The Role of Preoperative Abdominal Ultrasound in the Preparation of Patients Undergoing Primary Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Machine Learning Algorithm on 4418 Patients' Records.

BACKGROUND: The utility of preoperative abdominal ultrasonography (US) in evaluating patients with obesity before metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) remains ambiguously defined. METHOD: Retrospective analysis whereby patients were classified into four groups based on ultrasound results. Group 1 had normal findings. Group 2 had non-significant findings that did not affect the planned procedure. Group 3 required additional or follow-up surgeries without changing the surgical plan. Group 4, impacting the procedure, needed further investigations and was subdivided into 4A, delaying surgery for more assessments, and 4B, altering or canceling the procedure due to critical findings. Machine learning techniques were utilized to identify variables. RESULTS: Four thousand four hundred eighteen patients' records were analyzed. Group 1 was 45.7%. Group 2, 35.7%; Group 3, 17.0%; Group 4, 1.5%, Group 4A, 0.8%; and Group 4B, 0.7%, where surgeries were either canceled (0.3%) or postponed (0.4%). The hyperparameter tuning process identified a Decision Tree classifier with a maximum tree depth of 7 as the most effective model. The model demonstrated high effectiveness in identifying patients who would benefit from preoperative ultrasound before MBS, with training and testing accuracies of 0.983 and 0.985. It also showed high precision (0.954), recall (0.962), F1 score (0.958), and an AUC of 0.976. CONCLUSION: Our study found that preoperative ultrasound demonstrated clinical utility for a subset of patients undergoing metabolic bariatric surgery. Specifically, 15.9% of the cohort benefited from the identification of chronic calculous cholecystitis, leading to concomitant cholecystectomy. Additionally, surgery was postponed in 1.4% of the cases due to other findings. While these findings indicate a potential benefit in certain cases, further research, including a cost-benefit analysis, is necessary to fully evaluate routine preoperative ultrasound's overall utility and economic impact in this patient population.

Application of supraclavicular island flap in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction.

Several surgical modalities are available for maxillofacial reconstruction as locoregional or microvascular free flaps. PURPOSE: (a) Evaluate the reliability of the supraclavicular flap in cervico-orofacial region; (b) investigate the role of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in predicting the post-operative viability of the flap; (c) assess the speech, feeding, and esthetics after reconstruction using this flap. METHODS: Eleven patients included in this study underwent either conventional or delayed harvesting of the supraclavicular flap (SCF). All the patients had diagnostic computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the supraclavicular flap before the surgery. RESULTS: The mean harvesting time of the flap was 45.45 ± 4.16 min. The average length of the flap was 22.64 ± 1.12 cm, whereas the mean width of the flap was 6.14 ± 1.14 cm. The flap survived in 9 patients, while two patients had complete flap loss. After the surgery, three patients complained of speech difficulties. Two patients had swallowing problems. After the surgery, three patients complained of speech difficulties. Two patients had swallowing problems. Only two patients complained of weakness in the donor site. None of the patients reported that the weakness or pain at the donor site affected their daily activities or quality of life. CONCLUSION: The pedicled SCF represents a safe and feasible option that can be used to reconstruct a wide array of maxillofacial oncologic defects. However, a study with a larger sample size is recommended to achieve more reliable clinical results for the modified delayed technique modification in terms of their effect on the survival of the supraclavicular flap.

Role of percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in treatment of intra-articular, in close contact with cartilage and extra-articular osteoid osteomas: comparative analysis and new classification system.

PURPOSE: We investigated procedural safety, technical and clinical outcomes of the percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) of intra-articular (IA), intra-articular close to cartilage (IACC), and extra-articular (EA) osteoid osteomas (OO). We proposed a new radiologic classification for osteoid osteoma depending on the degree and location of sclerosis which may correlate with technical failure and/or difficulties. MATERIAL AND METHODS: According to the inclusion criteria, we enrolled consecutive patients who were referred to the investigation center from June 2018 to January 2022. After clinical and CT imaging features were suggestive for the diagnosis of OO, all the patients were treated by percutaneous CT-guided RFA with a standardized technique. Biopsy of the lesion was not performed in all patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted to assess the procedure's technical, primary clinical, and secondary clinical successes, recurrence rate, and complications. We classified all the OOs according to a new proposed classification of the site and the amount of sclerosis. RESULTS: A total number of 55 patients were enrolled in our study according to the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the enrolled patients was 24.07 ± 14.71 years (ranges from 7 to 57 years). The M/F ratio was roughly 2:1. The mean follow-up was 20.18 ± 12.60 months (ranges from 2 to 44 months). EA group included 36 patients, IA included 5 and IACC included 14 patients. Technical success was achieved in all cases of IA and IACC groups. Technical success in the EA group was 97.22% (1 technical failure). Primary clinical success was 100%, 92.85%, and 91.66% for IA, IACC, and EA groups, respectively. Accordingly, the recurrence rate was 5.88% in EA, and 7.14% in IACC, while no recurrence occurred in the IA group. No complications occurred. The secondary success rate of the 3 cases of recurrence was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: PRFA proved to be a safe procedure with a high rate of success for OO treatment even in intra-articular lesions in close contact with cartilage. This study showed that the results in terms of technical and clinical success are comparable for IA OO, IACC OO, and EA OO, even if the recurrence rate was higher in EA OO. Our proposed new classification of the degree and location of sclerosis may correlate to technical failure, but further studies with a larger number of patients are needed for validation.