Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Cancer ; 133: 56-65, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32442924

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced ovarian insufficiency among young patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumour (MOGCT) receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: This multicentre, retrospective study was conducted at 15 sites affiliated with the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group and enrolled 354 patients between January 1995 and September 2018. Among them, 227 patients were included in this study and divided into two groups according to the use of GnRHa during chemotherapy (GnRHa versus no GnRHa groups). The primary objective was to compare the rates of menstrual resumption between the two groups. We also assessed the clinical determinants affecting menstrual resumption among the study groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the GnRHa (n = 63) and no GnRHa (n = 164) groups regarding age at diagnosis, parity, ethnicity, age at menarche, body mass index, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, mode of surgery and surgery type. The rate of menstrual resumption after chemotherapy was 100% (63 of 63) in the GnRHa group and 90.9% (149 of 164) in the no GnRHa group (p = 0.013). The mean periods from last chemotherapy to menstrual resumption were 7.4 and 7.3 months in the GnRHa and no GnRHa groups, respectively. GnRHa co-administration during chemotherapy reduced the likelihood of amenorrhoea after chemotherapy, although statistical significance was not confirmed in the univariate analysis (odds ratio: 0.276; 95% confidence interval, 0.004-1.317; p = 0.077). CONCLUSION: Temporary ovarian suppression with GnRHa during chemotherapy does not significantly increase the chances of menstrual resumption in young patients with MOGCT.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Ovariana Primária/induzido quimicamente , Insuficiência Ovariana Primária/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Amenorreia/induzido quimicamente , Amenorreia/epidemiologia , Amenorreia/prevenção & controle , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Bleomicina/administração & dosagem , Bleomicina/efeitos adversos , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Etoposídeo/administração & dosagem , Etoposídeo/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Preservação da Fertilidade/métodos , Humanos , Infertilidade Feminina/induzido quimicamente , Infertilidade Feminina/epidemiologia , Infertilidade Feminina/prevenção & controle , Menopausa Precoce/efeitos dos fármacos , Menstruação/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/epidemiologia , Ovário/efeitos dos fármacos , Gravidez , Insuficiência Ovariana Primária/epidemiologia , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 51(3): 248-51, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21631445

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative blood loss is a concern in the surgical treatment of myomatous uteri. Misoprostol causes the myometrium and isolated uterine arteries to contract and has blood-saving effects in myomectomy. AIM: To assess the efficacy of rectal misoprostol in reducing haemorrhage during laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH). METHODS: Retrospective case-control study. Women who had undergone LAVH for leiomyoma were enrolled (n=117). Forty-nine women who used 400 µg of misoprostol rectally 1 h before LAVH were compared with 68 women who did not. The surgical outcomes were compared statistically with Mann-Whitney rank sum test, χ(2) test, or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The demographic variables were similarly distributed in both groups. There were no significant differences in the estimated blood loss, reduction in haemoglobin, operation time, or uterine weight between the two groups (P>0.05). The rates of operative complications (4.1 vs 10.3% for the misoprostol and control groups, respectively, P=0.21) were not different. There was no febrile morbidity (>38°C) within 24 h of the misoprostol insertion. CONCLUSION: These data do not support the use of rectal misoprostol to reduce blood loss during LAVH. The pharmacoclinical effects of misoprostol in the uterus should be clarified.


Assuntos
Abortivos não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Histerectomia Vaginal/efeitos adversos , Misoprostol/uso terapêutico , Hemorragia Uterina/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...