Effects of continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) in kidney transplant recipients.

Erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) are commonly used to treat anemia in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Since 2007, continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) has been one of the newest recombinant ESAs to treat anemia in dialysis and nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. The efficacy of CERA to manage anemia has not been extensively evaluated in KTRs. We evaluated safety, efficacy, and satisfaction among KTRs treated with CERA. We enrolled 19 anemic KTRs (60 ± 9.3 y) who were treated with short-acting ESA for ≥24 weeks. They were shifted to the equivalent dose of CERA and followed for 24 weeks. We measured serum hemoglobin, hematocrit, creatinine, iron, ferritin, and transferrin. To investigate tolerance to and satisfaction with short-acting ESA and CERA, questionnaires were administered to the patients before shifting to CERA and at the end of the follow-up. After 6 months, CERA induced an increase in hemoglobin levels (12.3 ± 0.8 vs 11.2 ± 1.1 g/dL; P = .002, CERA vs short-acting ESA, respectively). In 2 patients treatment was discontinued because the hemoglobin increased to >13 g/dL. No significant differences were observed in serum iron and creatinine between short-acting ESA and CERA throughout the study. The questionnaires showed better compliance to CERA treatment with reduced pain at the injection site, which led subjects to prefer CERA to short-acting ESA. In summary, CERA showed better control of anemia compared with short-acting ESA. It was preferred by the majority of patients, mainly because of the reduced number of monthly injections. Our results demonstrated CERA to be effective, safe, and well tolerated in the management of anemia in KTRs.

Sirolimus prevents short-term renal changes induced by ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) is present at various degrees in kidney transplants. I/R plays a major role in early function and long-term survival of renal allograft. The purpose of our study was to determine if immunosuppressants modulate I/R in a model that separates I/R from all immune responses. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats with monolateral renal I/R received daily cyclosporine (A), tacrolimus (B), sirolimus (C) or saline (D). Sham-operated rats received saline (E). After 30 days, glomerular filtration rate for each kidney was measured by inulin clearance. Kidney injury was examined, and TGF-ß, fibronectin and metalloproteases were evaluated by real-time PCR, Western blot and zymography. RESULTS: Sirolimus, but not cyclosporine and tacrolimus, prevented a glomerular filtration rate decrease in I/R kidneys (403 ± 303 vs. 1,006 ± 484 µl/min, p < 0.05; 126 ± 170 vs. 567 ± 374 µl/min, p < 0.05; 633 ± 293 vs. 786 ± 255; A, B and C group, respectively, I/R vs. contralateral kidneys). Sirolimus reduced ED-1+ cell infiltrate, interstitial fibrosis and intimal thickening of small vessels observed in I/R kidneys of controls and calcineurin inhibitor-treated rats. Tacrolimus and cyclosporine increased fibronectin and TGF-ß expression and matrix deposition. Only sirolimus increased metalloprotease activity. CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus but not calcineurin inhibitors prevented I/R-induced kidney injury.

Effects of sirolimus on human mesangial cells.

Mesangial cell (MC) proliferation and production of extracellular matrix or loss of MC are both central findings in a number of renal proteinuric diseases. However, the role of MC as components of the glomerular filtration barrier and whether MC alterations induce changes in the glomerular filtration barrier leading to proteinuria are still matters of debate. The effects of Sirolimus (SRL) in proteinuric nephropathies is controversial: some papers have indicated a reduction and others, an increase in proteinuria after sirolimus treatment. Considering the pivotal role of MC in the pathogenesis of many chronic nephropathies, we evaluated the effect of SRL on cultured human MC. We treated primary human MC cultures with SRL, or platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) or SRL + PDGF, or dimethylsulfoxide, the SRL vehicle, as a control. PDGF was used to activate MC. After 48 hours treatment, MC showed a significant growth increase that was significantly reduced by SRL (P < .01). Apoptosis, determined by the TUNEL assay and flow cytometry, was not modified by the treatments at 24 hours. SRL treatment increased significantly the number of alpha-smooth muscle actin-positive cells compared with controls (P < .05). Cells treated with SRL and SRL + PDGF showed significant changes in morphology with increased mean cell surface, perimeter, and maximum diameter (P < .01) but not protein content. Furthermore, MC treated with SRL showed decreased migration through polycarbonate membranes. The changes induced by SRL may help to explain some of the in vivo effects observed in SRL-treated patients.

The improvement of ischemia/reperfusion injury by erythropoetin is not mediated through bone marrow cell recruitment in rats.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is a major cause of acute renal failure in kidney transplantation; however, the mechanisms of kidney damage and repair are not yet clear. So far no treatment has been effective to prevent I/R injury. In the present study we evaluated the effect of erythropoetin (EPO) in I/R injury in rats. We investigated the role of bone marrow cells (BMC) in kidney repair and the effect of EPO on BMC recruitment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Female Sprague Dawley rats transplanted with male BMCs underwent I/R injury. In the treatment group rats received 5000 IU of EPO 30 minutes before renal ischemia. At 2 and 4 weeks after I/R, rats were humanely killed and we measured creatinine clearance (glomerular filtration rate [GFR]), proteinuria, and body weight (BW). Renal tissue was harvested for histologic and molecular analysis. Fluorescein in situ hybridization (FISH) and TUNEL were used to determined the presence of male cell chimerism and apoptosis in renal tissue. RESULTS: At 4 weeks after I/R, EPO significantly improved GFR (1.8 +/- 0.2 vs 1.2 +/- 0.14 mL/min; P < .05). No significant differences between EPO and control rats were observed in proteinuria, BW, and hemoglobin levels at 2 and 4 weeks. After death, the kidney showed only minimal tubulointerstitial changes, which were more marked in control rats. FISH analysis demonstrated a low degree of microchimerism, not significantly different between EPO and control rats. Apoptosis decreased between 2 and 4 weeks after I/R, in both EPO and control groups. CONCLUSION: EPO improved GFR and injury at 4 weeks after I/R; however, it did not enhance the recruitment of BMC.

Rapamycin reduces proteinuria and renal damage in the rat remnant kidney model.

Rapamycin is an immunosuppressive drug used to prevent acute allograft rejection in solid organ transplantation. It shows less nephrotoxicity than calcineurin inhibitors. We evaluated the effect of rapamycin in rats undergoing 5/6 nephrectomy, a model of proteinuric and progressive renal failure. Fourteen days after surgery rats were randomized either to receive rapamycin or to remain untreated (control). Rats were humanely killed on day 91; serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, and proteinuria were assessed. Renal sections were stained with periodic acid-Schiff to evaluate glomerular volume (Gv), glomerulosclerosis (GS) and tubulointerstitial damage (TIS); we evaluated GS and TIS by Sirius red staining (SR). Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Rapamycin affected neither serum creatinine nor creatinine clearance; it reduced Gv (controls, 5.9 +/- 3.1 x 10(6); rapamycin, 1.3 +/- 0.7 x 10(6) microm(3)) and proteinuria (control, 349 +/- 146; rapamycin, 56 +/- 27 mg/24 h; P < .05); rapamycin ameliorated GS (control, 78 +/- 7; rapamycin, 36 +/- 7%; P < .05; SR: control, 13.2 +/- 3.5; rapamycin, 3.8 +/- 1.0%; P < .05), and TIS (control, 3.25 +/- 0.5; rapamycin, 1.0 +/- 0.1; P < .05; SR: control, 29 +/- 3; rapamycin, 11 +/- 3%; P < .05). Rapamycin reduced alphaSMA (control, 3.25 +/- 0.5; rapamycin, 1.0 +/- 0.1; P < .05), VIM (control, 3.5 +/- 0.6; rapamycin, 1.0 +/- 1.4; P < .05), and CD68(+) cells infiltration (control, 110 +/- 43; rapamycin, 24 +/- 1 cells; P < .05). Rapamycin slows the progression of renal damage in the rat remnant kidney and may represent a novel approach to the treatment of chronic kidney disease.