A mild stressor induces short-term anxiety and long-term phenotypic changes in trauma-related behavior in female rats.

Introduction: Anxiety and anxiety-influenced disorders are sexually dimorphic with women being disproportionately affected compared to men. Given the increased prevalence in women and the documented differences in anxiety and trauma behavior between male and female rats this paper sought to examine the link between stress, anxiety, and fear learning and extinction in female rats. We tested the hypothesis that a mild stressor will induce short-and long-term increases in anxiety and produce long term effects on subsequent fear learning and extinction behavior. Methods: We induced anxiety in female Sprague- Dawley rats with a short (3 min) exposure to a ball of cat hair infused with 150 µl of cat urine (mild stressor) that elicits innate fear but does not cause fear conditioning. The control group was exposed to fake cat hair. Anxiety was assessed in the Light-Dark Open Field (LDOF) or Elevated Plus Maze (EPM) before, immediately after and 4 days after stimulus exposure. Two weeks later, all animals were subject to Contextual Fear Conditioning (CFC) in the Shock Arm of a Y-maze, blocked off from the rest of the maze. Memory and fear extinction (learning of safety) was assessed in the following four days by placing each rat in one of the Safe Arms and measuring avoidance extinction (time spent and number of entries in the Shock Arm). Results: Cat hair exposure induced changes in anxiety-like behavior in the short-term that appeared resolved 4 days later. However, the cat-hair exposed rats had long-term (2 weeks) phenotypic changes expressed as altered exploratory behavior in an emotionally neutral novel place. Fear learning and extinction were not impaired. Yet, using avoidance extinction, we demonstrated that the phenotypic difference induced by the mild stressor could be documented and dissociated from learning and memory. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that the history of stress, even mild stress, has subtle long-term effects on behavior even when short-term anxiety appears resolved.

Neuroinflammation is a susceptibility factor in developing a PTSD-like phenotype.

Introduction: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a psychological disorder that occurs after a traumatic event in a subset of exposed individuals. This implies the existence of susceptibility factors that foster the development of PTSD. Susceptibility factors are present before trauma and can contribute to the development and maintenance of PTSD after trauma. Manipulation of susceptibility factors may decrease the probability of developing PTSD. A putative susceptibility factor is inflammation. Patients with PTSD have been documented to have a higher pro-inflammatory profile compared to non-PTSD subjects. In addition, they are more likely to develop and die from cardiovascular disease which has a strong inflammation component. It is not known, however, whether inflammation plays a role in developing PTSD or whether reducing inflammation can prevent PTSD. Methods: We used the Revealing Individual Susceptibility to a PTSD-like phenotype (RISP) model to behaviorally classify male rats as resilient or susceptible before trauma and tested their serum and prefrontal cortical (mPFC) levels of IL-1ß, IL-6, TNFα, IL-10, IFN IFNγ, and KC/GRO to determine whether inflammation represents a putative susceptibility factor for PTSD. Results: We found elevated IL-6 levels in the mPFC, but not serum, of susceptible rats compared to resilient animals before trauma. Serum and mPFC levels were not correlated in any of the cytokines/chemokines. Rats with high anxiety-like behavior had elevated IL-6 and IL-10 mPFC levels. Acoustic startle responses were not associated with cytokine/chemokine levels. Discussion: Neuroinflammation, rather than systemic inflammation exists in susceptible male rats before trauma and is thus a putative susceptibility factor for PTSD. Thus, susceptibility appears neurogenic in its pathogenesis. The lack of differences between susceptible and resilient rats in serum cytokine/chemokine levels infers that peripheral markers will not be useful in determining susceptibility. Chronic neuroinflammation appears more broadly associated with anxiety rather than startle responses.

Sex Differences In Avoidance Extinction After Contextual Fear Conditioning: Anxioescapic Behavior In Female Rats.

Fear memories are important for survival and are implicated in the etiology of fear disorders such as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Fear memories are well studied pre-clinically and sex differences in rodent fear expression have been reported: females tend to freeze less than males. Whether this is a difference in fear learning or expression is debated. We aimed to differentiate between these possibilities with a task that allowed female rats to express fear memory by moving, rather than freezing. We assessed fear extinction after contextual fear conditioning in the isolated Shock Arm of a Y-maze in female and male rats by either placing them back in the isolated Shock Arm (Fear Extinction in the Shock Context) or allowing them to move freely in the Y-maze during extinction training and enter/avoid the Shock Arm (Avoidance Extinction). We confirmed that female rats freeze less than males during fear extinction in both settings. During Avoidance Extinction, however, both sexes had similar avoidance of the Shock Context, showing comparable fear memory and extinction. Additionally, female rats made more entries into the non-shock arms. Thus, female and male rats have similar fear learning but females express it with an active motor response. Furthermore, female rats also exhibited an active motor response under other anxiogenic conditions (Elevated Plus Maze) and had higher reactivity (Acoustic Startle Response) but not when fear-eliciting stimuli were present: cat hair and foot-shock. In summary, female rats have an active motor response to anxiogenic stimuli which we termed 'Anxioescapic' behavior strategy.

Emotional state alters encoding of long-term spatial episodic memory.

The neurobiology of emotion and episodic memory are well-researched subjects, as is their intersection: memory of emotional events (i.e. emotional memory). We and others have previously demonstrated that the emotional valence of stimuli is encoded in the dorsal hippocampus, a structure integral to the acquisition, consolidation and retrieval of long-term episodic memories. Such findings are consistent with the idea that the emotional valence of stimuli contributes to the "what" component of episodic memories ("where" and "when" being the other components). We hypothesized that being in a heightened emotional state by itself does not contribute to the "what" component of episodic memories. We tested an inference of this hypothesis - that negative emotional state does not alter re-encoding of a spatial episodic event. Rats from the experimental group explored a novel place at their baseline emotional state (Event 1) and 20 min later re-explored the same place (Event 2) in a negative emotional state induced by a state-altering event prior to Event 2. We examined neuronal ensembles that induced expression of Arc and Homer1a, two immediate-early genes (IEGs) necessary for synaptic plasticity and consolidation of long-term memories, during both events. We found that in dorsal CA1 and dorsal CA3, Event 1 and Event 2 induced IEG expression in different neuronal ensembles. This finding was reflected in a low Fidelity score, which assesses the percentage of the Event 1 IEG-expressing ensemble re-activated during Event 2. The Fidelity score was significantly higher in a control group which was at a baseline emotional state during Event 2. Groups which were matched for non-specific disruptions from the state-altering event had intermediate Fidelity scores in dorsal CA1. The Fidelity scores of the dorsal CA3 in the latter groups were similar to those of the control group. Combined, the findings reject the tested hypothesis and suggest that a negative emotional state is encoded in the hippocampus as part of the long-term memory of episodic events that lack explicit emotion-inducing stimuli. These findings also suggest that individuals who often experience strong negative emotional states incorporate these states into ongoing non-emotional episodic memories.

Light-Dark Open Field (LDOF): A novel task for sensitive assessment of anxiety.

BACKGROUND: Pre-clinical studies of psychiatric disorders often include a measure of anxiety-like behavior. Several tasks exist that serve this purpose, but because anxiety is complex with a myriad of anxiogenic stimuli, researchers are often compelled to use multiple tasks. The Light-Dark Open Field (LDOF) combines concepts from two such tasks, Light-Dark Box and Open Field, into one task with the synergistic effect of enhanced discrimination of anxiety-like behavior. NEW METHODS: Our goal was to increase the sensitivity of the Open Field task with the addition of a shadow, conceptually similar to the Light-Dark Box, to detect concealed differences even under bright light, which is highly anxiogenic. The resulting LDOF allows assessment of anxiety due to bright light and open space simultaneously, while retaining the ability to assess the impact of each with custom indices. In addition, it maintains all the advantages and measures of the Open Field. RESULTS: Using custom created indices from measures collected in the LDOF one can assess anxiety induced by light, open space, or light and open space combined and thus elucidate anxiety-inducing factors. Using two strains of rats: an outbred strain, Sprague-Dawley (SD), and a strain that exhibits high trait anxiety, Lewis rats, we found that increased discrimination for anxiety-like behavior can be achieved with the Light-Dark Open Field. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING MODELS: The LDOF allows researchers to extract the traditional measures of an Open Field, including valuable information about locomotion and habituation while adding a further layer of discrimination with the light-dark component. Because the LDOF is a combination of two different tests, it saves time compared to running multiple experiments in series that then need to be counterbalanced to reduce artefacts and task order effects. In addition, it detects differences even when traditional tasks of anxiety have reached their ceiling sensitivity (i.e. EPM under bright light conditions). CONCLUSION: We present the Light-Dark Open Field: a simple modification of an existing Open Field apparatus that incorporates aspects of the Light-Dark Box with the addition of a shadow. The shadow (Dark Perimeter) allows for increased discrimination in detecting anxiety-like behaviors. Comparison of anxiety-like behavior between Lewis and SD rats allowed us to develop the construct and face validity of the LDOF as well as demonstrate its sensitivity even under bright light conditions. In addition, we developed 3 indices that allow one to parse out, from one set of data, the effect of two anxiogenic stimuli- bright light and open space.