Cyclophosphamide-free mobilisation increases safety while preserving the efficacy of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in refractory Crohn's disease patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation [AHSCT] is a therapeutic option for refractory Crohn's disease [CD]. However, high adverse event rates related to chemotherapy toxicity and immunosuppression limit its applicability. This study aims to evaluate AHSCT's safety and efficacy using a cyclophosphamide (Cy)-free mobilisation regimen. METHODS: A prospective observational study included 14 refractory CD patients undergoing AHSCT between June 2017 and October 2022. The protocol involved outpatient mobilisation with G-CSF 12-16 µg/kg/daily for 5 days, and optional Plerixafor 240 µg/d (1-2 doses) if the CD34+ cell count target was unmet. Standard conditioning with Cy and anti-thymocyte globulin was administered. Clinical, endoscopic, and radiological assessments were conducted at baseline and during follow-up. RESULTS: All patients achieved successful outpatient mobilisation (7 patients needed Plerixafor) and underwent transplantation. Median follow-up was 106 weeks (IQR 52-348). No mobilisation-related serious adverse events (SAEs) or CD worsening occurred. Clinical and endoscopic remission rates were 71% and 41.7% at 26 weeks, 64% and 25% at 52 weeks, and 71% and 16.7% at the last follow-up. The percentage of patients who restarted CD therapy for clinical relapse and/or endoscopic/radiological activity was 14% at 26 weeks, 57% at 52 weeks, and 86% at the last follow-up. Peripheral blood cell populations and antibody levels post-AHSCT were comparable to Cy-based mobilisation. CONCLUSIONS: Cy-free mobilisation is safe and feasible in refractory CD patients undergoing AHSCT. Although relapse occurs in a significant proportion of patients, clinical and endoscopic responses are achieved upon CD-specific therapy reintroduction.

Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide and Tacrolimus for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prevention after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation from HLA-Matched Donors Has More Advantages Than Limitations.

This study compared the efficacy of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and tacrolimus (Tac) versus other regimens in 272 adults undergoing peripheral blood (PB) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) from HLA-matched donors. Of these 272 patients, 95 (34.9%) received PTCy/Tac. The times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were longer in the PTCy/Tac group (20 days versus 16 days for neutrophils and 19 days versus 12 days for platelets). The day +30 cumulative incidence (CuI) of bacterial bloodstream infection was higher in the PTCy/Tac group (43.2% versus 13.0%; P < .001). The CuIs of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) at day +180 were 14.7% and 4.2%, and the CuI of moderate/severe cGVHD at 2 years was 2.4% in the PTCy/Tac group and 41.8% (hazard ratio [HR], .29; P < .001), 15.8%, (HR, .24; P = .007), and 47.0% (HR, .05; P < .001), respectively, in the no-PTCy group. The duration of immunosuppression was shorter in patients receiving PTCy/Tac (6.2 months versus 9.0 months; P < .001). PTCy/Tac patients had higher OS (2 years: 74.3% versus 60.9%; HR, .54; P = .012), lower NRM (2 years: 8.6% versus 15.8%; HR, .54; P = .11), comparable CuI of relapse (2 years: 26.0% versus 24.4%; HR, 1.03; P = .89), and higher GRFS (2 years: 59.1% versus 16.7%; HR, .32; P < .001). Using PTCy/Tac in HLA-matched PB allo-HCT improved transplantation outcomes at out institution compared with previous prophylactic regimens, including a higher probability of survival despite more delayed engraftment and a higher rate of bacterial infection.

Competencias de la enfermera de práctica avanzada de hematología en la terapia CAR-T / Competencies of the Hematology Advanced Nurse Practitioner in CAR-T therapy

La terapia celular CAR-T es una inmunoterapia personalizada de última generación. Se basa en la modificación genética de linfocitos T autólogos del paciente para expresar un antígeno quimérico que identifique a las células cancerosas y las destruya. El rápido progreso de nuevos tratamientos de inmunoterapia ha generado una oportunidad a las enfermeras para que aporten su experiencia y sus competencias para liderar y facilitar la coordinación, educación y continuidad de cuidados a los pacientes beneficiarios de estas terapias. La enfermera de práctica avanzada de hematología en terapia CAR-T (EPACAR-T) es esencial para garantizar la continuidad de cuidados y la seguridad en la atención a pacientes tratados con CAR-T. En el presente trabajo se describen las competencias de la EPACAR-T basadas en el marco conceptual de Hamric y se determinan sus funciones en las diferentes etapas del proceso (acogida y valoración, leucoaféresis, producción celular y terapia puente, tratamiento linfodeplectivo, infusión de linfocitos T modificados, seguimiento y vigilancia activa), con el objetivo principal de ofrecer un plan de cuidados centrados en la persona y coordinar la atención, colaboración y comunicación entre centros remitentes y proveedores y conseguir su manejo exitoso

The CAR T-cell therapy is a personalized last-generation immunotherapy. It consists in the genetic modification of the patient's autologous T-lymphocytes in order to express a chimeric antigen that will identify cancer cells and destroy them. The fast progress of new immunotherapy treatments has created an opportunity for nurses to provide their experience and skills to lead and ensure coordination, education, and continuity of care for patients who will benefit of said therapies. The Hematology Advanced Nurse Practitioner in CAR-T therapy is essential to ensure continuity and safety of care for patients treated with CAR-T. The present article describes the competencies of the Hematology Advanced Nurse Practitioner in CAR-T therapy based on the conceptual framework by Hamric, and determines their role in the different stages of the process (reception and assessment, leukapheresis, cell production and bridge therapy, lymphodepletion treatment, infusion of modified T-lymphocytes, follow-up and active monitoring), with the main objective to offer a plan of care focused on the patient, and coordinate the care, collaboration and communication between referring centers and providers, and achieve a successful management

A reproducible and safe at-home allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant program: first experience in Central and Southern Europe.

In 2015, we implemented an at-home allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) program. Between 2015 and 2018, 252 patients underwent allo-HCT; 41 patients underwent allo-HCT in the at-home program (46% myeloablative; 63% unrelated donor; 32% posttransplant cyclophosphamide), and these patients were compared with 39 in-patients; safety, capacity to release beds for other programs, and economic efficiency cost were evaluated. We observed a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia in the at-home group compared with that in the in-patient group (32% versus 90%; p < 0.0001), whereas the incidence of aspergillosis was similar among groups (at-home 1% versus in-patient 3%; p = 0.5). The at-home patients showed a lower incidence of 1-year severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD; 10% versus 29%; p = 0.03). There were no differences in 1-year transplant-related mortality, relapse, or overall survival among groups. The re-admission rate in the at-home group was 7%. The at-home setting was less expensive (9087 €/transplant), and its implementation increased capacity by 10.5 allo-HCTs/year. Moreover, a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell program could be established without increasing beds. Thus, our at-home allo-HCT program may be a safe modality to reduce febrile neutropenia and acute GVHD, resulting in lower re-admission rates.