RESUMO
Background Liver abscesses are a significant health concern, necessitating prompt diagnosis and appropriate management. Spontaneous liver abscesses are a frequent reason for hospitalizations in India, particularly in the northern part. By analyzing demographics, symptoms, radiological findings, laboratory parameters, and treatment outcomes, this study will contribute valuable insights to enhance the understanding and management of liver abscesses. Aims and objective To evaluate demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological parameters and management options in hospitalized patients with liver abscesses at a tertiary care center. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from 150 patients diagnosed with liver abscesses who were admitted to our ward for one year. Data on demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, etiology, radiological findings, laboratory investigations, management strategies, and treatment outcomes were collected. Descriptive statistics and relevant statistical tests were employed for data analysis. Results The study population had a mean age of 40.28±12.72 years, with a male preponderance (136 (90.7%)). Amoebic abscesses (94 (62.7%)) were the most common. Hepatomegaly (144 (96%)), fever (140 (93.3%)), abdominal pain (136 (90.7%)), and anorexia (118 (78.7%)) were the most common symptoms. Ultrasonography revealed solitary abscesses (99 (66%)) to be more common than multiple abscesses (24 (16%)), with a predominant location in the right lobe (128 (85.3%)). Laboratory investigations showed leukocytosis in 121 (80.7%), elevated liver enzymes (95 (63.3%) aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and 80 (53.3%) alanine transaminase (ALT)), elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in 133 (88.7%), and low albumin levels (138 (92%)) in a significant proportion of patients. Single-time needle aspiration (95 (63.3%)), percutaneous drain (36 (24%)), and surgical intervention (4 (2.7%)) were the primary treatment modalities. Serum albumin level (p<0.001) and ALP (p<0.001) were significantly low and high, respectively, in patients with hospital stays ≥10 days. Conclusions This study provides insights into patients with liver abscesses' clinical and laboratory parameters and management strategies. The findings highlight the diverse clinical presentation, varied etiologies, and the importance of radiological imaging and laboratory investigations in diagnosis and management. Tailored treatment strategies based on the patient's condition are crucial for optimizing outcomes.
RESUMO
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54401.].
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Observational studies have explored the safety of magnetic resonance (MR) scanning of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) that are not Food and Drug Administration approved for MR scanning ("nonconditional"). However, concern has been raised that MR scanning that includes the thoracic region may pose a higher risk. This study examines the safety of MR scanning of thoracic versus nonthoracic regions of patients with CIEDs. METHODS: Patients underwent MR scanning utilizing an institutional protocol. CIED variables examined included sensing value, pacing capture threshold, lead impedance, and battery voltage. Regression analysis of the CIED variable differences (pre- to immediately post-MR and pre-MR to long-term follow-up) was performed to determine if CIED variable differences were dependent on region scanned (thoracic vs nonthoracic), time from CIED implant to MR scanning, or CIED type (pacemaker vs implantable cardioverter defibrillator). RESULTS: 238 patients (38% female, age 65 ± 15 years) underwent 339 MR scans, including 99 MR scans of the thoracic region. CIED variable differences to immediately post-MR or to long-term follow-up were not significantly different from zero (P > 0.05) and there was no dependence upon region scanned (thoracic vs nonthoracic), time from CIED implant to MR scan, or CIED type. One power-on reset occurred in a patient that underwent a cardiac MR and the CIED was successfully reprogrammed. There were no clinical adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: CIED variable differences following MR scan were not dependent on the region scanned (thoracic vs nonthoracic) and there were no clinical adverse effects in this prospective cohort.
