Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) ; 32(3): 334-340, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35199929

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic utility of traditional diagnostic tests (ie, radiographs and focused assessment using sonography for trauma [FAST] scans) to whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) for characterizing injuries in polytrauma patients. A secondary objective was to compare costs of traditional diagnostic tests to WBCT. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Private, level 1 veterinary trauma center. ANIMALS: Convenience sample of 21 client-owned cats and dogs presenting with polytrauma. INTERVENTIONS: Abdominal and thoracic FAST were performed by the primary clinician, if indicated. Radiographs were performed on areas concerning for trauma at the primary clinician's discretion. A WBCT was performed on each patient within 24 h of presentation and was blindly interpreted by a board-certified radiologist. Patients were only placed under anesthesia if further procedures were planned. IV contrast administration was employed at the discretion of the primary clinician and radiologist. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (14 dogs and 7 cats) were enrolled. Sources of trauma included blunt force (80%), penetrating wounds (10%), and unknown sources (10%). Twelve injuries were missed on traditional diagnostics tests. Injuries missed on traditional diagnostic workup included pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pulmonary contusions, pleural effusion, traumatic bulla, peritoneal effusion, and an appendicular skeleton fracture. A distal metacarpal fracture was missed on WBCT. Traditional diagnostic tests misdiagnosed a diaphragmatic hernia and a ruptured urinary bladder, whereas WBCT was able to rule out these injuries. There were no adverse outcomes associated with missed injuries. The median cost of traditional diagnostic tests was significantly less than the cost of WBCT (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although cost is higher, WBCT is a single test that can provide more comprehensive information and may help decrease the risk of missed injuries compared to traditional diagnostic tests. WBCT may be considered as a first-line diagnostic in severely traumatized patients.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Doenças do Gato , Doenças do Cão , Traumatismo Múltiplo , Traumatismos Torácicos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Abdominais/veterinária , Animais , Gatos , Cães , Traumatismo Múltiplo/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismo Múltiplo/veterinária , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Torácicos/veterinária , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/veterinária , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/veterinária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...