min all measurements were repeated (T2). Measurements of patient state index and mean arterial pressure were repeated after 20 (T3), and 40 (T4) min. Results: There was a significant decrease between T0 and T1 in heart rate (80.5 ± 11.6 vs. 75.9 ± 14.4 beats/min), MAP (105.8 ± 21.9 vs. 78.9 ± 18.4 mmHg) and PSI (88.5 ± 8.3 vs. 30.3 ± 9.7) (all p < 0.05). Mean arterial pressure decreased significantly after position change, and remained decreased, compared to T1. The overall analysis of patient state index values (T1-T4) showed no significant change; however, comparing only T1 and T2 resulted in a statically significant decrease in patient state index. There was a significant decrease in cerebral blood flow after beach chair position. Conclusion: Beach chair position was associated with a decrease in cerebral blood flow and patient state index values. Patient state index was affected by the gravitational change of the cerebral blood flow; however, both factors were not directly correlated to each other. Moreover, the decrease in patient state index value was transient and returned to normal values within 20 min.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: Demonstrar as possíveis alterações hemodinâmicas e do fluxo sanguíneo cerebral (FSC) em pacientes que foram posicionados de supinação para cadeira de praia (CP) e detectar se a mudança de posição causa alguma alteração na atividade cortical como mensurado pelo monitor de EEG com quatro canais. Métodos: Foram incluídos 35 pacientes. Antes da indução, os valores da PAM e do IEP foram registrados (T0). Após a intubação, ultrassonografias com Doppler da carótida interna e artérias vertebrais dos pacientes foram avaliadas para adquirir os valores do FSC a partir da fórmula. Em supinação, os valores da PAM, IEP e FSC foram registrados (T1) e o paciente foi posicionado em CP. Após cinco minutos, todas as mensurações foram repetidas (T2). As mensurações do IEP e PAM foram repetidas após 20 (T3) e 40 minutos (T4). Resultados: Houve uma diminuição significativa entre T0 e T1 na FC (80,5 ± 11,6 vs. 75,9 ± 14,4 bpm), PAM (105,8 ± 21,9 vs. 78,9 ± 18,4 mmHg) e IEP (88,5 ± 8,3 vs. 30,3 ± 9,7) (p < 0,05 para todos). A PAM diminuiu significativamente após a mudança de posição e permaneceu diminuída em relação a T1. A análise global dos valores do IEP (T1-T4) não mostrou mudança significativa, mas a comparação de apenas T1 e T2 resultou em redução estatisticamente significativa do IEP. Houve redução significativa do FSC após o posicionado em CP. Conclusão: O posicionado em CP foi associado à diminuição do FSC e dos valores do IEP. O IEP foi afetado pela mudança gravitacional do FSC; no entanto, ambos os fatores não estavam diretamente correlacionados. Além disso, a diminuição do valor do IEP foi transitória e voltou aos valores normais dentro de 20 minutos.

Patient state index and cerebral blood flow changes during shoulder arthroscopy in beach chair position.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study were to demonstrate the possible hemodynamic changes and cerebral blood flow alterations in patients who were positioned from supine to beach chair position; and to detect if the position change causes any cortical activity alteration as measured by the 4-channeled electroencephalography monitor. METHODS: 35 patients were included. Before the induction, mean arterial pressure and patient state index values were recorded (T0). After the intubation, doppler-ultrasonography of the patients' internal carotid and vertebral arteries were evaluated to acquire cerebral blood flow values from the formula. In supine position, mean arterial pressure, patient state index and cerebral blood flow values were recorded (T1) and the patient was positioned to beach chair position. After 5min all measurements were repeated (T2). Measurements of patient state index and mean arterial pressure were repeated after 20 (T3), and 40 (T4)min. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease between T0 and T1 in heart rate (80.5±11.6 vs. 75.9±14.4beats/min), MAP (105.8±21.9 vs. 78.9±18.4mmHg) and PSI (88.5±8.3 vs. 30.3±9.7) (all p<0.05). Mean arterial pressure decreased significantly after position change, and remained decreased, compared to T1. The overall analysis of patient state index values (T1-T4) showed no significant change; however, comparing only T1 and T2 resulted in a statically significant decrease in patient state index. There was a significant decrease in cerebral blood flow after beach chair position. CONCLUSION: Beach chair position was associated with a decrease in cerebral blood flow and patient state index values. Patient state index was affected by the gravitational change of the cerebral blood flow; however, both factors were not directly correlated to each other. Moreover, the decrease in patient state index value was transient and returned to normal values within 20min.