Can optic disc vessel density help in cases of residual disc elevation after shunt surgery in cases of idiopathic intracranial hypertension?

AIM: To detect if we can use the reduction in the optic disc vessel density as an indicator to the reduction in intracranial tension in patients with residual optic disc elevation after shunt surgery as fundus examination in those cases is not conclusive. PATIENTS AND METHOD: 21 patients with papilledema due to idiopathic intracranial hypertension underwent shunt surgery. Full neurological and ophthalmological assessments were done. The optic disc vessel density was measured before and 3 months after surgery. Patients were then divided according to the resolution of papilledema into 2 groups: 1) Residual disc elevation group. 2) Completely resolved disc edema group. CSF pressure was measured via lumber puncture preoperative for all patients and 3 months post-operative only for patients with residual disc edema. A comparison between both groups was done. RESULTS: There was a highly statistically significant difference between the two groups as regard the papilledema grade (the residual disc elevation group had a higher grade of papilledema) with P-value=0.000. As regard the difference in the preoperative optic disc vessel density between the two groups, there were statistically significant differences (optic disc vessel density was more in the residual disc elevation group). As regard the postoperative optic disc vessel density, there were non-significant differences between the two groups in whole image, inside disc and peripapillary vessel density (either in macro or microvasculature). CONCLUSION: The optic disc vessel density decreased with normal postoperative CSF opening pressure in cases with residual disc elevation postoperatively. Thus, in cases of residual optic disc swelling after shunt surgery, we can detect the reduction of intracranial pressure by the reduction in the optic disc vessel density which is a safe non-invasive technique. That may help in cases of residual disc elevation.

The role of preoperative ultrasound in the management of peripheral nerve injuries.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve injury refers to any damage or trauma to the nerves located outside the central nervous system. Ultrasonography is a reliable, cheap, and minimally invasive method in clinical practice to give physicians useful information about nerve injury. OBJECTIVES: to assess the power of ultrasound in determining the presence, localization, and extent of neural damage in patients with clinical evidence of peripheral nerve lesions before surgery. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 78 patients (56 females and 22 males, aged from 9 to 52 years) who had different pathologies including entrapment, tumoral, post-traumatic, and post-surgical nerve injuries at the Neurosurgery and Physical Medicine, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation Departments, Tanta University Hospitals. All studied patients had preoperative evaluation; neurological examination, electrodiagnostic studies, and sonographic examinations with linear array transducers (frequencies ranging from 7.5 to 16 MHz). RESULTS: The most common pathological condition was entrapment neuropathy (39 patients) (50%). Ultrasound complemented the electrodiagnostic studies by determining the site of entrapment manifested by increased mean maximum cross-sectional area of the nerve proximal to the site of entrapment and nerve hypoechogenicity. In post-traumatic and iatrogenic neuropathies (35 patients) (44.9%), the ultrasound finding revealed neuroma in continuity in nine cases (11.5%), complete neurotmesis with stump neuroma in eighteen patients (23.1%), and eight cases (10.3%) showed perineural adhesion. In all cases, the nerve was hypoechoic at the site of injury. The presence of hyperechoic fibrous tissue could indicate perineural adhesion and the necessity for neurolysis. This study also included three (3.8%) cases had schwannoma, and one case (1.3%) had neurofibroma. Ultrasound was used to confirm the diagnosis by determining the tumor's size and vascular supply. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography is a diagnostic and surgical planning tool that is becoming more and more useful for the management of peripheral nerve injuries. Its high resolution and real-time capability provide safe and cost-effective scans that aid in determining the extent of injuries. For patients with peripheral nerve injuries, ultrasound is advised to be added to the routine clinical and neurophysiological evaluation. It is also advised to use ultrasound as a first-line imaging modality for tumors thought to be of nerve origin.