A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Analysis of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Presence Among United States Occupational and Environmental Medicine Residency Program Websites.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the presence of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) among US occupational and environmental medicine (OEM) residency program websites. METHODS: In January to February 2022, two independent reviewers evaluated the websites of all 24 US accredited OEM residency programs and documented the presence of 10 predetermined DEI metrics and resident/faculty photographs and biographies. RESULTS: Program websites included a median of 1 (0-3) DEI element with 46% of websites containing none of the DEI metrics. Faculty photographs and biographies were included in 83% and 75% of websites, respectively. Resident photographs and biographies were included in 50% and 25% of websites, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Many OEM residency program websites lack DEI presence. Programs should consider presenting information relevant to DEI on their websites to help attract more diverse applicant pools.

Latex Anaphylaxis Caused by Occupational Exposure to Balloons.

Latex allergies often develop by sensitization to latex allergens by repeated exposure. Because in recent years latex has been ubiquitous in medical equipment, health workers have a higher prevalence of latex allergies than the general population, and care must be taken to ensure workers' safety. We report a case of a female health care worker in her 20s who experienced a severe, biphasic anaphylactic reaction within minutes after being exposed to rubber balloons at a latex-free children's hospital. After being stabilized with epinephrine, dexamethasone, and fluid resuscitation, over a six-hour period, she was discharged home. En route home, her symptoms recurred, and she was admitted to the ICU for observation for impending respiratory failure. She was hospitalized for about 48 hours before being discharged home. She presented to the occupational medicine clinic a few days later for further management. No acute care was required and she was discharged. This case is consistent with occupational latex-induced anaphylaxis. Health personnel should be educated about the importance of compliance with latex allergy mitigation procedures, as well as the severe nature of hypersensitivity reactions that may occur in sensitized persons. It may be beneficial to address the social pressures that can contribute to noncompliance, as balloons are a common gift for children and may be viewed as an acceptable way to cheer up a sick child, tempting some staff to turn a blind eye to policy. The reasons for the policy, and for strict adherence, should be communicated clearly.

The development of inflammatory arthritis following SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Given the widespread impact of COVID-19, it is important to explore any atypical presentations and long-term sequelae associated with this viral infection, including the precipitation of inflammatory arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To identify and summarize clinical reports of acute inflammatory arthritis associated with COVID-19. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed (MEDLINE), Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central databases through January 31, 2022 was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The inclusion criteria were: human subjects and English language. Data extraction and qualitative synthesis of the demographics, clinical presentations, treatments, and outcomes were performed. Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna-Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. RESULTS: A total of 37 articles collectively describing the cases of 54 patients were included. The mean age was 48.2 years (6-78 years). 53.7% of patients were male and 46.3% were female. The onset of articular symptoms varied considerably, and the majority of cases were described as polyarticular (29). The classification of inflammatory arthritis in the included studies was as follows: reactive (19), post-viral (13), new-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (8), crystal-proven arthropathy flare (4), acute viral (2), new-onset psoriatic arthritis (2), flare of preexisting RA (2), and other (4). Arthritis treatment regimens varied but consisted largely of NSAIDs and corticosteroids with most patients experiencing improvement or resolution of their joint symptoms. CONCLUSION: There is limited low-level evidence suggesting that patients may develop acute arthritis during or after SARS-CoV-2 infection. This review highlights the need for further research to elucidate the relationship between COVID-19 and the development of inflammatory arthritis.

This review paper sought to explore the relationship between COVID-19 disease and acute joint pain/inflammation (arthritis) through a systematic search of the literature. This review found limited low-level evidence suggesting that patients may develop inflammatory arthritis during or after COVID-19 disease. However, there is a need for further research to improve our understanding of the relationship between COVID-19 and the development of inflammatory arthritis.

Return to Work, Demographic Predictors, and Symptomatic Analysis Among Healthcare Workers Presenting for COVID-19 Testing: A Retrospective Cohort From a United States Academic Occupational Medicine Clinic.

Introduction We sought to determine time to return to work (RTW) among healthcare workers (HCWs) with mild/moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and identify predictors of COVID-19 test positivity and illness duration.  Methods A retrospective review of HCWs presenting for COVID-19 testing/evaluation in December 2020 was performed to examine demographics, clinical characteristics, and RTW. Results Of 250 exposure incidents, 107 employees (42.80%) tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). No significant differences between COVID-19 positive and negative HCWs were noted in terms of key demographics, including age, gender, and CDC risk scores. Cough (77.57% vs 56.64%, p = 0.001), fatigue (66.36% vs 51.05%, p = 0.015), fever/chills (65.42% vs 37.06%, p < 0.001), myalgia (57.01% vs 35.66%, p = 0.008), and change in smell/taste (38.32% vs 13.29%, p < 0.001) were more prevalent among COVID-19 positive versus negative HCWs. Change in smell/taste (p < 0.001, OR 3.592), cough (p = 0.001, OR 2.966), and fever/chills (p = 0.019, OR 2.107) were independently associated with COVID-19 test positivity. Mean time to RTW from symptom onset was 13.09 days for COVID-19 positive HCWs. Female gender (p = 0.020, + 3.20 days), older age (p = 0.014, + 2.22 days), and myalgia (p = 0.021, + 2.23 days) were predictive of longer illness duration. Conclusion Change in taste/smell, cough, and fever/chills were independently associated with COVID-19 test positivity. Among HCWs with mild/moderate COVID-19 infection, the mean time to RTW was approximately 13 days with female gender, older age, and myalgia being predictive of delayed RTW.

Treatment outcomes of peri-articular steroid injection for patients with work-related sacroiliac joint pain and lumbar para-spinal muscle strain.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluating treatment outcomes of local corticosteroid injections for work-related lower back pain (LBP) as the current evidence for the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine guidelines is considered insufficient to recommend this practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective study involving the patients who were treated with peri-articular and lower lumbar corticosteroid injections for work-related LBP at their occupational medicine clinic. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. The average pain level was reduced from M±SD 5.1±2.0 to M±SD 3.1±2.3 after the corticosteroid injection (p < 0.0001). Thirty-five patients (55%) were discharged to regular duty; 23 (36%) were transferred to orthopedics due to persistent pain; and 6 (9%) were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroid injections for work-related LBP are effective in reducing pain and enhancing discharge to regular duty. Nonetheless, larger prospective trials are needed to validate these findings. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2021;34(1):111-20.

Diesel exhaust exposure, its multi-system effects, and the effect of new technology diesel exhaust.

Exposure to diesel exhaust (DE) from vehicles and industry is hazardous and affects proper function of organ systems. DE can interfere with normal physiology after acute and chronic exposure to particulate matter (PM). Exposure leads to potential systemic disease processes in the central nervous, visual, hematopoietic, respiratory, cardiovascular, and renal systems. In this review, we give an overview of the epidemiological evidence supporting the harmful effects of diesel exhaust, and the numerous animal studies conducted to investigate the specific pathophysiological mechanisms behind DE exposure. Additionally, this review includes a summary of studies that used biomarkers as an indication of biological plausibility, and also studies evaluating new technology diesel exhaust (NTDE) and its systemic effects. Lastly, this review includes new approaches to improving DE emissions, and emphasizes the importance of ongoing study in this field of environmental health.

Population-based analysis of meningococcal disease mortality in the United States: 1990-2002.

BACKGROUND: Neisseria meningitidis is a leading cause of bacterial meningitis and septicemia in the United States. Approximately 10-15% of meningococcal patients died despite antimicrobial therapies. METHODS: We used vital records to assess meningococcal disease mortality in the United States during 1990-2002. Meningococcal cases were defined as reported deaths with recorded International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9) codes 036.0-036.9 or ICD-10 codes A39.0-A39.9. Denominator data were obtained from population estimates published by the U.S. Census Bureau. We analyzed the effects of age, sex, race/ethnicity and season of the year on meningococcal disease mortality. RESULTS: We identified 3335 meningococcal deaths. Both the crude and age-adjusted mortality rates were 0.10 death per 100,000 population per year (95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.10). Fifty-eight percent of deaths occurred among persons younger than 25 years old. Mortality was elevated in infants, young adults (15-24 years old), and older adults (older than 74 years old). Mortality rates in African-Americans were 1.45 and 3.32 times higher than mortality rates in whites and Asians/Pacific Islanders, respectively. Mortality caused by meningococcal disease rose in winter months and declined during the summer. Observed mortality rates increased from 1990 to 1997 and decreased from 1997 to 2002. CONCLUSIONS: Meningococcal disease continues to be an important, vaccine-preventable cause of death in the United States. Vaccination and other disease prevention efforts should be augmented for higher risk groups. Meningococcal mortality data can be used to assess the effectiveness of these efforts.