Image registration strategy of T(1)-weighted and FIESTA MRI sequences in trigeminal neuralgia gamma knife radiosurgery.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In Gamma Knife radiosurgery, T(1) MRI is most commonly used and is generally sufficient for targeting the trigeminal nerve. For patients whose trigeminal nerves are unclear on T(1) MRI, FIESTA MRI supplements anatomical structure visualization and may improve trigeminal nerve delineation. The purpose of this study was to develop a registration strategy for T(1) and FIESTA MRIs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on 54 trigeminal neuralgia patients. All patients were scanned with T(1) and FIESTA MRIs. We evaluated 4 methods of registration: automatic image definition, superior-slice definition, middle-slice definition and inferior-slice definition. Target discrepancies were measured by deviations from an intracranial landmark on T(1) and FIESTA MR images. RESULTS: The overall range in registration error was 0.10-5.19 mm using superior-, 0.10-1.56 mm using middle- and 0.14-2.89 mm using inferior-slice definition. Registration error >2 mm was observed in 11% of the patients using superior-, 4% using middle- and 7% using inferior-slice FIESTA MRI definition. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients for whom FIESTA and T(1) MRI are used, registration based on middle-slice definition reduces registration error and improves targeting of the trigeminal nerve.

Decreasing temporal lobe dose with five-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy for treatment of pituitary macroadenomas.

PURPOSE: To compare temporal lobe dose delivered by three pituitary macroadenoma irradiation techniques: three-field three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), three-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (3F IMRT), and a proposed novel alternative of five-field IMRT (5F IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Computed tomography-based external beam radiotherapy planning was performed for 15 pituitary macroadenoma patients treated at New York University between 2002 and 2007 using: 3D-CRT (two lateral, one midline superior anterior oblique [SAO] beams), 3F IMRT (same beam angles), and 5F IMRT (same beam angles with additional right SAO and left SAO beams). Prescription dose was 45 Gy. Target volumes were: gross tumor volume (GTV) = macroadenoma, clinical target volume (CTV) = GTV, and planning target volume = CTV + 0.5 cm. Structure contouring was performed by two radiation oncologists guided by an expert neuroradiologist. RESULTS: Five-field IMRT yielded significantly decreased temporal lobe dose delivery compared with 3D-CRT and 3F IMRT. Temporal lobe sparing with 5F IMRT was most pronounced at intermediate doses: mean V25Gy (% of total temporal lobe volume receiving ≥25 Gy) of 13% vs. 28% vs. 29% for right temporal lobe and 14% vs. 29% vs. 30% for left temporal lobe for 5F IMRT, 3D-CRT, and 3F IMRT, respectively (p < 10(-7) for 5F IMRT vs. 3D-CRT and 5F IMRT vs. 3F IMRT). Five-field IMRT plans did not compromise target coverage, exceed normal tissue dose constraints, or increase estimated brain integral dose. CONCLUSIONS: Five-field IMRT irradiation technique results in a statistically significant decrease in the dose to the temporal lobes and may thus help prevent neurocognitive sequelae in irradiated pituitary macroadenoma patients.

Stentless bioprosthesis in a valved conduit: implications for pulmonary reconstruction.

Pulmonic valve reconstruction is required for various congenital heart diseases and in concert with aortic valve autograft replacement (ie, the Ross procedure). Current techniques using homografts and autografts are often associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and are technically challenging. Furthermore, the long-term durability of these repairs has been questioned, leading to more frequent use of synthetic valved conduits. We report a case of pulmonary valve replacement and right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction using a stentless bioprosthetic aortic valve and polyester graft as a novel approach after radical pulmonary artery sarcoma resection.

Methylation screening of the TGFBI promoter in human lung and prostate cancer by methylation-specific PCR.

BACKGROUND: Hypermethylation of the TGFBI promoter has been shown to correlate with decreased expression of this gene in human tumor cell lines. In this study, we optimized a methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) method and investigated the methylation status of the TGFBI promoter in human lung and prostate cancer specimens. METHODS: Methylation-specific primers were designed based on the methylation profiles of the TGFBI promoter in human tumor cell lines, and MSP conditions were optimized for accurate and efficient amplification. Genomic DNA was isolated from lung tumors and prostatectomy tissues of prostate cancer patients, bisulfite-converted, and analyzed by MSP. RESULTS: Among 50 lung cancer samples, 44.0% (22/50) harbored methylated CpG sites in the TGFBI promoter. An analysis correlating gene methylation status with clinicopathological cancer features revealed that dense methylation of the TGFBI promoter was associated with a metastatic phenotype, with 42.9% (6/14) of metastatic lung cancer samples demonstrating dense methylation vs. only 5.6% (2/36) of primary lung cancer samples (p < 0.05). Similar to these lung cancer results, 82.0% (41/50) of prostate cancer samples harbored methylated CpG sites in the TGFBI promoter, and dense methylation of the promoter was present in 38.9% (7/18) of prostate cancer samples with the feature of locoregional invasiveness vs. only 19.4% (6/31) of prostate cancer samples without locoregional invasiveness (p < 0.05). Furthermore, promoter hypermethylation correlated with highly reduced expression of the TGFBI gene in human lung and prostate tumor cell lines. CONCLUSION: We successfully optimized a MSP method for the precise and efficient screening of TGFBI promoter methylation status. Dense methylation of the TGFBI promoter correlated with the extent of TGFBI gene silencing in tumor cell lines and was related to invasiveness of prostate tumors and metastatic status of lung cancer tumors. Thus, TGFBI promoter methylation can be used as a potential prognostic marker for invasiveness and metastasis in prostate and lung cancer patients, respectively.

Early metastatic spread after a complete response in locally advanced vulvar cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiation for advanced vulvar cancer reduces the tumor size and decreases morbidity from operative resection. CASE: A woman with locally advanced vulvar cancer had no evidence of metastatic disease at presentation. She displayed complete resolution of her vulvar and groin disease but developed early metastatic spread to the lungs and bone. CONCLUSION: Despite excellent local control, patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer are at risk for early metastatic spread. The effect of delayed surgical intervention, ifany, is unknown.

Intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer in the PSA era: radiotherapeutic alternatives.

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively compare the biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS) of patients treated with standard dose external beam radiotherapy (SD-EBRT), SD-EBRT plus androgen deprivation (AD), and brachytherapy-based treatment (brachytherapy with or without EBRT with or without AD). METHODS: All 297 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with these radiation-based treatments at our institution from August 1989 to June 2001 were included. Biochemical relapse was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) definition, a prostate-specific antigen level of 1.5 ng/mL or greater and rising on two consecutive occasions (the "Bolla" definition), and the current prostate-specific antigen nadir plus 2 ng/mL with failure dated "at call" (the "Houston/Phoenix" definition). The number of patients treated with SD-EBRT, SD-EBRT plus AD, and brachytherapy-based treatment was 141, 84, and 72, respectively. The year of treatment was analyzed as a prognostic factor. The median follow-up was 32.3, 34.7, and 41.5 months for the ASTRO, Bolla, and Houston/Phoenix definitions, respectively. RESULTS: The brachytherapy-based treatment resulted in improved BDFS compared with SD-EBRT (ASTRO definition, 5-year BDFS rate 88% +/- 5% versus 49% +/- 5%, P <0.01; Bolla definition, 88% +/- 8% versus 49% +/- 5%, P <0.01; Houston/Phoenix definition, 81% +/- 10% versus 64% +/- 5%, P = 0.01). SD-EBRT plus AD was superior to SD-EBRT alone using the Bolla definition (5-year BDFS 76% +/- 7% versus 49% +/- 5%, P <0.01) and the Houston/Phoenix definition (85% +/- 6% versus 64% +/- 5%, P = 0.01), but not using the ASTRO definition (P = 0.17). Multivariate analysis, including prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, Gleason score, and year of treatment, demonstrated improved biochemical outcomes for brachytherapy-based treatment versus SD-EBRT (ASTRO, P <0.01; Bolla, P <0.01; and a trend toward significance with Houston/Phoenix, P = 0.07) and for the addition of AD to SD-EBRT (Bolla, P <0.01 and Houston/Phoenix, P = 0.03). The year of treatment trended toward significance (P = 0.077) on multivariate analysis using the ASTRO definition. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer, brachytherapy-based treatment and the addition of AD to SD-EBRT resulted in improved biochemical outcomes compared with the outcomes with SD-EBRT alone; however, these findings were dependent on the definition of biochemical failure used. The year of treatment may be an important prognostic factor in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Improved biochemical control and clinical disease-free survival with intraoperative versus preoperative preplanning for transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that intraoperative preplanning for transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy may yield better prostate cancer control than preoperative preplanning. We tested this hypothesis by comparing treatment outcomes of patients who underwent implantation using these two preplanning methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the data of 135 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer treated from 1996 to 2001 with transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy+/-preimplantation hormonal therapy: 42 received preoperative preplanning (group 1), and 93 underwent intraoperative preplanning (group 2). Biochemical status was assessed using two failure definitions: American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) (three consecutive rises in prostate-specific antigen level) and Houston (prostate-specific antigen level>or=current nadir+2 ng/mL). Clinical disease-free survival and postimplantation dosimetry were also examined. RESULTS: All disease control outcomes were superior for group 2. The 4-year ASTRO biochemical no evidence of disease rate was 80% for group 1 versus 94% for group 2. The 4-year Houston biochemical no evidence of disease rate was 82% for group 1 versus 96% for group 2. The 4-year clinical disease-free survival rate was 87% for group 1 versus 99% for group 2. Preplanning method (preoperative versus intraoperative) remained predictive of disease control outcomes in multivariate analyses with the covariates of pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score, clinical stage, and case sequence number (proxy for brachytherapist experience and "stage migration"). Dosimetric prostate coverage was superior for group 2. The mean percentage of the prescription dose delivered to 90% of the prostate volume (%D90) was 75% for group 1 versus 90% for group 2. A %D90>or=70% predicted for improved disease control; fewer group 1 than 2 patients met this dosimetric criterion (55% versus 87%). DISCUSSION: Intraoperative preplanning yielded superior disease control outcomes in this analysis, likely due at least in part to improved dosimetric prostate coverage with this method. Although not mandatory for obtaining high prostate brachytherapy efficacy, intraoperative preplanning nevertheless may offer an excellent means of improving dosimetric prostate coverage and therefore disease control outcomes.

Rectal toxicity profile after transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy: use of a comprehensive toxicity scoring system and identification of rectal dosimetric toxicity predictors.

PURPOSE: To better understand rectal toxicity after prostate brachytherapy, we employed the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 3.0), a comprehensive system with distinct and separately reported gastrointestinal adverse event items (unlike Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity scoring), to evaluate item-specific postimplant rectal toxicities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed 135 patients treated with brachytherapy +/- hormonal therapy, using CTCAE v3.0 to score acute/late rectal toxicities (median follow-up, 41 months). Dosimetric parameters were evaluated for ability to predict toxicities. RESULTS: Use of CTCAE yielded a novel rectal toxicity profile consisting of diarrhea, incontinence, urgency, proctitis, pain, spasms, and hemorrhage event rates. No item had a < 5% Grade 1-2 acute toxicity rate (except spasms). Rectal dosimetry predicted late toxicities: for diarrhea, 5% Grade 1 toxicity rate for %V25 (percent of rectal volume receiving 25% of prescribed prostate dose) < or = 25% vs. 60% for %V25 > 25% (p < 0.001); for maximum toxicity, 10% Grade 1 toxicity rate for %V10 < or = 40% vs. 44% for %V10 > 40% (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive understanding of item-specific postimplant rectal toxicities was obtained using CTCAE. Rectal %V25 > 25% and %V10 > 40% predicted worse late diarrhea and maximum toxicity, respectively.