Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anesth Pain Med ; 11(4): e119346, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34692449

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: One of the methods of pain control after pediatric surgical procedures is regional techniques, including caudal block, despite their limitations. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the pain score and complications of caudal tramadol were evaluated in pediatrics following lower abdominal surgery. METHODS: In this study, 46 children aged 3 to 10 years were allocated into two equal groups (R and TR) for performing caudal analgesia after lower abdominal surgery. The injectate contained 0.2% ropivacaine 1 mL/kg in the R group (control group) and tramadol (2 mg/kg) and ropivacaine in the TR group. The pain score, duration of pain relief, amount of paracetamol consumption, hemodynamic alterations, and possible complications at specific times (1, 2, and 6 hours) were evaluated in both groups. RESULTS: No considerable difference was observed in the pain score between the groups in the first and second hours (P > 0.05). However, in the sixth hour, the TR group had a significantly lower pain score than the R group (P < 0.05). Compared to the R group, the TR group had a longer period of analgesia and lower consumption of analgesic drugs (P < 0.05). Heart rate and blood pressure differences were not significant between the two groups (P > 0.05). Similarly, the duration of operation and recovery time were not remarkably different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Complications had no apparent differences between these two groups, as well (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the addition of tramadol to caudal ropivacaine in pediatric lower abdominal surgery promoted pain relief without complications.

3.
Anesth Analg ; 117(6): 1485-92, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24257398

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We performed this randomized trial to compare the recovery profile of patients receiving single injection (SISB) and continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB) or general anesthesia (GA) for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery through the first postoperative week. Our primary hypothesis was that the highest pain numeric rating scale (NRS) (worst pain score) at the end of the study week would be lower for patients in the CISB group than for patients in the SISB or GA groups. METHODS: Seventy-one patients scheduled for elective outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were enrolled. CISB patients received 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine as a bolus through a catheter, whereas SISB patients received the same injection volume through a needle. CISB patients received an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 5 mL/h with a patient-controlled bolus of 5 mL hourly for 48 hours. GA-only patients received a standardized general anesthetic. Postoperative highest NRS pain scores through the first postoperative week, time-to-first pain, analgesic consumption, fast-tracked postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU) bypass rate, length of PACU stay, time-to-discharge home, total hours of sleep, and related adverse effects were recorded in the PACU and at home on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7. RESULTS: No patient in the CISB or SISB groups reported a NRS ≥1 or required analgesics while in the PACU. While most patients in the CISB and SISB groups were fast-tracked to PACU discharge, no patient in the GA group was fast-tracked (Χ P = 0.003). Length of stay in the PACU was significantly shorter for the CISB and SISB groups than for the GA group (20 ± 31, 30 ± 42, and 165 ± 118 minutes, respectively (CISB vs GA, P < 0.001; SISB vs GA, P <0.001), and time-to-discharge home was significantly shorter when compared with the GA group. Time to first pain report was longer in the CISB group. Mean NRS scores were lower for patients in the CISB group than in the SISB and GA groups on postoperative days 1 and 2, and use of narcotics (doses ≥1) was lower until postoperative day 3. Patients who received CISB slept significantly longer than patients who received SISB or GA (P < 0.01) during the first 48 hours postoperatively. By the end of the study week, 26% of patients in the CISB group, 83% in the SISB group, and 58% of GA patients reported NRS ≥4 (both P-values ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: The analgesic benefits of CISB found in the PACU and immediately after discharge extend through the intermediate recovery period ending on postoperative day 7.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Amidas/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Artroscopia , Plexo Braquial , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Manguito Rotador/cirurgia , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/efeitos adversos , Amidas/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Anestesia Geral , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Artroscopia/efeitos adversos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Sala de Recuperação , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Ropivacaina , Lesões do Manguito Rotador , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 38(5): 447-51, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23897425

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The connective tissue layers that surround the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa are poorly defined. We present high-definition ultrasound images of the sciatic nerve, which were acquired during ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block (SNB), that clearly demonstrate these fascial layers. METHODS: Four patients undergoing hallux valgus surgery received an ultrasound-guided popliteal SNB using a high-definition ultrasound system. In the ultrasound images, the paraneural sheath was identified as a hyperechoeic fascial layer between the outer surface of the sciatic nerve (epineurium) and the epimysium of the surrounding muscles. The paraneural sheath was distinct from the epineurium, better delineated after the local anesthetic injection, and enveloped not only the sciatic nerve but also the common peroneal and tibial nerves separately. In the postblock sonograms, the local anesthetic was compartmentalized into 2 broad areas, that is, external (subepimyseal) and internal (subparaneural) to the paraneural sheath. The popliteal SNB was effective for surgical anesthesia in all 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated the paraneural sheath and the fascial compartments, that is, the "subepimyseal perineural compartment" and the "subparaneural compartment" that surround the sciatic nerve and act as conduits for local anesthetic spread during a popliteal SNB.


Assuntos
Fáscia/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Nervo Isquiático/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Fasciotomia , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nervo Isquiático/cirurgia , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...