Comparative Analysis of Radiotherapy Linear Accelerator Downtime and Failure Modes in the UK, Nigeria and Botswana.

The lack of radiotherapy linear accelerators (linacs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been recognised as a major barrier to providing quality cancer care in these regions, together with a shortfall in the number of highly qualified personnel. It is expected that additional challenges will be faced in operating precise, high-technology radiotherapy equipment in these environments, and anecdotal evidence suggests that linacs have greater downtime and higher failure rates of components than their counterparts in high-income countries. To guide future developments, such as the design of a linac tailored for use in LMIC environments, it is important to take a data-driven approach to any re-engineering of the technology. However, no detailed statistical data on linac downtime and failure modes have been previously collected or presented in the literature. This work presents the first known comparative analysis of failure modes and downtime of current generation linacs in radiotherapy centres, with the aim of determining any correlations between linac environment and performance. Logbooks kept by radiotherapy personnel on the operation of their linac were obtained and analysed from centres in Oxford (UK), Abuja, Benin, Enugu, Lagos, Sokoto (Nigeria) and Gaborone (Botswana). By deconstructing the linac into 12 different subsystems, it was found that the vacuum subsystem only failed in the LMIC centres and the failure rate in an LMIC environment was more than twice as large in six of the 12 subsystems compared with the high-income country. Additionally, it was shown that despite accounting for only 3.4% of the total number of faults, linac faults that took more than 1 h to repair accounted for 74.6% of the total downtime. The results of this study inform future attempts to mitigate the problems affecting linacs in LMIC environments.

The microbiology of chronic osteomyelitis: prevalence of resistance to common empirical anti-microbial regimens.

OBJECTIVES: This study describes the microbiological spectrum of chronic osteomyelitis and so guides the choice of empirical antibiotics for this condition. METHODS: We performed a prospective review of a 166 prospective patient series of chronic osteomyelitis from Oxford, UK in which a standardised surgical sampling protocol was used. RESULTS: Staphylococcus aureus was most commonly isolated (32%) amongst a wide range of organisms including gram negative bacilli, anaerobes and coagulase negative staphylococci. Low grade pathogens were not confined to patients with a history of metalwork, a high proportion of cases were polymicrobial (29%) and culture negative cases were common (28%). No clear predictors of causative organism could be established. Many isolates were found to be resistant to commonly used empirical anti-microbial regimens. CONCLUSIONS: The wide range of causative organisms and degree of resistance to commonly used anti-microbials supports the importance of extensive intra-operative sampling and provides important information to guide clinicians' choice of empirical antibiotics.

Infections in pregnant women: the need to assess and possibly treat the fetus and the sexual partner as well.

Assessing and treating pregnant women in the emergency department for complaints unrelated to pregnancy are complex processes at best. Obtaining a consultation from an obstetrician is always prudent, even if it is simply by telephone. Careful attention to laboratory and other diagnostic test results is imperative, and communication with the patient's primary care physician and/or obstetrician is a must. Assessment of fetal well-being should be documented, and implications for the fetus of all treatments and/or omitted treatments should be considered. With infections in pregnant women, remember to think about implications for the baby and the woman's sexual partner; both may need to be assessed and treated.