The World Neurosurgery Global Champions Program: First-Year Experience of a Model Initiative for Reducing Disparities in Global Neurosurgical Literature.

OBJECTIVE: Most surgical journals are published in English, representing a challenge for researchers from non-Anglophone countries. We describe the implementation, workflow, outcomes, and lessons learned from the WORLD NEUROSURGERY Global Champions Program (GCP), a novel journal-specific English language editing program for articles rejected because of poor English grammar or usage. METHODS: The GCP was advertised via the journal website and social media. Applicants were selected to be a reviewer for the GCP if they demonstrated English proficiency on writing samples supplied in their application. The demographics of GCP members and characteristics and outcomes of articles edited by the GCP during its first year were reviewed. Surveys of GCP members and authors who used the service were conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-one individuals became part of the GCP, representing 8 countries and 16 languages apart from English. A total of 380 manuscripts were peer reviewed by the editor-in-chief, who determined these manuscripts to have potentially worthwhile content but needed to be rejected due to poor language. The authors of these manuscripts were informed of the existence of this language assistance program. Forty-nine articles (12.9%) were edited by the GCP in 41.6 ± 22.8 days. Of 40 articles resubmitted to WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 24 (60.0%) were accepted. GCP members and authors understood the purpose and workflow of the program and recognized improvements in article quality and the probability of acceptance through their participation. CONCLUSIONS: The WORLD NEUROSURGERY Global Champions Program mitigated a critical barrier to publication in an English language journal for authors from non-Anglophone countries. This program promotes research equity by providing a free, largely medical student and trainee operated, English language editing service. This model or a similar service can be replicated by other journals.

Review of the Treatments for Central Neuropathic Pain.

Central neuropathic pain (CNP) affects millions worldwide, with an estimated prevalence of around 10% globally. Although there are a wide variety of treatment options available, due to the complex and multidimensional nature in which CNP arises and presents symptomatically, many patients still experience painful symptoms. Pharmaceutical, surgical, non-invasive, cognitive and combination treatment options offer a generalized starting point for alleviating symptoms; however, a more customized approach may provide greater benefit. Here, we comment on the current treatment options that exist for CNP and further suggest the need for additional research regarding the use of biomarkers to help individualize treatment options for patients.

Comparison of sodium fluorescein and intraoperative ultrasonography in brain tumor resection.

Various intraoperative neuroimaging modalities are available to the neurosurgeon during brain tumor surgery. There remains no consensus on which modalities are superior. This retrospective, single-center cohort study directly compares sodium fluorescein (SF) and intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) as intraoperative imaging modalities in a sample of patients with glioblastoma isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 wildtype (GBM). Adult patients with GBM who underwent surgical resection using SF or IOUS guidance between 2010 and 2020 were included. Primary outcomes included extent of resection (EOR), post-operative residual tumor volume, gross total resection (GTR) rate, false negative assessments, and the incidence of new post-operative neurologic deficits. Additionally, pre-and post-test probabilities were calculated to assess each modality's ability to identify residual tumor. 98 patients met inclusion criteria (34 SF and 64 IOUS). Mean EOR was significantly higher for SF (94 ± 11 %) when compared to IOUS (87 ± 20 %; p = 0.032). Mean post-operative residual tumor was significantly higher for IOUS (197 ± 358 mm2) when compared to SF (81 ± 161mm2; p = 0.038). GTR was more frequent with SF (62 % vs 46 %, p = 0.12). False negative assessments for residual tumor were more common with IOUS (22 % vs 15 %, p = 0.53). One patient in each group suffered a new neurologic deficit post-operatively (p = 0.58). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 62 %, 100 %, 100 %, and 81 % for SF and 59 %, 100 %, 100 %, and 67 % for IOUS, respectively. Taken together, SF may be superior to IOUS in maximizing EOR in patients with GBM, however, both modalities appear to have good efficacy.

Botulinum Toxin as an Effective Treatment for Trigeminal Neuralgia in Surgical Practices.

BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a common cause of craniofacial pain with many medical and surgical therapies, all of which are imperfect. We examine the use of botulinum toxin type-A (BTX-A) as an intermediary approach in surgical practices. METHODS: We retrospectively identified TN patients seen by both pain neurology and neurosurgery at our center. Demographics were collected. Pain intensity was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) and compared from baseline to after BTX-A treatment via paired t test. Responder status was assessed, and success of BTX-A was determined for each cohort. Doses of common medications were compared between baseline visit and the most recent BTX-A administration visit. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients underwent BTX-A therapy for TN, 24 (77%) female and 7 (23%) male. Mean age was 62.5 ± 3.1 years and 29 (94%) identified as white. When divided into cohorts according to indication, 11 (35%) failed prior TN surgery, 9 (29%) either declined surgery or were poor surgical candidates, 4 (13%) had multiple sclerosis, 4 (13%) had trigeminal neuropathic pain, and 3 (10%) had atypical TN with pain in additional dermatomes outside the trigeminal distribution. Significant reductions in NRS from baseline to following initial BTX-A treatment were seen in the declined/high risk for surgery (p = 0.004) and those who failed prior TN surgery (p = 0.035) groups. No significant variation in demographics was found between any two groups (p > 0.05 for all). Finally, there was no significant reduction in total daily dose of gabapentin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, baclofen, or lamotrigine in BTX-A responders (p > 0.05 for all). DISCUSSION: Indication is an important predictor for BTX-A, with classical TN patients exhibiting the highest response rates. This research highlights the viability of BTX-A as an important tool in the arsenal of providers seeking to treat TN in a minimally invasive manner.

Efficacy of 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome: A retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: We examine the clinical efficacy of High Frequency 10 kHz (HF10) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) CRPS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of SCS-naïve patients with CRPS treated with HF10-SCS after a successful trial. Patients were evaluated at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operatively. Outcomes included mean numeric pain rating scale (NRS), mean NRS reduction, NRS percentage improvement (PI), patient reported subjective pain PI (Pain PI), and patients reporting > 50% benefit in symptoms. Pre and post-operative NRS were compared by ordinal regression analysis accounting for the patient's response to the SCS trial. RESULTS: 20 patients met inclusion criteria. 75% were female. Mean age 51 years. Baseline mean NRS was 6.1 for the cohort (1.7). Post-operatively, mean NRS decreased to 4.5 at 2 weeks (p = 0.077), 3.8 at 6 weeks (p = 0.034), 3.7 at 3 months (p = 0.307), and 4.4 at 6 months (p = 0.832). Mean NRS reduction and NRS PI is reported within. Pain PI was 25% at 2 weeks, 55% at 6 weeks, 54% at 3 months, and 53% at 6 months. Greater than 50% reduction in symptoms was reported in 25% of patients at 2 weeks, 85% at 6 weeks, 87% at 3 months, and 64% at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: HF10 SCS may represent an effective treatment option for reducing objective and subjective symptoms in CRPS that warrants further study.

Association of Outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain and Psoas Measurements Based on Size of Iliopsoas Muscles.

INTRODUCTION: Patients experience variable long-term improvement in chronic back pain despite successful spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trials. Iliopsoas (IP) size has been shown to differ between patients with low back pain and healthy controls. In this study, we examine whether the IP muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) is associated with SCS outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined patients for whom we had lumbar MRIs 6.3 years prior to SCS and baseline and one-year outcome data. Percent change from baseline to one year was calculated for Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Correlations between IP muscle CSA, ratio of iliopsoas muscle size to the vertebral body area (P/VBA), and the ratio of iliopsoas muscle size to BMI (P/BMI) were examined. Sex differences were considered. RESULTS: A total of 73 subjects were included in this study, including 30 females and 43 males. Males had significantly larger IP (males 15.70 ± 0.58, females 9.72 ± 0.43; p < 0.001), P/VBA (males 1.00 ± 0.04, females 0.76 ± 0.03; p < 0.001), and P/BMI ratio (males 0.51 ± 0.02, females 0.32 ± 0.01; p < 0.001) than females. In females, P/VBA predicted NRS worst pain scores (ß = 0.82, p = 0.004, r2 = 0.55) and BDI (ß = 0.59, p = 0.02, r2 = 0.24). In males, P/BMI was a significant predictor of BDI outcome scores (ß = 0.45, p = 0.03, r2 = 0.16). Males who had more muscle mass measured by iliopsoas size had more depression as measured using BDI (p = 0.03, r = 0.61). Females with less muscle mass measured by P/VBA also experienced more depression (p = 0.02, r = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that psoas measurements correlated with various pain outcomes specifically. P/VBA was most predictive in females and P/BMI in males. Depression correlated with P/BMI, reinforcing the complex relationship between depression and constant chronic pain. Tertile analyses further showed a relationship between iliopsoas CSA and depression in males and females. We provide preliminary data of sex-specific psoas measurements as a risk factor for worse SCS outcomes.

Current Strategies for the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.

The development of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a common complication of chronic diabetes that can be associated with significant disability and healthcare costs. Prompt symptom identification and aggressive glycemic control is essential in controlling the development of neuropathic complications; however, adequate pain relief remains challenging and there are considerable unmet needs in this patient population. Although guidelines have been established regarding the pharmacological management of PDN, pain control is inadequate or refractory in a high proportion of patients. Pharmacotherapy with anticonvulsants (pregabalin, gabapentin) and antidepressants (duloxetine) are common first-line agents. The use of oral opioids is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality and can also lead to opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Their use is therefore discouraged. There is an emerging role for neuromodulation treatment modalities including intrathecal drug delivery, spinal cord stimulation, and dorsal root ganglion stimulation. Furthermore, consideration of holistic alternative therapies such as yoga and acupuncture may augment a multidisciplinary treatment approach. This aim of this review is to focus on the current management strategies for the treatment of PDN, with a discussion of treatment rationale and practical considerations for their implementation.

Age as an Independent Predictor of Adult Spinal Cord Stimulation Pain Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an efficacious chronic pain treatment most commonly used in middle-aged patients. Results from previous studies that investigated SCS' effects in older patient populations have been equivocal. We examine whether SCS outcomes correlate with age. METHODS: We retrospectively examined prospectively collected outcomes from 189 patients who underwent SCS at Albany Medical Center between 2012 and 2020. The patients completed the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The mean percent change in each outcome was determined and compared via a regression analysis to determine relationships between patient age and each respective outcome metrics. Demographics were compared between patients aged under 65 versus those aged 65 and older via χ2 tests. RESULTS: All subjects demonstrated the expected improvement on NRS, BDI, PCS, and MPQ from baseline to 1-year follow-up, with several demonstrating statistically significant changes: NRS-worst pain (18.66%, p < 0.001), NRS-least pain (26.9%, p < 0.001), NRS-average pain (26.9%, p < 0.01), NRS-current pain (26.4%, p < 0.001), ODI (19.6%, p < 0.001), PCS (29.8%, p < 0.001), and MPQ (29.4%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between patients aged under 65 versus those aged 65 and older based on lead type (p = 0.454). Six patients (3.1%) had lead migration, one of whom was 65 or older. Regression analysis revealed improvements in MPQ-sensory and MPQ-affective scores as age increased (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.09; p = 0.046, R2 = 0.05, respectively). Age did not correlate with NRS, ODI, BDI, or PCS. Diagnosis, spinal level of SCS, and lead type were not found to influence any respective outcome measure based on covariate analysis. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest study where age was correlated to specific pain, depression, and disability outcomes following SCS. We provide evidence that SCS outcomes are equivalent, or better, in older patients following SCS. Based on these findings, SCS is a viable option for treatment of chronic pain in elderly patient populations.

The Role of Vancomycin Powder During Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the role of intrawound vancomycin powder as prophylaxis against postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) after spinal cord stimulator (SCS) implantation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 153 consecutive patients who had undergone permanent SCS implantation surgery via open laminectomy between 2014 and 2020. We queried the patients' medical records for patient age, sex, relevant medical history, and whether intrawound vancomycin had been administered. We compared the rates of SSI (primary outcome) and seroma (secondary outcome) within 3 months after surgery between the vancomycin and no-vancomycin groups. Finally, we conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify independent predictors of postoperative SSI or seroma. RESULTS: Of the 153 patients, 59% were women, and the average age was 65.4 years. Overall, 3 patients (2%) had developed an SSI: 2 (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella) in the vancomycin group and 1 (methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus) in the no-vancomycin group. This difference in SSI rate between the 2 groups was insignificant (P = 0.73). Three seromas, all in the no-vancomycin group, accounted for a statistically significant difference in seroma formation between the 2 groups (P = 0.04). Multivariate logistic regression failed to identify any perioperative characteristics as independent predictors of postoperative SSI or seroma. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests open laminectomy for SCS implantation surgery can be performed with a low postoperative SSI rate, with or without the use of powdered vancomycin. We found no evidence suggesting that the use of powdered vancomycin is unsafe or related to postoperative seroma formation. We failed to draw any definitive conclusions regarding its efficacy, despite referencing the largest single case series of SCS implantation to date.

Growth hormone replacement therapy: is it safe to use in children with asymptomatic pituitary lesions?

OBJECTIVES: Small pituitary cysts are commonly discovered on pediatric brain magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs), particularly in patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). We examined the need for operative management in children with these masses as well as the effect of growth hormone replacement (GHR) on these lesions. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of pituitary protocol MRIs conducted in children 0-19 at a single center between April 2010-November 2020. Sex, indication for initial MRI, volume, and whether surgery was performed was determined. Records were reviewed to determine whether GHD was present and treatment with GHR documented. For patients with subsequent MRIs, volume on most recent scan was calculated. RESULTS: Of the 101 children with cysts, 25 had laboratory-confirmed GHD and 76 did not. GHD patients had a higher mean age compared to no growth hormone deficiency (NGHD) cohort (11.2 and 8.4 years, respectively; p=0.02) and a larger proportion of males (p<0.001). The mean cyst volume on initial MRI was not significantly smaller in patients with GHD (0.063 ± 0.012 cm3) vs. those without GHD (0.171 ± 0.039 cm3, p=0.11). Of the 21 GHD patients who received GHR and had follow-up MRIs, 10 had no change in pituitary cyst size, two had cysts that shrank, and seven disappeared. The remaining two cysts enlarged an average of 0.061 ± 0.033 cm3. Zero GHR recipients required surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Small sellar cysts discovered incidentally on imaging in children are unlikely to require surgical intervention. GHR does not appear to significantly enlarge these pediatric pituitary lesions and is safe for use.

Can dogs and cats really help our spinal cord stimulation patients?

OBJECTIVES: Pet ownership has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality in several aspects of health but has not been studied in chronic pain patients. We evaluate whether subjects who underwent spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and own a pet have improved outcomes compared to non-pet owners. METHODS: After obtaining IRB approval, we re-contacted 38 subjects who underwent SCS surgery with preoperative and 1-year postoperative data on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Pain Catastrophizing scale (PCS). We examined influence of pets and pet ownership-specific behaviors on improvement in SCS outcomes. RESULTS: Patients included 24 males/14 females with a mean age of 59.9 ± 11.5 years. At mean follow-up of 12.2 months (range 10-14), there were improvements in NRS, ODI, BDI, PCS and MPQ. Twenty subjects owned pets and 18 did not; all believed pet ownership could improve health. Pet owners improved more on NRS-right now (p = 0.05) and BDI (p = 0.05), and were more satisfied with SCS (p = 0.04). No significant improvement was seen in ODI, MPQ, or PCS. However, PCS did improve in pet owners who exercised their pet (PCS-total, p < 0.01; PCS-helplessness, p < 0.01; PCS-rumination, p = 0.05; PCS-magnification, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We provide preliminary evidence that pet ownership is associated with improved pain, depression and SCS satisfaction. Exercising with a pet also appears to be beneficial in limiting pain catastrophizing. Pets show promise as a novel means to improve patient SCS outcomes.

Defining minimal clinically important differences in pain and disability outcomes of patients with chronic pain treated with spinal cord stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds for a limited number of outcome metrics were previously defined for patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) at 6 months after spinal cord stimulation (SCS). This study aimed to further define MCID values for pain and disability outcomes. Additionally, the authors established 1-year MCID values for outcome measures with previously defined metrics commonly used to assess SCS efficacy. METHODS: Preoperative and 1-year postoperative outcomes were collected from 114 patients who received SCS therapy for FBSS, complex regional pain syndrome, and neuropathic pain. MCID values were established for the numerical rating scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Four established anchor-based methods were utilized to compute MCID values with two anchored questions: "Are you satisfied with SCS therapy?" and "Would you have SCS surgery again?" For each question, patients were categorized as responders if they answered "yes" or as nonresponders if they responded "no." The methodologies utilized to compute MCID scores included the average change method, minimum detectable change approach, change difference calculation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis has been shown to inform the accuracy at which the MCID value can distinguish responders from nonresponders and was analyzed for each instrument. RESULTS: For the first time, ranges of MCID values after SCS were established for MPQ (1-2.3) and PCS (1.9-13.6). One-year MCID values were defined for all indications: NRS (range 0.9-2.7), ODI (3.5-6.9), and BDI (2-5.9). AUC values were significant for NRS (0.78, p < 0.001), ODI (0.71, p = 0.003), MPQ (0.74, p < 0.001), and PCS (0.77, p < 0.001), indicating notable accuracy for distinguishing satisfied patients. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study to successfully determine MCID values for two prominent instruments, MPQ and PCS, used to assess pain after SCS surgery. Additionally, previously established MCID values for ODI, BDI, and the visual analog scale for patients with FBSS at 6 months after treatment were explored at 12 months for the most common indications for SCS. These data may better inform physicians of patient response to and success with SCS therapy.

Spinal Cord Stimulation as Treatment for Cancer and Chemotherapy-Induced Pain.

Neuropathic pain is a rampant disease exacting a significant toll on patients, providers, and health care systems around the globe. Neuromodulation has been successfully employed to treat many indications including failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), phantom limb pain (PLP), radiculopathies, and intractable pelvic pain, among many others. Recent studies have also demonstrated efficacy for cancer-related pain and chemotherapy induced neuropathy with these techniques. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the most commonly employed technique and involves implantation of percutaneous or paddle leads targeting the dorsal columns of the spinal cord with the goal of disrupting the pain signals traveling to the brain. Tonic, high frequency, and burst waveforms have all been shown to reduce pain and disability in chronic pain patients. Closed-loop SCS systems that automatically adjust stimulation parameters based on feedback (such as evoked compound action potentials) are becoming increasingly used to help ease the burden placed on patients to adjust their programming to their pain and position. Additionally, dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is a newer technique that allows for dermatomal coverage especially in patients with pain in up to two dermatomes. Regardless of the technique chosen, neuromodulation has been shown to be cost-effective and efficacious and should be given full consideration in patients with chronic pain conditions.

Spinal cord stimulation programming: a crash course.

The aim of this comprehensive review is to provide an instructional guide for providers regarding the parameters and programming of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices. Knowing these fundamentals will aid in providing superior pain relief to patients. SCS has four programmable parameters: contact (electrode) selection, amplitude, pulse width, and frequency. Each parameter needs to be accounted for when assessing which program works for which patient. Traditional open-loop systems allow for different "programs," or combinations of these four parameters, to be pre-set by the provider and medical device representative. These allow for flexibility in the type of stimulation delivered to the patient depending on activity. Patients are also given control over programs and changing the amplitudes of these programs. However, some open-loop systems place the burden of toggling between programs to manage pain control on patients, though this tends to be less in subparesthesia programs. Newer closed-loop systems make it possible for stimulation settings to automatically adjust in response to accelerometry and evoked compound action potential feedback, and therefore have the potential to streamline the patient experience. This article provides practitioners with the basic knowledge of SCS parameters and programming systems. Understanding their use is essential to providing optimal pain relief to patients.

Pain and Interoceptive Awareness Outcomes of Chronic Pain Patients With Spinal Cord Stimulation.

OBJECTIVES: Meditation has been shown to improve outcomes for chronic pain by increasing patients' awareness of their own bodies. Some patients have an innate ability to leverage their mind-body connection, and this interoceptive awareness may aid them in garnering pain relief. We explored whether spinal cord stimulation (SCS) patients with greater innate awareness had better outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We contacted 30 thoracic SCS patients with baseline and postoperative pain, psychological, and disability outcomes to complete the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) survey. MAIA distinguishes between beneficial and maladaptive aspects of the perception of body sensations via six positive subscales (noticing, attention regulation, emotional awareness, self-regulation, body listening, and trusting) and two negative subscales (not distracting, not worrying). MAIA subscales and positive/negative groups were correlated with percentage change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). RESULTS: Patients included 14 males/16 females with a mean age of 58. At a mean follow-up of 14.13 months (range 6-26), NRS, ODI, BDI, PCS, and MPQ showed improvements. Positive traits correlated with improvements in pain (MAIA-self regulation with NRS-worst [p = 0.018], NRS-least [p = 0.042], NRS-average [p = 0.006], NRS-current [p = 0.001]; MAIA-body listening with MPQ-total [p = 0.016] and MPQ-sensory [p = 0.026]). Improvement in PCS-total was associated with higher scores in noticing (p = 0.002), attention regulation (p = 0.017), emotional awareness (p = 0.039), and trusting (p = 0.047). PCS-rumination correlated with MAIA-positive total (p = 0.012). In contrast, better attention regulation signified less improvement in ODI (p = 0.043) and MPQ affective (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Higher interoceptive awareness in SCS patients correlated with greater improvement following the procedure, particularly with regards to pain relief and pain catastrophizing. These findings suggest that patients with better mind-body connections may achieve greater pain relief following SCS in this patient population, thereby aiding providers in determining who may benefit from this intervention.

Correlations Between Family History of Psychiatric Illnesses and Outcomes of Spinal Cord Stimulation.

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established procedure for chronic neuropathic pain. Research has established patients with personal psychiatric history do not fare as well as their correspondents following SCS surgery. We explored whether a documented psychiatric family history (PFH) correlated with worse outcomes following SCS surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our single-center, prospectively collected database of patients who received permanent SCS implants over the past eight years. Subjects were separated into those with documented PFH and those without. Subjects completed validated scales at preoperative, 6 ± 2 postoperative, and 12 ± 3 months postoperative visits. The percent change in scores from preoperative to postoperative timepoints was compared between subjects with PFH vs. controls. RESULTS: SCS subjects reporting a PFH demonstrated significantly worse 6-month outcomes on Pain Catastrophizing Scale-rumination subscale (p = 0.02), numeric rating scale (NRS) scores on "pain at its least" (p = 0.04) and NRS "pain right now" (p = 0.02). This group also endorsed greater disability as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) throughout the follow-up period (p = 0.04 at 6 ± 2 months, p = 0.001 at 12 ± 3 months). CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with PFH may experience less improvement in disability following SCS as compared to subjects without PFH. They may take longer to achieve the same outcomes, including pain relief and decrease in pain rumination. Our findings show that improvements in the PFH cohort are equivalent to that of the no PFH cohort on all measures except ODI at 12-month follow-up. Thus obtaining a detailed PFH prior to performing SCS is important in order to implement pre-operative coping training for PFH patients, rather than exclusion from SCS.

Less Pain Relief, More Depression, and Female Sex Correlate With Spinal Cord Stimulation Explants.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a known therapy for a variety of chronic pain conditions, but over time a number of patients proceed to explants. OBJECTIVES: We compared explant rates based on degree of pain relief, diagnosis, lead location, gender, and age to determine possible predictors for SCS implant success. METHODS: First, we performed a single-center retrospective chart review of consecutive SCS-implanted subjects was to document internal explant rates. Rates of explants based on diagnosis, gender, age, and lead location were compared to determine potential trends. We then examined which thoracic SCS patients in our prospectively collected outcome measures data base who were explanted. RESULTS: A total of 63 of 671 thoracic SCS were explanted. Thoracic explants occurred in patients who were significantly younger (p = 0.03). Women who were explanted reported significantly more discomfort from the device (p = 0.05). When we looked at our data base of patients with a mean time implanted of 2.77 years and a minimum of one year follow-up, 11 of 114 thoracic SCS patients were explanted. All explants were women. There was no correlation with diagnosis or age. Those who were explanted reported more pain (p = 0.03) and depression (p < 0.01) at one year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our data correlates explants with less pain relief and more depression. Women are more likely to have explants than men. The role of physiologic and psychosocial variables leading to this difference has yet to be elucidated.