The impact of race/ethnicity on pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes for pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of race/ethnicity on surgical outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2014 to 2019. Patient and tumor characteristics and 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were conducted to investigate the relationship between race/ethnicity and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Six thousand five hundred and sixty-two patients were included (84.5% White, 7.9% Black, 3% Hispanic, 4.6% Asian). Larger proportions of Blacks had preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 or 4. There were no significant differences in tumor characteristics or operative techniques. A smaller proportion of Asians and Hispanics received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation than Blacks and Whites. Relative to White, the Black race was independently associated with postoperative sepsis and reoperation. Both Black and Hispanic race/ethnicity were associated with prolonged intubation and delayed gastric emptying, and minorities races/ethnicities were associated with longer length of hospital stay. Relative to White, Hispanic, and Asian race/ethnicity were independently associated with a lower likelihood of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) receipt. CONCLUSION: In ACS-NSQIP participating hospitals, non-White race/ethnicity was independently associated with adverse outcomes after pancreatic cancer resection. A possible disparity in NAT receipt may exist in Asian and Hispanic patients undergoing surgical resection.

Utilization of Supplemental Regional Anesthesia in Lobectomy for Lung Cancer in the United States: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Pulmonary lobectomy is the standard of care for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. This study investigated the rate of utilization of supplemental anesthesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or open lobectomy using a national database and assessed the effect of regional block (RB) on postoperative outcomes. Methods: Patients who underwent lobectomy for lung cancer between 2014-2019 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The patients' primary mode of anesthesia and supplemental anesthesia were recorded. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between 2 surgical groups: those who underwent general anesthesia (GA) alone versus GA with RB. Multivariable regression analyses were performed on the outcomes of interest. Results: In total, 13,578 patients met the study criteria, with 87% undergoing GA and the remaining 13% receiving GA and RB. The use of neuraxial anesthesia decreased over the years, while RB use increased up to 20% in 2019. Age, body mass index, and preoperative comorbidities were comparable between groups. Patients who underwent VATS were more likely to receive RB than those who underwent thoracotomy. RB was most often utilized by thoracic surgeons. An adjusted analysis showed that RB use was associated with shorter hospital stays and a reduced likelihood of prolonged length of stay, but a higher rate of surgical site infections (SSIs). Conclusion: In a large surgical database, there was underutilization of supplemental anesthesia in patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer. RB utilization was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay and an increase in SSI incidence.

Trends in open lobectomy outcomes for lung cancer over the last 15 years: national cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Adoption of thoracoscopic lobectomy has been increasing in the US; however, open lobectomy (OL) is still performed in half of the cases. Postoperative care and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have evolved and improved outcomes. The study aims to evaluate postoperative outcomes of OL over the last 15 years. METHODS: Patients who underwent lobectomy for lung cancer between 2005 and 2019 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and divided into three groups; pre-ERAS (2005-2011), transitional period (2012-2015), and wider ERAS implementation (2016-2019). Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared and multivariable regression analysis was constructed to assess independent predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: OL was comprised of 40% of lobectomies for lung cancer. 10,021 patients met inclusion criteria. 49% were males and mean age was 67. Patients who belonged to the (2016-2019) period group had significantly higher comorbidities and ASA classification. General surgeons performed < 10% of OL in 2016-2019 compared to over 30% during 2005-2011. Patients in the 2016-2019 period were less likely to experience unplanned intubation, surgical site infections, and sepsis. Mortality was also significantly lower than the previous groups (1.9% vs 2.0% and 2.8%, p = 0.05). The rate of discharge to facility as well as length of hospital stays improved over the years. The surgeon specialty served as an independent predictor for length of stay, unplanned intubation, and home discharge. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of OL are improving over the years. Increasing number of these surgeries being performed by dedicated thoracic surgeons and ERAS pathways are likely helping improve outcomes.