Hepatic T1-time, cardiac structure and function and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

AIM: Liver damage frequently occurs in patients with cardiovascular (CV) disease and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The associations of liver damage with cardiac structure/function measures and the risk of adverse CV events in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) are poorly known. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with DCM undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In addition to standard cardiac assessment, iron-corrected T1 mapping was also assessed in the liver. Cross-sectional associations between hepatic T1-time and cardiac structure and function were examined accounting for potential confounders. Longitudinal associations between hepatic T1-time and the risk of hospitalization for HF or CV death were also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 120 stable patients with established DCM were included in the study (mean age 54.7 years, 26 % women). The mean hepatic iron-corrected T1-time was 563±73 ms. In linear regression analyses, measures of left atrial structure (LA maximal volume, p = 0.035, LA minimal volume=0.012), interventricular septum thickness (p = 0.026), and right ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.005) were significantly associated with greater hepatic T1-time. Over a mean follow-up of 4.5 ± 1.8 years, 32 (27 %) died or were hospitalized for HF at a rate of 6.7 per 100 person-year. Higher hepatic iron-corrected T1-time was independently associated with a higher risk of adverse events (adjusted-hazard ratio 1.71, 95 % confidence interval: 1.14-2.56, p = 0.009). Patients with a hepatic T1-time ≥563 ms had a higher risk of CV events (log-rank p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Among stable patients with DCM, higher hepatic iron-corrected T1-time is associated with worse cardiac size and function and with higher rates of hospitalization for HF or CV death. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: Limited data exist regarding the clinical value of hepatic T1-time in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) undergoing cardiac Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI). We found that higher hepatic iron-corrected T1-time is associated with worse cardiac size and function, even after accounting for clinical confounders. Over a mean follow-up of 4.5 ± 1.8 years, higher hepatic iron-corrected T1-time was independently associated with a higher risk of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death. Among stable patients with DCM, the evaluation of liver tissue by cardiac MRI may provide useful clinical information for CV risk stratification.

Role of arrhythmic phenotype in prognostic stratification and management of dilated cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with arrhythmic phenotype combines phenotypical aspects of DCM and predisposition to ventricular arrhythmias, typical of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. The definition of DCM with arrhythmic phenotype is not universally accepted, leading to uncertainty in the identification of high-risk patients. This study aimed to assess the prognostic impact of arrhythmic phenotype in risk stratification and the correlation of arrhythmic markers with high-risk arrhythmogenic gene variants in DCM patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicentre study, DCM patients with available genetic testing were analysed. The following arrhythmic markers, present at baseline or within 1 year of enrolment, were tested: unexplained syncope, rapid non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), ≥1000 premature ventricular contractions/24 h or ≥50 ventricular couplets/24 h. LMNA, FLNC, RBM20, and desmosomal pathogenic or likely pathogenic gene variants were considered high-risk arrhythmogenic genes. The study endpoint was a composite of sudden cardiac death and major ventricular arrhythmias (SCD/MVA). We studied 742 DCM patients (45 ± 14 years, 34% female, 410 [55%] with left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <35%). During a median follow-up of 6 years (interquartile range 1.6-12.1), unexplained syncope and NSVT were the only arrhythmic markers associated with SCD/MVA, and the combination of the two markers carried a significant additive risk of SCD/MVA, incremental to LVEF and New York Heart Association class. The probability of identifying an arrhythmogenic genotype rose from 8% to 30% if both early syncope and NSVT were present. CONCLUSION: In DCM patients, the combination of early detected NSVT and unexplained syncope increases the risk of life-threatening arrhythmic outcomes and can aid the identification of carriers of malignant arrhythmogenic genotypes.

Apoptosis, a useful marker in the management of hot-phase cardiomyopathy?

AIMS: 'Hot phases', characterized by chest pain and troponin release, may represent the first clinical presentation of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies. Differential diagnosis with acute myocarditis is an unmet challenge for the clinicians. We sought to investigate histological and genetic features in patients with cardiomyopathy presenting with hot phases. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated a case series of consecutive patients hospitalized for suspected 'hot-phase cardiomyopathy' in two Italian centres from June 2017 to March 2022 (median follow-up 18 months) that underwent both endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and genetic testing. Apoptosis was confirmed with TUNEL assay. Among the 17 enrolled patients (mean age 34 ± 15 years, 76% male), only six patients (35%) presented standard histological and immunohistochemical markers for significant cardiac inflammation at EMB. Conversely, apoptosis was found in 13 patients (77%). Genetic testing was positive for a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in genes involved in cardiomyopathies (most frequently in DSP) in eight patients (48%), rising to 62% among patients with apoptosis on EMB. Notably, all patients without apoptosis tested negative for P/LP disease-related variants. Left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in patients showing apoptosis at EMB compared to those without (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Apoptosis, rather than significant inflammation, was mostly prevalent in this case series of patients with 'hot-phase' presentation, especially in carriers of variants in cardiomyopathy-related genes. Detecting apoptosis on EMB might guide clinicians in performing genetic testing and in more tailored therapeutic choices in 'hot-phase cardiomyopathy'.

Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and dilated cardiomyopathy: Not only an electrical issue?

The present case describes a dilated cardiomyopathy associated with both antidromic and orthodromic atrio-ventricular reentrant tachycardias supported by multiple right accessory pathways. Both right accessory pathways were successfully eliminated by catheter ablation and the patient progressively recovered during the follow up. The following etiologies might be involved: 1) primitive dilated cardiomyopathy (or post-inflammatory); 2) septal dyssinchrony due to ventricular pre-excitation; 3) tachycardiomyopathy.

New echocardiographic indices of shift to biventricular failure to optimize risk stratification of chronic heart failure.

AIMS: The present study investigated the prognostic impact of either isolated left atrial (LA) impairment, or its association with right ventricular (RV) failure, in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), using basic and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and six outpatients with HFrEF were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Patients with primary lung diseases, non-sinus rhythm, previous cardiac surgery, and poor acoustic window were excluded. After clinical examination and basic echocardiography, STE was used to measure peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) and a new marker of RV performance and pulmonary circulation relation: free-wall RV longitudinal strain (fwRVLS)/systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP). Patients were followed for all-cause/cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization. Of 84 eligible patients (60.1 ± 11.5 years; 82% male patients), 48 reached the combined endpoint (cardiovascular death and/or HF hospitalization). Population was divided into three groups: Group 1 (PALS ≥ 15 and fwRVLS/sPAP ≤ -0.5), Group 2 (PALS ≤ 15 and fwRVLS/sPAP ≤ -0.5), and Group 3 (PALS ≤ 15 and fwRVLS/sPAP > -0.5). Mean follow up was 3.5 ± 0.3 years. The higher severity groups were associated with higher LA volume index (P < 0.0001), New York Heart Association class (P = 0.02), mitral regurgitation (P = 0.0004) and tricuspid regurgitation grades (P < 0.0001), lower left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (P = 0.0003), LV global longitudinal strain (P < 0.0001), PALS (P < 0.0001), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (P < 0.007), sPAP (P < 0.0001), and RV strain (P < 0.0001). Reduced PALS and fwRVLS/sPAP were independent predictors of the combined endpoint with adjusted Cox models (hazard ratio = 9.54; 95% confidence interval = 2.95-30.92; P = 0.0002 for Group 3 vs. Group 1). Kaplan-Meier curves showed early and persistent divergence between the three groups for the prediction of the combined endpoint and of all-cause death (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of LA and right heart damage entails worse prognosis in patients with HFrEF. The evaluation of PALS and fwRVLS/sPAP could aid risk stratification of HFrEF patients to provide them early treatment.

Unequivocal interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiography in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis by right parasternal view.

We present the case of a 77-years-old man with aortic valve stenosis (AS) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, in whom right parasternal view provided the best hemodynamic evaluation of AS severity during dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Determinants of exercise intolerance symptoms considered non-specific for heart failure in patients with stage A and B: role of the left atrium in the transition phase to overt heart failure.

To assess to what extent left atrial (LA) structure and function are associated with non-specific heart failure symptoms, so that patients were classified as HF stage A and B. Mechanisms underlying the transition to overt HF in patients with stage A and B HF are unclear. Consecutive outpatients undergoing echocardiography and clinical evaluation and classified as HF stage A and B with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were included. The association between LA measures [volume (LAVi), peak longitudinal-(PALS), contraction-(PACS) and conduit-strain] and non-specific HF symptoms was assessed using adjusted logistic regression analyses. The incremental value of atrial myopathy in symptoms prediction on top of clinical or echocardiographic confounders was assessed through ROC curves analyses. The cohort comprehended 185 patients (63 ± 16 years, 47% women) of whom 133 (72%) were asymptomatic, and 52 (28%) reported non-specific HF symptoms. After adjustment for clinical and echocardiographic confounders for HF symptoms, LAVi, PALS and PACS were associated with symptoms (p < 0.05). Among echocardiographic variables, only LA parameters were significantly associated with symptoms on top of clinical confounders (for LAVi OR [95% CI] 1.56 [1.21-2.00], p < 0.0001; for PALS 1.45 (1.10-1.91), p = 0.0009; for PACS 2.10 [1.33-3.30], p = 0.002). After adjustment for age, hypertension and COPD or E/E', LV mass-i and mitral ERO, atrial myopathy added predictive value for symptoms presence compared to the clinical variables or echocardiographic parameters described (AUC increase 0.80 to 0.88, p = 0.004, and 0.79 to 0.84, p = 0.06, respectively). In patients with HF stages A-B and preserved LVEF, measures of LA structure and function were associated with non-specific HF symptoms. A comprehensive LA remodeling evaluation may help clinicians in the appropriate identification of overt HF.

The loss of left atrial contractile function predicts a worse outcome in HFrEF patients.

Background: In chronic heart failure, high intracardiac pressures induce a progressive remodeling of small pulmonary arteries up to pulmonary hypertension. At the end of left atrial conduit function, pulmonary and left heart end-systolic pressures equalization might affect left atrial systole. In this single-center prospective study, we aimed to investigate whether peak atrial contraction strain (PACS), measured by speckle tracking echocardiography, was independently associated with prognosis in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Materials and methods: Outpatients with HFrEF and sinus rhythm referred to our echo-labs were enrolled. After clinical and echocardiographic evaluation, off-line speckle tracking echocardiography analysis was performed. Primary and secondary endpoint were cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization, respectively. Spline knotted survival model identified the optimal prognostic cut-off for PACS. Results: The 152 patients were stratified based on PACS <8% (n = 76) or PACS ≥8% (n = 76). Patients with PACS <8% had lower left ventricle and left atrial reservoir strain and higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and left atrial volume index (LAVI). Over a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 2 years, 117 events (51 cardiovascular death, 66 heart failure hospitalizations) were collected. By univariate and multivariate Cox analysis, PACS emerged as a strong and independent predictor of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization, after adjusting for age, sex, left ventricle strain, and E/e', LAVI (HR 0.6 per 5 unit-decrease in PACS). Kaplan-Meier curves showed a sustained divergence in event-free survival rates for the two groups. Conclusion: The reduction of PACS significantly and independently affects cardiovascular outcome in HFrEF. Therefore, its assessment, although limited to patients with sinus rhythm, could offer additive prognostic information for HFrEF patients.

When Aortic Stenosis Is Not Alone: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management in Mixed and Combined Valvular Disease.

Aortic stenosis (AS) may present frequently combined with other valvular diseases or mixed with aortic regurgitation, with peculiar physio-pathological and clinical implications. The hemodynamic interactions between AS in mixed or combined valve disease depend on the specific combination of valve lesions and may result in diagnostic pitfalls at echocardiography; other imaging modalities may be helpful. Indeed, diagnosis is challenging because several echocardiographic methods commonly used to assess stenosis or regurgitation have been validated only in patients with the single-valve disease. Moreover, in the developed world, patients with multiple valve diseases tend to be older and more fragile over time; also, when more than one valvular lesion needs to address the surgical risk rises together with the long-term risk of morbidity and mortality associated with multiple valve prostheses, and the likelihood and risk of reoperation. Therefore, when AS presents mixed or combined valve disease, the heart valve team must integrate various parameters into the diagnosis and management strategy, including suitability for single or multiple transcatheter valve procedures. This review aims to summarize the most critical pathophysiological mechanisms underlying AS when associated with mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis, aortic regurgitation, and tricuspid regurgitation. We will focus on echocardiography, clinical implications, and the most important treatment strategies.

The Common Combination of Aortic Stenosis with Mitral Regurgitation: Diagnostic Insight and Therapeutic Implications in the Modern Era of Advanced Echocardiography and Percutaneous Intervention.

The combination of aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) is common in patients with degenerative valvular disease. It is characterized by having complex pathophysiology, leading to potential diagnostic pitfalls. Evidence is scarce in the literature to direct the diagnostic framework and treatment of patients with this particular combination of multiple valvular diseases. In this complex scenario, the appropriate use of advanced echocardiography and multimodality imaging methods plays a central role. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement or repair and transcatheter aortic valve replacement widen the surgical options for valve diseases. Therefore, there is an increasing need to reconsider the function, timing, and mode intervention for patients with a combination of AS with MR towards more personalized treatment.

Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Staged Versus Concomitant Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Coronary Procedures.

Background The impact of staged versus concomitant coronary procedures on renal function in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains unclear. Methods and Results Three-hundred thirty-nine patients undergoing coronary procedures and TAVI as a staged strategy (160, 47.2%) or concomitant strategy (179, 52.8%) were retrospectively analyzed. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) occurred in 49 patients in the staged strategy group (30.6%) and in 18 patients (10.1%) in the concomitant strategy group (P<0.001). Among the staged strategy group, 25 (15.6%) patients developed CI-AKI after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention, 17 (10.6%) after TAVI, and 7 (4.3%) after both the procedures. Staged strategy was associated with a higher risk of CI-AKI (odds ratio, 3.948; P<0.001) after adjustment for multiple confounders and regardless of the baseline renal function (P for interaction=0.4) when compared with the concomitant strategy. At a median follow-up of 24.0 months (3.0-35.3), CI-AKI was not associated with sustained renal injury (P=0.794), irrespective of the adopted strategy. The concomitant strategy did not impact the overall early safety at 30 days follow-up after TAVI compared to the staged strategy (P=0.609). Conclusions Performing coronary procedures with a staged strategy before TAVI was associated with a higher risk of CI-AKI compared with a concomitant strategy. Moreover, a concomitant strategy did not increase the risk of procedure-related complications.

Excess Mortality Associated with Progression Rate in Asymptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is a progressive condition characterized by gradual calcification of the aortic cusps. Progression rate evaluated using echocardiography has been associated with survival. However, data from routine practice covering the whole spectrum of AS severity and the rate of symptom onset are sparse. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes under medical management related to disease progression in asymptomatic patients with a wide range of AS severity. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-nine consecutive asymptomatic patients (mean age, 77 ± 10 years; 55% men) with AS, preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, and two or more echocardiographic examinations performed from 2004 to 2014 were retrospectively included. The median time between the two echocardiographic examinations was 24 months (interquartile range, 15-46 months). Patients were identified as rapid progressors if the annualized difference in peak aortic velocity between two echocardiographic examinations was ≥0.3 m/sec/y; others were labeled as slow progressors. The primary end point was mortality during medical follow-up (censoring on aortic valve interventions). The secondary end point was overall mortality. RESULTS: Rapid progressors accounted for 67 of the 229 patients (29%), and this feature was not associated with baseline characteristics. During a median of 5.8 years (interquartile range, 3.4-8.3 years) of follow-up from the first echocardiographic examination, 102 patients (45%) died, 86 (84%) during medical follow-up. Rapid progression rate predicted excess mortality (vs slow progression rate) after adjustment for age, sex, symptoms, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, and baseline aortic valve area (hazard ratio, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.48-4.21; P = .0006) and after adjusting for peak aortic velocity and left ventricular ejection fraction obtained at the last echocardiographic examination (hazard ratio, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.25-3.46; P = .005). Among patients with baseline peak aortic velocity < 4 m/sec (nonsevere AS), rapid progression rate was associated with higher 5-year mortality compared with slow progression (57% vs 22% [P < .0001] under medical management and 44% vs 18% [P = .005] overall). Outcomes were comparable between nonsevere AS rapid progressors and baseline severe AS. Progression rate showed incremental prognostic value on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis versus AS severity. Of note, among slow progressors, 11 patients (5%) presented with high rates of symptom development and poor outcomes related to ventricular dysfunction or other advanced AS features. CONCLUSIONS: Progression rate is an individual, almost unpredictable feature among patients with AS. Rapid progression is an incremental marker of excess mortality in asymptomatic patients with AS, independent of clinical and hemodynamic characteristics. Rapid progression rate may identify patients with nonsevere AS at higher risk for events.

The progression rate of aortic stenosis: key to tailoring the management and potential target for treatment.

Aortic stenosis is the most frequent valvular disease to require intervention in the western world and has always been featured as a progressive disease. The rate of progression can be assessed by carefully performed Doppler echocardiography and can vary greatly between individuals with a profound impact on prognosis. Unfortunately, the determinants of disease progression had been insufficiently studied and remain challenging to define, particularly in the outpatient setting. Multiple factors have been proposed and tested, but at present, there are no proven therapies to slow the course of the stenotic process. Heart valve clinics may be particularly important to define the progression rate and tailor follow-up and management at an individual level. This review enlightens knowledge and gaps regarding the progression-rate of aortic valve stenosis, from the historical perspective to the molecular one.

Usefulness of the Right Parasternal Echocardiographic View to Improve the Hemodynamic Assessment After Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis.

Right-parasternal-view (RPV) often provides the best hemodynamic assessment of the aortic-valve-stenosis by echocardiography. However, no detailed study on patients with aortic prosthesis is available. Thus, RPV usefulness is left as an anecdotical notion in this context. We aimed to define feasibility and clinical-impact of RPV before and soon-after percutaneous implantation (TAVI) or surgical (SAVR) aortic-valve-replacement (AVR) for AS. Patients with severe-AS electively referred for AVR between September-2019 and February-2020 were prospectively evaluated. Echocardiographic examinations inclusive of apical and RPV to measure aortic-peak-velocity , gradients and area (AVA) were performed the day before AVR and at hospital discharge and compared by matched-pair-analysis. Forty-seven patients (mean age 79 ± 8 years, 63% female, ejection-fraction 61 ± 6%) referred for SAVR (24 [51%]) or TAVI (23 [49%]) were enrolled. RPV was feasible in 45 patients (96%) before-AVR but in only 32 after-AVR (68%), particularly after SAVR (50%) than TAVI (87% p = 0.005). RPV remained the best acoustic window after TAVI in 75% of cases. Hemodynamic assessment of TAVI, but not SAVR, invariably benefit from RPV versus apical evaluation (aortic-peak-velocity: 2.57 ± 0.39 vs 2.23 ± 0.47 m/sec, p = 0.002; mean gradient: 15 ± 5 vs 12 ± 5 mm Hg, p = 0.01). Five (11%) patients presented severe patient-prosthesis-mismatch, 4 of which were detectable only by RPV. This pilot-experience demonstrates that RPV feasibility is slightly reduced after AVR. RPV can improve the hemodynamic assessment of the prosthetic valve versus apical view, including the detection of patient-prosthesis-mismatch. Furthermore, when RPV is the best acoustic windows in patients with severe AS, it generally remains so after-TAVI.

Discrepancies in Assessing Diastolic Function in Pre-Clinical Heart Failure Using Different Algorithms-A Primary Care Study.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines on diastolic function (DF) by the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) have been disputed and two alternative algorithms have been proposed by Johansen et al. and Oh et al. We sought (a) to assess the concordance of ASE/EACVI guidelines on DF using these proposed alternative approaches and (b) to evaluate the prevalence of indeterminate diastolic dysfunction (DD) by each method, exploring means for reducing their number. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the echocardiographic reports of 1158 outpatients including subjects at risk of heart failure without (n = 644) or with (n = 241) structural heart disease, and 273 healthy individuals. Concordance was calculated using the k coefficient and overall proportion of DD reclassification rate. The effectiveness of pulmonary vein flow (PVF), Valsalva maneuver, and left atrial volume index/late diastolic a'-ratio (LAVi/a') over indeterminate grading was assessed. RESULTS: The DD reclassification rate was 30.1% (k = 0.35) for ASE/EACVI and OH, 36.5% (k = 0.27) for ASE/EACVI and JOHANSEN and 31.1% (k = 0.37) for OH and JOHANSEN (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). DF could not be graded only by ASE/EACVI and OH in 9% and 11% patients, respectively. The majority of patients could be reclassified using PVF or Valsalva maneuver or LAVi/a', with the latter being the single most effective parameter. CONCLUSION: Inconsistencies between updated guidelines and independent approaches to assess and grade DF impede their interchangeable clinical use. The inconclusive diagnoses can be reconciled by conventional echocardiography in most patients, and LAVi/a' emerges as a simple and effective approach to this aim.

Relevance of Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Aortic Valve Stenosis.

The clinical relevance of functional-mitral-regurgitation (FMR) in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS) has been poorly studied using a quantitative approach. In addition, FMR prognostic value has mostly been analyzed after aortic valve replacement. Between 2010 and 2014 the echocardiograms of consecutive AS patients were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were calcified aortic valve with transaortic-velocity >2.5 m/s and calculated mitral effective regurgitant orifice area (ERO) in the presence of mitral regurgitation. Organic mitral valve disease was an exclusion-criteria. Primary endpoint was heart failure or death under medical management. Secondary endpoint was heart failure or death. Eligible patients were 189, age 79 ± 8 years, 61% NYHA I/II, indexed aortic valve area (AVA) 0.55 ± 0.17 cm2/m2. Mitral ERO was 7.6 ± 4.2 mm2 (>10 mm2 in 30% of patients). Longitudinal function (by S'-TDI) was associated with mitral ERO independently of ejection fraction and ventricular volumes (p = 0.01). Mitral ERO greater than 10 mm2 (threshold identified by spline survival-modeling) was associated with severe symptoms (Odds ratio [OR] 3.1 [1.6 to 6.0]; p = 0.0006) and higher pulmonary-arterial-pressure (OR 3.0 [1.4 to 5.9]; p = 0.002). Follow-up was completed for 175 patients. After 4.7 [1.4 to 7.2] years, 87 (50%) patients underwent AVR, 66 (38%) had heart-failure, 64 (37%) died. No procedure on FMR was required. Mitral ERO was independently associated with primary and secondary endpoints both as continuous variable (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.15 [1.00 to 1.30]; p = 0.04 and HR 1.23 [1.05 to 1.43]; p = 0.01 per 5 mm2 ERO increase) or as ERO> versus ≤10 mm2. Adjustment for S'-TDI or subgroup-analysis did not affect results. The analysis by AVA revealed the incremental prognostic role of mitral ERO over AS severity. In conclusion, AS patients with concomitant FMR >10 mm2 holds a higher risk during medical follow-up. FMR quantitation, even for volumetrically modest regurgitation, provides incremental prognostic information over AS severity.

Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing TAVI Compared With Coronary Interventions.

Background Differences in the impact of contrast medium on the development of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or a coronary angiography/percutaneous coronary intervention (CA/PCI) have not been previously investigated. Methods and Results Patients treated with TAVI or elective CA/PCI were retrospectively analyzed in terms of baseline and procedural characteristics, including preprocedural and postprocedural kidney function. CI-AKI was defined as a relative increase in serum creatinine concentration of at least 0.3 mg/dL within 72 hours of contrast-medium administration compared with baseline. The incidence of CI-AKI in the TAVI versus CA/PCI group was compared. After the exclusion of patients in dialysis and emergency procedures, 977 patients were analyzed; there were 489 patients who had undergone TAVI (50.1%) and 488 patients who had undergone CA/PCI (49.9%). Patients treated by TAVI were older, presenting a higher rate of anemia and chronic kidney disease (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Consistently, they also had a significantly lower glomerular filtration rate and higher serum creatinine concentration (P<0.001 for all). However, the occurrence of CI-AKI was significantly lower in these patients compared with patients treated by a CA/PCI (6.7% versus 14.5%, P<0.001). At multivariate analysis, the TAVI procedure had an independent protective effect on CI-AKI incidence among total population (odds ratio, 0.334; 95% CI, 0.193-0.579; P<0.001). This observation was confirmed after propensity score matching among 360 patients (180 by TAVI and 180 by CA/PCI; P=0.002). Conclusions CI-AKI occurred less frequently in patients undergoing TAVI than in patients undergoing a CA/PCI, despite a worse-risk profile. The impact of contrast administration on kidney function in patients who had undergone TAVI may be better tolerated because of the hemodynamic changes following aortic valve replacement.

The right parasternal window: when Doppler-beam alignment may be life-saving in patients with aortic valve stenosis.

: The need for multiple transducer positions, especially from right parasternal windows, is consistently mentioned in the recommendations for the accurate measurement of peak velocities across a stenotic aortic valve, but yet poorly adopted.We performed a subanalysis of the largest prospective series on the right parasternal acoustic windows in patients with aortic stenosis (330 consecutive) to calculate the degree of misalignment and estimate the potential outcome implication of this often-forgotten approach.The right parasternal view was highly feasible with an average estimated misalignment from the apical view of 14 ±â€Š16 degree; in 10 cases, an estimated misalignment >40 degree. Right parasternal assessment (vs. apical alone) provided a significant reclassification from moderate to severe or even very-severe aortic valve stenosis. Considering a wellestablished survival benefit provided by either percutaneous or surgical valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis the reclassification would result in approximately 1 life-year saved for every 30-35 patients in whom parasternal view were effectively utilized.