Bioequivalence Between a New Omalizumab Prefilled Syringe With an Autoinjector or with a Needle Safety Device Compared with the Current Prefilled Syringe: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Volunteers.

Omalizumab is an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody currently approved for the treatment of asthma, nasal polyps/chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, and chronic spontaneous urticaria. Omalizumab is available as an injection in a prefilled syringe (PFS) with a needle safety device (NSD). New product configurations were developed to reduce the number of injections per dose administration, improve patient convenience and treatment compliance. The objective of this randomized open-label 12-week study was to demonstrate pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between (1) new PFS with autoinjector (PFS-AI), (2) new PFS-NSD configuration, and (3) current PFS-NSD configuration. Each new configuration was considered bioequivalent to the current configuration if the confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMR) were contained in the 0.80-1.25 range for maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve until the last quantifiable measurement (AUClast), and AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf). Safety was assessed throughout the study. In total, 193 healthy volunteers were randomized at 1:1:1 ratio to omalizumab 1×300 mg/2 mL via new PFS-AI (n = 66), omalizumab 1×300 mg/2 mL via new PFS-NSD (n = 64), or omalizumab 2×150 mg/1 mL via current PFS-NSD (n = 63). Comparing new PFS-AI versus current PFS-NSD, the GMRs were: Cmax, 1.085; AUClast, 1.093; AUCinf, 1.100. Comparing new PFS-NSD versus current PFS-NSD, the GMRs were: Cmax, 1.006; AUClast, 1.016; AUCinf, 1.027. The 95% CIs for all GMR parameters were contained within the 0.80-1.25 range. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of omalizumab. Single-dose omalizumab administered as the new PFS-AI or new PFS-NSD was bioequivalent to the current PFS-NSD.

Effects of triclabendazole and its metabolite exposure on the heart-rate-corrected QT intervals: A randomized, placebo- and positive-controlled thorough QT study in healthy individuals.

Triclabendazole is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for human fascioliasis. A placebo- and positive-controlled, four-sequence by four-period crossover study was conducted in 45 healthy participants to assess the effect of therapeutic (10 mg/kg twice daily [b.i.d.] for 1 day) and supratherapeutic (10 mg/kg b.i.d. for 3 days) oral doses of triclabendazole on corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation. Moxifloxacin (400 mg, oral) was used as a positive control. The highest mean placebo-corrected change from baseline in QTcF (ΔΔQTcF) on day 4 with triclabendazole was 9.2 at therapeutic dose ms and 21.7 ms at supratherapeutic dose, at 4 h postdose. The upper limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval exceeded 10 ms across all timepoints, except at predose timepoint on day 4 in the therapeutic group indicating that an effect of triclabendazole on cardiac repolarization could not be excluded. However, triclabendazole had no clinically significant effects on heart rate and cardiac conduction at the studied doses. In the moxifloxacin group, the mean ΔΔQTcF peak value was 13.7 ms at 3 h on day 4. The assay sensitivity was confirmed. Maximum plasma concentration of triclabendazole, sulfoxide metabolite, and sulfone metabolite occurred at ~3-, 4-, and 6-h postdose, respectively. No deaths, serious adverse events, study discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events, or clinically relevant abnormalities in laboratory evaluations and vital sign values were observed. This study showed that triclabendazole had no clinically relevant effects on heart rate and cardiac conduction; however, an effect on cardiac repolarization (ΔΔQTcF >10 ms) could not be excluded.

Rationale for Use of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators in COVID-19 Patients: Overview of Scientific Evidence.

Maladjusted immune responses to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), for example, cytokine release syndrome, may result in immunopathology and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a bioactive lipid mediator, and its S1P receptor (S1PR) are crucial in maintaining endothelial cell chemotaxis and barrier integrity. Apart from the S1P1 receptor-mediated mechanisms of sequestration of cytotoxic lymphocytes, including Th-17 and S1P1/2/3-mediated endothelial barrier functions, S1PR modulators may also attenuate cytokine release via activation of serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A and enhance the pulmonary endothelial barrier via the c-Abl tyrosine kinase pathway. Chronic treatment with fingolimod (S1PR1,3,4,5 modulator) and siponimod (S1PR1,5 modulator) has demonstrated efficacy in reducing inflammatory disease activity and slowing down disease progression in multiple sclerosis. The decision to selectively suppress the immunity of a critically ill patient with COVID-19 remains a difficult choice. It has been suggested that treatment with fingolimod or siponimod may be appropriate to attenuate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)-induced hyperinflammation in patients with COVID-19 since these patients are already monitored in an intensive care setting. Here, we review the use of S1PR modulators, fingolimod and siponimod, in regulating the inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 with the aim of understanding their potential rationale use in patients with COVID-19.

Abuse and dependence potential of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review of literature and public data.

Abuse and misuse of prescription drugs remains an ongoing concern in the USA and worldwide; thus, all centrally active new drugs must be assessed for abuse and dependence potential. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators are used primarily in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Among the new S1P receptor modulators, siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod have recently been approved in the USA, European Union (EU), and other countries. This review of literature and other public data has been undertaken to assess the potential for abuse of S1P receptor modulators, including ozanimod, siponimod, ponesimod, and fingolimod, as well as several similar compounds in development. The S1P receptor modulators have not shown chemical or pharmacological similarity to known drugs of abuse; have not shown abuse or dependence potential in animal models for subjective effects, reinforcement, or physical dependence; and do not have adverse event profiles demonstrating effects of interest to individuals who abuse drugs (such as sedative, stimulant, mood-elevating, or hallucinogenic effects). In addition, no reports of actual abuse, misuse, or dependence were identified in the scientific literature for fingolimod, which has been on the market since 2010 (USA) and 2011 (EU). Overall, the data suggest that S1P receptor modulators are not associated with significant potential for abuse or dependence, consistent with their unscheduled status in the USA and internationally.

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Siponimod: A Randomized, Open-label Study in Healthy Subjects.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous (IV) siponimod in healthy subjects. METHODS: This randomized, open-label study was conducted in 2 parts. In Part 1, a total of 16 eligible subjects received either a single oral dose of siponimod (0.25 mg) followed by a single IV infusion (0.25 mg/3 h) in Sequence 1, or vice versa in Sequence 2. In Part 2, a total of 17 eligible subjects received single IV infusions of siponimod (1 mg/24 h). FINDINGS: No clinically relevant effect on mean 5-minute or hourly average heart rate was observed following the siponimod IV dosing regimens and both remained above 50 beats/min. Observed atrioventricular blocks and sinus pauses were asymptomatic. The mean change in absolute lymphocyte count from baseline was comparable for the siponimod 0.25 mg oral regimen and the two IV siponimod regimens. Oral siponimod displayed a good absolute bioavailability of 84%. The mean peak exposure of oral siponimod was approximately 48% lower than that of IV siponimod. The M17 metabolite was found to be the most prominent systemic metabolite of siponimod in humans. IMPLICATIONS: Siponimod IV infusions were well tolerated, with safety and PD (absolute lymphocyte count) profiles similar to those of oral siponimod. The PD/PK findings supported the development of an innovative rapid IV titration regimen for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.

Siponimod pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability in combination with the potent CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole in healthy subjects with different CYP2C9 genotypes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the PK and safety of siponimod, a substrate of CYP2C9/3A4, in the presence or absence of a CYP3A4 inhibitor, itraconazole. METHODS: This was an open-label study in healthy subjects (aged 18-50 years; genotype: CYP2C9 *1*2 [cohort 1; n = 17] or *1*3 [cohort 2; n = 13]). Subjects received siponimod 0.25-mg single dose in treatment period 1 (days 1-14), itraconazole 100 mg twice daily in treatment period 2 (days 15-18), and siponimod 0.25-mg single dose (day 19) with itraconazole until day 31 (cohort 1) or day 35 (cohort 2) in treatment period 3. PK of siponimod alone and with itraconazole and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 29/30 subjects completed the study. In treatment period 1, geometric mean AUCinf, T1/2, and median Tmax were higher while systemic clearance was lower in cohort 2 than cohort 1. In treatment period 3, siponimod AUC decreased by 10% (geo-mean ratio [90% confidence intervals]: 0.90 [0.84; 0.96]) and 24% (0.76 [0.69; 0.82]) in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Siponimod Cmax was similar between treatment periods 1 and 3. In both cohorts, the Cmax and AUC of the metabolites (M17, M3, and M5) decreased in the presence of itraconazole. All adverse events were mild. CONCLUSIONS: The minor albeit significant reduction in plasma exposure of siponimod and its metabolites by itraconazole was unexpected. While the reason is unclear, the results suggest that coadministration of the two drugs would not cause a considerable increase of siponimod exposure independent of CYP2C9 genotype.

Effect of Fluconazole Coadministration and CYP2C9 Genetic Polymorphism on Siponimod Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Subjects.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety/tolerability of siponimod in healthy subjects when coadministered with (1) the moderate cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and CYP3A inhibitor fluconazole (Study A), and (2) with three different CYP2C9 genotype variants (Study B). METHODS: Study A was an open-label, single-dose study comprising periods 1 (14 days; day 1: siponimod 4 mg) and 2 (20 days; day 1: fluconazole 200 mg twice daily; days 2-19: fluconazole 200 mg once daily; day 3: siponimod 4 mg) in healthy subjects (n = 14) with the wild-type CYP2C9 genotype (CYP2C9*1/*1). Study B was a multicentre, open-label study comprising parts 1 (day 1: siponimod 0.25 mg once daily in the CYP2C9*1/*1, CYP2C9*2/*3 and CYP2C9*3/*3 genotypes) and 2 (days 1-2: 0.25 mg once daily; day 3: 0.5 mg once daily in the CYP2C9*2/*3 and CYP2C9*3/*3 genotypes only) in healthy subjects with polymorphic variants of CYP2C9 (n = 24). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods. RESULTS: In Study A, coadministration with fluconazole produced an approximately twofold increase in mean area under the curve (AUC) versus siponimod alone (from 1110 to 2160 h*ng/mL), and an increase in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax; from 31.2 to 34.0 ng/mL) and elimination half-life (T½; from 40.6 to 61.6 h). In Study B, the AUCs of siponimod were approximately two to fourfold greater in subjects with the CYP2C9*2/*3 and CYP2C9*3/*3 genotypes, with a minor increase in Cmax versus the CYP2C9*1/*1 genotype. The mean T½ was prolonged in the CYP2C9*2/*3 (51 h) and CYP2C9*3/*3 (126 h) genotypes versus the CYP2C9*1/*1 (28 h) genotype. Siponimod did not result in increased adverse events in healthy subjects in both studies. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in siponimod PK, when coadministered with fluconazole at steady-state and in subjects with different CYP2C9 genotypes, indicate that the reduced CYP2C9 enzymatic activity does not affect the absorption phase of siponimod but prolongs the elimination phase. These results confirm the relevance of CYP2C9 activity on siponimod metabolism in humans.

Siponimod pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability in combination with rifampin, a CYP2C9/3A4 inducer, in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: To assess the potential pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between siponimod and rifampin, a strong CYP3A4/moderate CYP2C9 inducer, in healthy subjects. METHODS: This was a confirmatory, open-label, multiple-dose two-period study in healthy subjects (aged 18-45 years). In Period 1 (Days 1-12), siponimod was up-titrated from 0.25 to 2 mg over 5 days (Days 1-6) followed by 2 mg once daily on days 7-12. In Period 2, siponimod 2 mg qd was co-administered with rifampin 600 mg qd (Days 13-24). Primary assessments included PK of siponimod (Days 12 and 24; maximum steady-state plasma concentration [Cmax,ss], median time to achieve Cmax,ss [Tmax, ss], and area under the curve at steady state [AUCtau,ss]). Key secondary assessments were PK of M3 and M5 metabolites, and safety/tolerability including absolute lymphocyte count (ALC). RESULTS: Of the 16 subjects enrolled (age, mean ± standard deviation [SD] 31 ± 8.3 years; men, n = 15), 15 completed the study. In Period 1, siponimod geometric mean Cmax,ss (28.6 ng/mL) was achieved in 4 h (median Tmax,ss; range, 1.58-8.00) and the geometric mean AUCtau,ss was 546 h × ng/mL. In Period 2, the siponimod geometric mean Cmax,ss and AUCtau,ss decreased to 15.7 ng/mL and 235 h × ng/mL, respectively; median Tmax remained unchanged (4 h). Rifampin co-administration increased M3 Cmax,ss by 53% while M5 Cmax,ss remained unchanged. The AUCtau,ss of M3 and M5 decreased by 10% and 37%, respectively. The majority of adverse events reported were mild, with a higher frequency during Period 2 (86.7%) versus Period 1 (50%). The mean ALC increased slightly under rifampin co-administration but remained below 1.0 × 109/L. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings suggest that in the presence of rifampin, a strong CYP3A4/moderate CYP2C9 inducer, siponimod showed significant decrease in Cmax,ss (45%) and AUCtau,ss (57%) in healthy subjects.

Impact of siponimod on vaccination response in a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effects of siponimod on response to T-cell-dependent (influenza) and T-cell-independent (pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PPV-23]) vaccinations in healthy participants. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, each participant underwent a 7-week treatment period and received intramuscular injections of influenza and PPV-23 vaccines (day 21). Participants were randomized to 4 treatment groups (N = 30 each) and received placebo or siponimod 2 mg once daily in concomitant, interrupted, or preceding fashion. Individual response to vaccination was defined by a ≥4-fold (influenza) antibody titer increase and by a ≥2-fold increase in serotype-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) G concentrations (PPV-23) on day 28 vs baseline. Responder rates were compared using noninferiority analysis. RESULTS: Mean influenza titers were similar to placebo in the preceding and interrupted groups but lower in the concomitant group. The proportion of participants with influenza titers ≥40 four weeks after vaccination (seroprotection) was similar to placebo across all groups and antigens. In each treatment group, response criteria were met for 3 of 4 antigens including H1N1 and H3N2. A noninferior response was determined in the context of preceding treatment but not interrupted or concomitant treatment. Regarding PPV-23, approximately 90%-100% of participants exhibited a ≥2-fold increase in IgG concentrations vs baseline. Noninferior responder rates were determined for each siponimod treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Siponimod treatment had no relevant effect on antibody response to PPV-23. European Medicines Agency response criteria were essentially met for influenza, but titers were lower on concomitant treatment. Overall, these data suggest that siponimod has limited effect on the efficacy of vaccinations with neoantigens. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that in healthy persons, siponimod had limited effect on the immune response following influenza or pneumococcal vaccinations.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of siponimod (BAF312) in subjects with severe renal impairment: A single-dose, open-label, parallel-group study
.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of siponimod and selected inactive metabolites (M3 and M5) in subjects with varying degrees of renal impairment (RI) compared to demographically matched healthy subjects (HS). METHODS: The study enrolled subjects with severe RI (n = 8) and matched HS (n = 8). Subjects with moderate and mild RI were to be enrolled only if interim analysis showed ≥ 50% increase in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) or area under the curve (AUC) of total and/or unbound siponimod in severe RI subjects vs. HS. All subjects received a single oral dose of siponimod 0.25 mg on day 1; PK and safety were evaluated during the follow-up (~ 13 days). RESULTS: PK of siponimod was marginally affected in severe RI subjects vs. HS: Cmax decreased by 8%, and AUClast and AUCinf increased by 23% and 24%, respectively; half-life (37 vs. 26 hours) and systemic clearance (2.9 vs. 3.4 L/h) were comparable. Siponimod plasma unbound (u) fraction at 4 hours post-dose was similar between the two groups (range: 0.0172 - 0.0550%). Cmax(u) was comparable while AUClast(u) and AUCinf(u) were increased by 33% compared to HS. M3 exposure was similar (Cmax decreased by 9%; AUClast and AUCinf increased by 11%) and M5 exposure was slightly lower (Cmax decreased by 26%; AUClast decreased by 16%) in subjects with severe renal impairment (RI) compared with matched HS. No adverse events were reported during this study. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the plasma exposure of total and unbound siponimod and metabolites M3 and M5 were not considered to be clinically relevant. Further to severe RI, investigation of PK in subjects with mild and moderate RI was not warranted.
.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of siponimod (BAF312) in subjects with different levels of hepatic impairment: a single-dose, open-label, parallel-group study
.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of siponimod and major metabolites in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (HI) compared with demographically-matched healthy subjects (HS). METHODS: This open-label, parallel-group study enrolled 40 subjects (each HI group, n = 8; HS group, n = 16). A staged design was employed starting with the enrollment of subjects with mild HI, followed by those with moderate and severe HI. All subjects received single oral doses of 0.25 mg siponimod on day 1; PK and safety data were collected during the 21-day follow-up. RESULTS: All subjects had similar baseline characteristics and completed the study. No significant differences were observed in the plasma exposure of siponimod in mild, moderate, and severe HI groups vs. HS: Cmax changed by 16%, -13%, and -16%; AUC by 5%, -13%, and 15%, respectively. The unbound siponimod PK parameters vs. HS were similar in the mild HI, and increased in the moderate (Cmax, 15%; AUC, 17%) and severe HI groups (Cmax, 11%; AUC, 50%). Exposure of M3 and M5 also showed 2- to 5-fold increase, particularly in the moderate and severe HI groups vs HS. There were no clinically-relevant safety findings. CONCLUSIONS: Single oral doses of 0.25 mg siponimod were well tolerated, and HI did not significantly alter exposure to siponimod. Increase in the M3 and M5 metabolites requires further evaluation. These results do not warrant any dose adjustments of siponimod in subjects with HI.
.

Cardiac Effects of Siponimod (BAF312) Re-initiation After Variable Periods of Drug Discontinuation in Healthy Subjects.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of siponimod treatment re-initiation on the initial negative chronotropic effects and cardiac rhythm after variable drug discontinuation periods. METHODS: This partially double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in healthy subjects. Siponimod doses (0.5-4.0 mg) and placebo were evaluated in combination with drug discontinuation periods ranging from 48 to 192 hours. Twelve-lead Holter ECGs were performed from 1.5 hours before until 24 hours after single-dose re-initiation. Atrioventricular blocks (AVBs) and sinus pauses (RR >2 seconds) were categorized according to dose level, discontinuation period, and resting and nonresting hours. FINDINGS: Of the enrolled 138 subjects, 117 were evaluated. Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable between the treatment groups. Subjects rechallenged at the combination of 4 mg/192 hours (highest investigated dose and longest discontinuation period [7 missed doses]) exhibited the highest decrease in pooled, placebo-adjusted heart rate (HR) of 14.53 beats/min. The magnitude of the negative chronotropic effect of siponimod re-initiation was dependent on both dose and duration of treatment discontinuation. Regardless of the dose, the placebo-adjusted HR reduction at re-initiation of drug treatment after up to 96 hours of drug discontinuation remained <10 beats/min. Except for 1 outlier for HR decrease under the 96-hour/placebo combination, no outliers were observed for any combination up to and including the 96-hour discontinuation periods. Most of the AVBs and sinus pauses were observed during nocturnal hours concurrent with increased vagal tone. All detected AVBs and sinus pauses were asymptomatic and not considered clinically relevant. IMPLICATIONS: Siponimod could be safely re-initiated without retitration after drug discontinuation periods up to 96 hours. Retitration is required if patients miss ≥ 4 consecutive doses.

Effects of Therapeutic and Supratherapeutic Doses of Siponimod (BAF312) on Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Subjects.

PURPOSE: The International Conference on Harmonisation E14 guideline mandates an intensive cardiac safety evaluation in a clinical thorough QT study, typically in healthy subjects, for all new non-antiarrhythmic drugs with systemic bioavailability. This thorough QT study investigated the effects of therapeutic (2 mg) and supratherapeutic (10 mg) doses of siponimod (BAF312) on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects. METHODS: The study was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- and moxifloxacin-controlled, multiple oral dose study. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned to 3 groups to receive siponimod (up-titration to 2 and 10 mg over 18 days), placebo (Days -1 to 18), or moxifloxacin 400 mg Days 10 and 18). Triplicate ECGs were extracted at prespecified time points from Holter ECGs recorded from 1 hour predose until 24 hours postdose at baseline and on-treatment assessment Days 10 and 18. The primary pharmacodynamic variable was the time-matched, placebo-corrected, baseline-adjusted mean QTcF (ΔΔQTcF) at steady-state conditions. In addition, the pharmacokinetic parameters of siponimod and its main circulating metabolite M3 and its metabolite M5 were evaluated. FINDINGS: Of the 304 enrolled subjects, 281 (92.4%) were included in the pharmacodynamic analysis and 270 (88.8%) completed the study. The upper bounds of the 2-sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for ΔΔQTcF at both siponimod doses were within the regulatory threshold of 10 milliseconds (ms) at all predefined on-treatment time points, with the absence of any dose-related effects. The highest observed upper limits of the 2-sided 90% CIs of 9.8 and 9.6 ms for therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses, respectively, were both observed at 3 hours postdose. No treatment-emergent QTc values >480 ms and no QTc increases of >60 ms from baseline were observed. Similar results were obtained with individualized heart rate correction of cardiac repolarization (QTcI). Assay validity was demonstrated by maximum ΔΔQTcF of >5 ms after 400 mg moxifloxacin on both on-treatment assessment days. The selected supratherapeutic dose produced approximately 5-fold higher exposures (Cmax and AUC) than the therapeutic dose, and was considered appropriate to investigate the effects of siponimod on QT/QTc at substantial multiples of the anticipated maximum therapeutic exposure. IMPLICATIONS: The findings provide evidence that siponimod is not associated with a significant arrhythmogenic potential related to QT prolongation.

AQW051, a novel, potent and selective α7 nicotinic ACh receptor partial agonist: pharmacological characterization and phase I evaluation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Activation of the α7 nicotinic ACh receptor (nACh receptor) is considered an attractive target for the treatment of cognitive impairment associated with neurological disorders. Here we describe the novel α7-nACh receptor agonist AQW051 as a promising drug candidate for this indication. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: AQW051 was functionally characterized in vitro and cognitive effects evaluated in rodent behavioural models. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability were evaluated in three phase I placebo-controlled studies in 180 healthy subjects. KEY RESULTS: In vitro, AQW051 bound with high affinity to α7-nACh receptors and stimulated calcium influx in cells recombinantly expressing the human α7-nACh receptor. In vivo, AQW051 demonstrated good oral bioavailability and rapid penetration into the rodent brain. AQW051 administered over a broad dose range facilitated learning/memory performance in the object recognition and social recognition test in mice and the water maze model in aged rats. Clinically, AQW051 was well tolerated in healthy young and elderly subjects, with an adverse event (AE) profile comparable with placebo. No serious AEs were reported and all AEs were either mild or moderate in severity at single oral doses up to 200 mg and multiple daily doses up to 75 mg. Once-daily oral administration of AQW051 resulted in continuous exposure and a two- to threefold accumulation compared with steady state was achieved by 1 week. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These data support further development of AQW051 as a cognitive-enhancing agent, as a therapeutic, for example, in Alzheimer's disease or schizophrenia.

Tolerability and pharmacokinetics of ACT-280778, a novel nondihydropyridine dual L/T-type calcium channel blocker: early clinical studies in healthy male subjects using adaptive designs.

ACT-280778 is a novel nondihydropyridine dual L/T-type calcium channel blocker. Two clinical studies (AC-067-101 and AC-067-102) were conducted to characterize its safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics in healthy male subjects after oral administration of single and multiple doses. Both trials were single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adaptive design, ascending-dose studies, in which ACT-280778 was administrated as single doses of 2, 5, 15, or 40 mg, or as once-daily doses of 5 or 15 mg for 7 days. Single and multiple doses up to and including 15 mg were well tolerated, and no serious or severe adverse event was reported in either study. A single dose of 40 mg was associated with abnormal electrocardiogram findings resulting in the discontinuation of further treatment at this dose or higher doses. ACT-280778 was rapidly absorbed, and larger than dose-proportional increases of the maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve were observed. Food intake delayed the time to maximum plasma concentration and doubled exposure. Urinary excretion of unchanged ACT-280778 was negligible, and accumulation at steady state was modest. Overall, pharmacokinetic and tolerability profiles of ACT-280778 observed in these 2 studies warranted further evaluation of ACT-280778 in a proof-of-concept study in patients with hypertension.

Influence of mild and moderate liver impairment on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of almorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist.

This single-dose study aimed at investigating the effect of different degrees of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK), metabolism, and tolerability of almorexant, a first-in-class dual orexin receptor antagonist. Subjects with mild (Child-Pugh A, Group A, n=8) and moderate (Child-Pugh B, Group B, n=9) liver impairment and subjects with normal liver function (Group DA and DB, both n=9) received a dose of 100mg almorexant. PK parameters of almorexant and its four primary metabolites were determined. Almorexant exposure increased with severity of hepatic impairment. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of AUC0-∞ were 2.8 (1.5-5.4), 7.2 (3.7-14.1), and 3.3 (1.7-6.4) comparing A vs. DA, B vs. DB, and B vs. A, respectively. The four metabolic pathways involved in the formation of the primary metabolites were affected in a different fashion. Geometric mean AUC0-∞ ratios comparing A vs. DA were 6.9, 1.1, 1.4, and 3.6 for M3, M5, M6, and M8, respectively. Comparing B vs. DB the corresponding figures were 7.3, 2.0, 5.4, and 1.3, respectively. Significant effects of hepatic impairment on the PK of almorexant suggested the need for dose adjustment in subjects with mild hepatic impairment and did not support its use in subjects with moderate or severe hepatic impairment.

Elucidation of the metabolic pathways and the resulting multiple metabolites of almorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, in humans.

Almorexant [(2R)-2-{(1S)-6, 7-dimethoxy-1-[2-(4-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-ethyl]-3,4-dihydro-1H-isoquinolin-2-yl}-N-methyl-2-phenyl-acetamide], a tetrahydroisoquinoline derivative, is a dual orexin receptor antagonist with sleep-promoting properties in both animals and humans. This study investigated the disposition, metabolism, and elimination of almorexant in humans. After oral administration of a 200-mg dose of ¹4C-almorexant, almorexant was rapidly absorbed (Tmax = 0.8 hour), and the apparent terminal half-life (t(1/2)) was 17.8 hours. The radioactive dose was almost completely recovered with 78.0% of the administered radioactive dose found in feces and 13.5% in urine. Unchanged almorexant was not found in urine and represented 10% of the administered dose in feces. In total, 47 metabolites were identified of which 21 were shown to be present in plasma. There are four primary metabolites, the isomeric phenols M3 and M8, formed by demethylation, the aromatic isoquinolinium ion M5, formed by dehydrogenation, and M6, formed by oxidative dealkylation with loss of the phenylglycine moiety. Most of the subsequent products are formed by permutations of these primary metabolic reactions followed by conjugation of the intermediate phenols with glucuronic or sulfonic acid. The percentage of dose excreted in urine or feces for any of the metabolites did not exceed 10% of the administered radioactive dose, nor did any of the metabolites represent more than 10% of the total drug-related exposure. In conclusion, after rapid absorption, almorexant is extensively metabolized, and excretion of metabolites in feces is the predominant route of elimination in humans.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dabigatran etexilate, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, are not affected by moderate hepatic impairment.

The impact of moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of dabigatran etexilate was evaluated in an open, parallel-group study. Healthy volunteers (n = 12) and patients with hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh classification B; n = 12) received a single oral dose of 150 mg dabigatran etexilate. The mean values for area under the concentration-time curve, terminal half-life, and renal clearance of dabigatran were comparable between patients with hepatic impairment and healthy volunteers. Conversion of the dabigatran intermediate BIBR1087 to active dabigatran was slower in patients with hepatic impairment, indicating that the liver is partly involved in bioconversion of dabigatran etexilate. However, total drug exposure was comparable between groups; therefore, this observation is of no clinical relevance with respect to the anticoagulant activity of dabigatran. The extent of dabigatran glucuronidation was unchanged by liver disease; glucuronidation capacity was maintained in moderate liver disease. The activated partial thromboplastin time, ecarin clotting time, and thrombin time relationships were essentially identical in both groups. This study shows that moderate hepatic impairment does not affect the PK/PD or safety profile of dabigatran. Therefore, patients with moderate hepatic impairment can be given dabigatran etexilate without the need for dose adjustment.

Drug interactions during therapy with three major groups of antimicrobial agents.

This review focuses on drug-drug interactions with three major groups of antimicrobial agents: macrolides (including azalides and ketolides), quinolones, which are widely used for the treatment of bacterial infections, and azoles, which are used for antifungal therapy. Macrolides and the ketolide telithromycin are potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 and thus interfere with the pharmacokinetics of many other drugs that are metabolised by this enzyme. In contrast, although closely related, azithromycin is not a cytochrome inhibitor. All quinolones form complexes with di- and trivalent cations and, therefore, the absorption of quinolones can be dramatically reduced when given concomitantly with mineral antacids, zinc or iron preparations. Ciprofloxacin exhibits an inhibitory potential for the cytochrome isoenzyme 1A2, resulting in an inhibition of theophylline metabolism. Other quinolones, such as levofloxacin or moxifloxacin, do not interfere with theophylline metabolism. The systemic azoles, such as ketoconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole and voriconazole, are inhibitors of CYP isoenzymes, such as CYP3A4, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, to varying degrees. In addition, some are substrates of the MDR-1 gene product, P-glycoprotein. These features are the basis for most of the interactions occurring during azole therapy (e.g., in severely ill patients in the hospital who are treated with multiple drugs).