Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Saudi J Gastroenterol ; 26(1): 39-45, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31997777

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the specificity and sensitivity of eosinophil cutoff points defining the colonic tissue eosinophilia (TE) and compare the yield of reporting the highest count versus the mean of five high-power fields (HPFs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy-one cases of colonic TE, including 22 primary eosinophilic colitis (PEC) cases, were compared to one hundred and twenty-one normal controls in the University of Jordan. The highest eosinophil count (EC) and the mean of five HPFs were recorded. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to find the cutoff point with the best sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: There was no significant advantage of counting five fields over counting the most densely populated HPF. Using 30 eosinophils per HPF achieved 80% sensitivity and 65% specificity. This point is close to the mean in normal controls plus one standard deviation (SD) (29 per HPF). However, there was overlap between normal counts and TE, using 30 as a cutoff point resulted in 35% false-positive rate. There was no reliable cutoff point to differentiate PEC from secondary TE. CONCLUSION: We recommend reporting the highest EC in colonic biopsies and using 30 as a cutoff point, bearing in mind the overlap with normal and correlating with the clinical team to not treat asymptomatic patients. Clinicopathological correlation is essential to separate PEC from secondary TE.


Assuntos
Doenças do Colo/sangue , Enterite/sangue , Eosinofilia/diagnóstico , Eosinófilos/patologia , Gastrite/sangue , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Doenças do Colo/patologia , Enterite/patologia , Eosinofilia/sangue , Eosinofilia/patologia , Feminino , Gastrite/patologia , Humanos , Jordânia/epidemiologia , Contagem de Leucócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
2.
Cytotherapy ; 18(8): 970-984, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27378342

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Renal disease is a major health problem. Recent studies have reported the efficacy of stem cell therapy in nephropathy animal models. AIM OF THE WORK: This study was designed to investigate the therapeutic effectiveness of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) versus losartan in the treatment of renal alterations induced by adriamycin (ADR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five adult male albino rats were divided into four groups. Group I was the control group. Group II (adriamycin-treated group),which included ten rats that were injected with a single dose of adriamycin (15 mg/kg) intraperitoneally, was subdivided into subgroup IIa and IIb and they were sacrificed 1 week and 5 weeks after adriamycin injection, respectively. Group III was the adriamycin + losartan-treated group and 1 week after adriamycin injection five rats received 10 mg/kg of losartan orally and daily for 4 weeks. Group IV was the adriamycin + MSC-treated group); five rats were injected with adriamycin as group II then supplied with MSCs at a dose of 1 × 10(6) cells suspended in 0.5 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) per rat in the tail vein 1 week after adriamycin injection. Rats of this group were sacrificed 4 weeks after the stem cell injection. Blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine were measured. Samples from renal cortex were processed for light and electron microscope examination. As regards light microscope, sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H-E), periodic acid-Schiff (PAS), masson trichrome, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and Caspase-3 immunohistochemical stains. Morphometrical and statistical analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: Examination of adriamycin-treated group revealed deterioration of renal functions and various degrees of renal structural alterations as vacuolated cytoplasm, dark nuclei and detached epithelial lining. Administration of losartan partially improved ADR-induced kidney dysfunction, whereas MSCs denoted a more ameliorative role evidenced by structural and functional recovery. CONCLUSION: MSCs have a relevant therapeutic potential against ADR-induced renal damage. MSCs may accomplish this role by decreasing caspase-3 expression and increasing proliferating cell nuclear antigen staining which influence the regeneration of the kidney.


Assuntos
Transplante de Medula Óssea , Doxorrubicina , Losartan/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/induzido quimicamente , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Animais , Células da Medula Óssea/citologia , Transplante de Medula Óssea/métodos , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Progressão da Doença , Masculino , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/citologia , Ratos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...