Multiple Cycles of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Increase Survival Times of Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis in a Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is controversy regarding the inclusion of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in the treatment of decompensated cirrhosis. Previous studies tested only a single cycle of G-CSF administration or were underpowered to detect changes in survival time. We performed an adequately powered study to determine whether multiple cycles of G-CSF increased the survival of patients 1 year after the start of therapy. METHODS: We conducted an open-label trial of 100 patients with decompensated cirrhosis without acute-on-chronic liver failure at a tertiary center from July 2016 through June 2018. The patients were assigned randomly to a group given 5 days of G-CSF every 3 months, with standard medical therapy, in 4 cycles (group A, n = 50), or standard medical therapy alone (group B, n = 50). The primary outcome was survival for 12 months after treatment began. Secondary outcomes were an increase in the number of CD34+ cells at day 6 compared with day 0, along with reductions in Child-Turcotte-Pugh and model for end-stage liver disease scores, increased control of ascites, reduced decompensation and episodes of infection, fewer hospitalizations, lower liver stiffness measurements, increased quality of life and nutrition, fulfilment of liver transplant criteria, and fewer adverse events at 12 months after the start of treatment. RESULTS: Groups A and B were comparable at baseline. Survival at 12 months after initiation of treatment was significantly higher in group A (74%) than in group B (42%) (P < .001). Blood samples from patients in group A had significantly more CD34+ cells on day 6 than on day 0 (P < .001); there was no significant change in group B. Compared with patients in group B, patients in group A had significant reductions in Child-Turcotte-Pugh and model for end-stage liver disease scores, increased ascites control, fewer infections and hospitalizations, lower liver stiffness measurements, an increased quality of life, and a lower number fulfilled the liver transplant criteria (P < .05). There was no improvement in nutrition in either group compared with baseline. G-CSF was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of multiple cycles of G-CSF increases the numbers of hematopoietic stem cells and survival of patients with decompensated cirrhosis receiving standard medical treatment. The addition of G-CSF to medical treatment might provide a bridge to liver transplantation for these patients. ClincialTrials.gov no: NCT03415698.

Therapeutic whole blood exchange in the management of methaemoglobinemia: Case series and systematic review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic whole blood exchange (TWBE) has been used as an alternative when methylene blue (MB) fails in severe methaemoglobinemia. However, there are limited data on the efficacy and safety of TWBE. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to report our institutional experience with TWBE. We also perform a systematic review of published literature. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our respiratory intensive care unit database to identify cases of methaemoglobinemia managed with TWBE. A systematic review of the PubMed database was performed to identify similar cases (≥12 years). We report the indications, utility, and safety of therapeutic exchange in methaemoglobinemia. The procedural details were also noted. RESULTS: We identified five subjects who received TWBE for methaemoglobinemia (median methaemoglobin level 39%; range 19.6-42.4%). TWBE was successful in all five cases and no adverse events were encountered. Our review identified 27 additional subjects. The median methaemoglobin level was 37.5% (range 3.7-81%). The most common indication (n = 24, 75%) for therapeutic exchange was a lack of response to MB. A majority of the subjects (n = 26/32, 81.2%) survived. No procedure-related complications were reported. CONCLUSION: TWBE is a safe and effective salvage modality for adults with methaemoglobinemia, when MB is either contraindicated or ineffective. Future studies should standardise therapeutic exchange in the management of methaemoglobinemia.

Anti-HBc screening in Indian blood donors: still an unresolved issue.

AIM: To study the seroprevalence of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) in healthy blood donors negative for HBsAg and to evaluate whether anti-HBc detection could be adopted in India as a screening assay for HBV in addition to HBsAg. METHODS: A total of 1700 serum samples collected from HBsAg-negative healthy blood donors were tested for the presence of anti-HBc antibody (IgM + IgG). All samples reactive for anti-HBc antibody were then investigated for presence of anti-HBs and for liver function tests (LFTs). One hundred serum samples reactive for anti-HBc were tested for HBV DNA by PCR method. RESULTS: Out of 1700 samples tested, 142 (8.4%) blood samples were found to be reactive for anti-HBc. It was significantly lower in voluntary (6.9%) as compared to replacement donors (10.4%, P = 0.011). Seventy-two (50.7%) anti-HBc reactive samples were also reactive for anti-HBs with levels > 10 mIU/mL and 70 (49.3%) samples were non-reactive for anti-HBs, these units were labeled as anti-HBc-only. These 142 anti-HBc reactive units were also tested for liver function test. HBV DNA was detected in only 1 of 100 samples tested. CONCLUSION: Keeping in view that 8%-18% of donor population in India is anti-HBc reactive, inclusion of anti-HBc testing will lead to high discard rate. Anti-HBs as proposed previously does not seem to predict clearance of the virus. Cost effectiveness of introducing universal anti-HBc screening and discarding large number of blood units versus considering ID NAT (Individual donor nucleic acid testing) needs to be assessed.