Surgical decision-making in advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer is influenced by more than just guidelines.

Objective: This qualitative study sought to uncover factors that influence decisions to offer curative-intent surgery for patients with advanced-stage (stage IIIB/IV) non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: A trained interviewer conducted open-ended, semistructured telephone interviews with cardiothoracic surgeons in the United States. Participants were recruited from the Thoracic Surgery Outcomes Research Network, with subsequent diversification through snowball sampling. Four hypothetical clinical scenarios were presented, each demonstrating varying levels of ambiguity with respect to international guideline recommendations. Interviews continued until thematic saturation was reached. Interview transcripts were coded using inductive reasoning and conventional content analysis. Results: Of the 27 participants, most had been in practice for ≤20 years (n = 23) and were in academic practice (n = 18). When considering nonguideline-concordant surgeries, participants were aware of relevant guidelines but acknowledged their limitations for unique scenarios. Surgeons perceived that a common barrier to offering surgery is incomplete nonsurgeon physician understanding of surgical capabilities or expected morbidity; and that improved education is necessary to correct these misperceptions. Surgeons expressed concern that undertaking a controversial resection for an individual patient could fracture trust built in long-term professional relationships. Surgeons may face pressure from patients to operate despite a low expectation of clinical benefit, leading to emotional turmoil for the patient and surgeon. Conclusions: This qualitative study generates the hypothesis that the scope of current guidelines, availability of clinical trial protocols, perceived surgical knowledge among nonsurgeon colleagues, interprofessional relationships, and emotional pressure all influence a surgeon's willingness to offer curative-intent surgery for patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for visceral pleural invasion in 3-4-cm non-small-cell lung cancer improves survival.

OBJECTIVES: Visceral pleural invasion (VPI) guidelines, for tumours ≤4 cm are ambiguous. Non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) 3 to ≤4 cm are assigned the T2a designation. Similarly, any tumours with VPI, smaller than 3 cm, are upstaged and also assigned the same T2a designation. We hypothesized that adjuvant chemotherapy would significantly improve 5-year survival for NSCLC ≤4 cm with VPI. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried from 2010 to 2016 for cases of NSCLC with clinical stage I disease, ≤4 cm, who subsequently underwent surgical resection. These stage I NSCLCs were stratified according to clinical tumour sizes (0 to ≤1, 1 to ≤2, 2 to ≤3 and 3 to ≤4 cm). This cohort was then divided into groups with and without VPI and further split based on the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients categorized by tumour size, VPI status, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariable Cox regression adjusting for tumour size and VPI status was used to determine associations between use of adjuvant chemotherapy and OS. RESULTS: A total of 61 454 patients with NSCLC and clinical tumour sizes <4 cm were identified and grouped based on size along with VPI and adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5-year OS for combined tumour sizes without VPI was higher than for patients with VPI (66.2% vs 59.5%, P < 0.001). The OS for tumour size (0 to ≤1, 1 to ≤2, 2 to ≤3 and 3 to ≤4 cm) was lower for patients with VPI regardless of size (all P ≤ 0.010). When all tumour sizes were combined, patients with VPI who received adjuvant chemotherapy had an improved 5-year OS compared to patients without adjuvant chemotherapy (65.5% vs 58.8%, P < 0.001). When cohorts were created by tumour size, only VPI tumours 3 to ≤4 cm had a statistically significant increase in 5-year OS for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (68.8% vs 49.9%, P < 0.001). On multivariable Cox regression for OS, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer 5-year OS in tumour size 3 to ≤4 (hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.46-0.83, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: VPI remains a poor prognostic factor in clinically node-negative, T2a or less, NSCLC patients. Guidelines recommend considering chemotherapy for high-risk T2aN0, margin-negative patients-including those patients with VPI. Based on the analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered specifically for 3 to ≤4 cm with VPI due to an observed 5-year OS advantage.

Training residents in robotic thoracic surgery.

With growing integration of robotic technology in thoracic surgery, the need for structured training has never been greater with trainees expressing desire for additional experience. Determining the ideal education program is challenging as the collective experience is still relatively early and growing with many experienced surgeons still becoming facile with the platform. Understanding differences between robotic and thoracoscopic approaches including lung retraction and dissection, use of carbon dioxide insufflation, and lack of tactile feedback serves as the foundation for building a skillset. Currently, there is no standard accepted curriculum for residents. Inclusion of these trainees in structured programs has been shown to be safe with equivalent patient outcomes. There are multiple curricula under development, all of which incorporate use of simulation technology, dual console, and clear, graduated responsibilities within operations. These include introduction to the robotic system prior to progressing to bedside assistance and finally to time as console surgeon. The importance of clear definition of training milestones with deliberate graduation to more complex tasks once competency has been demonstrated cannot be overstated. It is crucial for surgeons practicing robotic surgery to make efforts to further the training of residents, but there has not been any perfect and suitable program identified yet.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Minimizes Intensive Care Unit Utilization and Improves Outcomes Following Pulmonary Resection.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been associated with improved postoperative outcomes but require further validation in thoracic surgery. This study evaluated outcomes of patients undergoing pulmonary resection before and after implementation of an ERAS protocol. METHODS: Electronic medical records were queried for all patients undergoing pulmonary resection between April 2017 and April 2019. Patients were grouped into pre- and post-ERAS cohorts based on dates of operation. The ERAS protocol prioritized early mobilization, limited invasive monitoring, euvolemia, and non-narcotic analgesia. Primary outcome measures included intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, postoperative pain metrics, and perioperative morbidity. Regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of morbidity. Subgroup analyses were performed by pulmonary risk profile and surgical approach. RESULTS: A total of 64 pre- and 67 post-ERAS patients were included in the study. ERAS implementation was associated with reduced postoperative ICU admission (pre: 65.6% vs. post: 19.4%, p < 0.0001), shorter ICU median length of stay (LOS) (pre: 1 vs. post: 0, p < 0.0001), and decreased opioid usage measured by median morphine milligram equivalents (pre: 40.5 vs. post: 20.0, p < 0.0001). Post-ERAS patients also reported lower visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2 (pre: 6.3/5.6 vs. post: 5.3/4.2, p = 0.04/0.01) as well as average VAS pain score over POD0-2 (pre: 6.2 vs. post: 5.2, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an ERAS protocol for pulmonary resection, which dictated reduced ICU admissions, did not increase major postoperative morbidity. Additionally, ERAS-enrolled patients reported improved postoperative pain control despite decreased opioid utilization.

Gender representation among leadership at national and regional cardiothoracic surgery organizational annual meetings.

BACKGROUND: Increased attention has been dedicated to gender inequity at scientific meetings. This study evaluated the gender distribution of session leaders at cardiothoracic surgery national and regional meetings. METHODS: This is a descriptive study of the gender of peer-selected session leaders at 4 cardiothoracic surgery organizations' annual meetings from 2015 to 2019. Session leaders included moderators, panelists, and invited discussants. Data from publicly available programs were used to generate a list of session leaders and organization leaders. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of female session leaders at annual meetings. Descriptive analyses were performed, including the Cochran-Armitage trend test for linear trends of proportions. RESULTS: A total of 679 sessions over 20 meetings were examined. Of the 3662 session leaders, 480 (13.1%) were women. The proportion of total female session leaders trended positively over time from 9.6% (56 of 581) in 2015 to 15.9% (169 of 1060) in 2019 (P = .001). Among specialty topic sessions, female session leaders were distributed as follows: adult cardiac, 6.9% (81 of 1172); congenital cardiac, 10.8% (47 of 437); and thoracic, 23.2% (155 of 668). The proportion of female session leaders trended significantly only for thoracic sessions (20.6% [21 of 102] in 2015 to 29.2% [58 of 199] in 2019; P = .02). More than one-half of the sessions (57.4%; 390 of 679) featured all-male session leadership. CONCLUSIONS: Women remain underrepresented in leadership roles at cardiothoracic surgery organizational meetings. This may deter female applicants and has implications for female surgeons' career trajectories; therefore, attention must be given to the potential for unconscious bias in leadership in cardiothoracic surgery.

Understanding thoracic surgeons' perceptions of administrative database analyses and guidelines in clinical decision-making.

OBJECTIVES: This study explored cardiothoracic surgeons' perceptions of health services research and practice guidelines, particularly how both influence providers' clinical decision-making. METHODS: A trained interviewer conducted open-ended, semistructured phone interviews with cardiothoracic surgeons across the United States. The interviews explored surgeons' experiences with lung cancer treatment and their perceptions of health services research and guidelines. Researchers coded the transcribed interviews using conventional content analysis. Interviews continued until thematic saturation was reached. RESULTS: The 27 surgeons interviewed mostly were general thoracic surgeons (23/27) who attend tumor board weekly (21/27). Five themes relating to physician perceptions of health services research and guidelines emerged. Databases analyses' inherent selection bias and perceived deficit of pertinent clinical variables made providers skeptical of using these studies as primary decision drivers; however, providers thought that database analyses are useful to supplement other data and drive future research. Likewise, providers generally felt that although guidelines provide a useful framework, they often have difficulty applying guidelines to individual patients. An analysis of provider characteristics revealed that younger physicians in practice for fewer years appeared more likely to report using guidelines, and physicians who were aged 50 years or more and not purely academic surgeons appeared to find database analyses less impactful. CONCLUSIONS: Health services research, including database analyses, comprise much of the surgical literature; however, this study suggests that perceptions of database analyses and guidelines are mixed and questions whether thoracic surgeons routinely use either to inform their decisions. Researchers must address how to present compelling data to influence clinical practice.

The prognostic significance of the 8th edition AJCC TNM staging system for non-small-cell lung cancer is not applicable to lung cancer as a second primary malignancy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is unclear whether the prognostic significance of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is applicable to lung cancer as a second primary malignancy (LCSPM). This study used a population-based database to evaluate this relationship. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with second primary lung cancer after a nonpulmonary malignancy were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry from 2004 to 2015. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) and multivariable CIF regression analyses were performed to estimate the difference in disease-specific mortality (DSM) among different TNM stages. RESULTS: Our cohort included 2687 patients from the SEER database. After CIF analysis, although rates of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year DSM trended higher with increasing TNM stages, the DSM curves overlapped for many subcategories. In a multivariable regression analysis, hazards ratios (HRs) for subcategories of stage Ι demonstrated no significant difference compared with the reference stage ΙA1 ([ΙA2 HR = 1.120; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.477-2.626]; [ΙA3 HR = 1.762; 95% CI, 0.752-4.126]; [ΙB HR = 2.003; 95% CI, 0.804-4.911]). The following HRs trended higher for increasing TNM stages but with overlapping CIs among adjacent stage groupings. CONCLUSION: The 8th edition AJCC TNM staging system fails to provide accurate prognostic value for LCSPM.

Fortification of Preservation Solution With Nitroprusside Does Not Alter Lung Allograft Survival in Clinical Human Lung Transplantation.

Background: Nitric oxide improves gas exchange following primary lung allograft dysfunction. Nitroprusside, a potent nitric oxide donor, has reduced reperfusion injury and improved oxygenation in experimental lung transplantation. Methods: We sought to study the effect on lung allograft outcomes of fortifying the preservation solution with nitroprusside. We conducted a single-center clinical study of 46 consecutive lung recipients between 1998 and 2000: 24 patients received donor organs preserved in modified Euro-Collins solution with prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) (control group), and 22 patients received organs preserved in modified Euro-Collins with PGE1 and nitroprusside (NP group). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups except for a significantly longer graft ischemic time in the NP group vs the control group (253.3 ± 52 vs 225.3 ± 41 minutes, respectively, P=0.04). No significant differences were found in partial pressure arterial oxygen to fraction inspired oxygen ratio at ≤48 hours, primary graft dysfunction, or bronchiolitis obliterans-free days. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 89%, 73%, and 63% in the control group and 76%, 38%, and 23% in the NP group. Log-rank survival analysis showed that the NP group had a significantly increased risk of mortality (P=0.034) compared to the control group. Conclusion: The addition of nitroprusside to the lung transplant perfusate in this clinical trial did not improve survival; however, a large randomized trial would likely reduce confounding ischemia times and increase the power of the study.