Factors associated with age of presentation of pediatric feeding disorder.

AIM: Understanding the association between pediatric feeding disorder (PFD) and age of presentation is limited. We aimed to investigate factors associated with PFD among different age groups. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical records of infants and toddlers diagnosed with PFD, according to the World Health Organization-based definition. We compared children aged 1-12 months to those aged 13-72 months. RESULTS: Included were 253 children with PFD (median [interquartile range] age 16.4 [9.5-33] months at diagnosis, 56% boys). Significantly more children in the younger age group were girls (52.6% vs. 34.4%, respectively, p = .03) and preterm (25% vs. 14%, p = .03). They had more hospitalizations (34% vs. 23%, p = .03) and needed more prescription medications (36% vs. 17%, p < .01). Additionally, disturbances in oral intake were primarily linked to feeding skills dysfunction in the younger group and nutritional dysfunction in the older group (39.6% vs. 23.7% and 55% vs. 38%, respectively, p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Infants under 1 year old with PFD represent a distinct patient group with unique characteristics and outcomes. The age of presentation plays a significant role in children with PFD, necessitating tailored treatment strategies.

Pediatric feeding disorders among children with parental history of feeding disorders: a distinct group of patients with unique characteristics.

To investigate factors associated with pediatric feeding disorders (PFD) among children of parents that reported to have had feeding disorders during their own childhood compared to children with PFD with no history of parental PFD. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of children diagnosed with PFD according to the recent WHO-based definition. The demographic and clinical characteristics of children with PFD with a parental history of PFD were compared to those of children with a PFD with no history of parental PFD. Included were 231 children with PFD (median [interquartile range] age 10 months [5.5-29] at diagnosis, 58% boys) of whom 133 children had parents without PFD and 98 children had parents with PFD. Unexpectedly, children of parents without PFD had a higher rate of low birth weight (28% vs. 19%, respectively, p = 0.007), more delivery complications (10% vs. 2%, p = 0.006), more hospitalizations (33% vs. 17%, p = 0.004), more prescription medications (27% vs. 18%, p = 0.05), and a higher percent of gastrostomy tube use (6% vs. 0, p = 0.02). Moreover, more parents with PFD had academic background compared with parents without PFD (72% vs. 59%, p = 0.05). There were no significant group differences in sex, history of breastfeeding, parental marital status, or type of the child's feeding disorder.  Conclusion: PFD among children with a parental history of PFD comprise a distinct group of patients with unique characteristics and outcomes. Since parental feeding history may explain their child's PFD in highly differing ways, such information may help in devising a specific family-based and multidisciplinary treatment plan for those children. What is Known: • Pediatric feeding disorder (PFD) is relatively common and its prevalence is increasing. • Information on an association between parental PFD and their child's feeding disorder is limited. What is New: • PFD among children with a parental history of PFD comprise a distinct group of patients with various characteristics and outcomes. • The parents' feeding history during childhood may provide important clues to their child's PFD.

Demographic and clinical parameters are comparable across different types of pediatric feeding disorder.

Knowledge and understanding of risk mechanisms associated with pediatric feeding disorder (PFD) remain limited. We aimed to investigate factors associated with PFD and their relation to specific PFD types according to the recent consensus WHO-based definition. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of children with PFD and retrieved their demographic and clinical characteristics. Healthy age- and sex-matched children served as controls. Included were 254 children with PFD [median (interquartile range) age 16.4 (9.5-33) months at diagnosis] and 108 children in the control group [median age 24.85 (14.5-28.5) months]. According to the WHO-based definition, disturbances in oral intake were predominantly related to nutritional dysfunction in 118 (46.6%), feeding skill dysfunction in 83 (32.3%), medical conditions in 42 (16.7%) and psychosocial dysfunction in 11 (4.4%). In multivariate analysis, children with PFD had a higher risk for lower socioeconomic background (P < 0.01) and low birth weight (26.8% compared to 7.4%, P < 0.001). Moreover, significantly fewer children in the PFD group were breastfed (75% versus 89%, P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in any of those variables between PFD types. In conclusion, low socioeconomic status, lack of breastfeeding, and low birth weight were significantly more frequent in children with PFD. PDF manifest as multiple dysfunctions, thus highlighting the need to offer these children and their families multidisciplinary care.

Physical and Visual Characteristics of the Neck Predicting Gender Perception.

The association between neck characteristics (physical and visual) and the perception of gender is unclear. This association is critical, especially when the perception of the speakers' gender is of interest, such as in transgender patients. This study was the first to provide basic empirical data on this association among cisgender men and women. METHODS: The necks of 30 adult men and women were measured physically and then photographed and evaluated visually by a group of 10 judges. These judges also evaluated voice recordings of the same speakers. Another group of 124 judges rated the visual and auditory masculinity/femininity of the necks and the voices. RESULTS: While most physical measures of the neck were larger for men, neck-length did not significantly differ between genders. A stepwise multiple regression model revealed that the single physical measure that consistently differed between genders was neck-girth (P < 0.0001). The single visual-appearance measure that consistently differed between genders was thyroid-protrusion (P = 0.0003). Neck-girth was the only physical characteristic that significantly correlated with gender differences in voice. Furthermore, the size of the thyroid prominence (ie, Adam's apple) was not associated with gender differences in voice. CONCLUSIONS: Neck characteristics (both physical and visual) are significantly associated with the perception of gender. While larger necks are typically perceived as masculine, neck-length is neither associated with gender nor with the speaker's voice characteristics. These findings highlight the importance of examining various physical and visual characteristics of the neck, when considering a feminization confirmation procedure for transgender patients.