Frontal inverted papillomas: A 25-year study.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study analyzes the treatment outcomes of frontal inverted papillomas (FIPs) in an attempt to provide guidelines for surgery selection. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: The treatment results of 29 FIPs classified into five categories were retrospectively analyzed. The five categories are F1, tumor prolapsed into frontal sinus, tumor origin outside frontal sinus; F2, tumor origin inside frontal sinus, medial to the plane of lamina papyracea; F3, tumor origin inside frontal sinus, lateral to the plane of lamina papyracea; F4, bilateral; and F5, extrasinonasal. RESULTS: Of the 11 F1 cases, 73% had Draf I and 27% had Draf IIA procedures. There was one (9%) frontal recurrence and one (9%) frontal stenosis. Of the 10 F2 cases, 10% had Draf I, 40% had Draf IIA, 40% had Draf IIB, and 10% had Draf III surgery with a trephination. One patient (10%) had a frontal recurrence. Of the five F3 cases, 40% had Draf IIA surgery, 20% had external frontoethmoidectomy, and 40% had external frontal sinusotomy. The recurrence rate was 60%, and frontal stenosis rate was 60%. The two F4 cases had external frontal sinusotomies and Draf III surgery with no frontal recurrence or stenosis. The patient with the F5 had a frontal recurrence after Draf IIA surgery and external frontoethmoidectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Draf I or IIA surgery is adequate for most F1 tumors, and Draf II surgery is adequate for most F2 tumors. F3 and F4 tumors can be managed initially by Draf III surgery with external frontal sinusotomy added when required. F5 tumors probably require combined surgical approaches. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:1622-1628, 2020.

A case-control study of the risk factors associated with sinonasal inverted papilloma.

BACKGROUND: The etiology of sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP) is unknown. This study was designed to evaluate the possible risk factors associated with IP Methods: This is a case-control epidemiology study in a tertiary referral center. Fifty patients with IP and 150 matched controls were interviewed using a questionnaire on suspected risk factors. Univariate analysis of the risk factors and calculation of the matched odds ratios, the corresponding 95% CIs, and p values was performed. Significant risk factors were further studied using conditional logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Outdoor and industrial occupations were associated with IP. Tobacco smoking, drinking alcohol, history of allergic rhinitis, sinusitis, nasal polyp, non-sinonasal papilloma and non-sinonasal malignancy were not significant factors. CONCLUSION: Outdoor and industrial occupations were associated with IP and may be potential risk factors. Future studies are warranted to further evaluate the individual type of occupation and chemical involved.

A case-control study of the risk factors associated with sinonasal inverted papilloma.

BACKGROUND: The etiology of sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP) is unknown. This study was designed to evaluate the possible risk factors associated with IP Methods: This is a case-control epidemiology study in a tertiary referral center. Fifty patients with IP and 150 matched controls were interviewed using a questionnaire on suspected risk factors. Univariate analysis of the risk factors and calculation of the matched odds ratios, the corresponding 95% CIs, and p values was performed. Significant risk factors were further studied using conditional logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Outdoor and industrial occupations were associated with IP. Tobacco smoking, drinking alcohol, history of allergic rhinitis, sinusitis, nasal polyp, non-sinonasal papilloma and non-sinonasal malignancy were not significant factors. CONCLUSION: Outdoor and industrial occupations were associated with IP and may be potential risk factors. Future studies are warranted to further evaluate the individual type of occupation and chemical involved.