RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic drainage should preferably be tried unless the abscess caused by the anastomotic leak is generalized and disseminated into the abdominal cavity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of patients treated with EndoVac. PATIENT AND METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent low anterior resection and were treated using the EndoVac therapy system due to the detection of an anastomotic leak were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-three of the patients with detection of anastomotic leaks were treated using EndoVac therapy system. The mean number of application of the EndoVac therapy system was 5.8 (1 to 12) for each patient. Mean duration of hospitalization of the patients was 24.5 (9 to 92) days. Five patients underwent a second operation during the follow-up period after application of the EndoVac therapy system. In our study, the number of patients recovering without the need for additional treatment is 30 (30/33). Our success rate was 90.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The EndoVac therapy system is an alternative and helpful system in the treatment of colorectal anastomotic leaks without reoperation needed. It can also prevent permanent stoma.
Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica , Neoplasias Colorretais , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Fístula Anastomótica/cirurgia , Fístula Anastomótica/terapia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Humanos , Reoperação , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
The optimal method for preventing abscesses in perforated appendicitis is unclear. We compared the efficacy of lavage versus aspiration for periappendicular collections/abscesses in perforated appendicitis. Our study included 286 patients. After the removal of the appendectomy material, those who underwent aspiration without prior lavage were assigned to Group I, whereas those who underwent aspiration after lavage with 500 mL physiological saline were assigned to Group II. The primary outcome measure was postoperative complications. Secondary outcome measures were intraoperative complications, morbidity, and mortality. Group I comprised 174 patients (60 female and 114 male; mean age 34.47±17.40 y), whereas Group II comprised 112 patients (39 female and 73 male; mean age 36.22±18.60 y). The 2 groups were not significantly different in age, hospitalization duration, sex, abscess formation, morbidity, or mortality. Our results demonstrate that aspiration of the surgery area without prior lavage is sufficient and can be safely applied in perforated appendicitis.