Feasibility of Embedding a Randomised Clinical Trial (RCT) into an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for Patients Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

To establish the feasibility of embedding an RCT into EMR in the ICU, we evaluated the route of phosphate replacement. The EMR screened 207 patients who met the inclusion criteria from 20 April 2022 to 30 June 2022. 162 patients were randomised and 145 patients allocated to treatment. Our study showed that it was feasible to embed screening, randomisation, and treatment allocation for an RCT within an EMR in the ICU.

Clearance of Piperacillin-Tazobactam and Vancomycin During Continuous Renal Replacement With Regional Citrate Anticoagulation.

BACKGROUND: The use of regional citrate anticoagulation during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) has increased worldwide. However, data on its effect on the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics are limited. In this study, the authors aimed to measure the clearance of piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin in patients receiving CVVHDF with regional citrate anticoagulation. METHODS: This study measured piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin concentrations in patients receiving CVVHDF with regional citrate anticoagulation. Dosing regimens were independently selected by intensivists. Arterial blood and effluent fluid samples were obtained over a single dosing interval and analyzed using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Seventeen sampling intervals in 15 patients (9 receiving piperacillin-tazobactam only, 4 receiving vancomycin only, and 2 receiving both) were used. The median overall clearance for piperacillin was 35.2 mL/min [interquartile range (IQR): 32.2-38.6], 70 mL/min (IQR: 62.7-76.2) for tazobactam, and 29.5 mL/min (IQR: 26.2-32) for vancomycin. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to quantify the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam in patients receiving CVVHDF with regional citrate anticoagulation. These results indicate high clearance and provide key information to guide optimal dosing.

Administration of pharmacological sleep aids prior to, during and following critical illness.

BACKGROUND: Sleep in the intensive care unit (ICU) is frequently disturbed and this may have a detrimental effect on recovery. AIM: To determine the use of pharmacological sleep aids in critically ill patients prior to, during and after ICU admission. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre period prevalence study of all adult patients admitted to a university-associated adult medical-surgical ICU for more than two nights in a 3-month period ending September 2019. The major outcome of interest was the proportion of ICU patients who had a pharmacological sleep aid administered prior to, during and after ICU admission. Associations of selected patient variables with sleep aid prescription in the ICU were summarised both as unadjusted univariable comparisons and as adjusted effect estimates returned by a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: During the study period, 370 patients met all eligibility criteria. A pharmacological sleep aid was identified prior to hospital admission in 34 (9%) patients and in 62 (17%) patients during ICU admission. Of the 340 ICU survivors, 292 remained in the same hospital. Of these, 96 (33%) received a pharmacological sleep aid at least once during their post-ICU general hospital ward stay. Pre-hospital sleep aid use, male sex, longer ICU admission and higher APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) III scores were associated with sleep aid prescription in the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacological sleep aids are administered frequently in the ICU with administration increasing substantially after ICU discharge.

A fixed dose approach to thrombosis chemoprophylaxis may be inadequate in heavier critically ill patients.

Objectives: Overweight patients are at greater risk of venous thromboembolism. We aimed to describe prescribing patterns of thrombosis chemoprophylaxis in critically ill patients weighing ≥ 100 kg and quantify the effectiveness of these regimens using the surrogate biomarker of plasma anti-Xa level. Design, setting and patients: A prospective single-centre cohort study was conducted over a 6-month period. Patients weighing ≥ 100 kg who were prescribed enoxaparin for chemoprophylaxis and expected to remain in the intensive care unit for > 48 hours were eligible. Anti-Xa levels were measured once a patient had received at least three consecutive doses of enoxaparin. Peak levels were measured 4-6 hours after the third dose and trough levels were measured before the fourth dose. Anti-Xa levels were compared with established target ranges for peak and trough anti-Xa levels (0.2-0.5 IU/mL and > 0.1 IU/mL, respectively). Results: Eighty-eight patients met the eligibility criteria, and anti-Xa levels for 42 patients were obtained. Fixed dose chemoprophylaxis approaches varied considerably, with 40 mg once daily (54/88 [61%]) and 40 mg twice daily (20/88 [23%]) being the most frequently prescribed regimens. No patient had a peak anti-Xa level > 0.5 IU/mL. When comparing 40 mg once daily versus twice daily, the once daily regimen had lower median trough levels (0.01 IU/mL [interquartile range (IQR), 0.00-0.04] v 0.09 IU/mL [IQR, 0.05-0.13]; P < 0.001) and greater proportions of patients with levels below the established range (< 0.1 IU/mL) (15/16 [95%] v 7/14 [50%]; P = 0.002) and levels that were undetectable (0.00 IU/mL) (8/16 [50%] v 1/14 [7%]; P = 0.01). Conclusions: At a single centre, thrombosis chemoprophylaxis prescribing patterns for heavier critically ill patients varied considerably. Current fixed dose approaches may be inadequate in this cohort.