Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neurotrauma Rep ; 3(1): 286-291, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36060455

RESUMO

The goal of this study was to ascertain the efficacy, safety, and comparability of ultra-early cranioplasty (CP; defined here as <30 days from the original craniectomy) to conventional cranioplasty (defined here as >30 days from the original craniectomy). A retrospective review of CPs performed at our institution between January 2016 and July 2020 was performed. Craniectomies initially performed at other institutions were excluded. Seventy-seven CPs were included in our study. Ultra-early CP was defined as CP performed within 30 days of craniectomy whereas conventional CP occurred after 30 days. Post-operative wound infection rates, rate of return to the operating room (OR) with or without bone flap removal, operative length, and rate of post-CP hydrocephalus were compared between the two groups. Thirty-nine and 38 patients were included in the ultra-early and conventional CP groups, respectively. The average number of days to CP in the ultra-early group was 17.70 ± 7.75 days compared to 95.70 ± 65.60 days in the conventional group. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale upon arrival to the emergency room was 7.28 ± 3.90 and 6.92 ± 4.14 for the ultra-early and conventional groups, respectively. The operative time was shorter in the ultra-early cohort than that in the conventional cohort (ultra-early, 2.40 ± 0.71 h; conventional, 3.00 ± 1.63 h; p = 0.0336). The incidence of post-CP hydrocephalus was also lower in the ultra-early cohort (ultra-early, 10.3%; conventional, 31.6%; p = 0.026). No statistically significant differences were observed regarding post-operative infection, return to the OR, or bone flap removal. Our study shows that ultra-early CP can significantly reduce the rate of post-CP hydrocephalus, as well as operative time in comparison to conventional CP. However, the timing of CP post-DC should remain a patient-centered consideration.

2.
Neurospine ; 19(2): 453-462, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35793936

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Spinal arachnoid cysts (SACs) are rare lesions that often present with back pain and myelopathy. There is a paucity of literature evaluating the impact of surgical timing on neurological outcomes for primary SAC management. To compare long-term neurological outcomes in patients who were managed differently and to understand natural progression of SAC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients treated for SAC at our institution from 2010 to 2021, stratified into 3 groups (conservative management only, surgical management, or conservative followed by surgical management). Study outcome measures were neurological outcomes as measured by modified McCormick Neurologic Scale (MNS), postoperative complications, and cyst recurrence. Nonparametric analysis was performed to evaluate differences between groups for selected endpoints. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with SAC were identified. Eighteen patients were managed surgically. The remaining 18 patients were managed conservatively with outpatient serial imaging, 7 of whom (38.9%) ultimately underwent surgical treatment due to neurological decline. Most common presenting symptoms included back pain (50.0%), extremity weakness (36.1%), and numbness/paresthesia (36.1%). Initial/preoperative (p = 0.017) and 1-year postoperative (p = 0.006) MNS were significantly different between the 3 groups, but not at 6 weeks or 6 months postoperatively (p > 0.05). Additionally, at 1 year, there was no difference in MNS between patients managed surgically and those managed conservatively but ultimately underwent surgery (p > 0.99). CONCLUSION: Delayed surgical intervention in minimally symptomatic patients does not seem to result in worse long-term neurofunctional outcomes. At 1 year, postoperative MNS were significantly higher in both surgical groups, when compared to the conservative group highlighting worsening clinical picture regardless of preoperative observational status.

3.
World Neurosurg ; 132: e53-e58, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31518748

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Transcallosal microscopic and endoscopic excisions are both well established approaches to colloid cyst resection; however, there has been no clear consensus regarding the favored approach. We performed a systematic review comparing the transcallosal microscopic and endoscopic transcortical approaches for colloid cyst excision. METHODS: We performed a systematic review from 2000-2018 of patients undergoing colloid cyst excision via a microscopic transcallosal or endoscopic transcortical approach where the surgical intent was gross total resection. Studies that included multiple approaches were included if the reported results were stratified by approach. RESULTS: The microsurgical transcallosal approach had a higher rate of gross total resection when compared with endoscopic excision (96% for transcallosal vs. 78.5% endoscopic; P < 0.0001). There was also a lower recurrence rate with the transcallosal approach (0.98% vs. 2.16%; P = 0.0036); however, there was no difference in reoperation rates with similar length of follow-up (0.33% transcallosal, 0.61% endoscopic; P = 1.000). Endoscopy had lower overall morbidity when compared with transcallosal approaches (8.7% vs. 18.6%; P = 0.0001), including statistically significant lower rates of infection, infarct, and seizures in the endoscopic cohort. Rates of permanent memory deficit were similar (6.55% transcallosal vs. 4.5% endoscopic; P = 0.52). Shunt dependency was 9.8% after transcallosal excision versus 3.5% after endoscopic excision (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Modern series of colloid cyst excision continue to favor transcallosal approaches in achieving gross total resection. Nevertheless, endoscopic techniques have significantly reduced morbidity compared to transcallosal approaches, including lower rates of infection, infarct, and seizure. Endoscopic approaches also have a statistically significant decreased rate of shunt dependency-arguably the most important primary endpoint of surgery. With improving endoscopic technology and mastery of the technique, endoscopic excision is maturing into a standard first-line approach for colloid cyst excision.


Assuntos
Cistos Coloides/cirurgia , Corpo Caloso/cirurgia , Endoscopia/métodos , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Humanos , Microcirurgia/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA